Title: EAS 2005 Presentation
1Corrosion of the Wrought Iron Turret of the USS
Monitor
Desmond Cook Physics Department and Consorti
um for Maritime Studies Old Dominion
University Norfolk, Virginia, USA
This presentation is available at www.RustDr.com
Supported by funds from National Oceanographic
and Atmospheric Administration, The Mariners
Museum. Old Dominion University
2- USS Monitor history
- January 1862 USS Monitor constructed and
launched - 9 March 1862 Infamous battle of the Ironclads
USS Monitor and CSS Virginia - 31 December 1862 USS Monitor sank during a storm
off Cape Hatteras.
3- USS Monitor history
- 1973 USS Monitor discovered upside down at a
depth of 240. - Turret was dislodged with the hull resting on
top.
- USS Monitor history
- Turret was full of ocean sediments.
- 1983 Anchor recovered
- 1998 Propeller and shaft recovered
- 2001Engine Condensor recovered
- 2002 Turret recovered
4- USS Monitor history
- August 2002 USS Monitor turret raised and moved
to the Mariners Museum, Newport News, Virginia. - Turret contained remains of 3 crew, personal
items, ships instruments, galley utensils, coal,
and the two 11 Dahlgren cannons.
5Turret Construction Diameter 20 ft. Height 9
ft. Weight 200 tons Construction Wrought Iron
8 layers, each 1 thick, Bolted
6Part 1 Corrosion of the USS Monitor
- Goals
- General Corrosion Evaluation
- Turret
- Cannons
- Engine and Condenser
- As a result of
- Submerged Saltwater exposure for 150 years
- Recovery and Exposure to Air.
- Use Spectroscopic Analysis
- Rust identification, Source and Corrosion Rate
- Correlate rust formation with the exposure
conditions.
7Corrosion Evaluation
- Spectroscopic Identification
- of
- rust composition
- Iron Oxide Identification
- Oxide Mapping
- Impurity (pollutant) content (Cl, S)
- Analytical Techniques
- X-Ray Diffraction
- Mössbauer Spectroscopy
- --Transmission and Scattering
- Micro-Raman Spectrometry
- Electron Micro-Probe
- Ion Chromotography
- XAFS
- IR/UV Spectroscopy
- Ion Transport
- Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy
8Turret Wall Thickness Corrosion Rate
Thickness measurements Outer and Inner sheets
¾ Thickness loss ¼ (250 mils) in 140
years 1 ½ - 2 mils per year (mpy) 50
microns/yr. (Compared with bridge corrosion 2
mpy very adverse chlorine environment 2 mpy
5-10X expected corrosion of steel). Conclusion
Corrosion rate of the turret has been high.
9 Turret rust High Time-of-Wetness, Low oxygen,
Chlorine
10Turret Corrosion Outside
Bolt Heads
11Turret Corrosion Inside
Submerged Corrosion Environment (Anaerobic and
salt-water)
12Cannon Rust
13USS Monitor Turret Rust (Unstable black
rust) Mössbauer Analysis
Magnetite and Green Rust ? Magnetite Fe3O4 ?
Maghemite ?-Fe2O3
A new corrosion product Corrosion Magnetite
Corrosion Magnetite is unstable
As the magnetite ages, the B1 site oxidizes to
the A1 site.
14Exterior Turret Rust Magnetite, Lepidocrocite,
Goethite, Akaganeite FeSiO4 and CaCO3
Corrosion mainly due to high TOW (submersion) But
exposure to air produces Akaganeite with bound
chlorine
15Ocean sediments
Exterior Turret Wall
16Turret Mud FeCO3, CaCO3, Quartz
Lepidocrocite, Goethite 3 Sulfur
.MIC??? Variable pH 2-3 - 6-7
17Rusticles On Engine and Condenser in NaOH
Composition Outer CaseCaCO3 Inside Mainly
Corrosion Magnetite This is in variation with
Rusticle analysis on the Titanic.
18Marine growth
19Turret Marine Growth Rust FeCO3, CaCO3, Quartz
Magnetite, Goethite, Lepidocrocite
20Research Conclusions for corrosion
- During seawater submersion of Wrought and Cast
Iron - Corrosion Magnetite forms
- Unstable and oxidizes to Maghemite
- Corrosion rate very high
- Sediments exhibit low pH 2-3, high sulfur
- Possible Microbial Induced Corrosion.
- Exposure to air
- Akaganeite (with bound chlorine) forms.
21Part 2 Metallurgical study of wrought Iron found
in the turret
- Goals
- Part 1 Metallurgical Characterization.
- Investigate the Inclusions and identify their
composition - Study the corrosion of the wrought iron
- Study the chlorine diffusion into the wrought
iron - Study the effects of exposure of the inclusions
to air and drying - Map the chlorine and other elements in the
wrought iron. - Part 2 Remove the chlorides Sub-Critical Fluid
Extraction. - Part 3 Confirm the chlorides have been
completely removed.
22- Analysis of Wrought Iron
- Polished Metallographic cross-sections
- Electron Probe Micro-Analysis (EPMA) with WDS
(elemental analysis) - SEM with WDS/EDS
- Micro-Raman Spectrometry. Compound identification
(1 um spatial resolution). - Rust identification, XRD and Mössbauer
spectroscopy. - ICP, IC, and Wet Chemistry for Chlorine (and
Sulfur) analysis
23USS Monitor Wrought Iron Sample
MNMS.2002.WI001 Recovered From the Turret Sample
Preparation 1 (Pre-Treatment Analysis)
- Metallurgy
- Pre-Treatment
- Piece1 (Long.)
- Piece 2 (Trans.)
- S/C Fluid Treatment
- Piece 5
- 3. Post-Treatment
- Piece 5A
Direction of Rolling
24Sample Preparation 2 (S/C Treatment Cutting)
25Sample Preparation 2 (S/C Treatment Piece 5)
26Sample Preparation 3 (Piece 5 Post-Treatment
Cutting)
Post-Treatment Fresh Cut Surface (Mount and
Polish)
27Pre-Treatment Analysis Piece 1. Longitudinal to
rolling direction
50X
Direction of Rolling
28Internal Inclusions
50X
200X
500X
29Corroded Inclusions
30Region 4 Internal Inclusion
31Region 4 Internal Inclusion
Electron Probe Micro Analysis with WDS
A
B
Each compound identified by Micro-Raman Analysis
32Region 4 Internal Inclusion
Cl
Electron-Probe Micro-Analysis X-Ray Mapping Probe
Current 9 nA
Si
P
33Region 1 Surface Inclusion (Corroded Section)
34Region 1A Surface Inclusion (Corroded Section)
Magnetite, Fe3O4
Corrosion
Element K-ratio Z A F ZAF
Atom Wt Fe-K 0.737 1.040 1.000 1.000
1.040 51.84 76.66 Cl-K 0.014 0.984
1.272 0.993 1.243 1.89 1.78 S -K
0.008 0.943 1.392 0.995 1.305 1.30
1.10 P -K 0.018 0.968 1.565 0.997 1.510
3.25 2.66 Si-K 0.002 0.936 1.866
0.998 1.744 0.39 0.29 O -K 0.097
0.902 2.011 0.997 1.807 41.32 17.50 Total
100.00
Fayalite, Fe2SiO4 Iron Phosphate
Element K-ratio Z A F ZAF
Atom Wt Fe-K 0.825 1.029 0.998 1.000
1.027 62.09 84.75 Mn-K 0.006 1.050
1.002 1.000 1.052 0.44 0.59 O -K
0.090 0.894 1.827 0.996 1.627 37.47
14.65 Total 100.00
Each compound identified by Micro-Raman Analysis
35Electron-Probe Micro-Analysis X-Ray Mapping Probe
Current 9 nA
Region 1A Surface Inclusion (Corroded Section)
Si
P
Cl
36Region 1B Surface inclusion Un-corroded Section
EPMA Current 9 nA
Fayalite, Fe2SiO4 Iron Phosphate
Si
P
Cl
37Sub-Critical Fluid Treatment Piece 5
- Sub-Critical Fluid
- Extraction of Chlorine
- Collaboration between
- Clemson University
- Warren-Lasch Laboratory
- Old Dominion University
- Mariners Museum
- Sub-Critical Treatment
- NaOH
- Time 3 Days
- Cl lt 1ppm
38Sub-Critical Treatment Monitor Sample
5. Chlorine Concentration in Fluid
39Post-Treatment of Sample 5
40Post-Treatment of Sample 5 Region 1 Surface
Inclusion, Corroded Section. EPMS Analysis WDS
Surface Inclusion Corrosion Products
    Element K-ratio Z A F
ZAF Atom Wt Fe-K 0.810 1.032 0.998
1.000 1.030 59.75 83.41 Cl-K 0.000
0.978 1.264 0.992 1.227 0.00 0.00 S -K
0.000 0.937 1.395 0.996 1.301 0.00
0.00 Si-K 0.002 0.931 1.926 0.999
1.791 0.53 0.38 Na-K 0.001 0.956
5.095 1.000 4.870 1.13 0.65 P -K
0.002 0.962 1.607 0.998 1.542 0.36
0.28 O -K 0.093 0.896 1.840 0.996 1.642
38.23 15.29 Total 100.00
41Post-Treatment of Sample 5 Region 1 EPMS
Analysis X-Ray Mapping Current 90 nA
Cl
Na
Si
P
42Post-Treatment of Sample 5 Region 2 Surface
Inclusion Corroded Section. EPMS Analysis X-Ray
Mapping Current 90 nA
Na
Cl
Si
P
43Post-Treatment of Sample 5 Region 6 Corrosion-
Metal interface EPMS Analysis
Cl
44- Conclusions
- Pre-Treatment
- Surface inclusions responsible for chlorine
diffusion - 1-2 Cl in the inclusions
- Cl diffusion between inclusion and iron.
- Cl Depths 1-5 mm
- Silicates and Phosphates unaffected by the
corrosion - Inclusion widths 5 um before corrosion
- Inclusion widths 25-50 um with corrosion
- Post-Treatment
- Inclusion Material not removed (Silicates and
Phosphates) - Corrosion Products Removed from inclusions
- Chlorine and sulfur removed from inclusions
45Monitor Center To open March 9,
2007 www.monitorcenter.org
469 September 2004