Journ - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 26
About This Presentation
Title:

Journ

Description:

Journ e Gestion alternative et Imperfections de march Hedge Fund Risk Profiling: A non-linear approach to assess the risk and optimise – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:124
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: RD66
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Journ


1
Journée  Gestion alternative et Imperfections de
marché Hedge Fund Risk ProfilingA
non-linear approach to assess the risk and
optimiseFunds of Hedge Funds allocation.Univer
sité dEvry, 1-2 Avril 2004
? raphael.douady_at_riskdata.com ?
www.riskdata.com ? 33 1 44 54 35 00
Raphaël Douady Research Director, Riskdata
2
Hedge Fund Modelling
  • The Investor Problem
  • What is the most likely Hedge Fund behaviour
    under the various market conditions?
  • What factor or event can put the Hedge Fund at
    risk?
  • Is the risk of a portfolio well diversified
    across the funds
  • Goal
  • Build and Rebalance portfolio of Hedge Funds
  • Select new Hedge Funds to invest in

3
Hedge Fund Modelling
  • Hedge Funds form asset class different from
    others
  • Apparent Statistical Instability
  • Structural Non-linearity stemming from Dynamic
    Trading
  • Usual market factors inefficient to explain
    returns
  • Seldom and imprecise information
  • Net Asset Value (weekly or monthly, delayed in
    all cases)
  • Exposure and sensitivity report
  • Position transparency only in some cases

4
Hedge Fund Modelling
  • Methodology
  • Determine a set of Factors that define the
    Market
  • Identify, for each Hedge Fund, the Factors that
    do impact the returns
  • Build a Proxy of the fund, as a function of each
    Selected Factor, or of the subset of them
  • HF return Proxy Prediction error
  • Proxyt E(HF returnt Factort U ?t-1)

5
What Statistical Model for H.F.
  • Single factor vs. Multi-factor
  • Factor choice?
  • Linear vs. Non-linear
  • Non-linear modelling?
  • Instantaneous info vs. Lagged
  • Number of periods for the Fund? For the Factors?
  • Return series vs. Integrated series
  • Extreme moves modelling

6
Evaluation Criteria
  • Explanatory Power
  • In-sample modelling error
  • Fund(t) fa(Factor1(t), , Factorn(t)) e(t)
  • a calibrated on the whole analysis period
  • Predictive Power
  • Out-of-sample modelling error
  • Fund(t) fa(t-1)(Factor1(t), , Factorn(t))
    e(t)
  • a calibrated on t0, t - 1

7
Explanation Power
  • R-square obtained with a Set of 25 Factors
    Linear Reg.
  • TUNA Hedge Fund Indices
  • Selection of best combination of 5 factors
  • Factor set
  • SP500, size/style indices
  • Corp. Bond and HY indices
  • US Libor, bond curve, swap curve
  • MSCI World, Emerging markets
  • Fama-French
  • FX Basket
  • Commodity index, Gold, Oil
  • SP options
  • SP historical and implied Vol
  • US T-bond historical vol

8
Risk Profiling Pairwise Analysis
  • Question Does the Risk Factor significantly
    impacts the fund returns?
  • Statistical Inference
  • Sensitivity (Beta)
  • Convexity (Gamma)
  • Directional Sensitivities
  • Conditional Statistics under Up and Down
    hypotheses

Beta 0 does not imply no exposure to Risk Factor
9
Evaluation Criteria
  • Prediction Power
  • Correlation between Predicted Series and Actual
    Returns
  • Direction Match Probability
  • Biased if the the Fund average return is ? 0
  • Unbiased measure Correlation of Sign Series
  • Prediction Power P2
  • P2 1 Var(Error) / Var(Return)
  • Negatively biased because of Spurious Selections
  • Var(Error) Var(Specific) Var(Spurious)

10
State of the Art
  • Maximum Correlation
  • Select, in a set of market factors, the factor
    that is the most correlated to the fund
  • Proxy the fund by linear regression with respect
    to this factor
  • Factor Model / Style Analysis
  • Determine a fixed factor set
  • Size limited to the number of data points
  • Multi-dimensional regression of the Fund returns
    on this set
  • Constrain by positive weights for stability (only
    with directional funds)
  • Stepwise Regression
  • Factor set Not Limited
  • Exposed to Spurious Selections
  • Still Linear

11
Testing Procedure
  • Test Pannel (250 funds)
  • Directional 75
  • Non directional 64
  • Arbitrage 32
  • Special/Event 24
  • Aggregates 23
  • Other 22
  • Random 10
  • Hedge Fund Analysis
  • 3Y slipping window
  • Monthly returns
  • Jan 99 Dec 01
  • to Jan 01 Dec 03
  • Factor set
  • 200 factors
  • Equity, IR, Commodity, FX
  • Volatility, Correlation, Trend

12
Overview of Riskdata Factor Set
  • Market Variables
  • Equity Indices main, sectors, size, style,
    individual equity
  • Fixed Income Interest rates, Gov. bond yields,
    swap rates, credit spreads, high yield return
    indices, etc.
  • Commodities energy, metals, food
  • FX, FX baskets
  • Emerging markets
  • Implied volatilities, implied correlation indices
  • Market Rolling Statistics
  • Historical volatilities
  • Historical volatility indices
  • Historical correlations
  • Historical correlation indices
  • Combinations and Spreads
  • Equity Size/Style vs. Main index, Sector vs.
    Main index
  • Fixed Income YC slope/butterfly, Bonds vs.
    Swaps, Credit spreads, etc.
  • Implied volatility vs. statistical
  • Simulated Strategies
  • Dynamic portfolios
  • Trend/Revert strategy
  • Strategies involving options
  • Lagged Series
  • Hedge Fund Indices

13
Max Correlation
Threshold
14
Max Correlation Prediction Correlation
15
Max Correlation Selection Rate
16
Stepwise Regression Prediction Correlation
17
Stepwise Regression P2
18
Other Selection Methods
  • Non linear regression F-test, Log-likelihood
  • Causality (non linear VARMA) F-test
  • Cointegration. Non linear factor ? Factt² dt
  • P2
  • Direction Match
  • Joint occurrence of Extreme Moves

19
Selection Method Comparison Prediction
Correlation (1 fact)
20
Selection Method Comparison Prediction
Correlation
21
Selection Method Comparison Selection Rate
22
Selection Method Comparison Direction Match
23
Missed Selections
24
Findings
  • Classical Linear methods are either often
    spurious (stepwise regression) or miss essential
    afctors (correlation)
  • Non linear modelling is necessary
  • Statistical factors, such as Hist. Vol., Correl
    Index, etc. expalin a lot of hedge fund returns
  • Causality is efficient because of Lagged series
  • Co-integration is useful to find the right
    factor, but not for prediction capabilities.
    Dickey-Fuller mean reversion test worsen
    statistics
  • Direction match probability test good for event
    type strategies
  • Large factor shifts should be analysed
    differently use the frequency of joint large
    move occurrence between the fund and the factor.

25
Conclusion
  • Performance Analysis Correlations are
    insufficient for the construction of Portfolios
    of of Hedge Fund
  • A Complete Set of Risk Factors contains Factors
    that replicate Dynamic Strategies
  • Sensitive to Volatility and Correlation of Assets
  • Include Non-linear Features
  • Hedge Funds must be Proxied by Non-linear
    functions of Factors
  • Building a Risk Profile is the only way to
    identify Market Conditions under which Funds
    over/under-perform
  • This is also the only way to extract Stable
    information from Return series

26
Correlation of Long-Short Equity Funds to TUNA LS
Index24M slipping period (end indicated)
27
Riskdata FoFIX
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com