Forms of Moral Reasoning - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 29
About This Presentation
Title:

Forms of Moral Reasoning

Description:

What is the Universe? How do we relate to the Universe? What should we do? ... Ethical egoism 'What's in it for me?' Importance of. Consequential Reasoning ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:101
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 30
Provided by: theunivers97
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Forms of Moral Reasoning


1
Forms of Moral Reasoning
  • Ethics in Management
  • Business Administration
  • The University of Winnipeg

2
Three Fundamental Questionsof Philosophy
  • What is the Universe?
  • How do we relate to the Universe?
  • What should we do?
  • This is the subject of Ethics from a
    philosophical perspective

3
What are Ethics
  • Customary and prescribed communal living
    standards, broadly considered to be good, i.e.
    what we should do
  • But this begs the questions
  • standards about what?
  • what determines / defines good?
  • is there more than one valid answer to the above?

4
Forms of Moral Reasoning
  • Approaches for considering the ethical merit of
    an action
  • Principles
  • Consequences
  • Purposes
  • Traditional, Charismatic, Consensual
  • Subjective

5
Principled Reasoning
  • Rules for ethical behaviour
  • Focus on means, not end results
  • Equally applicable to all

6
Examples of Principles
  • The Golden Rule Do unto others as you would
    have others do unto you.
  • United Nations declaration of Human Rights
  • Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
  • Freedom of speech, gender equality

7
Importance ofPrincipled Reasoning
  • Guards against inappropriate means to even
    desirable ends
  • Broadly generalizable by definition can be
    compelling across a wide range of people and
    situations

8
Challenges ofPrincipled Reasoning
  • Principles must be kept very general in order to
    be widely accepted
  • Sometimes difficult to apply principles to
    specific actions / situations
  • Better at proscribing actions (what we shouldnt
    do) than showing what we should
  • Are independent of consequences

9
Mr. Mrs. Isador Strauss
10
Consequential Reasoning
  • Actions are ethical or not depending on the net
    of benefits minus costs of their future
    consequences.
  • These consequences can be both positive and
    negative, and of various natures

11
Examples ofConsequential Reasoning
  • Ends justify the means
  • Cost / benefit analysis
  • Utilitarianism
  • The greatest good for the greatest number
  • Ethical egoism
  • Whats in it for me?

12
Importance ofConsequential Reasoning
  • Practical keeps us in touch with reality and
    with the fact that our actions will have
    consequences
  • Easy to understand, discuss good basis for
    communicating rationales to others

13
Challenges ofConsequential Reasoning
  • Consequences for whom?
  • Consequences over what time frame?
  • In the long run, we are all dead.
  • How do we net positive consequences of one type
    with negative consequences of a totally different
    nature?
  • Consequences are uncertain

14
Purposive Reasoning
  • Actions are ethical or not depending on their
    relationship to the fundamental purpose (What
    are we here for, why do we exist?) of the entity
    taking them or context in which they will take
    place.
  • This is the hardest concept in the course!

15
An example ofPurposive Reasoning
  • Should the Business Administration department
    offer university credit courses on how to use SAP
    programs?
  • (SAP is the world's largest business software
    company)

16
An example ofPurposive Reasoning
  • Should the Business Administration department
    offer university credit courses on how to use SAP
    programs?
  • What is the purpose of a university?
  • To prepare people for employment?
  • To develop peoples intellect?

17
Importance ofPurposive Reasoning
  • Keeps us focused on whats really important
    avoids the distraction of the specific situation.

18
Challenges ofPurposive Reasoning
  • Difficult to ascertain and achieve consensus
    about fundamental purpose (especially once a
    particular action is being contemplated).
  • Difficult to determine which entitys / contexts
    purpose is the relevant one.
  • Relating an action to purpose can be highly
    subject to interpretation.

19
Checks and Balances
  • Purposive Reasoning
  • Keeps us on track towards worthwhile ends
  • Principled Reasoning
  • Keeps us on the straight and narrow
  • Consequential Reasoning
  • Keeps us in touch with reality, and the fact that
    our actions will have consequences.

20
Traditional Reasoning
  • Looking to past practice, precedent, history for
    guidance as to what is ethical
  • Case law based on precedent

21
Importance / Drawbacksof Traditional Reasoning
  • Provides stability, continuity for society, and
    thereby builds community.
  • BUT
  • Is a force against change
  • May reinforce outdated concepts, power
    relationships, practices

22
Charismatic Reasoning
  • Deferring to a charismatic authority figure (e.g.
    the Pope) or text (e.g. the Koran)

23
Importance / Drawbacksof Charismatic Reasoning
  • Reinforces sense of community, builds commitment
    to a cause
  • BUT
  • Deals in absolutes, doesnt allow for debate
  • Is subject to abuse

24
Consensual Reasoning
  • Ethical actions are those to which all affected
    parties agree, based upon full information and
    free debate.
  • Basis for democracy
  • Even good decisions should not be forced on
    people

25
Importance / Drawbacksof Consensual Reasoning
  • Is situation specific, not abstract
  • Can lead to better decisions through multiple
    inputs, checks and balances.
  • BUT
  • Often difficult to achieve consensus
  • Is subject to politicization

26
Subjective Reasoning
  • Acting on personal conscience, based on personal
    integrity and commitments.
  • Ethics from within no one can impose ethics

27
Importance / Drawbacksof Subjective Reasoning
  • Emphasizes our inescapable responsibility for our
    actions.
  • Can be extremely motivating.
  • BUT
  • Difficult to communicate to others
  • No basis for group / organization action

28
Subjective Reasoning
  • This above all
  • To thine own self be true,
  • And then it must follow, as the night the day
  • Thou canst not be false to any man.
  • William Shakespeare,
  • Hamlet Act I, Scene III

29
Forms of Moral Reasoning
  • Approaches for considering the ethical merit of
    an action
  • Principles
  • Consequential
  • Purposive
  • Traditional, Charismatic, Consensual
  • Subjective
  • These concepts are key to the course.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com