Presentazione di PowerPoint - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Presentazione di PowerPoint

Description:

Real-time Independent Component Analysis of functional MRI time-series A new TBV (3.0) Plugin for Real-Time ICA during fMRI Brain Innovation BV Turbo BrainVoyager ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:44
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 34
Provided by: Unknow77
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Presentazione di PowerPoint


1
Real-time Independent Component Analysis of
functional MRI time-series A new TBV (3.0) Plugin
for Real-Time ICA during fMRI
2
Real-time ICA of fMRI data Outline
  • Data model and analysis tools in real-time fMRI
  • Sliding-window vs Cumulative approaches
  • Data-driven analysis tools in fMRI
  • Component-based generative models for fMRI
  • Spatial independent component analysis (s-ICA)
  • Real-time (spatial) Independent Component
    Analysis
  • Data model and implementation
  • The Sliding-window FastICA algorithm
  • Perfomances, operation and user interface
  • Examples of applications
  • Motor activity, Auditory and emotional activity
    during music listening
  • A New plug-in for Turbo BrainVoyager 3.0
  • Example of application for visual activity
    monitoring

3
Data Analysis Tools for Real-time fMRI (1)
  • Real-time fMRI enables one to monitor a subjects
    brain activities during an ongoing session
  • Results are to be delivered (and used) in/near
    real-time, i. e. within times in the order of one
    (or a few) TR(s) ...
  • Trade-off between accuracy VS computational
    times
  • gt Minimum batch of temporal observations time
    points to generate a reliable activation map
    (statistical power)
  • gt Minimum time window size s to cover the
    essential dynamics of the activaiton
    (hemodynamics, stimulus changes, ...)

4
Data Analysis Tools for Real-time fMRI (2)
  • Real-time fMRI enables one to monitor a subjects
    brain activities during an ongoing session
  • Results are to be delivered (and used) in/near
    real-time, i. e. within times in the order of one
    (or a few) TR(s) ...
  • Trade-off between accuracy VS computational
    times
  • lt Maximum batch of temporal observation to
    generate the activation map in real-time
    (bottleneck computational load)
  • lt Maximum time window size s to promptly detect
    transient (or temporally nonstationary) dynamic
    effects before these become irrelevant and
    sacrificed in favor of more repetitive and
    temporally stationary effects (Mitra and Pesaran,
    1999).

5
Data Analysis Tools for Real-time fMRI (3)
  • Real-time fMRI utilizes two different approaches
  • cumulative window (Cox et al., 1995)
  • sliding window (Gembris et al., 2000 Posse et
    al., 2001)
  • In the cumulative approach
  • the entire partially measured fMRI time-series is
    analyzed in one step. One edge of the time window
    is fixed, whereas the other moves during the
    acquisition of new data.
  • the specificity (wrt repetitive/stationary
    effects) increases over time (more data become
    available for averaging).
  • The sensitivity (wrt transient/non-stationary
    effects) is reduced (more fluctuations become
    relevant)
  • The computational load increases over time
    (unless spatial or temporal resolution is
    sacrificed!)

6
Data Analysis Tools for Real-time fMRI (4)
  • Real-time fMRI utilizes two different approaches
  • cumulative window (Cox et al., 1995)
  • sliding window (Gembris et al., 2000 Posse et
    al., 2001)
  • In the sliding-window approach
  • The analysis is restricted to the most recently
    acquired data. Both edges of the window move
    during the acquisition.
  • The accuracy is constant over time and the
    sensitivity to dynamic changes in brain activity
    can be maximized.
  • The specificity is limited and critically
    dependent on SNR
  • The computational load is constant

7
Esposito et al., Neuroimage 2003
8
Data-driven tools in Real-time fMRI (1)
  • Off-line, data-driven tools nicely and usefully
    complement by hypethesis-driven analysis tools
  • E. g., independent component analysis (ICA) can
    identify brain activity without a priori
    temporal assumptions on brain activity
  • No info about experimental paradigm (stimulus)
  • No detailed information about hemodynamics
  • Rough knowledge of potentially relevant areas
  • ...

9
Data-driven tools in Real-time fMRI (2)
  • Real-time fMRI data analysis is traditionally
    based solely on hypothesis-driven tools (e. g.
    GLM) because data-driven tools (such as ICA) are
  • computationally demanding (time consuming)
  • difficult settings (options, contrains and
    constants)
  • e. g. convergence problems (no result delivering)
  • difficult selection of the results
  • post-hoc (complex) interpretation
  • ...

10
Component-based Generative Models (1)
Measured fMRI time-series
C1
C3
Time (scans)
C2
Cn
11
Component-based Generative Models (2)
Mixing Unmixing
voxels
voxels
C1j C2j ... Cnj
COMPONENTS (C)
time
time
W-1(A)
DATA (Y)
Yj
Ai
Al
12
Principal Component Analysis
  • Orthogonality Principle (simple linear
    decorrelation)
  • Maximum variance principle (VARIMAX)
  • (1) time-courses must be also orthogonal
    (uncorrelated)
  • (2) components ordered by relative contribution
    to variance

13
Independent Component Analysis (1)
  • Independency Principle (non-linear
    decorrelation)
  • Information Theory Minimization of mutual
    information
  • Maximize entropy flow of a neural network H(C)
    -gt max (Infomax)
  • Maximize Non-gaussianity of components N(C) -gt
    max (Fastica)
  • Statistical dependency is removed along one
    dimension (e.g. space)
  • (1) time-courses can be correlated (spatial
    ICA)
  • (2) components not ordered by relative
    contribution to variance

14
ICA vs PCA
Formisano, et al., Magnetic Resonance Imaging 2004
15
Independent Component Analysis (2)
  • (Like PCA) ICA requires the computation of the
    data covariance matrix of the voxels time
    courses included in the analysis
  • (Unlike PCA) spatial ICA only models the spatial
    distributions of brain activities (and builds
    accordingly the output maps)
  • What ICA offers in addition to PCA does not
    depend on the covariance but only the spatial
    statistics
  • While the statistical power of covariance
    estimation depends on the temporal window of
    observation (and the number of time points), the
    power of the spatial distribution estimation only
    depends on the voxel space

16
The power of spatial statisistics (1)
Signal
Features
Noise (pure)
17
The power of spatial statisistics (2)
Z-score (activation parameter)
18
Real-time ICA (1)
  • The computational load of spatial ICA algorithms
    grows much more with the temporal dimension than
    with the number of voxels included in the
    analysis
  • If we fix the temporal window the power of
    spatial statistics is constant. If the temporal
    window is large enough to ensure enough accuracy
    of the maps, the computation load can be held
    constant in a sliding-window approach
  • In order to deliver components as fast as
    possible a deflation scheme can be used to
    extract ICA components one by one (FastICA
    algorithm by Hivarinen 1999). This renders the
    ICA component maps immediately available even in
    the presence of convergence problems.

19
The FastICA algorithm
one-unit function
deflation
multi-unit function
symmetric
20
Real-time ICA (2)
  • Rt-ICA -gt sliding-window approach FastICA
  • The window is chosen to solve the trade-off
    between accuracy and computational load.
  • This approach works and can be useful if
  • FastICA delivers useful and accurate components
    among the first extracted ICs in a relatively
    low number of iteration per run. If not, we
    cannot assume no activity
  • The selection can be aided and supported by
    (rough) prior knowledge about where activity of
    interest takes place but selectivity should be
    unambigous
  • Cumulative maps about a process of interest can
    be obtained by adequately tracking over time (and
    combining) subsequent sliding-window ICA
    components

21
Esposito et al., Neuroimage 2003
22
Esposito et al., Neuroimage 2003
23
Esposito et al., Neuroimage 2003
24
Esposito et al., Neuroimage 2003
25
Esposito et al., Neuroimage 2003
26
ICA in real-time fMRI during visual
stimulation A new plugin for Turbo Brain Voyager
3.0
27
ICA in real-time fMRI during visual
stimulation A new plugin for Turbo Brain Voyager
3.0
28
ICA in real-time fMRI during visual
stimulation A new plugin for Turbo Brain Voyager
3.0
29
ICA in real-time fMRI during visual
stimulation A new plugin for Turbo Brain Voyager
3.0
TBV LOG
Incoming Data
Real time ROI Selection
Data Pointer
ICA Component Rankings Spatial correlations and/or
other relevant parameters
RTICA PLUGIN
MAP VIEWER NeuroFeedback (MAP ANALYZER)
Ranked ICA Component Maps
30
ICA in real-time fMRI during visual
stimulation A new plugin for Turbo Brain Voyager
3.0
31
ICA in real-time fMRI during visual
stimulation A new plugin for Turbo Brain Voyager
3.0
32
Real-time ICA of fMRI data Conclusions
  • Real-time ICA during fMRI is feasible in many
    circumanstances and has some potentials in
    monitoring brain activity under typical real-time
    fMRi settings
  • The Sliding-window fastICA algorithm has
    comparable performances to GLM under highly
    controlled situations but requires no timing
    information and no critical settings
  • This opens the possibility of monitoring
    non-triggered, non-repetitive and non-stationary
    neural activity with only mininal spatial prior
    on the networks involved
  • Integration of rt-ICA generated maps in
    neurofeedback experiments now possible with the
    new Plugin for TurboBrainVoyager 3.0

33
Thank You!support_at_brainvoyager.com
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com