Title: Auction theory and policy
1Auction theory and policy
- Why auction theory matters for governments
- Europe and the 3G auctionsThe UK and the
Netherlands - Auctions and the Victorian Government
21 Why auction theory matters for government
- Governments
- Buy goods (and services)
- Sell goods
- Auctions overcome information problems (adverse
selection) - Auctions are transparent
31 Why auction theory matters for government
- Auction design impacts on behaviour, which in
turn impacts on the outcome of the auction - Auctions can be tailored to reflect
- The governments objectives
- The good/service being auctioned
- Single units or bundles of units? Do
complementarities exist between units? - The nature of the market
- Competitive industry? (Market power a problem?)
- Collusion likely to be a problem?
42 Europe and the 3G auctions
- What is a 3G license?
- The policy issue
- In 2000 six Governments across Europe auctioned
off 3G licenses. - 3G new technology governments had no capacity to
estimate the value of licenses. - 3G licenses had a common value component
- Each country designed its own auction.
- Each market had different market conditions
(number and size of incumbents and potential
market entrants). - Countries made different numbers/bundles of
licenses available for purchase.
52.1 The UK auctions
- The UK market conditions
- 4 incumbent companies with market advantages
- Several potential market entrants
- Government goals
- Assign licenses efficiently
- Encourage competition
- To realise the full economic value of licenses
- Limit of one license per bidder (to maintain a
competitive industry) - The Government hired auction theorists to design
the auction and tested the design in experimental
labs.
62.1 The UK auctions cont
- The original plan was to sell 4 licenses.
- Because there were 4 incumbents there was concern
that an ascending auction (English Auction) - Would discourage new entrants, as dominant
companies can always out-bid weaker firms - May lead to collusion
- On the other hand there was concern that a
sealed-bid auction may lead to an inefficient
outcome, as dominant firms may under-bid in an
attempt to capture large surpluses, and therefore
be outbid by weaker firms
72.1 The UK auctions cont
- The Government therefore planned to run an
Anglo-Dutch auction an ascending auction would
run until 5 contestants remained, at which point
these companies would submit sealed bids at or
exceeding the final price. - This format performed well in experimental
testing.
82.1 The UK auctions cont
- At this point, a fifth license became available
for sale. - As a result the government elected to use a
simple ascending (English) auction - the
restriction of one license per company and the
availability of a fifth license made it possible
for a new market entrant to purchase a license. -
- 9 new market entrants participated ( 4
incumbents) - The UK 3G auction raised 39billion
- This auction format gave the government a good
understanding of the value the market placed on
3G licenses.
92.1 The UK auctions cont
- What can be learned from the UK 3G auction?
- There is no such thing as a good auction, just
a good auction for the particular task. - UK Government hired auction theorists and tested
their auction design in the lab to make sure that
their design was robust and achieved their goals.
102.2 The Netherlands auctions
- The Dutch market conditions
- 5 incumbent companies with market advantages
(versus 4 in the UK) - 5 licenses for purchase (as per the UK)
- The Dutch Government used the same design as the
UK Government an ascending auction.
112.2 The Netherlands auctions cont...
- Recognising that the 5 incumbent companies would
be able to out-bid them, smaller companies chose
to make deals with the incumbents rather than
losing at auction. - Only 1 non-incumbent participated ( 5
incumbents) - The Netherlands auction raised 3 billion (versus
39 billion in the UK). - The auction did not reveal to the Dutch
Government the value the market placed on 3G
licenses.
122.2 The Netherlands auctions cont...
- What can be learned from the Netherlands 3G
auction? - The auction format that works in one set of
circumstances is extremely unlikely to work
successfully in other circumstances subtle
variations in the market conditions can give rise
to big differences between outcomes. Treating
auction designs like blueprints is extremely
risky for governments. - Auctions needs to be tailor-made auction theory
and experimental testing will substantially
improve auction outcomes.
133 Auctions and the Victorian Government
- BushTender
- The Government wanted to improve native
vegetation on private land therefore needed to
procure improvements in native vegetation. - The Government wanted to engage private
landholders in contracts to improve their native
vegetation. - A specific goal was that contracts should be
cost-effective.
143 Auctions and the Victorian Government
- Problems
- It was difficult to measure improvements in
native vegetation the good the government
wanted to purchase was poorly defined - It was difficult to identify the landholders who
offered the government good value for money
(adverse selection) - Solution
- The Government developed a metric that made it
possible to measure the quality and quantity of
vegetation improvements that they were purchasing
(Habitat Hectare) - The Government decided to use an auction
mechanism to allocate contracts for improvements
in native vegetation.
153 Auctions and the Victorian Government
- Design questions
- First price or second price? (Discriminating
price or uniform price auction)? - Sealed bid or open auction?
- Single round or multiple rounds?
- How encourage participation?
163 Auctions and the Victorian Government
- The piloted BushTender format
- First-price auction (discriminating price
auction) - Sealed bid
- Single round
- Encouraged participation through lengthy
engagement with potential participants and
information distribution.
173 Auctions and the Victorian Government
183 Auctions and the Victorian Government
Rare and good value
Common and poor value
19Auction theory and policy
- Summary
- Auctions are a transparent allocation mechanism
- The design of an auction impacts on participants
behaviour (bidding), and in turn the outcome of
the auction - Well-designed auctions can be used to
- Improve allocative efficiency
- Increase revenue / reduce expenditure
- Gather information
- Auctions must be carefully designed to reflect
policy objectives and the specific nature of the
good/s being auctioned and market conditions - Auction theory and can be used to improve auction
design, while testing in experimental labs can be
used to test the robustness of an auction and to
minimise the risk of unexpected outcomes