Title: ISA
1ISA
www.isa-gov.org.uk
2Aims of sessionTo provide an update regarding
measures available to safeguard vulnerable adults
from abuse by staff with a duty of care to
protect them from harm
- Whistleblowing
- Cases of institutional abuse
- Care Council for Wales information
- NMC information
- POVA List
- Wilful neglect / ill treatment new criminal
offences - Cases prosecuted
- Independent Safeguarding Authority
- Implementation plan
3Public interest disclosure /Whistleblowing
- In 2000, CHI reported on institutional abuse at
North Lakeland NHS Trust, stating there was a
systematic failure of management that allowed a
culture of abuse to flourish. - Patients with dementia were manhandled and denied
a normal diet. One was tied to a commode others
were fed whilst on the toilet two were left
outside wearing inadequate clothing for the
weather. - Abuse was reported by student nurses. An internal
investigation followed, but no disciplinary
action was taken. Relatives later reported
concerns directly to CHI. - CHI reported that the Trust had ignored
whistleblowers and implicitly condoned/excused
abuse, allowing it to continue for 2 years. Its
governance was felt to be seriously compromised
and Trust managers were dismissed. - In 1998 the Public Interest Disclosure Act
became statute, requiring all statutory bodies to
produce policies for confidential reporting, to
ensure whistleblowers are protected from
victimisation or dismissal. (See supplementary
guidance - Appendix B of the Policy.) - The VA1 abuse referral form allows it to be noted
that the staff member who refers wishes to remain
anonymous, however, professionals are bound by
their Codes of Practice to support abuse
investigations.
4(No Transcript)
5(No Transcript)
6(No Transcript)
7(No Transcript)
8(No Transcript)
9Care Council for Wales Register
- The Register of Social Care Workers opened in
June 2003 with the registration of individuals
with a Social Work qualification, followed by
Social Work students in 2004 and Social Care
Managers in 2005. - The Register is open to all Social Care Managers
and Workers as described in the Care Standards
Act 2000. The Register puts social care workers
on a similar footing to other public service
professions. - It functions in the same way as the NMC Register
and Social Workers who breach the Code of
Practice for Social Care Workers could be removed
from the Register. - A major part of the drive for higher standards in
social care services, registration will help give
social care workers the recognition they deserve.
It will also allow service users to be confident
that they can depend on a trained and trusted
workforce.
10Care Council for Wales Register cont
- The number of social workers currently registered
with the Care Council is 5277, as of March 2008. - A Care Council for Wales Registration Committee
has not refused registration to any applicant. - In total 8 Conduct Committee Hearings have been
held - 2006 2
- 2007 6
- No Conduct Hearings have yet been held in 2008
although 3 are scheduled. - The Committees have removed 4 registrants,
imposed a 1 year Suspension Order on a Registrant
and Admonished 3 Registrants.
11(No Transcript)
12NMC Fitness to Practice Report 2004-5
13POVA List
- From July 2004, a POVA List of staff within
care homes/ domiciliary care agencies who abused,
neglected or otherwise harmed vulnerable adults
in their care was kept. - The POVA List gave employers covered by the
scheme a statutory responsibility to check staff
against the list before they took up employment.
Access to a check was through the Criminal
Records Bureau (CRB). Therefore, a POVA check
also included an enhanced CRB check. - Employers were required to refer staff to the
list where staff have been sacked or suspended
because of misconduct which harmed a vulnerable
adult or placed them at risk of harm. To have
been confirmed on the list, a person had to
fulfil the criteria - Their employment fell within the scheme
- Misconduct occurred which harmed or placed at
risk of harm a vulnerable adult - The misconduct resulted in the person being
sacked or suspended - The person was deemed unsuitable to work with
vulnerable adults. - Decisions were made on the balance of probability
and are made by a senior official in WAG on
behalf of the Secretary of State.
14POVA List 1st year data research
- By the end of June 2005, 155 people had been
permanently barred from working with vulnerable
adults and 559 people were provisionally on the
POVA list pending further clarification of their
cases, equalling a total of 714. - An audit of the first 100 referrals, commissioned
from King's College London by the DoH, which
introduced the scheme, found that - Just over a third of referrals concerned male
workers involved in physical abuse, despite them
forming only 5-15 of the workforce - The vast majority (87) of referrals were of
front line workers, care assistants and support
workers, including 8 who were registered nurses - The top three reasons for referral concerned
neglect, physical or financial abuse - Neglect and physical abuse were more likely to be
found in residential settings, and financial
abuse in domiciliary care - 81 of referrals came from residential services,
despite the fact that in England and Wales 80 of
service users receive community-based services - The Police were involved in 40 of referrals 7
staff were convicted of offences - Many workers were referred for more than one type
of abuse.
15POVA List 1st year report cont.
- A total of 2,124 referrals were made in the first
year, at the rate of approximately 200 a month,
and cases involving violence or sexual abuse were
prioritised. - The researchers at Kings concluded there was a
need for a wider examination on the quality of
social care employment practice, more information
on ethnicity of service users and staff, and more
guidance about the roles of adult protections
teams. - There were clear implications for the
workforce - males were over represented and more likely to be
involved in direct forms of harm - female staff were more likely to be involved in
neglect or financial abuse - staff were inadequately equipped to deal with
challenging behaviour
16Problems with the POVA List
- The POVA List was always seen as being flawed, as
it only applied to staff working within the
social care sector. What about staff who
perpetrate abuse within voluntary sector services
and the NHS? - The gap allowed staff who abused within other
sectors to be re-employed within social care
after they had been dismissed (or resigned before
dismissal) for abuse of vulnerable adults.
(People could move between care sectors or
geographically, perhaps obtaining references from
earlier employment.) - The POVA List was also successfully challenged in
the High Court, by several nurses working in care
homes who had been placed on the provisional
list and had been subject to loss of earnings. - Thus the POVA List was replaced by the
Independent Safeguarding Authority Vetting and
Barring Service in January 09 and will be
extended to the NHS and other sectors on 12th
October 09.
17New criminal offence
- The Mental Capacity Act 2005 introduced new
criminal offences of ill treatment and wilful
neglect of a mentally incapacitated adult.
Penalties range from a fine to a sentence of
imprisonment of up to 5 years, or both. - 14.25 For a person (or authority) to be found
guilty of ill treatment, they must either - Have deliberately ill-treated the person, or
- Be reckless in the way they were ill-treating the
person or not. - It does not matter whether the behaviour was
likely to cause, or actually caused, harm to the
persons health. - 14.26 The meaning of willful neglect varies
depending on the circumstances, but will usually
mean that a person has deliberately failed to
carry out an act they knew they had a duty to do.
18(No Transcript)
19(No Transcript)
20(No Transcript)
21Independent Safeguarding Authority
- The new Independent Safeguarding Authority
(www.isa-gov.org.uk) will have an important and
lasting impact on our work with vulnerable
adults, especially in terms of recruitment and
disciplinary processes. - The ISA was established after the Safeguarding
Vulnerable Groups Act 2006 passed into statute.
The Act was developed as an outcome of the
Bichard Inquiry which investigated the tragic
murders of Holly Wells and Jessica Chapman in
Soham in 2002. - Recommendation 19 of the Bichard Inquiry stated,
"New arrangements should be introduced requiring
those who wish to work with children or
vulnerable adults to be registered. The register
would confirm that there is no known reason why
an individual should not work with these
clients. - Such a register would have prevented Ian Huntley
from being appointed as a school caretaker
despite known previous concerns.
22ISA Scheme cont.
- The ISA will establish Barred Lists for Children
and Vulnerable Adults, which will replace the
existing POCA List, List 99 and the POVA List, as
well as Disqualification Orders. - The new Barring List - Vulnerable Adults, will
extend the existing POVA List scheme from social
care to cover all sectors, including health and
voluntary services (from 12th October 2009). - All those working in 'Regulated activity' have
to be 'Vetted' (registered) to work with
vulnerable adults. Thus a Vetting Service is
established. - 'Regulated activity' is defined as being, "any
activity of a specified nature that involves
contact with children or vulnerable adults
frequently, intensively or overnight. - Any person applying to work with vulnerable
adults must first apply to the ISA Vetting
Service via the CRB, who will check whether there
is any relevant information from the Police or
any referred information from previous employers
or professional bodies that states that the
person has been dismissed (or resigned) because
they harmed, or put at risk of harm, a vulnerable
adult.
23ISA Scheme cont
- It will be a criminal offence for employers to
appoint someone to work in a regulated activity
without first checking their status under the
Vetting Service and/or to allow a Barred
individual to work in such activity. (It will
also be an offence for a Barred individual to
seek such employment.) - If there is no information held on record, the
CRB will inform the applicant that they are
Vetted. If there is information, the CRB will
pass it on to the ISA, which will make the
decision to place the person on the Barred List. - Those working within 'Controlled activity', i.e.
support work which involves indirect contact with
vulnerable adults, such as cleaners and catering
staff, will also need to be Vetted. However, a
Barred person may be permitted to work in
controlled activity, providing effective
safeguards are put in place. - The ISA will make independent discretionary
Barring decisions based on clear criteria and
evidence. Individuals placed on the Barred List
will be able to appeal against the decision via a
Care Standards Tribunal, except when they have
committed a serious offence.
24Implementation
- The Barred List will be more current than the
Enhanced CRB Check, as it will be reactive and
maintained with rigour by the ISA. (CRB Checks
are merely a 'snapshot' of information, only
valid on the day of issue.) - Employers will be able to undertake a 'live'
on-line check of prospective employers' status on
the Vetted Register and Barred List. - Registration will cost individuals a one off fee
of 64, as once on the Vetted Register the ISA
will maintain the Vetted Register and Barred List
on a regular basis. - Referrals to the ISA will be made by the Trust
once a disciplinary process is concluded (the
process for this is yet to be defined, but it is
likely that referrals will be co-ordinated via
multi-agency Adult Protection Case Conferences
(POVA), as the case file for the ISA will need to
be prepared. - There will be a legal duty to refer (criminal
offence not to refer) when a worker has been
dismissed (or resigned before dismissal) for
causing harm to a vulnerable adult or placing
them at risk of harm.
25Updates ISA ROADSHOWS JULY 2009
- The CRB will be maintaining the Barred Lists
(vulnerable adults and children) and providing
information to the ISA from 12th Oct 2009. - From 12th Oct 2009 all enhanced CRB checks will
include an ISA Barred List check. Enhanced CRB
check will reveal the new Barred List information
decisions may take up to 28 days. It will be an
offence to employ anyone before satisfactory
checks are available. - From 26th July, 2010 the ISA on-line service
will be available, where employers can check a
persons ISA status Vetted or Barred. However,
prospective employees will have to consent to
their status being checked and will need to
supply their ISA registration number and date of
birth. - The system will be constantly monitored and any
new information supplied to the CRB via the
Police National Computer or from the ISA will be
included. - - Employers will be able to subscribe to the
on-line checking system, so that all individuals
within the organization can be monitored. E-mails
will be sent to the employer automatically if
there any changes in the status of individuals.
26Phasing In
- - YEAR 1 - From November 2010 it will be
mandatory for all new entrants and job movers to
seek ISA registration, before they commence work
in a new post and a legal requirement for all
employees to check individuals status. - Year 2, 2011-12 - all those who have never had a
CRB check including existing employees must be
enhanced CRB checked/ISA vetted - Year 3, 2012-13 - all those whose CRB checks are
over three years old - Year 4, 2013-14 - those with more recent checks
will need to be re-checked Year 5 (in 2015) - all
remaining workers, including those who work in
controlled activity will need to be enhanced CRB
checked and ISA vetted. - ISA registration is fully portable and travels
with the employee to any new posts. There will
be a one-off fee of 64 for the ISA
registration. - Further information, including a FAQ Booklet,
can be obtained form the ISA website
www.isa-gov.org.uk