Title: The Totalitarian Image and the Reach of the State
1The Totalitarian Image and the Reach of the State
- Original definition of totalitarianism
- an official ideology
- a single mass party
- a system of terroristic police controls
- monopoly of communications
- monopoly of all means of coercion
- central control and direction of the entire
economy
2The Totalitarian Image and the Reach of the State
- Other definitions - not referring to specific
institutional traits, but to the structural
features between the state and society - Samuel Finer the entire society is politicized,
and the viewpoints which so politicize it are
reduced to one alone and no other viewpoints are
tolerated. The scope and authority of government
is not limited, but total.
3The Totalitarian Image and the Reach of the State
- Tsou Tangunlimited extension of state functions
the state strives for total power, total
submission and total social transformation - Gradual reduction of relying on political terror
and political mobilization
4The Totalitarian Image and the Reach of the State
- Andrew Walder
- the ties between the party and its followers is
impersonal and ideological, based on an
identification that grows out of psychological
impulses as much as considered political
commitment - social atomization - the abolition of social ties
that are not directly harnessed to the partys
aims - gradual reduction on reliance on political terror
5The Totalitarian Image and the Reach of the State
- totalitarianism implies a deep penetration of the
central state into every corners of society - has the central state effectively extended its
power and controls into rural China? - Does the rural society have any characteristics
that prevent the totalitarian state from
effectively extending its power and influence?
6Rural China
- History and the story of state making in China
the limited extension of state power to the rural
society - Structural factors
- vastness of the country
- prevailing organizations in peasants villages
- smallness of administrative group relative to
rural population
7State-making in China
- The competition between the ambitions of imperial
state builders and the prerogatives of the landed
elite was not resolved in the same manner as in
Western Europe China has never experienced the
profound political fragmentation of European
feudalism and had never solved this problem as
decisively as in Europe
8State-making in China
- The struggle between central authority and local
control still continued in contemporary China and
had remained a central issue throughout Chinese
history - the totalitarian image is therefore not entirely
correct the central authority has never been
able to effectively penetrate rural China -
argues Vivienne Shue
9Rural Gentry and Local Governance
- Two layers in the power structure of traditional
China the central government at the top and the
local gentry class at the bottom - there is a de facto limit to the authority of the
central government - influence from the bottom up
- zone of local politics not penetrated by central
government power - the state had little means by which to supervise
or sanction members of local gentry families
10Rural Administrative Set-up at the sub-county
level in PRC
- Peoples commune, production brigade and
production team - more deeply penetrate the countryside
- two types of rural cadres
- those on the state payroll
- those remaining members of collectives and
remunerated on the basis of collective income
11Rural Cadres
- Social revolution did not entirely solve the
problem of the administrative reach of the state - the rural leaders were not a dramatic break with
the past - rural cadres behave in many ways similar to the
local gentry in the past
12Market Reform and the Reach of the State
- Shues argument market reform does not represent
a retreat of the state as generally understood,
but very likely facilitates deeper penetration of
the state - market reform helps remove the barriers to state
penetrate in rural society
13Rural Economic Growth in China in the Reform Era
- Gradualism versus shock therapy
- Rural China as the engine of economic growth
- rapid growth in the absence of privatization
- property rights assigned to local governments,
not to individuals - local officials as entrepreneurs
- the role of local governments local state
corporatism or local governments as industrial
firms
14Analytical and Theoretical Challenges
- Why do local officials have a strong
entrepreneurial motivation to pursue local
economic development? - fiscal reforms and local
state corporatism - Why is the absence of privatization not a problem
as argued by classical liberal economist? -
tightened budgetary constraints on local
governments, and local governments as industrial
firms
15Local State Corporatism
- Workings of a local government that coordinates
economic enterprises in its territorial units as
it were a diversified business corporation - loosening of central control but continuing local
government control and intervention into the
economy, no real enterprise autonomy
16Fiscal Reforms
- Changing the revenue sharing arrangements to
provide incentives to local governments local
governments are required to submit only a portion
of their revenues to the upper levels and then
are allowed to retain most of the remainder
local governments become independent fiscal
entities responsible for revenue collection and
expenditures - Shortage of budgetary revenue and need to
increase revenue
17Budgetary and Extra-budgetary Revenue
- Budgetary revenue (yusuannei shouru) taxes that
local governments share with upper levels - extra-budgetary revenue (yusuanwai shouru)
various fees and surcharges collected by local
governments no sharing with upper levels - Shifting of budgetary revenue to extra-budgetary
revenue
18Fiscal Reforms and Rise of Rural Industrial
- The problem facing local governments in China has
been how best to general revenues - de-collectivization means agriculture was no
longer a viable source of revenue for local
governments - rural industrial enterprises as lucrative sources
of revenues - localities that have rural industry can provide
services and are most likely to be strong
effective governments those that do not are most
likely to be weak and ineffective governments
19Local State Corporatism
- Critical importance of revenues from rural
industrial enterprises to local governments - high rates of extraction and other forms of
controls such as factory management, selection of
management personnel, and control of investment
and credit decisions - extraction of enterprise profits enables local
governments to operate as corporations I.e. they
decide how to use profits from various
enterprises under their jurisdictions and how to
redistribute income
20Implications and Problems
- No need for individual property rights and
government officials are not necessarily
rent-seeking - governments as entrepreneurs and the benefits
flowing from it - What are the reasons making government officials
good entrepreneurs?
21The Argument of Andrew Walder
- Government ownership and soft-budget constraints
and bargaining - analysis and prediction of
Kornai - why does the prediction of Kornai appear in
China? - The analyses of Kornai treat as fixed key
organizational characteristics that in fact vary
widely in a large and decentralized industrial
economy - When variation in the size and scope of local
industrial bases is introduced, the predictions
of Kornai change, and the same reasoning that
predicted the failure of partial reform under
public ownership provides instead an explanation
for the success witnessed in China.
22Soft-Budget Constraints
- Owners of public enterprises have objectives
other than profitability the supply of scarce
inputs for other enterprises, maintenance of full
employment, funding of pensions, medical
insurance, and provision of housing and social
services - flexibility in redistributing funds from
profitable enterprises to subsidize the
unprofitable ones - dependence of public enterprises on government
for bailouts and subsidies, a mutual dependence
between government and enterprises, and
bargaining between government and enterprise
23How Does the Chinese Case Differ?
- There are many owners of public enterprise, as
there are many local governments - the organizational characteristics responsible
for weakening government financial interests in
firms, and for creating dual dependence and
information problems, vary widely according to
the scale and organizational characteristics of
governments jurisdictions and their industrial
bases
24Local governments as Industrial Firms
- Government, as owner of public enterprises, as
the principal in a corporate structure and
enterprise managers analogous to division chiefs
or plants heads within a corporate firm - Some corporate hierarchies work and some do not,
the issue is under what circumstances the
problems associated with soft-budget constraints
can be remedied - variations in industrial productivity and growth
are linked to the organizational characteristics
of local governments as industrial firms
25Hierarchy of Public Ownership in China
- The real meaning of state ownership
- the real issue is the nature of public ownership,
but the composition and scale of industry and the
degree to which government rights in enterprises
are constrained by central regulations - Local governments have stronger financial
incentives, less non-financial interests in
enterprises, and they are also more capable of
monitoring the performance of enterprises under
their control. As a result, the conditions for
soft-budgetary constraints no longer hold.