Imagology - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

Imagology

Description:

... of Otherness A developing field in comparative literature and cultural studies Falls under the labels of imagology or semiotic ... gender group views ... analysis ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:217
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: Uten1338
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Imagology


1
Imagology
2
Imagology
  • Study of images of (supposedly) national
    character in literature. Not what the Other is
    but how s/he is perceived and represented.
  • Sees national images as intrinsic to a texts
    inner fabric, permeating its very substance
    (Dyserinck 1967, 1982).
  • Deconstruction of the rhetoric of national
    characteristics.
  • Analyse how and why it was constructed

3
The issue of Otherness (Alterity)
  • Closely linked to the debate Alterity / Identity
  • People external to ones society are naturally
    perceived as Other in terms of language, mores,
    religion or physical characteristics.
  • Stereotypes,clichés, ethnic prejudices
  • Essentialism
  • Determinism
  • Self / Other dialectic at the core of the debate
    on alterity.

4
Imagined Communities
  • The Other is endowed with a specific set of
    characterizations and attributes which cannot be
    tested empirically and, therefore, are
    imaginated (Leersen)
  • Generally, imaginated discourse
  • a singles out a nation from the rest of humanity
    as being somehow different or typical,
  • b articulates or suggests a characterological,
    collective-psychological motivation for given
    social or national features.

5
Study of Otherness
  • A developing field in comparative literature and
    cultural studies
  • Falls under the labels of imagology or semiotic
    theory of culture, literary geopolitics, cultural
    geography.
  • de Certeau calls it Ethno-graphy .

6
The representation of the Other as inferior
  • Imagology is closely linked to the study of the
    racial, gendered, or ethnic Other, in other words
    to the way a hegemonic culture or gender group
    views different and subaltern ones as exotic or
    inferior or just plain alien (Miller 1).

7
Identity
  • Identity too is constructed and not a
    transcendent-essentialist notion.
  • Often based on binary oppositions,
    characteristics belonging to ones own culture
    are opposed to those belonging to the other
    culture,
  • ones own characteristics are idealized
  • those of the Other are denigrated.

8
Self-definition
  • One defines ones own culture by defining other
    cultures in the same way as the self defines
    itself by defining the other Each description
    or definition of the other culture implies a
    self-description or self-definition(Pfister 4)
  • Stephen Greenblatt calls this process
    self-fashioning.

9
Constructedness of Nationality e.g. National
Identity
  • What came first, Nation or Nationalism?
  • Notion of nationality has no ontologically
    autonomous existence. There is no nationality per
    se.
  • Case of Italy. An abstraction. (indicates neither
    a state nor a nation). Gioberti popolo italiano
    non esiste, è un presupposto) Existed only in
    literature and thanks to it. Literature promotes
    it

10
Field for imagological studies
  • Exists because it has been articulated
  • Literature, because it manifests and documents
    the nations identity (V. Italian lit.)
  • Travel literature
  • Culture (cinema, TV, cartoons)
  • National stereotypes are first and most
    effectively formulated, perpetuated and
    disseminated by imaginary literature.
  • Nationality Identity Alterity are literary
    tropes (Guyard, Létranger tel quon le voit,
    1954)

11
Imagology a meta-discursive practice
  • Study of literary representation of foreign
    cultures and nationalities .
  • Study of national and ethnic stereotype in
    literature.
  • Discourse analysis. Imagology is concerned with
    representations as textual strategies.
  • What has been written about him/her.

12
What Imagology is not
  • Its aim is not to understand the society or
    culture of another country.
  • Not sociology nor even literary sociology
    (Wellek)
  • Not anthropology.
  • Not collective opinion but a summa of
    subjectivities.

13
Not an objective representation
  • Not what the Other is but how s/he is perceived
    and represented. What has been written about
    him/her.
  • The image is a textual construct. No question of
    its validity or objectivity.
  • Not making the difference, i.e. Considering
    difference an objective datum, has let to
    persecutions, podroms, colonialism, Hitler)

14
Subjectivity in the construction of the Other
  • Subjectivity must be taken into account in the
    analysis of representations of the Other.
  • The nationality represented is silhouetted in the
    perspectival context of the representing text or
    discourse.
  • Dynamics between those images which characterize
    the Other (hetero-images) and those which
    characterize ones own, domestic identity
    (self-images or auto-images).

15
Genres
  • Fiction. Often concerned with encounter with
    Other whether at home or abroad.
  • Travel literature and literary works engaging
    with questions of travel
  • Michel de Certeau Every story is a travel
    story, a spatial practice
  • Fictional accounts (but all representations are
    fundamentally fictional)
  • So-called truthful travel account, are also based
    on construction of delf and other.
  • Drama (V. Shakespeare) Poetry

16
The question of Otherness (or Alterity) in Travel
Literature
  • Most travel writing - whether part of an
    anthropological, sociological, semiological or
    literary project - is concerned with the
    encounter with Otherness either directly or
    through signs.
  • Terms of a discourse on Otherness were
    established in descriptions of the natives in
    countries discovered by the Western world
    (seeTodorov, Fanon)

17
Emergence of travel writing as a focus for study
  • Dismissed in the past as a subliterary genre.
  • At best considered as an historical archive .
  • Travel writing has emerged in recent years as a
    focus for study and research across a whole range
    of disciplines.
  • Now being studied in terms of its history, formal
    characteristics, and problems of representation,
    and for what it can be made to say about a whole
    range of themes

18
Reasons for the resurgence of interest in travel
writing
  • Cultural studies. (cf. Raymond Williams).
  • Discourse analysis, or rhetorical analysis
  • a suspicious close reading
  • deconstructing the text
  • decoding of imperialist rhetoric and its key
    tropes.
  • Anthropology, Ethnography. Were the first to show
    interest in Otherness
  • Representations of identity and difference.
  • Discourse of the Other
  • Colonialism, Postcolonialism. (cf. Todorov)
  • Multidisciplinary studies.

19
Effects of travel studies
  • Increase in understanding of and interactions
    with the rest of the world.
  • Change in how others have perceived and
    understood other places, cultures and societies.
    Self.consciousness about stereotyping.
  • Inputs about a whole range of themes
  • history, geography, society, art
  • identity and difference
  • Gender and Power,
  • elitism
  • Nationalism

20
Travel and Otherness
  • Travel literature mostly focuses on different
    people and countries and on how certain
    characteristics, functions, and qualities are
    assigned to them.
  • Ideological bias behind national stereotypes (See
    Edward Saids Orientalism (1978).
  • Ideas of difference, strangeness, exoticism, lack
    of civilisation do not only apply to far off
    countries (e.g. The East) but also to places
    nearby (Ireland, Italy)

21
Conventions about the representation of the Other
  • Stigmatisation of a foreigner or someone who is
    different from oneself as a way of defining and
    securing ones own positive identity through
    comparison.
  • Ignoring or demeaning the artistic and literary
    manifestation of the Other and imposing ones
    language and ones own literary and artistic
    canons are all forms of discrimination.
  • The Othering process may take subtler avenues and
    work out through language.
  • e.g. stereotyping, the use of clichés, metaphors.

22
Conventions continued
  • Inexpressibility can only be represented by
    inversions no longer a matter of a and b,
    simply of a and the converse of a. ( Hartog, The
    Mirror of Herodotus).
  • Binary oppositions, whereby characteristics
    belonging to ones own culture are opposed to
    those appertaining to the other culture, in
    such a way that ones own characteristics are
    idealized and those of the Other are denigrated.

23
Some important theorists
  • Edward Said,Orientalism, (1978) a seminal work
    that has transformed the study of culture and
    cultures. It uncovers the ideological bias behind
    national representations (primarily concerned
    the East and colonized countries., but applicable
    to other countries as well)
  • Yuri M. Lotman Universe of the Mind A Semiotic
    Theory of Culture (1990).
  • Michel de Certeau, creates a historical
    psychology of alterity.
  • Joep Leersen, Raymond Corbey, Manfred Beller.
  • Hayden White Tropics of Discourse (1984) a
    milestone in modelling and theorising
    non-fictional representation of the Other.
  • New Historicists (Greenblatt, Montrose) study
    documents related to travel and conquest as if
    they were literary texts.

24
Questions for discussion
  • How have literary texts expressed, or
    propagandized identity?
  • How are is the image of the other used to
    exorcise certain undesirable traits of the self?
  • How is otherness confronted or assimilated
  • What is the role of the Other in
    forming identity?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com