Presentazione di PowerPoint - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 12
About This Presentation
Title:

Presentazione di PowerPoint

Description:

Milan: 46 EMOs interviewed (Egyptians, Filipinos, Ecuadorians) 4. How much do they connect? ... Milan: 2.4 (Egyptians more active) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:49
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: UM4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Presentazione di PowerPoint


1
Parallel communities? The Segmentation of
Migrants Social Capital
Mario Diani (University of Trento)
Sponsored by
2
My talk will address three issues
  • a) How much and with whom do ethnic migrant
    organizations (EMOs) link
  • b) What is the structure of the EMO
    organizational field
  • c) What are the implications for the relationship
    between organizational social capital and the
    cohesion of civil society

3
Four cities and eleven groups
  • Barcelona 100 EMOs interviewed (Moroccan,
    Ecuadorian, Andeans)
  • Budapest 51 EMOs interviewed (Ethnic Hungarians,
    Chinese, Muslims)
  • Geneva 48 EMOs interviewed (Italians and
    Kosovars)
  • Milan 46 EMOs interviewed (Egyptians, Filipinos,
    Ecuadorians)

4
How much do they connect?
  • Barcelona 3.8 major partners (could name 10)
  • Budapest 3.9 (Ethnic Hungarians more active)
  • Geneva 3
  • Milan 2.4 (Egyptians more active)
  • Differences across cities but not significant
    differences between groups

5
To whom? (Bonding or bridging?)
  • Barcelona 1.9 mentions for each actor (198).
    Autochtonous below the average
  • Budapest 1.4 (139 mentioned)
  • Ethnic Hungarians more central than other
    groups
  • Autochtonous below the average
  • Geneva 1.2 (114 mentioned)
  • Autochtonous above the average
  • Milan 1 (105 mentioned)
  • Autochtonous above the average

6
Patterns I
7
Barcelona (density 0.019)
8
Budapest (density 0.028)
9
Geneva (0.026)
10
Milan (density 0.028)
11
Patterns II
  • Geneva, Milan
  • Fewer ties in general
  • but more ties to autochtonous ?
  • Network integration
  • Barcelona, Budapest
  • More ties in general
  • but less ties to autochtonous ?
  • Network segmentation

12
Provisional remarks
  • a) High involvement in organizational alliances
    (many major partners) ? greater segmentation of
    organizational fields (ties concentrated within
    ethnic migrant groups)
  • b) Low involvement in organizational alliances
    (fewer major partners) ? greater integration of
    organizational fields (with key role for
    autochtonous organizations)
  • c) Social capital does not always yield cohesion
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com