Hantavirus - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Hantavirus

Description:

(Original image kindly provided by Dr. Simmons of U. Missouri) Panhandle Structure ... Believed to be initiation signals for transcription and gene expression. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:2116
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 104
Provided by: howar8
Learn more at: http://www.columbia.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Hantavirus


1
Hantavirus
  • Loraine Wu
  • Howard Zeng
  • Yuka Yamaguchi

2
What is Hantavirus?
  • Hantaviruses belong to the bunyaviridae family of
    viruses.
  • Hantavirus leads to diseases such as HPS
    (Hantavirus Pulmonary Syndrome) and HFRS
    (Hemorrhagic Fever and Renal Syndrome)
  • There are many different strains of Hantaviruses,
    but only a few strains of Hantavirus actually
    lead to disease

3
Old World Hantavirus vs New World Hantavirus
  • Found mostly in Europe and Asia
  • Carried by rodents
  • Causes HFRS
  • Targets the kidney
  • Mortality rate is lt10-15
  • Vaccine exists for these strains
  • Discovered in the four corners in America
  • Carried by rodents
  • Causes HPS
  • Targets the lungs
  • Mortality rate is 50-60
  • Vaccine does not exist for these strains

4
The History of Hantavirus
  • In 960 AD, Chinese medical records document a
    possible outbreak of HFRS
  • About 1000 years later (1913) Russian clinical
    records from eastern Siberia also document the
    symptoms of a mysterious disease, which is highly
    suspected to have been HFRS

5
Virus of Wars?
  • An outbreak of Field nephritis occurred in both
    German and Allied troops during WWI in Flanders,
    Belgium
  • During WWII, Field nephritis makes another
    appearance.
  • During the Japanese invasion of Manchuria in
    1934, Hantavirus also made an appearance
  • Throughout the war, focal outbreaks of HFRS
    occurred
  • From the initial encounter with HFRS, Japanese
    physicians immediately began a full study of the
    disease

6
Those smart Japanese doctors
  • By 1940, the Japanese had a comprehensive
    clinico-pathological description of the disease
  • The disease had incubation period was estimated
    to be about 2-3 weeks
  • Mortality rates were found to be around 10

7
Is it the mouse?
  • In 1944, Japanese physicians and scientists begin
    testing on human subjects
  • Tissues from wild mice A. agrarius and from mites
    were injected into volunteers to induce the
    disease.
  • From these studies the Japanese physicians
    deduced that the mice and the mites were possible
    carriers of the disease causing virus

8
Meanwhile..
  • Soviet scientists were also hard at work
  • Annual outbreaks of HFRS (aka Tula fever) were
    seen in the Amur River Valley of Russia beginning
    in 1932
  • Soviets also performed tests on human subjects to
    discover the natural reservoir for this disease
  • They deduced that 3 species of mites were
    incapable of transmitting the disease to humans

9
It IS the mouse
  • In 1939, an incident occurred that incriminated
    field mice more clearly
  • Workers in 2 different camps, 4 km apart were
    engaged in earth moving labor
  • 31 workers in one camp and those living around
    that camp fell ill with HFRS
  • Only 1 other worker from the other camp fell ill
  • Rodent contact was documented to be the highest
    in the camp with the infected workers

10
Mouse genocide
  • In Sept 1961, rodents (Clethnommys glareolus and
    C rustlius) were sent from Kirov county in Russia
    to Moscow as part of a tick borne encephalitis
    test
  • On October 18, the first worker fell ill
  • By Nov 1, 20/23 of the workers had contracted the
    disease!
  • 44/94 casual visitors contracted HFRS
  • All the mice were sacrificed on Nov 2, and the
    last case of HFRS was documented on Nov 29
  • 5 of the workers who had previously contracted
    HFRS did not contract the disease because of
    acquired immunity
  • Fortunately, there were no fatalities

11
Hantavirus strikes again
  • America met HFRS in 1951 during the Korean War
  • By 1954, over 3,000 UN soldiers had been
    clinically diagnosed with this disease, which had
    been given the name Korean Hemorrhagic fever
  • The Japanese literature was quickly translated to
    gain a better understanding of this illness
  • The mortality rate for these soldiers was 7

12
Hanta virus
  • After the coded serum sample from convalescent
    HFRS patients in the Soviet Union were studied in
    1978, scientists finally made the crucial
    connection between field nephritis, KHF and Tula
    fever.
  • Hantavirus is named for the Hantaan River which
    flows through the endemic region in Korea. (this
    is where the prototype strain was found)
  • At this point, scientist were able to isolate and
    propagate the virus
  • In 1983, the World Health Organization finally
    adopted the name HFRS to describe all the
    previous outbreaks of Hantavirus

13
Hantavirus in America
  • In April, 1993 a young healthy Navajo woman in
    the four corners dies of an acute respiratory
    disease
  • The fiancée of the dead woman also dies on his
    way to her funeral
  • The blood vessels in his lungs had spurt blood
    and had caused him to drown in his own blood

14
The mysterious illness
  • An Indian Health physician began to notice an
    outbreak of an unexplained illness that caused
    death among normal healthy young adults
  • After calling his colleagues, he discovered that
    10 people had already died of a similar
    respiratory disease
  • Autopsies did not reveal any sign of viral
    pneumonia, influenza or any other common disease
    that attacked the lungs
  • Although this disease was not specific to the
    Navajo people, to the media, the disease became
    known as the Navajo disease
  • When the number of cases doubled to about 20
    victims, the CDC was called in

15
The CDC
  • In May 1993, the CDC was called in to investigate
    the case.
  • The CDC, using immunofluorescent techniques and
    their virus library, was able to positively
    identify this new virus as a relative of the
    hantavirus strains that were found on the
    Eurasian continent
  • However, scientists were skeptical for 3 reasons
  • The only hantaviruses known were on the Eurasian
    continent
  • The diseases caused by the Eurasian hantavirus
    strain did not cause respiratory failure
  • The new virus in the four corners appeared to
    be 5 times as lethal as the strain in Europe!

16
Those smart Navajo elders.
  • The CDC also spoke to some of the Navajo elders
  • The elders noted that because of the increase in
    rainfall that year, the pinon crop as well as the
    mice population had thrived that year
  • According to oral tradition, in 1918 and 1932, a
    similar outbreak had occurred, and mice were
    always seen as the carriers of disease
  • This information helped incriminate the mouse as
    a reservoir and also helped positively identify
    the virus as a Hantavirus

17
Human to human transmission?
  • In 1996, there was an outbreak of HPS in Southern
    Argentina
  • 18 incidents of HPS were discovered within a
    period of 3 months
  • Among the 18, 5 of the patients were physicians
  • The mouse/rat population was low in 1996, thus
    further suggesting that person to person
    transmission was very probable in this incident
  • The pattern of transmission for Andes strain does
    not follow that of any other hantavirus

18
  • Figure 1. Transmission tree for HPS cases in
    southern Argentina, September-December 1996,
    indicating dates of onset of symptoms, survivor
    status, and proposed lines of transmission. Lines
    of transmission are hypothetical since many of
    the patients had contact with multiple HPS
    patients. Bold lines denote husband and wife. The
    two sporadic cases, U and R, are not shown.

19
                                             Fi
gure 2. Towns involved in the 1996 HPS outbreak
in southern Argentina.
20
Hantavirus HFRS
  • Hantavirus named according to rodent host/First
    Hantavirus detection

21
Hantavirus HPS
22
Hantavirus HPS
23
(No Transcript)
24
Tracking HPS in the United States (1993 till
2001)
  • As of April 2001, 283 hantavirus cases have been
    confirmed in 31 states
  • Mean age of those contracting the disease was 37,
    Range 10-70
  • Mortality rate 50
  • Incidents of HPS date back to 1959 and 1978
    although it was unidentified at the time
  • The most popular vectors include the deer mouse
    and cotton rat

25
HPS Statistics as of March 28, 2002
26
Topics of Molecular Biology
  • Bunyaviridae family
  • Structure and properties
  • Transcription and replication
  • Pathogenesis
  • Host and epidemiology
  • Transmission

27
Family Bunyaviridae
28
Bunyaviridae Family
  • Similarities
  • RNA viruses
  • Enveloped
  • Tri-segmented genome
  • Differences
  • Hantavirus transmitted through aerosolized rodent
    urine, feces and saliva.
  • Others genera transmitted through arthropod
    vectors.

29
23 Well-described Hantaviruses
(Adapted from work by Simmons and Riley)
30
Virus is Rodent-specific
Murinae
Arvicolinae
Sigmodontinae
31
(No Transcript)
32
Physical Properties of Virion
  • Spherical or oval-shaped.
  • Diameter 80-120 nm.
  • Unique grid-like surface pattern -- transmembrane
    glycoproteins.
  • Survive 12 hours at 4 ?C, high salt concentration
    and non-physiological pH.
  • 1-3 days after drying.

(Image taken from CDC)
33
Viral Genome
  • Granular, filamentous interior consists of genome
    and protein structure.
  • Single-stranded negative-sense RNA.
  • Approximately 13 kb.
  • Three segments
  • Small (S) 1,700 bases.
  • Medium (M) 3,600 bases.
  • Large (L) 6,500 bases.

(Original image kindly provided by Dr. Simmons of
U. Missouri)
34
Panhandle Structure
  • The 3 and 5 terminal sequences are conservative
    and complementary, forming panhandle structure.
  • Believed to be initiation signals for
    transcription and gene expression.

(Images adapted from work by Meyer and Schmaljohn)
35
Protein Products
(Images adapted from work by Jonsson and
Schmaljohn)
  • Four proteins products
  • S segment ? Nucleocapsid protein.
  • Encapsulate vRNA and cRNA.
  • Regulate replication and transcription.
  • Nucleocapsid protein vRNA Ribonucleocapsids.

36
Protein Products Contd
  • M segment ? Glycoproteins, G1 and G2.
  • Associated with the lipid membrane.
  • Interact with integrin receptors on host cell
    surface.
  • Induce neutralizing antibody response in animals.
  • L segment ? RNA-dependant RNA polymerase (RdRp)
  • Associated with the ribonucleocapsids.
  • Endonuclease Cleave host mRNA caps, which are
    used to prime transcription from vRNA to mRNA.
  • Replicase Generate copies of the genome.
  • Helicase Unwind RNA during transcription.

37
Transcription Viral Entry
  • Virion binds to a host cells surface receptor.
  • Enter the cell through receptor-mediated
    endocytosis.
  • Pathogenic hantaviruses use ?3 integrin receptor.
  • Non-pathogenic hantaviruses use ?1 integrin
    receptor.
  • Virus uncoats in the cytoplasm, and releases the
    three ribonucleocapsids.

38
Transcription and Translation
  • Primary transcription
  • For all negative-sense RNA virus, an initial
    burst of transcription.
  • Viral RNA polymerase transcribes viral RNA into
    mRNA.
  • Viral mRNAs are translated into proteins.
  • Polymerase and nucleocapsid proteins are
    translated on free ribosomes.
  • G1 and G2 proteins are translated on
    membrane-bound ribosomes.

39
Replication
  • An uncharacterized signal switches transcription
    to replication.
  • Maybe cytoplasmic accumulation of nucleocapsid
    proteins.

(Image provided by Dr. Simmons of Univ. of
Missouri)
  • RdRp makes complementary RNA (cRNA).
  • cRNA is used as template to make viral RNA
    (vRNA).
  • Production of vRNA results in more viral genomes
    for packaging into progeny virions.
  • Increases the number of templates for mRNA
    synthesis.

40
Prime and Realign Model
  • Question 1 How does hantavirus cap the 5 end of
    its mRNA transcripts?
  • Answer Cap snatching.
  • Question 2 Where does hantavirus get the primers
    from for transcription?
  • Answer Stolen host mRNA caps are used as
    primers.
  • Observations
  • The 5 end of viral mRNA is heterogeneous.
  • 5 UAG triplets (stop codon) are deleted.
  • Commonly, there is a terminal G.

41
Prime and Realign Model Contd
  • Garcin, et al. proposes that G residue aligns
    with vRNA template to initiate transcription.
  • After a few RNAs are added, the mRNA slips back
    to realign with the template.
  • Replication has a similar prime and realign
    model.
  • When cRNA is made, RdRp cleaves off the terminal
    G base.

42
Virion Assembly
  • Nascent vRNA associate with nucleocapsid and
    polymerase proteins upon transcription.
  • G1 and G2 are expressed from a single mRNA, and
    are cleaved cotranslationally.
  • Virus and proteins assemble in the Golgi
    apparatus.

43
Virion Release and Persistence
  • Virions are transported to the cell surface
    within Golgi vesicles.
  • Two hantavirus strains, including Sin Nombre
    Virus, bud from cell membranes.
  • Infected cells are not lysed.
  • Hantavirus infection is persistent in cultured
    cells and in rodents.
  • Maintain viral genetic information
  • Avoid the rodent immune system

44
The Big Picture
(Image kindly provided by Dr. Simmons of Univ. of
Missouri)
45
Pathogenesis
  • In both cell cultures and rodents, hantavirus
    does not cause clinical symptoms, despite the
    presence of large amounts of antibodies.
  • In human, the virus causes HFRS and HPS.
  • The pathogenesis of HFRS and HPS are incompletely
    understood.
  • Lack of animal models for human symptoms.
  • The requirement for Biosafety Level 3 or 4
    containment limits the number of laboratories
    that can work on it.

46
?3 Integrins and Pathogenesis
  • Observation All pathogenic hantaviruses use ?3
    integrin receptors to infect host cells.
  • Experiment When ?3 receptors are blocked by
    integrin-specific antibodies, cells are not
    infected by Sin Nombre Virus (SNV), New York
    Virus (NY-1), Hantaan Virus (HTN) or Seoul Virus
    (SEO).
  • Hantavirus pathogenesis is related to the use of
    ?3 integrin receptor.

47
?3 Integrins
  • ?3 integrins are critical surface receptors on
    endothelial cells and macrophages in human.
  • platelet activation and adhesion
  • endothelial cell adherence
  • capillary integrity and vascular permeability
  • Hantavirus dysregulates normal ?3 functions,
    which are fundamental to pathogenesis.
  • HFRS- and HPS-causing hantaviruses have different
    G1 and G2 composition
  • Interactions between viral G proteins and ?3
    receptors contribute to pathogenic differences.

48
Immune Response Pathogenesis
  • Observation The onset of hantavirus symptoms
    coincide with immune response.
  • Autopsy results showed higher than normal numbers
    of interleukin (IL), tumor necrosis factor (TNF),
    interferons (INF), and activated T cells.
  • Hantavirus pathogenesis is a result of the host
    inflammatory response to the virus.
  • Hantavirus pathogenesis awaits for a suitable
    animal model.
  • Hooper, et al. reported Syrian hamsters
    inoculated with Andes Virus strain develop
    compatible HPS symptoms.

49
Rodent Hosts and Epidemiology
  • Carried by peri-domestic and wild rodents.
  • Each strain of hantavirus is generally associated
    with a single rodent species.
  • 100 rodent species have been screened, and 23
    hantaviruses found ? 1/4 of the rodents are
    carriers.
  • There are about 2000 species of rodents. 2000 x
    1/4 500 different strains of hantaviruses.
  • Not all hantaviruses cause disease, e.g.,
    Prospect Hill virus found in the US.
  • HPS-causing rodents in the US belong to the
    Muridae family, Sigmodontinae subfamily.

50
Rodent Hosts in the United States
  • Deer mouse (Peromyscus maniculatus).
  • Carrier of Sin Nombre strain, primary agent of
    HPS in the US. 250300 cases since discovery.
  • gt 50 mortality rate.

51
White-footed Mouse (Peromyscus leucopus)
  • Carrier of New York strain.

52
Cotton Rat (Sigmodon hispidus)
  • Carrier of Black Creek Canal strain.

53
Rice Rat (Oryzomys palustris)
  • Carrier of Bayou strain.
  • gt 40 mortality rate.

54
Rodent Transmission
Infected rodent
Virions in excretion (urine, feces, saliva).
Biting, fighting, sexual behavior.
Naive rodent
55
From Rodent to Human
  • Breathing contaminated air, touching contaminated
    surface, and bite from infected rodent.

56
Person-to-Person Transmission
  • In general, hantavirus is not transmitted among
    human.
  • The Andes strain found in the 1995 outbreak in
    Argentina may be an exception.

57
Summary
  • Negative-sense RNA virus.
  • Family Bunyaviridae. 23 strains so far.
  • Simple structure tri-segmented genome 4
    proteins.
  • Simple replication and transcription.
  • Prime and realign model.
  • Pathogenesis is unclear.
  • Dysregulate ?3 integrin receptor.
  • Immunoresponse.
  • Carried by rodents.
  • Transmitted through inhalation or contact with
    rodent excretion.

58
Topics
  • Clinical Manifestations
  • HFRS
  • HPS
  • Comparison
  • Diagnostics
  • Treatments
  • Vaccines

59
Clinical Manifestations
  • Hantavirus is associated with two frequently
    fatal human diseases
  • a. Hemorrhagic Fever with Renal Syndrome (HFRS)
    -15 fatality
  • b. Nephropathia Epidemica (NE) a mild form of
    HFRS
  • Hantavirus Pulmonary Syndrome (HPS)
  • -50 fatality

60
Stages of Hemorrhagic Fever with Renal Syndrome
(HFRS)
  • After an incubation period of 1 or 2 weeks (4-40
    days)
  • 1)Febrile Phase
  • 2)Hypotensive Phase
  • 3)Oliguric Phase
  • 4)Diuretic Phase
  • 5)Convalescent Phase

61
HFRS Febrile Phase
  • Persists 3-5 days
  • Sudden onset of fevers and chills
  • Accompanied by headache, severe myalgia, nausea
  • Blurred vision, photophobia, pain on ocular
    movement
  • Flushing of face, V-area of the neck and back
  • petechiae
  • Abdominal pain and back pain.
  • Vascular leak syndrome thirst, edema,
    hemoconcentration, postural hypotension

www.emedicine.com/emerg/topic887.htmsectionpictu
res
62
HFRS Hypotensive phase
  • -Lasts for hours or days
  • - Blood pressure decrease, hypovolemia, shock
  • -worsening of bleeding manifestations petechiae,
    epistaxis, gastrointestinal and intracranial
    bleeding
  • -levels of urea and creatinine in blood rise,
    proteinuria
  • - leukocytosis, thrombocytopenia

www.emedicine.com/emerg/topic887.htmsectionpictu
res
33 of all HFRS deaths are linked to multi-organ
hypoperfusion at this stage
63
HFRS Oliguric Phase
  • Lasts 3-7 days
  • Elevation of blood pressure
  • Hypervolemia leading to hypertension
  • Urine output decreases (renal dysfunction)
  • Blood electrolyte imbalance
  • Continuation of hemorrhagic symptoms
  • Severe complications cardiac failure pulmonary
    edema, and cerebral bleeding
  • 50 of fatalities during this phase

64
HFRS Recovery
  • Diuretic Phase
  • Lasts a few days to a few weeks
  • Clinical recovery begins
  • 3-6 liters of urine/ day
  • Anorexia, lassitude due to dehydration
  • Convalescent Phase
  • Lasts 2-3 months
  • Progressive improvement in glomerular filtration,
    renal blood flow, and urine concentrating ability

65
Nephropathia Epidemica (NE)
  • Puumala strain
  • Most common form of HFRS in Europe
  • Generally a milder form of HFRS
  • Similar sequence of symptoms, but attenuated
  • Only 6 of serologically confirmed cases require
    hospitalization

66
Stages of Hantavirus Pulmonary Syndrome (HPS)
  • After asymptomatic incubation of 4-30 days
  • 1) Febrile Phase
  • 2) Cardiopulmonary Phase
  • 3) Diuretic Phase
  • 4) Convalescent Phase

67
HPS Febrile phase
  • Lasts 3-5 days (1-12 days)
  • Fever, myalgias, malaise
  • Other symptoms headache, dizziness, anorexia,
    nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea.
  • Difficult to diagnose as HPS at this stage, since
    the symptoms are similar to many other viral
    prodromes

Image from CDC
68
HPS Cardiopulmonary Phase
  • Non-productive cough and tachypnea appear
  • Presentation and rapid progression of shock and
    pulmonary edema (4-24h).
  • Hypovolemia due to progressive leakage of high
    protein fluid from blood to lung interstitium and
    alveoli
  • Myocardial failure
  • Hypotension and oliguria
  • Death within 24-48 hours due to hypoxia and/or
    circulatory compromise.

69
HPS
  • Diuretic Phase
  • Rapid clearance of pulmonary edema
  • Resolution of fever and shock
  • Early sign spontaneous diuresis
  • Convalescent Phase (up to 2 months)
  • Slow but full recovery
  • Short term finding pulmonary dysfunction.
  • Decreased small-airways flow and diminished
    diffusing capacity

70
HPS
  • Clinical Laboratory Findings
  • Thrombocytopenia (decrease in number of
    platelets) this is consistent in almost all
    cases in Americas
  • Normal or elevated white cell count on
    presentation of symptoms which increases to high
    values as disease progresses (leukocytosis).
  • A left shift and presence of immunoblasts from
    late in febrile phase.
  • Hemoconcentration

71
HPS
  • Radiologic Findings
  • Radiography of chest show progression from slight
    interstitial edema to bilateral alveolar edema

Images from CDC
72
HPS Differential Diagnosis
  • During prodromal phase difficult to differentiate
    HPS from other acute febrile conditions.
  • Blood picture circulating immunoblasts and
    thrombocytopenia
  • Cardiopulmonary phase
  • Common cause of diffuse pulmonary edema is silent
    myocardial infarction
  • Obtain ECG and echocardiogram
  • Bilateral pneumonia with sepsis, adult
    respiratory distress syndrome complicating
    systemic infections, sepsis syndrome complicated
    by disseminated intravascular coagulation or
    alcohol toxicity

73
Similarities between HFRS and HPS
  • Febrile illnesses with acute onset
  • Generalized vascular involvement (capillary leak,
    vasodilation)
  • Common laboratory features thrombocytopenia,
    proteinuria, and leukocytosis with occurrence of
    activated lymphocytes in peripheral blood.
  • Theory same pathophysiological events, different
    location.
  • The main difference between the two conditions
    seems to be the difference in location of the
    particular vascular beds afflicted.

74
Similarities Post-mortem Analysis
  • The lack of histological lesions in both HFRS and
    HPS cases to explain disordered organ function
  • Hantaviruses induce altered endothelial function
    without overt cell death

Image from CDC
  • Functional derangement of vascular endothelium
  • Increased permeability of microvascular beds

75
Similarities Spectrum of Illnesses
  • There is no clear delineation the symptoms of
    some HFRS and HPS causing strains overlap
  • HFRS cases without apparent renal involvement
  • Renal involvement in HPS cases
  • HPS associated with Bayou and Black Creek Canal
    viruses display moderate to prominent renal
    involvement.
  • HPS associated with SNV without pulmonary
    symptoms
  • Pulmonary manifestations in HFRS
  • Pulmonary complications recorded in 6 of 828
    patients in 1954 outbreak of HFRS fatal
    complications in 2

76
Etiological Diagnosis
  • Serologic
  • Detection of circulating immunoglobulins.
  • Usually there is a robust immune response by the
    time symptoms are present (24hours within one
    week of infection)
  • IgM present 3-6 months after infection
  • IgG can be detected for years post infection
  • ELISA IgM capture assay, using either SNV,
    Laguna Negra, or Andes antigens depending on
    location
  • Broad cross-reactivities
  • Western blot assay using recombinant antigens
    and isotype specific conjugates for IgM/IgG
    differentiation
  • Indirect Immunofluorence
  • Rapid immunoblot strip assay (RIBA) an
    investigational prototype assay to identify serum
    antibody to recombinant proteins and peptides
    specific for different strains of hantavirus

77
Etiological Diagnosis
  • Immunohistochemistry can test formalin fixed
    tissues with specific monoclonal and polyclonal
    antibodies
  • -retrospective
  • RT-PCR Demonstration of hantavirus antigen in
    tissues by immunochemistry
  • Use of genus specific primers
  • Confirms genotype of the infecting virus
  • Exponential production of product that may be
    sequenced for further study

78
Treatment Bad News
  • There is NO CURE for HFRS or HPS!!

79
Treatment
  • Aggressive supportive care
  • Fluid management
  • Hemodynamic monitoring
  • Ventilatory support
  • Peritoneal dialysis
  • Pressor agents (blood pressure support)
  • Inotropic agents (cardiac support)
  • Increases cardiac muscle contractility
  • Broad spectrum antibiotic therapy until HPS is
    proven (to cover for differential diagnoses)
  • Intravenous ceftriaxone or aminoglycoside
  • Doxycycline

80
Experimental TreatmentExtracorporeal Membrane
Oxygenation (ECMO)
  • CASE REPORT University of New Mexico Hospital
    (UNMH)
  • ECMO as rescue therapy
  • - Physicians reviewed hemodynamic and
    oxygenation data from the 14 HPS patients treated
    at UNMH during the 1993 Four Corners outbreak
  • - Identified the findings that correlate with
    100 mortality from HPS related cardiopulmonary
    failure
  • - Identified three patients with confirmed HPS
    and severe cardiopulmonary failure, with
    predicted 100 mortality to be put on ECMO
  • - 2 of 3 survived with good outcome

81
ECMO how does it work?
  • Takes over the function of heart and lungs while
    the patient recovers from initial cause of
    pulmonary/cardiac failure
  • Three components
  • 1)membrane artificial lung that adds oxygen and
    removes carbon dioxide
  • 2) roller pump that moves the patients
    deoxygenated blood to the membrane and back into
    the body
  • 3) heat exchanger that warms the blood back to
    body temperature

http//biomed.brown.edu/Courses/BI108/BI108_2001_G
roups/ECMO
  • Venoarterial ECMO A catheter takes blood from
    a major vein, runs it through the ECMO machine,
    and then replaces the blood, under pressure, to
    arterial circulation.

82
ECMO Why isnt it used?
  • Complications of the therapy itself
  • Cost tens of thousands to a million dollars per
    patient depending on length of time necessary
  • Only specialized tertiary care institutions have
    these units.

83
Experimental Treatmentantiviral agents
(Ribavirin)
  • RNA virus mutagen antiviral guanosine analog
  • Inhibits hantavirus growth in vitro
  • Mechanism is unknown
  • Severson et al (2003) hypothesize that ribavirin
    challenges the fidelity of the hantavirus
    polymerase, causing error catastrophe

www. sch-plough.com/prod/prod03_anti.htm
  • Effective in treating HFRS if administered 5 days
    after onset of disease.
  • -Lessens renal failure
  • -Decreases bleeding manifestations
  • -Decreases overall mortality
  • Not proven effective in HPS

84
RibavirinHPS
  • Open label protocol treating 30 patients with HPS
    with IV ribavirin (June 4, 1993 to September 1,
    1994), comparing outcome to 34 untreated HPS
    patients
  • Treated mortality rate of 47 (14/30)
  • Untreated mortality rate of 50 (17/34)
  • INCONCLUSIVE
  • Most enrolled were ill in the early phase of the
    epidemic or presented in nonepidemic areas where
    diagnosis may have been delayed.
  • Treatment with ribavirin may have come too late.
  • Currently in progress an NIH sponsored
    double-blinded placebo controlled trial of
    intravenous ribavirin for presumed HPS
  • Designed to treat patients in the earliest stage
    of illness before the onset of shock.
  • And so we await the results

85
Treatment
  • Future strategies for treatment
  • Target the hantavirus/ß-3 integrin interaction
  • Immunologic approach
  • Target host inflammatory responses
  • In progress work to find inhibitors of TNF-?

86
Vaccines
  • No hantavirus vaccines are currently approved for
    common use in the U.S.
  • Inactivated virus vaccines in Asia
  • Cell culture derived vaccines in China
  • Vaccination trial with gt100,000 participants
    showed that four years after primary vaccination,
    average prevention rates were gt90
  • Formalin inactivated rodent brain derived
    vaccines for HFRS (from SEOV and HTNV
    infections).
  • Example Hantavax, commercially produced in South
    Korea
  • Seroconversion of 97 one month after second
    vaccination
  • Safe, only minor side effects

87
Vaccines
  • U.S. is now focusing on recombinant DNA
    approaches.
  • Investigational vaccinia HTNV vaccine is
    currently offered to laboratory workers at
    USAMRIID.

88
Summary
  • HFRS febrile illness with acute renal dysfuntion
  • HPS febrile illness with acute pulmonary
    dysfunction.
  • Both characterized by vascular leakage.
  • Treatment is mainly supportive
  • Inactivated virus vaccines are available for HFRS
    in Asia
  • There are no vaccines for HPS

89
  • Based on current human population growth and
  • development trends, hantavirus diseases will
    become
  • more common in the near future unless public
    health
  • measures are taken to curtail or eliminate
    rodents from
  • human communities.
  • -JA Lednicky Department of Pathology,
    Loyola University Medical Center,

90
Hantavirus as a bioweapon?
  • In more recent years, it has been more common for
    outbreak investigators to consider the
    possibility of a terrorist event when they
    investigate the cause of an outbreak
  • The 1993 outbreak of Hantavirus in the Four
    Corners represented an incident in which a
    bio-terrorist attack was suspected
  • Throughout the investigation there were rumors
    that a biological agent had been released as an
    act of genocide against the Navajo people

91
Speculation of Hantavirus use?
  • The outbreak in Korea in 1950 is suspected to
    have been caused by bioterrorist attack
  • In 1995, an outbreak in Bosnia infected over 250
    people (outbreak)
  • Because this virus has made an appearance at
    almost every major war of the 20th century, it
    has definitely been suspected to have been used
    as a biological weapon
  • However, it is unknown whether this occurs mainly
    because of increased exposure during wartime or a
    disruption in the ecosystem resulting in an
    increase in the mouse population

92
HFRS as a bio-weapon
  • HFRS is categorized as a Biological Agents
    Category A High priority
  • Easily disseminated or transmitted person to
    person
  • High mortality - major P.H. impact
  • Cause public panic, social disruption
  • Special action for P.H. preparedness 

93
However
  • However, there are currently quick and efficient
    diagnostic tests
  • Treatments for HFRS available
  • Vaccines are against HFRS are also available

94
HPS as a bio-weapon
  • Hantavirus causing HPS are classified under
    Biological Agents Category C third priority
  • Emerging Pathogens  
  • Availability
  • Ease of production
  • Potential for high morbidity, mortality and major
    public health impact 

95
However 
  • SNV is highly lethal in its aerosolized form
    (four corners incident)
  • Certain forms (the Andes virus) are suspected of
    being able to transmit through human contact
  • There are no vaccines
  • Natural immunity to HPS is low
  • Mice populate the entire United States
  • Can pose a worldwide threat because it is carried
    by all types of rodent

96
If hantavirus were to be used
  • The hantavirus can only exist 1-3 days outside of
    the host because of its weak lipid envelope
  • However, the symptoms will take anywhere from
    4-40 days to show, thus delaying the impact of
    the weapon release
  • This may cause secondary and tertiary waves of
    illness, especially if a strain that has
    properties that allow for human-human
    transmission

97
The good news
  • The Hantavirus can be destroyed with a simple
    detergent
  • The disease itself is considered rare, as the
    virus is not very infectious except under certain
    circumstances (like an attack!)
  • The detection methods are improving, thus
    allowing physicians and other health personnel to
    catch the disease at an earlier time, thus
    increasing the chances of full recovery

98
Staying Safe
  • As usual, PREVENTION is the BEST method
  • Even if Hantavirus is not used as a bioterrorist
    method, because of the nature of the rodent
    reservoir, everyone is potentially at risk
  • Furthermore, education would help prevent or
    contain an outbreak or an attack

99
Keep away from
  • occupying rodent-infested vacant cabins or other
    dwellings
  • cleaning barns or other outbuildings
  • disturbing rodent infested areas while hiking or
    camping
  • planting or harvesting fields,
  • living in or visiting areas where there has been
    an increase in rodents.

100
Lowering the risk of contracting HPS
101
Preventing the spread of a possible bio-terrorist
attack or outbreak
  • Maintaining surveillance systems for emerging
    diseases allows possible infectious diseases to
    be detected quickly and efficiently
  • If the weapon is transmissible from person to
    person, there may only be a short window of
    opportunity to identify the organism and prevent
    further spread before a second wave of illness
    strikes
  • Training emergency personnel and more experienced
    in addressing the cases of unexplained illness
    (ie. Its NOT the flu)
  • Improving diagnostic techniques
  • Making sure that resources for outbreak
    investigations are readily available

102
References
  • Simmons, J, Riley, L (2002). Hantaviruses an
    overview, Comparative Medicine 52, 97-110.
  • Garcin, D, Lezzi, M, Dobbs, M, Elliott RM,
    Schmaljohn C, Kang CY, Kolakofsky D (1995). The
    5 end of Hantaan virus (Bunyaviridae) RNAs
    suggest a prime-and-realign mechanism for the
    initiation of RNA synthesis. J. Virio 69,
    5754-5762.
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
    (2002). Hantavirus Pulmonary Syndrome - United
    States Updated Recommendation for Risk
    Prevention. MMWR 51.
  • Schmaljohn, C. Hantaviruses (Bunyaviridae),
    Academic Press, 1999.
  • Meyer B, Schmaljohn C (2000). Persistent
    hantavirus infections characteristics and
    mechanisms. Trends in Microbio 8, 61-67.
  • National Center for Infectious Diseases.
    Preventing hantavirus disease education video,
    September 1994.
  • Zhao X, Hay, J (1997). The epidemiology of
    hantavirus infections. Clinical Microbiology
    Newletter 19, No. 7.
  • Crowley, MR., et al (1998). Successful treatment
    of adults with severe Hantavirus pulmonary
    syndrome with extracorporeal membrane
    oxygenation. Critical Care Medicine 26, 409-414.
  • Khaiboullina, Svetlana F. and Stephen C. St. Jeor
    (2002). Hantavirus Immunology, Viral Immunology
    15, 609-625.
  • Peters, C.J., Gary L. Simpson and H Levy. (1999).
    Spectrum of Hantavirus Infection Hemorrhagic
    Fever with Renal Syndrome and Hantavirus
    Pulmonary Syndrome, Annu. Rev. Med. 50, 531-45.
  • Severson, William E., Connie S. Schmaljohn, Ali
    Javadian, and Colleen B. Jonsson (2003).
    Ribavirin causes error catastrophe during hantaan
    virus relication, Journal of Virology 77,
    481-488.
  • Peters, Clarence J. Infections Caused by
    Arthropod and Rodent Borne Viruses (2001-2003).
    Harrisons Principles of Internal Medicine.
    McGraw Hill Companies.

103
The End
  • Thank you!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com