Leveraging Front Line Expertise - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

Leveraging Front Line Expertise

Description:

... spend 30-60 min. on front lines observing work (please refer to sample matrix) ... difference between responses of front line employees and senior leaders. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:50
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: david2914
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Leveraging Front Line Expertise


1
Leveraging Front Line Expertise
  • An intervention designed to improve culture of
    safety
  • In conjunction with Stanford Universitys Centers
    for Health Policy/Primary Care and Outcomes
    Research (CHP/PCOR)

2
What is it?
  • Four components
  • Worksite visits Getting executives out to the
    front-lines of care, in the spirit of Gemba
    Kaizen
  • Safety Town meetings Open communication forums
    designed to gather input regarding patient safety
    from front line staff
  • Debrief, working meetings Organize and
    prioritize information gathered from worksite
    visits and safety town meetings to address safety
    issues
  • Cross-institutional learning Conference calls
    among hospital senior leaders to share lessons
    and strategies for addressing safety issues

3
Agenda
  • Overall aim for the intervention
  • Why this intervention? Motivation behind
    Leveraging Front Line Expertise (LEFLE)
  • Understanding patient safety activities at your
    institution
  • Implementation Activities and Responsibilities

4
Understanding your institution
  • Are there any current programs in place that
    entail senior executives spending time observing
    front-line care or processes?
  • If yes, please describe these programs and their
    processes.
  • Are there informal, unstructured instances when
    senior executives spend time observing front-line
    care or processes?

5
Understanding your institution
  • Are there any current programs in place that
    foster safety-related discussions between
    front-line staff and senior executives?
  • If yes, please describe these programs and their
    processes.
  • Are there informal, unstructured instances when
    senior executives gather feedback from front-line
    staff regarding their perceptions of patient
    safety?

6
Overall Aim
  • Intervention seeks to improve staff communication
    by increasing executive availability to patient
    care areas by
  • Exposing executives to daily forces that work
    against patient safety (i.e. insufficient
    equipment, conflicting information, etc.)
  • Shifting focus to macro level system
    improvements for patient safety

7
Differences in perception between senior managers
and front line staff
  • PSCHO Survey Findings, 2001
  • Senior management has a good idea of the kinds of
    mistakes that actually occur in this facility
  • Senior managers 14 disagree
  • All other personnel 21 disagree
  • Senior management has a clear understanding of
    the risks associated with patient care
  • Senior managers 11 disagree
  • All other personnel 21 disagree

8
Implementation Worksite Visits
  • Once a month for 18 months, executives spend
    30-60 min. on front lines observing work (please
    refer to sample matrix)
  • Different, but related locations for different
    executives throughout the hospital
  • Emergency room, ICU, operating room, medication
    administration
  • Technique is also called Management by Walking
    Around, Gemba Kaizen, WalkRounds

9
Worksite visits A four step program
  • Preparing for a visit Notify department manager
    to schedule time with host
  • Beginning the visit Give host signed Tenets of
    Trust and copy of Host Feedback Form
  • The visit Observe the work system factors to
    understand factors that help or hinder patient
    safety
  • Follow up debrief meeting with other executives
    to share learning gain common understanding

10
Tenets of Trust for Worksite Visits
  • None of these discussions will be used to
    discipline, punish, or in any way evaluate any
    employee
  • We are interested in understanding and improving
    systems, and creating a blame-free environment
  • We are committed to improving patient safety
    through better communication between employees
    and leadership

11
Implementation Safety Information Gathering
  • Once every other month for 18 months (please
    refer to sample matrix)
  • Executives gather front line, cross-functional
    feedback related to patient safety
  • Can be gathered in multiple ways
  • Open meeting (i.e. after staff meeting)
  • Email solicitation of ideas
  • Drop box on units with 3x5 cards
  • Designated representative gathers information
    from peers
  • Different areas within the hospital, tied in with
    the last 2 months worksite visits

12
Safety Information Gathering
  • Preparation Notify department to arrange
    solicitation method and timing
  • Generate Ideas Participants identify system
    factors that currently are strengths or
    weaknesses with regard to patient safety
  • Compilation of Ideas After generating ideas,
    consolidate information into two concise lists
    (strengths, weaknesses)
  • Prioritization Distribute lists to front line
    staff for voting on what they consider to be most
    important

13
Debrief Meeting
  • Patient safety manager, Executives, Department
    managers, and Front line staff
  • Compile information learned from the visits and
    information gathering
  • Select high frequency or high impact items for
    resolution
  • Assign follow-up responsibility
  • Determine and implement countermeasure
  • Track metric to see if countermeasure is having
    desired impact
  • Create summary document including follow-up and
    share it with employees from the worksite

14
Communicate to Employees
  • Communicate actions resulting from work site
    visits and information gathering meetings to
    employees
  • Directly to those involved
  • Posting on communication boards in the area
  • Managers talk about during staff meetings
  • Highlight success stories in hospital newsletters
  • Also important to let employees know WHY action
    not taken on other items raised

15
Implementation Cross-institutional Learning
  • Quarterly conference calls with other executives
    participating in the intervention
  • Presentation by one site
  • What was learned on visits
  • What was selected for follow up action
  • Metrics and countermeasures identified
  • Discussion of obstacles and concerns

16
How will we know if LEFLE works?
  • Incremental improvement in safety culture survey
    results over time.
  • Reduced difference between responses of front
    line employees and senior leaders.
  • Improved reporting and discussion of safety
    issues
  • Improved morale
  • Positive changes towards improving safety

17
Summary
  • Our shared goal is to provide safe patient care
  • LEFLE is designed to
  • Help executives help staff have the tools they
    need to do their jobs
  • Open communication between staff and senior
    executives
  • Provide support to unit managers
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com