Title: Safeguarding Adults and the NHS
1Safeguarding Adults and the NHS
2Introduction Review of No Secrets
- Our society is redefining how we enable adults to
be safe from harm and abuse. - No Secrets is being reviewed to provide a
framework and principles that can guide local
practice - The NHS have a key role in safeguarding adults
3Drivers for Change
Safeguarding Adults Vision
Safeguarding Adults Principles
No Secrets 2
Specific Guidance
4Primary Driver 1- Government Policy
- Strengthened regulatory role
-
- Break down barriers between Health and Social
Care - Increased collaboration across statutory and 3rd
sector - Decisions closer to people GP consortia
- Quality of care - Patient Safety
- Quality Innovation Prevention Productivity
- Outcome focused
- Shift power from state to local communities and
individuals - Big Society greater involvement of voluntary
agencies and communities - Maximise autonomy - limited state intervention
- Accountability to patients
- Democratic legitimacy
- Informed choice control
- no decision about me without me
AFFORDABILITY
5Primary Driver 2 - Legislative Framework
- Existing Legislation
- Human Rights Act 1998
- Mental Capacity Act 2005 amended 2007
- NHS Community Care Act 1990
- Health and Social Care Act 2008 regulation
direct payments - Equalities Act 2010Â
- Domestic Violence Crimes and Victims Act 2004
- SVG Act
- and the rest!
- Law Commission Review April 2011
- Social Care Bill Autumn 2011
6Case Law
- Limitations of Local Authority duty and authority
- - to investigate, act where person lacks
capacity, support, guide, inform and involve
police where necessary Justice Hedley Re Z
(Local Authority Duty (2004) EWHC 2817 (Fam). - - to support not to control. Court authority
required before any attempt to control, coerce
Justice Munby -A C 2010 EWHC 978 (Fam) - Best Interest and Risk Enablement
- - sensible risk appraisal not striving to avoid
all risk.. in particular to achieve the vital
good of the elderly or vulnerable persons
happiness. What good is making someone safer if
it merely makes them miserable? Justice Munby MM
(An Adult) (2007) EWHC 2003 (Fam), (2009) - Use of Inherent Jurisdiction for those with
Capacity - - Capacitated persons ability and free choice
to make decisions and give true consent may be
impaired if under constraint, coersion, undue
influence. Court may be asked to intervene but
jurisdiction will be used sparingly and only to
enable the person to make decisions without the
external pressures - Re SA (2005) EWHC 2942 (Fam)(Case related to
forced marriage) Justice Munby - (JE 2009 unreported)
- Â
7Primary Driver 3 No Secrets Consultation
- People experiencing safeguarding reported
- They got lost in the system
- Safeguarding should not be at the cost of other
qualities of life - Wanted to be listened to and to make choices
- They are not children
- General
- Prevention pro active safeguarding system
- Balance protection and levels of intervention
enable people to take considered risk. -
- The NHS
- Struggling to engage with safeguarding seen as
the LA responsibility - Failure to recognise safeguarding concerns arise
in NHS care - Need to create culture of openness and learning
- Need for leadership and accountability
- Need to integrate clinical governance and
safeguarding
8Primary Driver 4 Learning from Inquests,
Inquiries Research
- Steven Hoskins 2006- failures in identifying
vulnerability risk indicators partnerships
information sharing eligibility criteria
assessment of decision making capacity - Fiona Pilkington 2007 failures in identifying
vulnerability risk indicators failure to share
information and refer on - Margaret Panting 2001 self determination
balanced with duty of care
- Mid Staffordshire failures to focus on quality
failure to listen to patients need for early
warning systems role of commissioners and
regulators - failure to use intelligent
information - Death by Indifference institutional
discrimination led to deaths - Cornwall Partnership NHS Trust 2006 inadequate
arrangements to protect vulnerable adults staff
largely unaware of what constituted abuse. - Shipman Inquiry 2004 Kerr Haslam 2005
- Etc Etc
- AEA Prevalence Study 2007
- Womens Aid Making the Links Disabled Women and
Domestic Violence 2008 - Domestic Abuse in older women University of
Sheffield ( Autumn 2010) - CSCI/HCC research restrictive care
institutional abuse - Demographic Change National Office Statistics
9Distilling the Primary Drivers
- For Individuals
- Choice and control
- Enablement
- Full and informed consent
- Representation and making best interests decision
for those lacking capacity. - Least intrusive means
- For Services and Systems
- Focus on prevention
- Limited intervention - proportionality
- Partnerships and cooperation
- Greater community involvement
- Managing across plurality of providers and under
new commissioning systems - Accountability for quality of services to
public , commissioners and regulators - Systems need to be affordable
10We want people to be safe from harm and
exploitation, and in control of their own lives
11Safeguarding Adults Pathways
FAMILY LIFE AND COMMUNITIES SAFEGUARDING PATHWAY SERVICES SAFEGUARDING PATHWAY
Prevention safer communities strategies user enablement and empowerment stay safe initiatives Personalised care plans -risk enablement plans etc. Vigilant neighbourhoods Big society safeguarding as everyones business Prevention commissioning for quality monitoring and early intervention Integrated clinical governance systems service planning - health and wellbeing partnerships supporting self funders and Personal Budget holders as commissioners People and communities hold services to account
Responses Person defined outcome, consent, representation Proportionality Levels of response advice mediation single agency multi agency statutory interventions etc Responses Person defined outcome for decisions affecting the person Duty to address service failures and protect others Proportionality of response role of commissioners and regulators internal or independent investigation
Restoration for individual e.g. counselling justice for source of harm e.g. support to a carer Restoration for individual service improvement
12What does this mean for the NHS?
- The NHS have a key role to play in their own
services -preventing harm occurring and
responding effectively where harm occurs - The NHS also have a key role in supporting
adults at risk within their own communities and
within other services.
13Safeguarding is Integral to Quality Outcomes
Clinical Effectiveness
Patient safety
Dignity in Care
Safeguarding
Policy areas E.G Dementia Strategy 6
Lives Carers strategy
Prevention
Patient Experience
14Safeguarding as a continuum
Safeguarding activity
15Addressing Safeguarding prevention and early
intervention
- Patient empowerment
- Build resilience factors personal, social,
environmental - Maximise decision making
- Minimise the impact of disability/condition
Aids adaptations assistive technology relapse
prevention planning - Person centred planning - risk enablement Stay
safe personal plans - Effective communication - Information , choices
- Promote advance planning LPA Advance
decisions statements of preference - Access to complaints
- Patient involvement in service /strategic
planning review - Prevention/early intervention in the care
- ID higher risk patients person centred care
planning support with eating drinking - Safe physical environments
- What are high risk areas of care? Pressure ulcer
care? Discharge? - ID risks in environment
16Addressing Safeguarding prevention and early
intervention
- Care and Environment
- Identify patients at greater risk of harm - e.g.
assistance to eat and drink pressure care
communication needs enhanced discharge planning
privacy dignity consent advocacy
requirements? - How is use of restriction and restraint governed?
- How are carers identified carers assessments
and support plans? - What are your organisations critical points of
care? e.g. Pressure ulcers medication
discharge capacity and capability of staff
managing challenging patient behaviours - Which wards/services present highest risk?
- How is clinical governance informing
preventative/early intervention? - How do commissioners know that quality care is
being delivered? - Strategic partnerships Wellbeing and Health
Safer Communities - Prevention/early intervention in the care
- ID higher risk patients person centred care
planning support with eating drinking - Safe physical environments
- What are high risk areas of care? Pressure ulcer
care? Discharge? - ID risks in environment
17Addressing Safeguarding Concerns in Community
Pathway
- What is the patients desired outcome and how can
they be supported to achieve this? - Does the patient have capacity to make decisions
about their safeguarding? Maximise involvement
representation - Who else may be at risk of harm?
- Who needs to be involved?
- Relationship with the patient
- Clinical/ specialist skills knowledge required
- Roles responsibilities required for
investigation risk assessment
support/protection plan review - Single agency or multi agency?
- How do we know we have improved the outcome for
the patient?
18Addressing Safeguarding Concerns in Services
- How are concerns identified and managed ?
- How are complaints and incidents integrated
within safeguarding? - How are decisions made about when to refer?
- How do you work with local multi agency
safeguarding partners? - - Cooperation
- Accountability
- Proportionality
- How are decisions made within your interagency
procedures about internal or independent
investigation? Whats the role of commissioners
and regulators in this? - How is the patient supported throughout?
- How do we know we have improved the outcome for
the patient? - How do we know lessons learned have improved
outcomes?
19Clinical Governance Safeguarding
Serious case review - IMRs
Serious Incident - reporting investigation
Safeguarding Procedures
Preventative /Early Intervention Safeguarding
Clinical incident e.g. near miss
20Making it Happen Leadership and Workforce
21Making it Happen - Assurance Accountability
22Safeguarding is the business of the NHS