Annabelle Pau - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 32
About This Presentation
Title:

Annabelle Pau

Description:

... cost due to the need to create own class numbers and the need to maintain the ... Large .txt files contained original barcode range 3 helpers being assigned each ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:136
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 33
Provided by: Anto139
Category:
Tags: annabelle | barcode | make | own | pau | your

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Annabelle Pau


1
From Lais to LC an account of experience on
HKU Libraries reclassification exercises
  • Annabelle Pau Peter Sidorko

2
Part 1Reclassification at HKU Libraries
  • The why?

3
The previous practice
  • HKU Libraries
  • DDC
  • Others
  • Moys for Law
  • Black for Dentistry
  • Sequential numbers for microform
  • Degree code for HKU theses
  • Cutter system for HK gov doc,
  • In-house classification schemes.

4
The previous practice
  • Fung Ping Shan Library
  • Lai Yung Xiang (Modified)
  • Modified DDC
  • Doo Ding U Classification Scheme
  • Sequential number for microform, etc

5
The why?
  • International standard for classification
  • Collocation of materials
  • Saving on Resources
  • Conforming with local libraries

6
(No Transcript)
7
(No Transcript)
8
(No Transcript)
9
(No Transcript)
10
Views of cataloguing staff
  • The general sentiment was that the current FPS
    Classification Scheme, being a hybrid and mixture
    of elements from several schemes, is difficult to
    apply and often results in a great deal of
    inconsistency in application. There was a
    general agreement that the current status cannot
    continue.

11
Views of FPSL cataloguing staff
  • Among the existing classification schemes, which
    do you consider the most appropriate for FPSL?
  • 1st choice Library of Congress Classification
    (12)
  • 2nd choice Lai Yung Xiang (23)
  • 3rd Choice Chinese Library Classification (30)
  • DDC scheme was ruled out because of its
    extremely inadequate treatment of Chinese
    language materials
  • lowest scores indicate top choice

12
Views of Cataloguing Department
  • If FPSL decide to adopt another classification,
    should the rest of the University Libraries also
    change?
  • Re-classifying to achieve uniformity 11
  • Maintaining separate classifications 3

13
Views of Dept/Section Heads(Main Library and
Branches)
  • If FPSL decide to adopt another classification,
    should the rest of the University Libraries also
    change?
  • Re-classifying to achieve uniformity 6
  • Maintaining separate classifications 3

14
Decisions
  • Given the current situation and condition of
    classification in the FPSL, it would be in the
    best interest of the Library to reclassify its
    collection.
  • In spite of its imperfections and bias, the
    Library of Congress Classification emerges as the
    top candidate to replace the FPSL Classification
    Scheme.
  • While, in principle, the staff favors a unified
    approach to classification for the entire library
    system, should the issue of re-classifying the
    rest of the library come up in the future, it
    should be carefully re-examined in view of the
    FPSL experiences and any new developments in
    bibliographic control and technology and take
    into consideration users reactions to the
    prospect of re-classifying the entire collections
    at the point of decision making.

15
Part 2Reclassification at HKU Libraries
  • The how?

16
FPS re-labeling project
  • Result of consultants recommendations
  • Special committee formed in 2002 for the
    implementation of the project
  • After considering various factors, it was decided
    that
  • Reclassification of FPS materials started with
    the re-labeling of items of which LC numbers can
    be downloaded from external sources
  • Materials in closed stack and remote storage were
    given lowest priority in re-class.
  • All items required manual re-class remained
    un-touch until all items with LC numbers
    downloaded were done.

17
Project progress
  • Project became Operational Priority 4.1 after the
    2004 annual library retreat with the setting up
    of project team
  • Large scale de-selecting and relocating exercise
    was carried out prior to start of project
    because
  • No decanting areas for the re-labeled materials.
  • less used FPS materials have to be relocated to
    vacate shelf space for subsequent reshuffle of
    shelving for the re-labeled materials.

18
Project scope
  • 159,730 items with LC numbers downloaded were
    waiting to be re-labeled on 5/F 6/F of the FPS
    library when the project officially kicked off in
    September 2004
  • These items included
  • FPS general collection
  • FPS Large Book
  • FPS Large Reference
  • FPS Taiwan Collection
  • FPS Reference Collection

19
Logistics planning
  • Factors which affected logistics plan and work
    flow of the re-labeling project
  • Space available
  • Human factors
  • labor available
  • peoples prefer way of operation - smooth
    workflow enable efficient productivity in a
    labor-intensive work environment

20
Space available
  • No extra floor space can be used as decanting
    areas for the re-labeled materials
  • Workflow designed must ensure the least moving
    around of items for the convinence of users,
    helpers and shelvers

21
Work area of the Re-labeling team
22
Labor available
  • When project team set up we hired 3 temporary
    helpers specifically for the project
  • Retrieval and re-labeling of items mainly 3
    helpers
  • Re-shelving, compacting and shuffling of
    re-labeled materials relies on Access Services
    Department colleagues
  • Design of workflow need to consider reducing any
    duplication of retrieving re-shelving efforts
    of the 3 re-labeling helpers and ASD colleagues

23
Logistics
  • Re-labeling team decided that basic logistics for
    relabeling to be
  • Items came off shelves in Lais
  • Items went back to shelves in LC
  • Former Systems Analysis, Mr. William Ko, first
    retrieved from INNOPAC all items that got LC
    numbers downloaded
  • Sort them in alphabetical sequence and
    transformed to EXCEL format
  • ALL A class items finished re-labeling before
    moving onto B class and so on and so forth.

24
  • Each LC class were again sorted in original Lais
    sequence within each EXCEL files before label
    printing
  • Facilitate re-labeling helpers to retrieve items
    from shelves efficiently which was arranged in
    original Lais sequence before any re-labeling
    done

25
With very large LC class such as P class (50387
items in total) more analysis within each sub
class e.g. from P, PA to PZ need to be done in
order to enable ASD colleagues to have a clearer
idea on what to expect in shelving and reshuffle
of items
26
  • Large .txt files contained original barcode range
    3 helpers being assigned each day which were
    converted to text format
  • Small .txt file contained the re-labeled item
    barcodes scanned by helpers each day
  • Every day scanned barcode from the 3 helpers will
    be saved as .txt file and merged together as one
    file called SMALL.TXT with date as file name
  • Original barcode range assigned to them were
    converted and named LARGE.TXT again with date
    stamped

27
  • Script which William put on INNOPAC compared the
    two .txt files and identified those missing or
    out on loan items on INNOPAC needed re-labeling
  • Script marked those items identified in LARGE.txt
    but not in SMALL.txt on INNOPAC item message
    field to alert ASD colleagues about any missing
    or returned items to be returned to re-labeling
    team
  • Script also replaced ORIGINAL Lais number with
    LC in call number field with item barcode found
    in both large and small.txt

28
  • Items not found on shelves and scanned by
    re-labeling helpers (e.g. those out on loan or
    missing) but contained in the original EXCEL
    files (LARGE.txt) will then be marked with an
    item message Return to Annabelle by the script
    items would be shipped for re-labeling upon its
    returning to library

29
These item messages would then be removed or
leave blank by the script on INNOPAC after label
changed and barcode scanned as .txt files.
30
Statistics
  • Statistics of FPS items when project team
    disbanded on 15th of November 2005
  • 155,528 FPS items relabeled since project started
    September 2004 an average of 3500 items being
    re-labeled on a 5 days working week basis in not
    more than a year
  • 1, 887 FPS items NOT on loan NOR can be found on
    shelves (missing?)
  • 895 FPS items with NO barcodes i.e. title call
    nos. found on spine labels and on INNOPAC but no
    barcodes were being supplied in the barcode field
    of the III item records
  • 36,027 titles or 43,236 volumes of FPS items
    needed manual re-class

31
Recommendations on follow up actions
  • For the 1,887 items in category C were to declare
    missing after searching done
  • ASD colleagues searched if items really missing
  • If confirmed considered whether replacements
    are necessary
  • If not replacing TS colleagues need to
    remove/suppress bibliographical records from OPAC
    so as not to confuse users
  • For the 895 items without barcode
  • Replace the barcode on items
  • Update the records on INNOPAC
  • Recommend to be followed up by TS.
  • For the 1,036 items out on loan either
  • To call back all 1036 items for re-labeling OR
  • To re-label each one as they come back each day
    if they cant be back before re-labeling team
    disband

32
Achievements
  • Thorough stock take of CJK materials
  • Relegate of less used materials
  • Great uniformity of the CJK collections
  • An easier classification systems for users
  • Re-labeling project finished way ahead of the
    original estimated time because of faster
    processing speed (In the original project plan it
    was estimated each day 7 trolleys of books were
    being done i.e. _at_90 books x 7 630 books)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com