Can we shape the future? The - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

Can we shape the future? The

Description:

Can we shape the future? The cultural turn and the role of intellectuals in path-shaping processes Borut Ron evi Faculty of Applied Social Studies – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:49
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: BorutRo
Category:
Tags: future | semiotic | shape

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Can we shape the future? The


1
Can we shape the future?The cultural turn and
the role of intellectuals in path-shaping
processes
  • Borut Roncevic
  • Faculty of Applied Social Studies
  • Nova Gorica, Slovenia
  • Lancaster University
  • Lancaster, UK

2
(No Transcript)
3
Country DP CC SC CM QG ES COH OP
Sweden 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Finland 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Denmark 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Netherlands 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Belgium 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Norway 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Switzerland 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.5 1
Germany 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.5 1
Austria 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.5 1
UK 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.5 1
Ireland 1 0.5 1 1 1 1 0.5 1
France 1 1 0.5 1 1 1 0.5 0.5
Italy 1 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5
Spain 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 0.5
Portugal 0.5 0.5 0 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 0.5
Czech R. 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
Slovenia 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
Hungary 0.5 0.5 0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0 0.5
Estonia 0.5 0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0 0.5
Greece 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0 0.5 0.5
Slovak 0.5 0.5 0.5 0 0.5 0.5 1 0.5
Poland 0 0 0 0.5 0.5 0 0 0
Latvia 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 0.5
Lithuania 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 0
Romania 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bulgaria 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Russia 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4
  • The impact of civilisational competence

dependent significance factor of
factors
SC 0.017 CM
0.033 QG 0.358 ES
0.012 COH
0.003 OP
0.025

5
PERFORMANCE CC SC CM QG ES COH
OP Number of Cases Tested (Outcome gt 0) 21 (
77.8 of Total) Method Probabilistic Test
Proportion 0.65 p lt 0.10 Necessary Cause
Observed Binomial Variable
Outcome Proportion p

CC 19 0.90 0.009 SC
17 0.81 0.092 CM
19 0.90 0.009 QG
20 0.95 0.001 ES
20 0.95
0.001 COH 12 0.57
OP 19
0.90 0.009

6
  • Some tentative implications
  • Only semi-peripheral societies have the realistic
    option to become part of the European core
  • A combination of context-specific factors can
    contribute to developmental leap
  • gt context-specific processes immense
    complexity!!!
  • gt Not possible to predict the long-term outcome
    of specific policies
  • Top-down approach cannot yield favourable results
    in the long-run
  • gt contextual intervention as the only option
  • Developing necessary and sufficient factors of
    development

7
Vision
  • Economy Slovenias level of economic development
    is well above the EU average. Achievement of this
    is connected with the growth in employment
  • Quality of life is among highest in Europe,
    according to both quantitative and qualitative
    criteria. This includes both individuals and
    social groups
  • Intergenerational end environmental
    sustainability is the elementary qualitative
    criterion in all fields of development. The
    population is stable.
  • Slovenias model of development, cultural
    identity and participation in the international
    community are recognised and respected

8
Scenario 1 Path dependency and semi-periphery
  • Regulation and bureaucratisation of markets
  • Limiting business and entrepreneurial environment
  • Relatively closed financial markets
  • Inflexible labour markets (flexibility of the
    workforce)
  • Collective systems of social security
  • Corporatism of big social partners
  • Bureaucratic-hierarchical system of public
    administration
  • Emphasis on macroeconomic and social
    sustainability

9
Scenario 2 Path creation towards the core
  • Deregulation and liberalisation of markets
  • Support for creation and growth of businesses
  • Open financial markets and competition
  • Greater flexibility of labour markets
    (flexibility for the workforce)
  • Emphasis on individual needs and responsibility
  • Open and inclusive partnerships and developmental
    coalitions
  • Decentralisation and public-private partnerships
  • Emphasis on sustainable development

10
Strategic priorities for the future
  • Priority 1 Competitive economy and economic
    growth
  • Priority 2 Efficient creation and two-way
    transfer of knowledge
  • Priority 3 Cheaper and more effective state
  • Priority 4 Modern welfare state and increased
    employment
  • Priority 5 Connecting measures for sustainable
    development

11
Two hypotheses about the possible role of
intellectuals in path-shaping processes
  • Thesis 1 We can shape the future!
  • Not a social engineering
  • Shaping discoursive practices of imagined
    economies
  • The real question is How do we create hegemonic
    semiotic systems?
  • Thesis 2 And yet, we do not know how the future
    is going to look like.
  • Is this a paradox?
  • Distinguishing between actually existing
    economies and imagined economies

12
Cultural political economy (1)
  • This is distinctive post-disciplinary approach
    to the analysis of contemporary capitalisms
  • Takes for granted path-shaping potentials of
    economic imaginaries
  • Why only some economic imaginaries come to be
    selected and institutionalised?
  • Two lines of research
  • 1. How do extra-semiotic and semiotic factors
    affect the variation, selection and retention of
    particular instances of semiosis and associated
    practices in transforming various forms of
    capitalisms?
  • 2. What role does semiosis play in constructing
    and stabilising forms of capitalisms?

13
Cultural political economy (2)
  • CPE opposes transhistorical analysis both
    history and institutions matter
  • CPE takes cultural turn seriously, emphasising
    complex relationships between meanings and
    practices
  • CPE focuses on the co-evolution of semiotic and
    extra-semiotic practices and their conjoint
    impact on the constitution and dynamic of
    capitalisms
  • Therefore The key task in testing the first
    hypothesis is to explore semiotic and
    extra-semiotic mechanisms involved in selecting
    and consolidating the the dominance of systems
    of meaning!!!

14
Cultural political economy (3)
  • Overall complexity of the social world need for
    complexity reduction
  • Complexity reduction involves
  • Discursively selective imaginaries
  • and
  • Structurally selective institutions
  • actually existing economy chaotic sum of all
    economic activities
  • vs.
  • economies imaginatively narrated subset of
    these activities
  • NOTE Totality of economic activities is too
    complex for management
  • gt Such practices are always oriented to subsets
    of economic relations

15
Cultural political economy (4)
  • Economic imageries play crucial role in this
    respect.
  • A semiotic order, specific configuration of
    discourses and styles, constituting semiotic
    quality of a network of social practices in a
    given social setting, institutional order or
    wider social formation
  • Successful economic imaginaries have their own,
    performative, constitutive force in the material
    world
  • There is no economic imaginary without
    materiality
  • gtwhere imaginary is successfully operationalised
    and institutionalised, it transforms to
    materiality, thereby gaining emergent properties

16
Evolutionary mechanisms for economic imaginaries
(1)
  • 1. Continuing variation in discourses and
    practices
  • Incomplete mastery, skilful adaptation,
  • New challenges of recurring crises
  • 2. Selection of particular discourses
  • Semiotic factors Influencing the resonance of
    discourses
  • Extra-semiotic factors power relations,
    path-depndency, structurally-inscibed
    selectivities
  • 3. Retention of some resonant discourses
  • Inclusion in actors habitus, hexis and personal
    identity
  • Enactment in organisational routines
  • Objectification in built environment
  • Material and intellectual technologies
  • Articulation into widely accepted strategies,
    accepted projects, state visions

17
Evolutionary mechanisms for economic imaginaries
(2)
  • 4. Reinforcement
  • Procedural devices, privileging these discourses
    and associated practices
  • Filtering-out contrary discourses and practices
  • Discursive selectivity and material selectivity
  • 5. Selective recruitment, inculcation, and
    retention
  • By relevant social groups, organisations,
    institutions...

18
Path-shaping potential of current crisis
  • Crisis is especially interesting opportunity to
    develop new economic imaginaries
  • Crisis is never a purely objective process or
    moment that automatically produces a particular
    response o outcome. Instead , a crisis emerges
    when established patterns of dealing with
    structural contradictions, their
    crisis-tendencies , and dilemmas no longer work
    as expected and, indeed, when continued reliance
    thereon may even aggravate the situation (Jessop
    and Oosterlynck, 2001)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com