Ferris State University Employee Leadership Development Program - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 71
About This Presentation
Title:

Ferris State University Employee Leadership Development Program

Description:

Internal and external forces influence planning and budgeting ... students with the means to help meet their financial obligations in obtaining their education. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:46
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 72
Provided by: sally53
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Ferris State University Employee Leadership Development Program


1
Ferris State UniversityEmployee Leadership
Development Program
  • Financial Management at FSU
  • Budget Fundamentals
  • Budget and Planning Overview
  • December, 2008

2
Session Overview
  • Budgets/Budgeting
  • What is a Budget?
  • Budget Management
  • Public University Budget Fundamentals
  • Budget Function
  • Pots of Money
  • FSU Budget Overview
  • Planning at FSU
  • Planning and Budgeting Exercise

3
Operational Budgeting
  • What is a Budget?
  • Who budgets?
  • How are budgets developed?

4
What is a Budget?
  • Plan
  • Roadmap for the future
  • Control
  • Monitored, spending curtailed when needed
  • Commitment
  • Promise to deliver services, employ people, etc.
  • Performance Measure
  • Assessing performance on deliverables

5
Planning and Budgeting
  • Processes are directly linked
  • Plans influence budgets
  • Budgets influence plans
  • Dynamic activities
  • Internal and external forces influence
    planning and budgeting on an ongoing basis
  • Statement of businesses priorities
  • Resources reallocated from low- to high-priority
    needs

6
Whos Involved?
  • Planning and Budgeting must be directed from the
    top
  • CEO/President
  • Widespread Involvement
  • Major unit heads (Vice Presidents)
  • Financial team
  • Individual employees
  • Expertise in their areas

7
How are Budgets Developed?
  • Past Experience used to Project the Future
  • Annual financial statements
  • Prior year budget compared to actual experience
  • Generally incremental in nature
  • Based upon Planning Assumptions
  • Projected Revenues
  • Sources of revenue
  • Tuition/State Funding
  • Anticipated changes
  • Enrollment/New Initiatives/External Support

8
Key Fiscal Analysis Tools
  • Constant analysis of the fiscal health of an
    organization is crucial to success
  • Monthly budget comparisons
  • How are we performing compared to budget
  • Fiscal comparison over time
  • How are we performing compared to prior years?
  • Competition
  • How are our competitors improving their bottom
    line?
  • Indicators of health and success (Assessment)

9
Annual VS Strategic Budgeting
  • Annual Budget
  • Very specific
  • Best estimate of fiscal activity for the year
  • Strategic (Long-Range) Budgets
  • Provided to support long-range planning
  • Usually three- to five-years in length
  • Allows entity to plan for the future

10
Operational VS Capital Budgeting
  • Operational budget is annual, recurring
    categories of revenue and expense
  • Capital budget is the plan for expending large
    amounts for facility improvement/ replacement.
  • Funded through cash flows or borrowing
  • Michigan Universities 75 State/ 25
    institution
  • Funding restricted for capital project involved

11
Budget Management Policy
  • What is it?
  • Why have it?
  • What does it do?

12
What Is It?
  • Institutional policy that
  • Delegates authority for use of budgeted resources
  • Delineates who is responsible for budgeted
    resources
  • Prescribes manner in which resources can be used

13
Why Have It?
  • Provides common rules for use of budgeted
    resources
  • Important to have written rules to avoid
    confusion
  • Everyone manages from the same set of rules
  • Specifies accountability for the use of budgeted
    resources
  • Details who is responsible (and therefore
    accountable) for use of those resources

14
What it Does
  • Provides Policy Guidelines
  • What resources are subject to the policy
  • Who can make budget adjustments
  • What happens if budgets are overspent
  • Not allowed by policy managers are responsible
    to ensure that spending is held to
    approved resource levels
  • What resources are not available to managers
  • Those that are administered centrally, rather
    than at the unit level
  • Identifies Authority
  • Who has authority to amend the policy, who is
    responsible for what resources, etc.

15
Budget Management Policy Overview
  • Unit resources (except centrally controlled
    employee benefits) are available at the
    discretion of the vice president who has the
    ability to
  • Reallocate budgets among and between units in
    that division
  • Carry any unused balances at the end of the year
    over to the new year

16
Carryover Decision
  • Some universities do not allow for the carryover
    of unused budget amounts into the new fiscal
    year. Few allow for the total amount to be
    carried forward.
  • Reasons to allow for carryover include
  • Reduces volume of spending activity at the end of
    the fiscal year (units spend it rather than
    losing it)
  • Allows those resources to be used in a planned
    value-added way
  • Good management tool when resources are tight

17
Centrally Controlled Resources
  • University-wide budgets administered centrally
  • Items that are more global in nature and are more
    volatile to outside economic change
  • Thus administered centrally to provide greater
    flexibility in responding to unplanned change
  • Employee benefits
  • Utilities
  • Scholarships
  • Insurance

18
Summary
  • Policies are necessary to ensure appropriate use
    of institutional resources
  • Must be updated regularly to respond to
    institutional changes
  • Kendall merger
  • Must be shared openly so managers have easy
    access
  • Web http//www.ferris.edu/htmls/administration/bus
    polletter/bpl0001.htm

19
University Budgeting Concepts
20
University Models for Budget Function
  • Central planning activity reporting to the
    President
  • Central planning activity reporting to
    Provost or VP Business/Finance
  • Non-planning activity reporting along
    traditional lines as a finance or control
    function

21
The Budget Function at FSU
  • Prior to the 1980s, Ferris had traditionally
    housed the budget function as a sub-component of
    the control function
  • There was no planning or development focus within
    that organizational structure
  • Ferris was growing steadily, without need for a
    formal fiscal planning effort

22
State Funding Challenges
  • In the early 1980s, the State of Michigan faced
    economic decline affecting all State units,
    including higher education
  • Higher education received unplanned, in-year
    State funding cuts each year from FY 81 through
    FY 84
  • The impact on Ferris was one that required
    immediate fiscal analysis and planning, an
    activity which had been given little attention
    prior to this time

23
FSU Response
  • Budget function better defined
  • Established a budget office providing much
    greater planning for the operating budget
  • More direct reporting line to the President
    established

24
Defining the Budget Function
  • This definition of the budget as a planning
    function identified four basic fiscal functions,
    and the appropriate administrative
    distribution of those functions
  • Budget Development (Planning)
  • Budget Allocation and Analysis
  • Fiscal Control of the allocated resources
  • Audit

25
Rationale for FSU Structure
  • Budget office is not a major consumer of
    resources therefore, has no vested interest in
    budget decisions
  • Provides the link between short-term operational
    planning and long-term strategic planning for the
    University
  • Budgetary and strategic planning both need to be
    administered at the policy level

26
Ferris State University Budget Overview
27
FSU Budget Fundamentals
  • Ferris is a major industry
  • customer base of over 13,000 students
  • 1,500 full-time employees
  • Annual revenue of over 230 million
  • Ferris is the largest employer in Mecosta County
  • Locations across the State
  • Ferris has an annual payroll of over 110 million

28
Where do Ferris Dollars Come From?
  • State of Michigan
  • FSU is a public university, supported in part
    through State budgets
  • State operating appropriation
  • State capital appropriation
  • Students
  • Tuition and Room/Board
  • Books and Supplies
  • Public
  • Grants, Contracts, Gifts
  • Consumers of products and services (golf course,
    etc.)

29
FSU Operating Funds
  • General Fund Primary support from State of
    Michigan and student tuition supports academic
    mission of the University
  • Designated Fund Supported from gifts and grants
    for designated purposes
  • Auxiliary Fund Self-supporting operations of
    the University (housing, dining, golf course,
    etc.)
  • Expendable Restricted Restricted State and
    Federal Grants and Contracts

30
FSU Non-Operating Funds
  • Student Loan Fund
  • Provides students with the means to help meet
    their financial obligations in obtaining their
    education. Major sources of revenue are private
    gifts and government grants
  • Endowment Fund
  • Amounts for which the donor or Board of Trustees
    has specified that the principal may not be
    expended. Interest income used to support
    operations.

31
FSU Non-Operating Funds
  • Plant Fund - Consists of Four Units
  • Unexpended Appropriations - records assets
    available for new construction or major
    repairs/renovations
  • Reserve for Maintenance and Replacement
  • Reserve for Debt Service
  • Physical Properties - Value of physical
    properties
  • Agency Fund
  • Represents funds held in custody for students and
    University related organizations.
  • Ferris Professional Women
  • Residence Hall Association

32
Current Operating Funds Revenues - FY 2008 - 232
Million
33
General Fund Detail
  • Largest of the operating fund groups
  • Supports the major activity of the University -
    Instruction of Students
  • The State of Michigan and Student tuition are the
    primary support of the General Fund operation

34
State of Michigan Budget FY 2009 - 43.9 Billion
35
State of Michigan Spending9.7 Billion General
Fund/General Purpose Budget - FY 2009
36
2008-2009 University Appropriations (Millions of
Dollars)
37
2008-2009 1.5 B University Appropriations
59 to the Big 3 universities!
38
FSU FY 08 General Fund Spending
39
Ferris FY 09 General Fund Operating Budget -
172 Million
40
FSU General Fund Revenue Perspective
41
State Appropriation Process
42
Appropriation HistoryFinancial Statement Amounts
43
Appropriation Decline
  • Between FY 2002 and 2009, Ferris State base
    operating appropriation was reduced by 5.3M
    (10)
  • University cut budgets by over 10M
  • Mid-Year FY 2007 6.1M (12.5 of the FY 07 total)
    was delayed or eliminated
  • All but 844k later repaid
  • FY 2008 approved at 300k less than the initial
    FY 2007 appropriation
  • FY 2009 1 increase reduction pending

44
State Funding and TuitionRate of Change
Inverse Relationship between State Funding and
Tuition
45
Calculated Appropriation per FYES (Student)FY 01
through FY 09
Appropriation payments per student have declined
29
46
State Appropriation per FYESFY 01 Indexed for
Inflation Compared to Amount Paid
47
10-Year Tuition IncreaseResident, Undergraduate
taking 15 Credits
48
Tuition and State Dollars per FYES Indexed to
Inflation
49
FY 09 University Budget
  • Budget reallocations of 1M
  • State increase of 1
  • State increase in jeopardy
  • Tuition increase of 6.3

50
Current State Budget Status
  • State appropriation approved
  • State economy not improving
  • Governor has announced first wave of executive
    order budget reductions
  • Higher education spared in first round
  • Further reductions contingent on Federal stimulus
    package to states

51
FY 2010 State Budget Requests
  • Capital Outlay Request
  • Priority 1 Health and Human Services facility
    (40M)
  • Priority 2 College of Technology (50M)
  • Operating Appropriation Request
  • 4 inflationary increase
  • MPSERS relief
  • Emergency Preparedness
  • Need-Based Scholarship Assistance
  • Michigan Workforce Training
  • Environmental Sustainability

52
FY 2010 State Budget Issues
  • Operating Budget Policy Issues
  • Research and Teaching University Separation
  • Higher Education Funding Formula
  • Issue of new legislators learning curve
  • Further Appropriation Reductions
  • Tuition Restraint
  • Michigan Public School Employees Retirement
    System
  • Tuition Incentive Program Scholarships

53
FSU Concerns
  • States ability to fully fund FY 2009 approved
    State appropriation to Higher Education is
    questionable
  • State economy not improving
  • New taxes still being implemented
  • FY 2010 will be worse fiscally than 2009

54
Michigans Economy
  • Michigans Recent Statistics Lowest or near
    lowest in all categories
  • Personal Income Growth
  • Unemployment Rate
  • Employment Growth (decline for Michigan)
  • Index of Economic Momentum (Population, Personal
    Income, Employment)

Source Citizens Research Council of Michigan
55
State General Fund Revenues
Source Senate Fiscal Agency
56
Reasons for Sluggish Growth
  • Increasing senior citizen population retirement
    income not taxed and they spend less on goods
  • Consumption tax is goods oriented growth will
    be in services
  • Flat rate income tax
  • Some revenues dont grow much (tobacco,
    gambling, alcohol)

Source Citizens Research Council of Michigan
57
Michigan Beyond 2009
  • Spending pressures grow 6.5 per year
  • Baseline revenues grow 2.8 per year
  • Revenues grow unevenly due to Earned Income Tax
    Credit and Income Tax increase phase-out
  • Average revenue growth reduced to 1.5 per year
  • Shortfall averages 5 per year
  • Policy changes required

Source Citizens Research Council of Michigan
58
Source Citizens Research Council of Michigan
59
State Policy Options
  • Reduce Rate of Spending
  • Corrections incarceration policies reduce health
    care cost rate of increase
  • Increase Revenue Growth
  • Broader service tax tax retirement income
    graduated income tax
  • Combination of Options

60
  • Ferris State Planning

61
University Planning
  • Strategic Plan approved by Board of Trustees on
    November 7
  • Implementation
  • Strategic Alignment Planning
  • Align Division and College planning with
    University Plan
  • Unit Level Planning
  • Unit activities to support plans

62
Strategic Alignment Planning
  • Goals of SAP
  • Assist units in setting goals and initiatives
    supporting their mission
  • Assist units in evaluating and deciding on
    priorities
  • Establish a record and accountability for
    progress
  • Provide fiscal resources as may be needed

63
Division/College Planning
  • The Universitys Value, Mission, and Vision
    statements guide process
  • Divisions will establish Mission statement or
    statement of purpose supporting University
  • Broad (3-year) goals to guide the units in that
    division will be developed and approved
    (collaboratively)
  • Colleges develop broad (2-year) goals
  • Stable, multi-year goals
  • Focus on collaboration

64
Unit Level Planning
  • Unit planning aligns with the University
    Strategic Plan and Division and College/Unit
    goals
  • Goals
  • Units identify long-term goals, with start and
    completion times
  • Goals should be prioritized
  • Action Steps
  • Goals are realized through concrete action steps
    to achieve them
  • Actions steps are supported by rationale,
    assessment data, program review, advisory board,
    or other recommendations
  • Units should identify ways they can fund action
    steps however some action steps may receive new
    funding

65
SAP Implementation
  • By September 2009, all divisions and colleges
    complete review of mission statement or statement
    of purpose
  • Long-term goals should be identified
  • By February 1, 2010, units will complete their
    goals consistent with above
  • In the 08/09 cycle, unit planning will be aligned
    with the University Strategic Plan while
    college/unit goals are being developed
  • The 2010/11 planning cycle will reflect alignment
    with divisional and college goals

66
FY 10 Planning
  • While divisions and colleges are developing
    alignment plans, annual planning for FY 10 needs
    to also take place
  • Process this year will be based on the broader
    University-wide strategies and goals while
    unit-level goals are being developed

67
FY 10 Planning Timeline
  • Departments forward plans to the college/unit by
    February 1
  • Colleges/units forward approved plans to vice
    president by March 1
  • Vice presidents forward divisional plans to the
    President by March 15
  • Presidents Council reviews and makes decisions
    by April 1

68
Strategic Alignment Planning and Unit Level
Planning
69
Web Reference
  • Presidents Office Site
  • http//www.ferris.edu/htmls/administration/preside
    nt/
  • Planning Information
  • Budget Information
  • Budget Terms and Definitions
  • Budget Management Policy
  • http//www.ferris.edu/htmls/administration/buspoll
    etter/bpl0001.htm

70
Exercise in Fiscal Planning
  • Break into groups
  • Background information
  • Planning and Budgeting Exercise
  • Discussion of value of planning

71
Thank You for your Attention!Questions?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com