Title: Moral Reasoning and Gender
1Moral Reasoning and Gender
- The Kohlberg-Gilligan Debate and Beyond
2Overview
- Part I. Kohlbergs Theory of Moral Development
- Part II. Gilligan and Moral Voices
- Part III. Four Models of the Place of Gender in
Ethics
3Part One. Kohlbergs Theory of Moral
Development
4Kohlbergs Inspiration
- Disobeying the law for a higher cause
- The Founding of Israel
- Why do some people feel they must obey the letter
of the law while others believe that there is a
higher law? - Most countries, including the United States, are
founded through illegal acts of rebellion or
revolution. - In order to answer this question, Kohlberg began
to look at the ways in which people develop
morally.
KohlbergsInspiration
5Kohlbergs Stages
- Eventually, Kohlberg suggested a stage theory of
moral development - Preconventional Morality
- 1. Punishment-obedience
- 2. Personal reward orientation
- Conventional Morality
- 3. The good boy/nice girl Orientation
- 4. The law and order orientation
- Post-conventional Morality
- 5. Social contract orientation
- 6. Universal ethical principle orientation
6Kohlbergs StagesPreconventional Morality
- Preconventional Morality
- Stage 1 Punishment-Obedience Orientation
- Avoid (physical) punishment
- High school example One middle school teacher
has latecomers do pushups--50 of them--in front
of the class. - Stage 2 Personal Reward Orientation
- You scratch my back, Ill scratch yours
- High school example A group of high school
students involved in a cooperative learning
activity get upset because one of their group
members is repeatedly absent and did not do any
work.
7Kohlbergs StagesConventional Morality
- Conventional Morality
- Stage 3 The good boy/nice girl Orientation
- In an inner city high school student's journal,
she wrote "I am going to work harder in school so
I won't let you down because if you think I can
make it then I can make it" - Stage 4 A Law and Order Orientation
- "Move carefully in the halls". This rule
reinforces the fundamental purpose of government
to protect the health and welfare of its citizens
8Kohlbergs StagesPost-conventional Morality
- Post-conventional Morality
- Stage 5 Social Contract Orientation
- Example for a handout in a high school class
"Please remember that this is your room and your
class. The behavior and participation of each
person will shape the type of learning that will
occur. Since one person's behavior affects
everyone else, I request that everyone in the
class be responsible for classroom management. To
ensure that our rights are protected and upheld,
the following laws have been established for this
classroom..."
9Kohlbergs StagesPost-conventional Morality
- Post-conventional Morality
- Stage 6 Universal Ethical Principle Orientation
- an orientation toward universal ethical
principles of justice, reciprocity, equality, and
respect - Very rare. ExampleS Gandhi, Mother Theresa,
Martin Luther King, Jr. - High school teacher "I will not tolerate any
racial, ethnic, or sexual slurs in this
classroom. It is not fair to erase someone's
face. In this room, everyone is entitled to equal
dignity as a human being.
10Kohlbergs Method
- In order to determine which stage of moral
development a person was at, Kohlberg presented
the person with moral dilemmas - The Case of Heinz and the Druggist.
- Mr. Heinz's wife is dying. There is one drug that
will save her life but it is very expensive. The
druggist will not lower the price so that Mr.
Heinz can buy it to save his wife's life. What
should he do? More importantly, why? - Moral dilemmas were judged, not according to the
respondents position (to steal the drug or not),
but on the basis of the kind of reasoning the
answer exhibited.
11Kohlbergs Initial Basis
- Initially, Kohlberg administered his test to
people all over the world, being careful to
include all races, to include rural as well as
urban dwellers, etc. - a Malaysian aboriginal village,
- villages in Turkey and the Yucatan, and
- urban populations in Mexico and the United States
- There was only one thing he forgot
- He only administered his dilemmas to males!
12Gender and Kohlbergs scale
- When Kohlbergs instrument was administered on a
large scale, it was discovered that females often
scored a full stage below their male
counterparts. - The moral reasoning of women and girls was more
likely to value looking for a solution that
preserved connections. This often looked like
the good girl orientation, Stage 4.
13Part Two.Gilligan and Moral Voices
14Gilligans Initial Research
- Gilligan began with an interest in moral
development - She had been a teaching assistant for Erik
Erikson - She was particularly interested in the issue
Kohlberg raised why do some individuals
recognize a higher moral law, while others simply
are content to obey the rules without question?
15Gilligans Initial Research
- Here initial research project was directed toward
draft resisters during the Vietnam war. - Nixon cancelled the draft just as her project was
getting started. - She switched to study women who had made
difficult moral choices about abortion. - Not originally concerned about gender issue.
16Gilligans CritiqueIntroduction
- In light of the differences between the scores of
males and females on the Kohlberg scale, one
could draw either of two conclusions - females are less morally developed than males, or
- something is wrong with Kohlbergs framework.
17Gilligans CritiqueIntroduction
- Gilligan began to look more closely at the
responses she was receiving in her work, and
began to suspect that Kohlbergs framework did
not illuminate the responses she was
encountering. It was like trying to put round
pegs into square holes.
18Gilligans Concept of Voice
- The metaphor of voice replaced orientation and
theory. - Concrete and specific
- Allows harmony without imposing sameness
- Not competitive or combative but collaborative
- Combines both emotion and content
- Voices may be described in a wide vocabulary that
has nothing to do with right or wrong, true or
false - Voices may be different without excluding one
another.
19Differences between Mens Moral Voices and
Womens Moral Voices
- Men
- Justice
- Rights
- Treating everyone fairly and the same
- Apply rules impartially to everyone
- Responsibility toward abstract codes of conduct
- Women
- Care
- Responsibility
- Caring about everyones suffering
- Preserve emotional connectedness
- Responsibility toward real individuals
20Differences between Mens and Womens View of the
Self
- Men
- Autonomy
- Freedom
- Independence
- Separateness
- Hierarchy
- Rules guide interactions
- Roles establish places in the hierarchy
- Women
- Relatedness
- Interdependence
- Emotional connectedness
- Responsiveness to needs of others
- Web of relationships
- Empathy connectedness guide interactions
- Roles are secondary to connections
21Differences between Mens and Womens View of
Moral Safety
- Men
- Sense of gender identity grounded in initial act
of separation from mother - Threatened by anything that threatens sense of
separation - Being at the top of the hierarchy is appealing
- Women
- Sense of gender identity grounded in initial act
of identification with mother - Threatened by anything that undermines sense of
identification - Experience top of hierarchy as isolated and
detached
22Stages of Womens Moral Development
- Concern for individual survival
- Transition from selfishness to responsibility
- Goodness equated with self-sacrifice
- Transition from self-sacrifice to giving
themselves permission to take care of themselves - Goodness seen as caring for both self and others
- Inclusive, Nonviolent
- Condemns exploitation and hurt
23Part Three.Four Models of the Place of Gender
in Ethics
24How do we understand Gilligans claims?
- Four possible models
- Separate but equal
- Men and women have different but equally valuable
moral voices - Superiority thesis
- Womens moral voices are superior
- Integrationist thesis
- Only one moral voice, same for both men and women
- Diversity thesis
25How do we understand Gilligans claims?
- Four possible positions
- Separate but equal
- Superiority thesis
- Integrationist thesis
- Diversity thesis
26The Separate but Equal Thesis
- Separate but equal Men and women have different
but equally valuable moral voices - Criticisms
- Reinforces traditional stereotypes
- Hard to retain the ...but equal part
- Suggests that men and women have nothing to learn
from one another, since each has its own
exclusive moral voice - Devalues men with a female voice and women with
a male voice
27The Superiority Thesis
- Superiority thesis
- Womens moral voices are superior
- Criticisms
- Inversion of traditional claims of male
superiority - Exclusionary
- Demands that one side of the comparison be the
loser
28The Integrationist Thesis
- Integrationist thesis
- Only one moral voice, same for both men and women
- Morality is androgynous
- Criticisms
- Loses richness of diversity
- Tends to be assimilationist in practice, reducing
other voices to the voice of the powerful majority
29The Diversity Thesis
- Diversity thesis
- Suggests that there are different moral voices
- Sees this as a source of richness and growth in
the moral life - External diversity
- Different individuals have different, sex-based
moral voices - Internal diversity
- Each of us have both masculine and feminine moral
voices within us - Minimizes gender stereotyping
30Two Models of Internal Gender Diversity
- There are two ways of thinking about the
relationship between masculinity and femininity
within each individual - Exclusive
- Inclusive
31Exclusive Models of Internal Gender Diversity
- Traditionally, we have thought of gender in
exclusionary terms - The more masculine a person is, the less feminine
that person is - The more feminine a person is, the less masculine
that person is
32Exclusive Models of Internal Gender Diversity
- In this model, which is the most common
traditional model, an increase in masculinity is
bought at the price of a decrease in femininity,
and vice versa.
33The Bem Scale
- In Sandra Bems conceptualization of gender, an
increase in femininity is not bought at the price
of a decrease in masculinity and vice versa
34Conclusion
- Thinking about gender in Bems framework allows
us to to appreciate both the feminine and the
masculine moral voices within each of us and to
avoid traditional stereotypes.