Title: Forms of Moral Reasoning
1Forms of Moral Reasoning
- Ethics in Management
- Business Administration
- The University of Winnipeg
2Three Fundamental Questionsof Philosophy
- What is the Universe?
- How do we relate to the Universe?
- What should we do?
- This is the subject of Ethics from a
philosophical perspective
3What are Ethics
- Customary and prescribed communal living
standards, broadly considered to be good, i.e.
what we should do - But this begs the questions
- standards about what?
- what determines / defines good?
- is there more than one valid answer to the above?
4Forms of Moral Reasoning
- Approaches for considering the ethical merit of
an action - Principles
- Consequences
- Purposes
- Traditional, Charismatic, Consensual
- Subjective
5Principled Reasoning
- Rules for ethical behaviour
- Focus on means, not end results
- Equally applicable to all
6Examples of Principles
- The Golden Rule Do unto others as you would
have others do unto you. - United Nations declaration of Human Rights
- Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
- Freedom of speech, gender equality
7Importance ofPrincipled Reasoning
- Guards against inappropriate means to even
desirable ends - Broadly generalizable by definition can be
compelling across a wide range of people and
situations
8Challenges ofPrincipled Reasoning
- Principles must be kept very general in order to
be widely accepted - Sometimes difficult to apply principles to
specific actions / situations - Better at proscribing actions (what we shouldnt
do) than showing what we should - Are independent of consequences
9Mr. Mrs. Isador Strauss
10Consequential Reasoning
- Actions are ethical or not depending on the net
of benefits minus costs of their future
consequences. - These consequences can be both positive and
negative, and of various natures
11Examples ofConsequential Reasoning
- Ends justify the means
- Cost / benefit analysis
- Utilitarianism
- The greatest good for the greatest number
- Ethical egoism
- Whats in it for me?
12Importance ofConsequential Reasoning
- Practical keeps us in touch with reality and
with the fact that our actions will have
consequences - Easy to understand, discuss good basis for
communicating rationales to others
13Challenges ofConsequential Reasoning
- Consequences for whom?
- Consequences over what time frame?
- In the long run, we are all dead.
- How do we net positive consequences of one type
with negative consequences of a totally different
nature? - Consequences are uncertain
14Purposive Reasoning
- Actions are ethical or not depending on their
relationship to the fundamental purpose (What
are we here for, why do we exist?) of the entity
taking them or context in which they will take
place. - This is the hardest concept in the course!
15An example ofPurposive Reasoning
- Should the Business Administration department
offer university credit courses on how to use SAP
programs? - (SAP is the world's largest business software
company)
16An example ofPurposive Reasoning
- Should the Business Administration department
offer university credit courses on how to use SAP
programs? - What is the purpose of a university?
- To prepare people for employment?
- To develop peoples intellect?
17Importance ofPurposive Reasoning
- Keeps us focused on whats really important
avoids the distraction of the specific situation.
18Challenges ofPurposive Reasoning
- Difficult to ascertain and achieve consensus
about fundamental purpose (especially once a
particular action is being contemplated). - Difficult to determine which entitys / contexts
purpose is the relevant one. - Relating an action to purpose can be highly
subject to interpretation.
19Checks and Balances
- Purposive Reasoning
- Keeps us on track towards worthwhile ends
- Principled Reasoning
- Keeps us on the straight and narrow
- Consequential Reasoning
- Keeps us in touch with reality, and the fact that
our actions will have consequences.
20Traditional Reasoning
- Looking to past practice, precedent, history for
guidance as to what is ethical - Case law based on precedent
21Importance / Drawbacksof Traditional Reasoning
- Provides stability, continuity for society, and
thereby builds community. - BUT
- Is a force against change
- May reinforce outdated concepts, power
relationships, practices
22Charismatic Reasoning
- Deferring to a charismatic authority figure (e.g.
the Pope) or text (e.g. the Koran)
23Importance / Drawbacksof Charismatic Reasoning
- Reinforces sense of community, builds commitment
to a cause - BUT
- Deals in absolutes, doesnt allow for debate
- Is subject to abuse
24Consensual Reasoning
- Ethical actions are those to which all affected
parties agree, based upon full information and
free debate. - Basis for democracy
- Even good decisions should not be forced on
people
25Importance / Drawbacksof Consensual Reasoning
- Is situation specific, not abstract
- Can lead to better decisions through multiple
inputs, checks and balances. - BUT
- Often difficult to achieve consensus
- Is subject to politicization
26Subjective Reasoning
- Acting on personal conscience, based on personal
integrity and commitments. - Ethics from within no one can impose ethics
27Importance / Drawbacksof Subjective Reasoning
- Emphasizes our inescapable responsibility for our
actions. - Can be extremely motivating.
- BUT
- Difficult to communicate to others
- No basis for group / organization action
28Subjective Reasoning
- This above all
- To thine own self be true,
- And then it must follow, as the night the day
- Thou canst not be false to any man.
- William Shakespeare,
- Hamlet Act I, Scene III
29Forms of Moral Reasoning
- Approaches for considering the ethical merit of
an action - Principles
- Consequential
- Purposive
- Traditional, Charismatic, Consensual
- Subjective
- These concepts are key to the course.