Title: Can we shape the future? The
1Can we shape the future?The cultural turn and
the role of intellectuals in path-shaping
processes
- Borut Roncevic
- Faculty of Applied Social Studies
- Nova Gorica, Slovenia
- Lancaster University
- Lancaster, UK
2(No Transcript)
3Country DP CC SC CM QG ES COH OP
Sweden 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Finland 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Denmark 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Netherlands 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Belgium 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Norway 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Switzerland 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.5 1
Germany 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.5 1
Austria 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.5 1
UK 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.5 1
Ireland 1 0.5 1 1 1 1 0.5 1
France 1 1 0.5 1 1 1 0.5 0.5
Italy 1 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5
Spain 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 0.5
Portugal 0.5 0.5 0 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 0.5
Czech R. 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
Slovenia 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
Hungary 0.5 0.5 0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0 0.5
Estonia 0.5 0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0 0.5
Greece 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0 0.5 0.5
Slovak 0.5 0.5 0.5 0 0.5 0.5 1 0.5
Poland 0 0 0 0.5 0.5 0 0 0
Latvia 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 0.5
Lithuania 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 0
Romania 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bulgaria 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Russia 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4- The impact of civilisational competence
dependent significance factor of
factors
SC 0.017 CM
0.033 QG 0.358 ES
0.012 COH
0.003 OP
0.025
5PERFORMANCE CC SC CM QG ES COH
OP Number of Cases Tested (Outcome gt 0) 21 (
77.8 of Total) Method Probabilistic Test
Proportion 0.65 p lt 0.10 Necessary Cause
Observed Binomial Variable
Outcome Proportion p
CC 19 0.90 0.009 SC
17 0.81 0.092 CM
19 0.90 0.009 QG
20 0.95 0.001 ES
20 0.95
0.001 COH 12 0.57
OP 19
0.90 0.009
6- Some tentative implications
- Only semi-peripheral societies have the realistic
option to become part of the European core - A combination of context-specific factors can
contribute to developmental leap - gt context-specific processes immense
complexity!!! - gt Not possible to predict the long-term outcome
of specific policies - Top-down approach cannot yield favourable results
in the long-run - gt contextual intervention as the only option
- Developing necessary and sufficient factors of
development
7Vision
- Economy Slovenias level of economic development
is well above the EU average. Achievement of this
is connected with the growth in employment - Quality of life is among highest in Europe,
according to both quantitative and qualitative
criteria. This includes both individuals and
social groups - Intergenerational end environmental
sustainability is the elementary qualitative
criterion in all fields of development. The
population is stable. - Slovenias model of development, cultural
identity and participation in the international
community are recognised and respected
8Scenario 1 Path dependency and semi-periphery
- Regulation and bureaucratisation of markets
- Limiting business and entrepreneurial environment
- Relatively closed financial markets
- Inflexible labour markets (flexibility of the
workforce) - Collective systems of social security
- Corporatism of big social partners
- Bureaucratic-hierarchical system of public
administration - Emphasis on macroeconomic and social
sustainability
9Scenario 2 Path creation towards the core
- Deregulation and liberalisation of markets
- Support for creation and growth of businesses
- Open financial markets and competition
- Greater flexibility of labour markets
(flexibility for the workforce) - Emphasis on individual needs and responsibility
- Open and inclusive partnerships and developmental
coalitions - Decentralisation and public-private partnerships
- Emphasis on sustainable development
10Strategic priorities for the future
- Priority 1 Competitive economy and economic
growth - Priority 2 Efficient creation and two-way
transfer of knowledge - Priority 3 Cheaper and more effective state
- Priority 4 Modern welfare state and increased
employment - Priority 5 Connecting measures for sustainable
development
11Two hypotheses about the possible role of
intellectuals in path-shaping processes
- Thesis 1 We can shape the future!
- Not a social engineering
- Shaping discoursive practices of imagined
economies - The real question is How do we create hegemonic
semiotic systems? - Thesis 2 And yet, we do not know how the future
is going to look like. - Is this a paradox?
- Distinguishing between actually existing
economies and imagined economies
12Cultural political economy (1)
- This is distinctive post-disciplinary approach
to the analysis of contemporary capitalisms - Takes for granted path-shaping potentials of
economic imaginaries - Why only some economic imaginaries come to be
selected and institutionalised? - Two lines of research
- 1. How do extra-semiotic and semiotic factors
affect the variation, selection and retention of
particular instances of semiosis and associated
practices in transforming various forms of
capitalisms? - 2. What role does semiosis play in constructing
and stabilising forms of capitalisms?
13Cultural political economy (2)
- CPE opposes transhistorical analysis both
history and institutions matter - CPE takes cultural turn seriously, emphasising
complex relationships between meanings and
practices - CPE focuses on the co-evolution of semiotic and
extra-semiotic practices and their conjoint
impact on the constitution and dynamic of
capitalisms - Therefore The key task in testing the first
hypothesis is to explore semiotic and
extra-semiotic mechanisms involved in selecting
and consolidating the the dominance of systems
of meaning!!!
14Cultural political economy (3)
- Overall complexity of the social world need for
complexity reduction - Complexity reduction involves
- Discursively selective imaginaries
- and
- Structurally selective institutions
- actually existing economy chaotic sum of all
economic activities - vs.
- economies imaginatively narrated subset of
these activities - NOTE Totality of economic activities is too
complex for management - gt Such practices are always oriented to subsets
of economic relations
15Cultural political economy (4)
- Economic imageries play crucial role in this
respect. - A semiotic order, specific configuration of
discourses and styles, constituting semiotic
quality of a network of social practices in a
given social setting, institutional order or
wider social formation - Successful economic imaginaries have their own,
performative, constitutive force in the material
world - There is no economic imaginary without
materiality - gtwhere imaginary is successfully operationalised
and institutionalised, it transforms to
materiality, thereby gaining emergent properties
16Evolutionary mechanisms for economic imaginaries
(1)
- 1. Continuing variation in discourses and
practices - Incomplete mastery, skilful adaptation,
- New challenges of recurring crises
- 2. Selection of particular discourses
- Semiotic factors Influencing the resonance of
discourses - Extra-semiotic factors power relations,
path-depndency, structurally-inscibed
selectivities - 3. Retention of some resonant discourses
- Inclusion in actors habitus, hexis and personal
identity - Enactment in organisational routines
- Objectification in built environment
- Material and intellectual technologies
- Articulation into widely accepted strategies,
accepted projects, state visions
17Evolutionary mechanisms for economic imaginaries
(2)
- 4. Reinforcement
- Procedural devices, privileging these discourses
and associated practices - Filtering-out contrary discourses and practices
- Discursive selectivity and material selectivity
- 5. Selective recruitment, inculcation, and
retention - By relevant social groups, organisations,
institutions...
18Path-shaping potential of current crisis
- Crisis is especially interesting opportunity to
develop new economic imaginaries - Crisis is never a purely objective process or
moment that automatically produces a particular
response o outcome. Instead , a crisis emerges
when established patterns of dealing with
structural contradictions, their
crisis-tendencies , and dilemmas no longer work
as expected and, indeed, when continued reliance
thereon may even aggravate the situation (Jessop
and Oosterlynck, 2001)