Projets dingnierie

1
Projets dingénierie
GEF 455/457 - Introduction
Collège militaire royal du Canada Département de
génie électrique et de génie informatique

• R. Smith, PhD
• smith-r_at_rmc.ca
• 1-613-541-6000 ext. 6030

S. Leblanc Sylvain.Leblanc_at_rmc.ca 1-613-541-6000
ext. 6355
2
Detailed Design Document

• Comments on your draft this afternoon
• Dr. Smith has already approached his groups
• 1430 hrs Doppler Radar III
• 15h00 Lanceur d'impulsions électromagnétiques
• 15h30 Simulateur d'éffet de dispositif
  d'explosion artisanal
• 16h00 SASHA
• Final document due 16 March, NLT 1630 hrs
• General Comment
• Dr. Smith

3
Final Project Presentations

• Monday 23 March 2009, from 1240 1630 hours
• Schedule will be published this week
• Held in Sawyer Theatre (TBC)
• You would be able to rehearse in the room from
  1800 2100 hrs on Sunday 22 March 2009.
• Read the DID!

4
FPP

• 6.1 Objectives. The objectives of the final
  project presentation are
• to present the salient points of the project's
  design
• to present and discuss the results obtained and
• c. to answer to questions from a review panel.
• 6.2 General format. The final project
  presentation shall be organized as follows
• Each presentation will be 20 minutes in length.
  A 5-minute question period will follow (total
  time 25 minutes). The detailed schedule will be
  published at least 1 week before the actual
  presentations.
• An overhead projector will be provided during the
  presentations. Use of overheads is encouraged,
  but care must be taken to ensure that the
  material is legible (ensure that the font is
  large enough - at least 18 pt).
• All team members are expected to participate in
  the presentation.
• CONTENT
• 7.1 The final presentation shall be structured as
  follows
• Scope. This part should include a brief
  description of the project, a summary of the
  objectives, and a brief recapitulation of the
  background information.

5
Final Project Demonstrations

• Held in S5203 (old S5001)
• 0800 0900 final Set-up
• 0900 1000 Faculty Evaluations
• 1015 1200 Open House
• You will be given a "Display Board", 36" X 48"
• You will have access to the wide format printer
• Black White 11" X 17" in labs (ask techs for
  paper, define manual feed)
• Colour 11" X 17" or up to 36" wide (landscape or
  portrait)
• Email Scott Sararas 72 hours before you need it
• Read the DID!

6
FPD

• 6.1. Objectives. The objectives of the final
  project demonstration are
• a. to demonstrate how the project implementation
  works
• b. to demonstrate acceptance test coverage
• c. to show how experimental results were
  obtained and
• d. to answer questions from a review panel.
• 6.2. General format. The final project
  demonstration shall be organized as follows
• a. Each demonstration will be 15 minutes in
  length. A five-minute question period will
  follow (total time 20 minutes). Students will be
  giving this presentation to one or two members of
  the faculty at a time during the faculty
  evaluation period.
• b. Project teams will be asked where they would
  like to perform their demonstration.
• c. Whenever possible, the same review panel that
  attended the final presentation will also attend
  the demonstration. It can therefore be assumed
  that the review panel is already familiar with
  the project.
• d. All team members are expected to participate
  in the demonstration.

7
FPD

• 7. CONTENT
• 7.1. Organization. The final demonstration shall
  be structured as follows
• a. Scope. This part should include a very brief
  review of the project's objectives, along with an
  overview of the demonstration.
• b. Demonstration setup. Each component of the
  demonstration setup shall be presented, including
  their role in the demonstration, and how they
  interface with the other components.
• c. Product demonstration. All key parts of the
  product's functionality shall be demonstrated.
  This demonstration shall be centred on the
  Acceptance Testing of the project as defined by
  the contractual SOR. Acceptance test procedures
  shall be developed so as to ensure that testing
  is complete and well structured. It will be
  important to comment on the relevance/validity of
  the input data used to demonstrate the product.
• d. Limitations. Important limitations of the
  demonstrated product shall be discussed, along
  with their impact on overall product
  functionality. This part shall also comment on
  the extent to which acceptance tests were not
  completed.

8
Competitions

• PEO Paper Night 25 March 2009 (abstracts by
  email NLT 18 March 2009)
• Email to students
• IEEE Competition
• 1st 2nd and 3rd placed winners decided based on
  results of FPP (300 bursary in total)
• Regional (U of Ottawa, Carleton, RMC, Queen's,
  Algonquin College) to be held on Thursday 26
  March (
• One or two teams may compete at the RIT SDC
  (9,000 bursary in total) on 2 May 2009
  (application deadline is 1 April 2009)
  http//ieee.rit.edu/sdc9/index.php
• Chikhani Award
• 7 May 2009 from 1000 1200 in Sawyer Theatre

9
Questions?