Title: Union Financing of the Civil War
1Union Financing of the Civil War
- Initial solution put forward by Salmon Chase
- tax to meet normal operating expenses
- remainder to be financed from borrowing
- Why? War was expected to be short.
- Failure to gain a rapid victory resulted in
expenses growing faster than tax revenues, hence
Union gold supply began to diminish. - To mitigate the rapidly diminishing gold supply,
the issue of printing money to meet expenses was
raised.
2Arguments concerning the merits of legal tender
- Constitution did not grant Congress the power to
print paper currency. Issue was debated in
Congress but not decided. - Opponents to legal tender made the following
arguments - "'The provisions of this bill contemplate
impairing the obligations of every contract...It
proposes to say to a party who has entered into a
contract...Although you have agreed to pay gold
and silver, you shall be discharged upon the
payment of these note although you are entitled
to demand gold and silver, you shall rest content
with the reception of this paper'"
(Representative George Pendelton) (Kroos (1969)) - "'It is not in the power of this Congress...to
accomplish an impossibility in making something
out of nothing. The piece of paper you stamp as
five dollars is not five dollars, and it never
will be, unless it is convertible into a five
dollar gold piece and to profess that is, is
simply a delusion and a fallacy.'"
(Representative Owen Lovejoy) (Mitchell (1903))
3Argument for legal tender
- Proponents of legal tender made the following
argument depreciation is a result of issuing
currency in excess of the ability of nation to
support the paper moderation was the lesson of
history, not banning legal tender. - Opponent rebuttal moderation is not likely to be
practiced, hence depreciation would result. If
the currency depreciated, then coin would
eventually vanish from circulation prices would
increase dramatically fixed incomes would fall
creditors would be unable to reclaim their loans
the value of bank deposits would be depreciated
and finally, labor would lose as prices rose
faster than wages. - Furthermore an issue of paper is equivalent to
the federal government admitting it cannot meet
its obligations from taxes or borrowing, hence
making the paper suspect from the start. - Also, the resulting inflation would raise the
cost of financing the war.
4Taxes to Finance the War
- Taxes John Quincy Adams, in Public Debts,
outlined the reasons why taxation was the
preferred method to finance a war in a democracy.
(Hepburn(1967)) - "It is a recognized fact that self-governing
peoples are stronger for tax purposes than the
subjects of a monarchical state, for their will
lies more closely to the heart of the state. But
the administration of a self-governing people
would never undertake a war in favor of which
there is no strong sentiment. As things go,
then, in democratic countries it does not appear
that loans to the full extent of extraordinary
demands are necessary, and there is no question
as to the superiority of taxes over loans when
use will not curtail industrial energy. The
measure of this first money tax should be the
popular enthusiasm for the war" (Hepburn(1967)) - Proponent rebuttal Not enough time to levy and
collect taxes.
5Bonds to Finance the War
- Sell bonds at current market price and fund the
war effort from future revenue. - Proponent rebuttal Bonds were trading at a 25
discount, hence the federal government would
assume a substantial loss from such a policy. - In the end, the argument for the necessity of
legal tender won the day.
6The Legal Tender Acts
- Review the 1st and 2nd Legal Tender Act
- Third Legal Tender Act "SEC. 2. And be it
further enacted, That the Secretary of the
Treasury be, and he is hereby, authorized to
issue, on the credit of the United States, four
hundred millions of dollars in Treasury notes,
payable at the pleasure of the United
States...bearing interest at a rate not exceeding
six per centum per annum...and the interest on
the said Treasury notes and on the certificates
of indebtedness and deposit thereafter issued,
shall be paid in lawful money. ... And said
Treasury notes may be made a legal tender to the
same extent as United States notes, for their
face value, excluding interest"(Act to Authorize
Issuance of Interest-Bearing Legal Tender Notes
and Fractional Currency, March 3, 1863).
(Kroos(1969)) - How would interest bearing currency impact the
problems of printing money?
7Origins of the National Banking Acts
- The National Bank Acts of 1863 and 1864
- Problems with Free Banking
- No unified currency
- Money supply and price level were unstable
- Bank runs on even sound banks led to deposit loss
8National Banking Acts
- Create a system of national banks
- Federal government chartered the banks with a
higher capital requirement and reserve ratio than
the state banks. - Banks were restricted from making real estate
loans and could not lend to any one person an
amount exceeding ten percent of the banks
capital. - Create a uniform national currency
- National banks accepted all national bank notes
at par - Bank notes were printed by the Comptroller of the
Currency to introduced uniformity and restrict
counterfeiting. - Create an active secondary market for Treasury
securities to help finance the Civil War - The volume of notes a national bank could issue
was based on the market value of the U.S.
Treasury securities it held. If it wished to
extend additional loans it needed to increase its
holding of securities.
9Origin of Checking Accounts
- By 1865 there were 1500 national banks, of which
800 had formerly been state banks. - To further reduce state banks, a tax on state
bank notes was passed making state banking
unprofitable. By 1870 there were 1638 national
banks and only 325 state banks. - State banks did survive by switching to checking
accounts. - The popularity of checking accounts led to a
return to the dominance of state banking by the
late 1880s. - By 1890, only 10 of the money supply was in the
form of currency.