Syntax - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Syntax

Description:

Syntax Definition of Syntax Types of Grammar Hierarchical Structure Tree diagram Phrase structure rules Recursiveness Deep/surface structure Universal Grammar – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:263
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 54
Provided by: feli85
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Syntax


1
Syntax
  • Definition of Syntax
  • Types of Grammar
  • Hierarchical Structure
  • Tree diagram
  • Phrase structure rules
  • Recursiveness
  • Deep/surface structure
  • Universal Grammar
  • Principles
  • Parameters

2
Definition of Syntax (1)
  • syntaxis (Greek) arrangement
  • The rules of sentence formation the study of
  • the structure of sentences.
  • Language Structure
  • Phonology Grammar Semantics
  • morphology syntax
  • (the specific sense more traditional)

3
Definition of Syntax (2)
  • Popularized by Chomsky (the general sense)
  • Grammar
  • Phonology (Morphology) Syntax Semantics

4
II.    Types of Grammar
  1. Mental Grammar Internal linguistic knowledge
  2. Developmental Grammar a learners grammar
  3. Prescriptive Grammar a set of prescribed rules
    which tells people how to speak/write
  4. Descriptive Grammar how people do speak in
    actual utterances.
  5. Pedagogical Grammar teaching grammar widely used
    in schools

5
A. Mental Grammar Internal linguistic
knowledge
  • Grammar
  • Phonology (Morphology) Syntax Semantics
  • Linguistic knowledge in the mind
  • Here, well just consider grammatical
  • knowledge as structural knowledge but NOTE
  • you also must know how to USE the structural
  • knowledge.

6
  • Grammar
  • mental grammar ling. etiquette the nature
    of lang.
  • (psycholing. view) (socioling. view)
    (ling. view in general)
  • Internal ling. knowledge social attitudes
    a description of the grammar
  • (what goes on in lang. and values
    (study and analysis of the
  • users mind sub- (proper or best
    structures found in a lang.)
  • conscious, not result structures to be
  • of any teaching) used in a
    lang.)

7
B. Developmental Grammar a learners grammar
  • The mental grammar in the developmental stage
  • Type of lang. produced by learners who are in
    the process of learning a language.
  • In the language use of a L1 or L2 learner which
    is the result of a normal pattern of development,
    and is common among language learners.
  • e.g. comed, goed, breaked
  • Because of overgeneralizations a natural or
    developmental stage in lang. learning.

8
C. Prescriptive Grammar a set of prescribed
rules which tells people how to speak/write
  • A set of rules about how you SHOULD speak or
    write gives judgments on which structures are
    CORRECT and which are INCORRECT
  • Their influence lives on in the handbook of usage
    widely found today.
  • e.g. double negative(affirmative), aint
  • its me, ending sentences with preposition
    (Who are you talking to?)

9
D. Descriptive Grammar how people do speak in
actual utterances
  • Linguistic description of the structures of a
    language as they are observed to be used, with no
    evaluation (non-judgmental) of social
    correctness.
  • Collins Cobuild dictionary examplehuge corpus
    analyzed and described
  • e.g. Either of the dictionaries are/is good.
  • (but should be is according to prescriptive
    view)
  • e.g. Neither of the books were/was a good buy.

10
E. Pedagogical Grammar teaching grammars
widely used in schools
  • A teaching grammardesigned for developing NS
    students awareness of their mother tongue, or
    for teaching a language as a foreign language.
  • Often a combination of descriptive prescriptive
    grammars more contemporary pedagogical grammars
    moving away from prescriptive.
  • e.g. M. Swam. Practical English Usage or a
  • textbook a grammar book.

11
III. Hierarchical Structure (1)
  • Concepts of hierarchy
  • e.g.1 John is easy to please
  • John is eager to please
  • Q Do the two sentences have the same sentence
    structure (the same syntax)?
  • Paraphrase
  • Its easy for somebody to please John.
  • John is eager to please somebody.

12
III. Hierarchical Structure (2)
  • Analogy
  • A. university school board, principle, vice
    presidents, dean of academic affairs, dean of
    student affairs, dean of general affairs, dean of
    research and development, dean of each college,
    dept. chairs.
  • B. country president, vice- president,
    legistrative yuan (???), executive yuan (???),
    control yuan (???), judicial yuan (???).

13
  • University
  • School board
  • President, Vice presidents
  • ??? ??? ??? ???
  • ?? ?? ? ? ?? ? ?? ? ??
  • ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ??

  • ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ???

14
  • country
  • president vice- president
  • legistrative yuan executive yuan control
    yuan judicial yuan
  • (???) (???) (???)
    (???)


15
Hierarchy
  • Hilary couldnt open the windows.
  • VP NP
  • sentence phrases words morphemes
  • Constituent part that makes up something a
    linguistic unit which is part of a larger
    construction.
  • e.g. Can you identify the construction and
    constituents in the sentence, the boy jumped?

16
III. Hierarchical Structure (3)
  • Modal of syntactic investigation Five-rank
    hierarchy (Crystal 95)
  • Sentences Sentences
  • are analyzed into are used to build
  • Clauses
    Clauses
  • are analyzed into are used to build
  • Phrases
    Phrases
  • are analyzed into are used to build
  • Words
    Words
  • are analyzed into are used to build
  • Morphemes Morphemes

17
Upward Expansion
  • Phrases
  • e.g. cars ? the cars ? the big cars ? all
  • the big cars ? all the big cars in the garage
  • (premodification) (head)
    (postmodification)
  • Upward expansion
  • Tom couldnt find his notes, and Davie couldnt
    find his textbook, and (repeat the structure) . .
    . but he still lectured for three hours.

18
Hierarchy
  • Another way to look at hierarchies
    construction and constituents
  • The young must respect the old people.
  • (A) the young (B) must respect the old people
  • (C) the (D) young (E) must respect (F) the old
    people
  • (G) must (H) respect (I) the (J) old
    people
  • (K) old (L) people

19
Clauses
  • Clause Types
  • SV (The dog is running)
  • SVO (The dog bites him)
  • SVC (The car is ready)
  • SVA (The picture lays on the ground)
  • SVOO (I give him a pen)
  • SVOC (He calls John a fool)
  • SVOA (Mary saw John yesterday)
  • Note subject (S), verb (V), complement (C),
    object (O), adverbial (A).

20
Formats of the Hierarchy
  • Tree Diagrams different levels in analysis
  • Phrase Structure (in tree diagrams)
  • Recursiveness (Recursion)
  • Deep and Surface Structure
  • Transformational Generative Grammar
  • e.g.1. Imperative Transformation
  • e.g.2. Reflexive Transformation and
  • Imperative Transformation
  • e.g.3. Passive Transformation
  • e.g.4. Particle Movement

21
1.Tree Diagrams (1)
  • The girl chased the dog. (Crystal 96)
  • The girl chased the dog
  • Identify the 2 major constituents (The girl
    chased the dog)
  • Divide the next-biggest constituent into 2
    chased the dog
  • Continue dividing constituents into 2 units until
    we can go no further.
  • e.g. the girl, the dog, chase -ed

22
1.Tree Diagrams (2)
  • Tree Diagrams Different levels in analysis
  • The tree diagram format may be viewed as
  • A static representation of the structure of the
    sentence at the bottom of the diagram.
  • A dynamic format, representing a way of
    generating a very large number of sentences
    with similar structures (by the use of phrase
    structure rules).

23
2. Phrase Structure
  • S
  • NP VP
  • ART N V NP
  • (DET)
  • ART N
  • the girl chased the dog

24
Phrase Structure Rules
  • Phrase structure rules (Nash 75-77) present the
    information of the tree diagram in an alternative
    format
  • S NP VP
  • VP V (NP) (PP) (ADV)
  • (ART) (ADJ) N
  • NP PRO
  • PP P NP
  • Note see Yule 105 for symbols and abbreviation
    definition.

25
3. Recursiveness (Recursion)
  • Recursive rule VP VS (Yule 107)
  • e.g. John said Cathy thought (Mary helped
    George).
  • Another e.g. of recursiveness
  • The Rose in My Garden
  • This is the rose in my garden.
  • This is the bee that sleeps on the rose in my
    garden.
  • These are the holly hocks high above ground,
    that give shade to the bee that sleeps on the
    rose in my garden.

26
4. Deep and Surface Structure
  • Deep and surface structure the form of a
    sentence we produce and understand is very often
    not the same as the basic form which shows its
    meaning (Nash 79)
  • A. Deep Structure the abstract, underlying
    level, but basic form of the sentence
  • B. Surface Structure the superficial,
    syntactic form that we produce in reality
  • e.g. old men and women
  • e.g. Annie whacked a man with an umbrella. (Yule
    103)
  • same surface structure form, two underlying
    interpretations (deep structures)
  • Other examples
  • 1. Look! 2. Help herself. 3. The runner broke
    the world record.

27
Transformational-generative grammar
  • Transformations processes that change the deep
    structure into surface structure.
  • Generative using phrase structure rules, se can
    produce (generate) infinite sentences.
  • Surface Structure
  • S
  • NP VP
  • V NP
  • eat ART N
  • the chou tofu

28
  • Deep Structure
  • S imperative
  • NP VP transformation
  • pro V NP
  • ART N
  • you eat the chou tofu

29
  • Surface structure Help yourself!
  • Deep Structure
  • S S
  • NP VP reflexive NP VP
  • pro V NP transformation pro V NP
  • pro (reflexive pro)
  • you help you you help
    yourself

30
  • S
  • NP VP imperative
  • Pro V NP transformation
  • (reflexive pro)
    Help yourself
  • You help yourself

31
  • Transformation important criteria
  • A. Some transformations are required some are
    optional.
  • B. Transformation is in a certain order.
  • e.g. Help yourself!
  • reflexive transformation is required.
  • imperative transformation is optional.

32
  • Passive transformation
  • NP1 V NP2 and changes it into
  • NP2 BE V-EN BY NP1
  • e.g. The runner broke the world record.
  • The world record was broken by the runner.

33
Transformational Process
  • In this process wont change the relationship
  • and the meaning of the sentence
  • 1. Combination e.g. You have Youve
  • 2. Substitution e.g. You Yourself
  • 3. Deletion e.g. You X
  • 4. Movement e.g. Puton Put on
  • 5. Addition e.g. relative clause

34
Important Contribution of TGG
  • Not everything we know about a sentence is
    revealed in the actual form we producethe
    surface structure. We must look for deeper
    structural information.
  • The deepsurface structure ideaa very important
    contribution.

35
Relative clause (1)
  • S
  • NP VP
  • NA S V NP
  • (N) NP VP confused ART N
  • (definite) N V NPx
  • (-human) (N) gave N the students
  • lecture (-common) (N)
  • Nash (definite)
  • (-human)
  • lecture

36
Relative clause (2)
  • 1st TRNAS relative clause transformation
  • S
  • NP VP
  • NP S
  • ART N1 NP N NP VP
  • (DEF) lecture (ART) lecture
  • (-Human) (N) (DEF) (N) N V
  • (DEF) (-Human) (DEF)
  • (-Human) (WH) (-Human) Nash gave
  • (PRO) (WH)
  • (PRO)

37
Problems of TGG
  • 1. Theory is unwieldy. (too cumbersome, too
    clumsytoo many transformations)
  • 2. Not universal (Its language specific, not
    conform to all languages).
  • 3. Psychological unreal (Semantics should be
    applied first, then comes the syntax)

38
Ambiguity
  • Children are nice to understand.
  • 1. Its nice for someone to understand children.
  • 2. Its nice for children to understand
    something.
  • S-structure
  • Children are nice Ø to understand Ø
  • D-structure
  • Children are nice Ø to understand Ø

39
D-Structure and S-Structure
  • Definition
  • D-structurein which the basic order of
    phrases is represented.
  • S-structurein which the actual linear order of
    phrases is observed deep
    structure positions of phrases are
    represented by empty categories.
  • What will Frances drink Ø ?
  • Drano, he drank Ø !

40
  • D-structure
  • S
  • S
  • NP VP
  • N V NP
  • N
  • he drank Drano
  • S-structure
  • S
  • NPi S
  • NP VP
  • N N V NP
  • Drano he drank ti
  • Ttrace an inaudible copy of the moved NP is
    left in the D-structure position of the moved
    phrase

iidentical index
41
  • D-structure
  • S
  • S
  • NP I VP
  • N V VP
  • N
  • Frances will drink what
  • S-structure
  • S
  • NPj S
  • Willi S
  • N
  • NP I VP
  • V NP
  • What Frances ti drink tj

42
Language Ambiguity
  • 1. Sentence Ambiguity
  • e.g. Visiting relatives can be a nuisance.
  • 2. Word Ambiguity
  • e.g. The man put his straw on the floor.

43
IV. Universal Grammar
  • Definition a set of limits on the form
    of mental grammar.
  • Two kinds of limits
  • 1. Principles invariable principles which
    dictate the form that grammar can take.
  • 2. Parameters strictly defined possibilities of
    variation across languages. (There is
    limited number in choices)

44
Principles (1)
  • An example of principles
  • Subjacency
  • A. No constituent can be moved over more than
    one bounding category.
  • B. A set of universal constraints on
    movement
  • C. It can move only from a layer that is
    subordinate and adjacent.

45
Principles (2)
  • Bounding category
  • S (sentence) and NP (noun phrase) in English
  • e.g.1 What did Sue destroy? (a correct
    sentence?)
  • S Ø
  • What did Sue destroy t ?
  • e.g. 2 What did Sue destroy a book about?
    (correct?)
  • S NP Ø
  • What did Sue destroy (a book about t) ?

46
Principles (3)
  • S
  • (That all of us but you were upset) is obvious.
  • S
  • (That all of us were upset) but you is obvious.
  • S S
  • (That all of us were upset) is obvious but you.

47
Principles (4)
  • S S
  • (John saw a horse) that kicked a box.
  • S S
  • (What did John see a horse) that kicked Ø?
  • S
  • What did John see a horse kick Ø?

48
Parameters (1)
  • Definition
  • Any of the established limits within which
    something must operate. dictionary definition
  • Strictly defined possibilities of variation
    across languages.
  • A range of possibilities and languages choose
    within that range every language must set its
    parameters.

49
Parameters (2)
  • An example
  • Pro-drop (an overt pronominal subject is
    dropped/optional) subjectless sentences
  • English I am going to the cinema.
  • Am going to the cinema.
  • Spanish Yo voy al cine.
  • voy al cine.
  • Italian Io vado al cinema. (I go to the
    movies.)
  • Vado al cinema.
  • Spanish Italian pro-drop languages.
  • (but English is not)

50
Parameters (3)
  • More Spanish examples
  • A. Salieron a las ocho.
  • Left at eight. (They left at eight.)
  • B. LloviÓ mucho ayer.
  • Rained a lot yesterday.
  • (It rained a lot yesterday.)
  • Free subject-verb inversion
  • Han llegado mis estudiantes.
  • Have arrived my students.
  • (My students have arrived.)

51
Conclusion
  • UG the ling. System involved rules too abstract
    and complex to be learned without the aid of
    innate knowledge about the nature of the system .
    . . The child is equipped with a set of
    blueprints that define and limit what a human
    language can be like.

52
  • The child is assumed to be biologically equipped
    with knowledge of universal grammarthe basics of
    lang. structure. The child has blueprints for
    all the possible types of lang. in her head. In
    the course of lang. development she settles on
    the particular grammar of the lang. surrounding
    her.

53
  • The primary role of UG in lang. development is to
    limit the hypotheses that a child can form
    concerning the rules of speech and ease with
    which lang. is learned.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com