World War IV? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

World War IV?

Description:

World War IV? As viewed from Above and from Below – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:96
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: utexasEdu
Learn more at: http://la.utexas.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: World War IV?


1
World War IV?
  • As viewed
  • from
  • Above and from Below

2
Woolsey on WWIV
  • James Woolsey Ex-CIA Director under Clinton
  • Speech at UCLA, April 2003
  • Forum sponsored by Americans for Victory over
    Terrorism
  • Right Wing Group founded by Bill Bennett
  • Quotes Elliot Cohen of Johns Hopkins
  • Not War on Terrorism, but World War IV
  • Who are the enemies in this war?
  • Islamist Shia in Iran,
  • fascists/Baathists, like Hitler, in Iraq and
    Syria
  • Islamist Sunni, Al-Qaeda
  • Saudi Royal Family, Mubarack in Egypt

3
Marcos on WWIV
  • Subcomandante Marcos
  • Spokesperson for the EZLN
  • War in Chiapas
  • January 1, 1994 to the present
  • Should have ended with San Andrés Accords
  • Why not?
  • Constants in WWI, WWII, WWIII, WWIV
  • Conquest and reorganization of territory
  • Destruction of the Enemy
  • Administration of Conquest

4
WWIV?
  • End of WWIII (cold war) left unipolar world
  • WWIV achievement of globalization
  • Globalization embodiment of neoliberalism
  • Requires defeat and administration of enemy
  • Enemy humanity
  • Strategy?
  • Homogenization
  • Fragmentation

5
Homogenization
  • Destroy effective differences
  • Whatever makes nation states different, e.g.,
    language, culture, economy, social fabric
  • Destruction?
  • Not of people, per se, but of relationships
  • Reduction to computer language logic of market
  • Break up and destroy social relationships that
    resist their reduction to market relationships

6
Fragmentation
  • Fragmentation of nation states (Balkans)
  • Fragmentation of social groups
  • New identities for old
  • A commercial/financial network
  • No local equilibrium
  • Market determines what you produce, buy, consume,
    your worth
  • People reduced to producing/consuming machines

7
The Enemy
  • All that resists this becomes the enemy,
    including dignity, overt resistance, solidarity,
    i.e., those qualities that make people human
  • Thus the hate campaigns
  • Xenophobia against foreigners
  • Racism against immigrants
  • Homophobia against gays
  • Thus the attack on civil liberties
  • No rights for foreigners
  • Discrimination against immigrants
  • Persecution of gays
  • Ethnicide against the indigenous
  • But thus too growing resistance to these attacks,
    increased solidarity across borders, within and
    across differences

8
More than military WWIII
  • Many (US) soldiers vs many (USSR) soldiers, I.e.,
    conventional war scenarios
  • Limited Nuclear war (in Europe)
  • Total Nuclear war, MAD, Deterrence
  • Surrogate conventional wars in Third World, e.g.,
    Vietnam, domino theory
  • Total War (on all fronts) military anything
    else, e.g., media, diplomacy, economic warfare,
    sabotage
  • Tried to recapture legitimacy of WWII defense
    of freedom for all

9
More than military WWIV
  • Total war all fronts anywhere anytime
  • Against all possible enemies
  • Thus flexible forces and rapid deployment
    capacity
  • Thus forward basing of materiel and troops
    ready for fast deployment
  • But also use of surrogates
  • Supranational institutional legitimacy (UN, NATO)
    of humanitarian intervention
  • From containment to the extension of total
    war
  • From national armies national security to
    national stability and policing both domestic
    and international
  • From national defense to hemispheric defense,
    e.g., against drug trafficking

10
War in Chiapas
  • Total war, no neutrals
  • Not just against the EZLN, it is secondary
  • But the terrorism of the military and
    paramilitaries against the real enemy the
    indigenous people/communities in rebellion
  • That is why the war didnt end
  • Implementing the San Andres Accords would have
    mean accepting the existence of an enemy they
    actually want to destroy, to disperse, to wipe
    out as peoples
  • Question But why destroy the indigenous?
  • Answer 1 for the resources of on their lands
    oil, uranium and lumber, the Mayan Lands
    tourism project
  • Answer 2 the indigenous are neither consumers
    nor producers, they go their separate way and
    that is unacceptable, they are in the way

11
The Machinery of Ethnicide
  • The Army
  • An occupying force, on alien terrain
  • The enemy is the civilian population
  • That goes about its life
  • That shouts get out every day
  • Bought media hide the reality of this occupation,
    profitable and destructive
  • Trafficking in babies
  • Drug trafficking (reversed EZLN ban)
  • Prostitution
  • Alcohol
  • Desertions and promotions

12
Army Strategies
  • Surgical Strike
  • Special operation units to strike EZLN
  • Total Strike
  • The Army seals of the area to hide what happens,
    no press, no HR observers
  • The rest of the army attacks all known leaders
  • Secret basements and tunnels for torture and
    killing and disposal (within and without)

13
Human Rights Strategies
  • Violation of Individual Human Rights
  • Beatings, torture, killings
  • Violation of collective human rights under the
    legitimacy of individual human rights
  • Collective human rights have no legal status
  • There are no collective HR observers
  • Objective destruction of indigenous peoples,
    I.e., ethnicide.

14
Resistance
  • Not to take power (like Emiliano refused)
  • We question everything, we are an army that wants
    to abolish armies
  • The old resist, the young resist, they are the
    bridge between an unacceptable present and more
    acceptable future
  • Against neoliberalism in Mexico, nationalism is
    revolutionary
  • Nationalism as self-determination
  • Nationalism as shaping ones own future

15
--END--
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com