Title: JIFAS talk
1Development of a Gulf of Mexico Offshore
Mariculture Industry
Gulf Marine Institute of Technology
National Resource Center for Cephalopods Marine
Biomedical Institute, UTMB Galveston, TX
2Aquaculture Planning
Market
Site
Species
3Slide 2 Caption
- Slide 2 shows the most important aspects of
designing a profitable aquaculture venture. Our
project has optimized these by identifying a
growing market for cultured marine fish,
identifying suitable species and locating and
obtaining an ideal site. Hence we are in the
yellow optimum area of the figure.
4Fisheries Production
5Slide 4 Caption
- Slide 4 shows that capture fisheries rose
steadily during 1950-1980s but not in the
1990s. The overall increase in fisheries has
been due to the dramatic rise in aquaculture.
Authorities believe that capture fisheries will
decline or stabilize between 80-90 M mt/yr. All
increase due to demand must be met from
aquaculture.
6Aquaculture Production
7Slide 6 Caption
- Slide 6 show the dramatic increase in aquaculture
production and value for the last 10 years. In
1999, the value was expected to pass US50 B.
8Fisheries Product Consumption
13.5 kg 16 of animal protein
8 kg
9Slide 8 Caption
- Slide 8 shows the increase in world population
and fisheries catches for the period from 1950 to
mid-1990s. The pink line shows the increase in
per caput consumption (excluding China). We see a
60 increase in these 40 years. With China, the
number is gt 15 or almost 90 increase in
consumption. The trend is expected to continue
for the next 25 years.
10Global Aquaculture Production- 1996
Production 34.1 M mt
Value US46.5 B
2
7
11Slide 10 Caption
- Slide 10 shows the quantity and value of all
aquaculture products broken down by species.
Marine fish represent a very small percent of
production but 3.5 times as much for value,
signaling its true potential. Many countries
consume freshwater products but, given a choice,
they would consume marine species instead and pay
more too.
12Aquaculture Production by Region
13Slide 12 Caption
- Slide 12 shows the relative aquaculture
production by region. This shows that North
America produces very little, yet the US is the
number one importing nation. Japan used to be the
number one importing nation but their production
is up and economy is down. We in the US must
reverse this trend.
14Fisheries Product Consumption by RegionA
15Slide 14 Caption
- Slide 14 shows that consumption of fisheries
products is increasing in all regions except
Eastern Europe. This is because of the economic
turmoil there and they are desperate to increase
production and consumption. This increase in
consumption is fueling the increase in market
demand and should continue for the next 25 years.
16Aquaculture Production by Country
17Slide 16 Caption
- Slide 16 shows the dominance of freshwater fish
production in China. The US has similar
geographic resources but produces insignificant
quantities despite increasing demand. This must
change to offset US5 B trade deficit in
fisheries products.
18Fishery Trends at the Millennium
- Global fisheries business was estimated to be
US250 B in 1996 - Fishery exports were US52.5 B in 1996 and
US51.4 B in 1997- approximately 11 of all
agricultural exports - Aquaculture is increasing 10/yr compared to
3/yr for livestock (chicken 5.3, pork 3.4,
lamb 1.4 and beef 0.9) and 1.6 capture
fisheries (15 yr average annual rate) - Fish is the most important product exported by
developing countries. It comes before coffee,
bananas and tea. FAO - The US imported US8.1 B of fisheries products in
1997, only behind Japans US15.5 import - Capture fisheries declined 6 from 1997 to 1998
due to El Nino - 20 of future catch is discarded as by-catch and
some are fishes in which stocks are declining - Current capture fisheries are stable (lt0.1
decrease in 1997) while aquaculture is increasing
(6.7 increase in 1997) - In US, there was a US9 B trade deficit in 1999
FAO 1999, Dar 1999, Rana Immink 1998, Tacon
1998, Pascoe 1997
19Fishery Trends at the Millennium
- Per caput consumption of fish has risen from 8 kg
in 1950 to 13.3 kg in 1996 (excluding China) - 1 in 4 fish consumed is from aquaculture
- Capture fishery contributed 10.8 kg per caput in
1984 and 10.9 kg in 1995 (1 increase) while the
aquaculture contribution rose 250 from 1.4 to
4.9 kg - 40 and 70 increase in aquaculture production
needed by 2010 and 2025, respectively - Aquaculture increasing 10/yr compared to 3/yr
for livestock (chicken 5.3, pork 3.4, lamb 1.4
and beef 0.9) and 1.6 capture fisheries (15 yr
mean annual rate) - Mariculture expanded 15/yr from 1990-1996
accounting for 51 of total aquaculture
production - A key factor in the rapid production of some
finfish and crustaceans is the increasing
availability of hatchery produced seed - The US consumes 14 of aquaculture production but
US produces only 2 (second largest seafood
importing nation)
FAO 1999, Dar 1999, Rana Immink 1998, Tacon
1998, Pascoe 1997
20US Department of Commerce Plans- A mission of
DOC is to create sustainable economic
opportunities in aquaculture in a manner that is
environmentally sound and consistent with
applicable laws and policy, DOC Secretary
- Reduce US9 B fisheries trade deficit (1999)
- Increase production of US industry from US900 M
to US5 B - Increase the number of jobs from 180,000 to
600,000 - Enhance depleted natural stocks
- Increase fisheries exports 5-fold
- Focus efforts on offshore and recirculating
system technologies - Offshore priorities include-
- re-use of existing offshore structures
- subsurface cage systems
USDOC Aquaculture Policy 8/99
21Issues and Challenges- FAO 1999
- Establish an enabling environment
- Adopt integrated planning and management
- Increase efficiency of resource use and
productivity - Reduce externalities and avoid irreversible
damage - Establish reliable databases and information
management - Maximize positive sustainability attributes
- FAO, Shehadeh Pedini 1999
22Critical Issues Facing Open Ocean Aquaculture
- Siting
- mooring
- regulations
- effects on navigation
- capital costs
- Operating Costs
- automation
- transportation
- Seedstock Production
- Maturation- biosecurity
- Species Selection
23Net Pen Culture
24GMIT Platform Specifications
Permitted Site- 500 acres Main platform- 2-decks,
40 m X 24 m Main deck 25 m above water Water
depth on legs 24 m 2-250 kW diesel
generators Sleeping quarters for 20
men Galley and office Satellite platforms (3)- 2
decks, 14 m X 18 m
253-Satellites
26Satellite Upper Deck
27Main Platform
28Superstructure
29Main Deck
30Crew Quarters
31Galley
32UTMB Site Survey
- Water quality good
- Water column well mixed
- Sediment loose and shifting
- Structure covered with biofouling
- Many fish in the area
- Depth adequate for pens
- Platform capable of supporting hatchery and
grow-out crew - Logistics excellent
33Next Line of Rigs
Not in Texas waters
34Seedstock Production
- Requires massive amounts of fry
- Requires even greater amounts of larval diets
- algae
- micro-invertebrate prey
- Requires development of new larval feeds
- Requires selective breeding programs
- Biosecurity and health related issues
35World Hatchery Capacity
- Seabass, Sea Bream, Yellowtail Flatfish
- Production in 1990 225,000 mt
- approximately 2.7 B fry
- Estimated production in 2000 350,000 mt
- approximately 3.9 B fry
- New species
- dolphin, snapper, cobia, grouper
36First Feeding
37Algae Production
38Rotifer Culture
39World Production of Marine Fish Fry
40Recommendations
- Construction and funding of a government/industry
network of mariculture hatcheries (2-4) modeled
on the prefectural aquaculture stations found in
Japan. - Development and application of improved hatchery
technologies, especially for large scale
production of algae and micro-invertebrate prey.
Automation of as many hatchery functions as is
possible. - Identification of ideal species for culture,
focusing first on egg and hatching size, second
on prey/food selection, and third the species
must also be amenable to out-of-season spawning
techniques. - Once optimal candidate species are identified,
genetic selection programs must be instituted to
develop biosecure, domesticated stocks,
optimizing hatching size, disease resistance,
conversion efficiencies and growth rate.
41Fish Hatchery Development
Ibaraki Prefecture- 3 M/yr. Flounder
42Lower Deck
43Platform Hatchery
44Gulf Marine Institute of TechnologyBusiness
Statistics
- GMIT is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit research institute
- GMIT owns a US6.2 M oil production platform 15
km off Texas coast - GMIT owns a 115 ft powered barge with 7.5 ton
crane and 2 service vessels- 27 32 ft - GMIT is partnered with UTMBs Biomedical
Institute, Galveston, TX - GMIT has guarantees for US10 M funding from an
investment company, is insured for losses and
platform removal, and is pursuing a partner to
manage hatchery production
45Gulf Marine Institute of TechnologyAdvanced
Technology
- GMITs goal is to establish cage culture of
finfish and a shellfish relay cleansing system
for oysters - GMIT holds patents to these technologies
- GMIT operates a large platform in the Gulf from
which both projects can be initiated - GMIT is collaborating with UTMBs Marine
Biomedical Institute, Galveston, TX to create a
regional technology base and expertise
46Gulf Marine Institute of TechnologyCurrent
Accomplishments
- Platform acquisition and site survey
- Vessel acquisition
- Technological innovations
- Sea Star Oyster relay system
- Sea Trek barrel cage system
- Permits
- US Army Corps of Engineers
- Texas TNRCC (EPA)
- Capitalization
- Funded by private and public donations
47GMIT Platform Farming Goals
- Phase I- 2000
- 1. Install net pen system- Ocean Spar SeaStation
- 2. Construct a small maturation and hatchery
facility on the platform - 3. Install oyster relay system- Sea Star
- 4. Stock sea cage with fingerlings
- 5. Establish baseline environmental data
- 6. Grow-out of finfish in sea cage- roundup
- 7. Develop marketing program
48GMIT Platform Farming Goals
- Phase II- 2001
- 1. Full-scale production in net pens
- 2. Evaluate feeding methods
- 3. Evaluate harvesting and transporting
mechanisms - 4. Evaluate processing technologies
- 5. Continue oyster relaying program
- 6. Continue environmental monitoring program
-
Phase III- 2002 Commercialization
49Gulf of Mexico Candidate Species
- Name Species Feasibility
Potential - Red Drum Sciaenops ocellatus
Commercial Excellent - Red Snapper Lutjanus campechanus
Technological Excellent - Mutton snapper Lutjanus analis
Technological Excellent - So. Flounder Paralicthys lethostigma
Technological Very good - Cobia or Ling Rachycentron canadum
Technological Very good - Dolphin Coryphaena hippurus
Technological Good - Amberjack Seriola dumerili
Experimental Excellent - Yellowfin Tuna Thunnus albacares
Experimental Very good - Gulf Flounder Paralicthys albigutta
Experimental Very good - Pompano Trchinotus carolinus
Experimental Very good - Nassau grouper Epinephelus spp.
Experimental Very good - Yellowtail Snapper Ocyrus chrysurus
Experimental Good - Red Porgy Pagrus pagrus
Experimental Good
50Gulf of Mexico Candidate Species
- Cobia- Rachycentron canadum
- extremely high growth rate
- spawning and hatchery knowledge both limited but
Taiwanese have recently produced commercially - attracted to platforms
- strong market in Southern US and Orient
51Gulf of Mexico Candidate Species
- Red Snapper- Lutjanus campechanus
- strong market
- spawning technology known
- hatchery success low
- strong government and sport fishing interest in
stock enhancement - current growth rates lower than other species
52Gulf of Mexico Candidate Species
- Red Porgy- Pagurus pagurus
- Selonda Aquaculture of Athens, Greece, has
developed hatchery and grow-out technology - good growth rate
- strong foreign market but limited in US
53Gulf of Mexico Candidate Species
- Red Drum- Sciaenops ocellatus
- commercially produced
- good growth rate and FCR
- market may not be as strong as other species
54Gulf of Mexico Candidate Species
- Dolphin- Coryphaena hippurus
- spawning and hatchery knowledge excellent
- extremely high growth rate
- strong domestic and foreign market
- FCR a problem
55Gulf of Mexico Candidate Species
- Southern Flounder- Paralicthys lethostigma
- spawning and hatchery knowledge is good
- extremely strong domestic and foreign market
- diverse culture technologies, net pens vs
recirculating seawater vs freshwater - coloration and runt problems require extensive
grading