Bucket Eradication - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Bucket Eradication

Description:

Title: Implementation & Monitoring Plan Author: Robert Last modified by: PC 10 Created Date: 10/18/2006 11:24:01 AM Document presentation format: On-screen Show – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:139
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 34
Provided by: Robe522
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Bucket Eradication


1
  • Bucket Eradication
  • Status Action Plans
  • Presentation to Select Committee on Land
    Environmental Affairs
  • Dated the 23rd of February 2007

Presented by MEC Mafereka
2
Definition of a Bucket System to be Eradicated
  • Elimination of a historic plastic or any other
    form of bucket system in formalized areas and
    replacing it with a suitable approved alternative.

3
Current Status on Eradication of Buckets in the
Free State
  • Total buckets 2004 ? 160 000
  • Current Backlog Jan 2007 ? 88 791
  • Buckets eradicated to date Jan 2007 ? 71 209
  • Funding required to eradicate current backlog _at_
    R9000/bucket as per Policy 2006 ? R799.1
    million
  • Funding required to eradicate current backlog _at_
    an average unit cost in the FS _at_ R12 534/bucket
    ? R1 113 billion
  • Funding available currently ? R 679.9 m
  • Shortfall ? R 566.1m

4
Current Status on Eradication of Buckets in the
Free State
PROVINCE Progress 1st quarter (Apr06-Jun06) Progress 2nd quarter (July06-Sep06) Progress 3rd quarter (Oct06-Dec06) Buckets removed Jan07 Total Removed Apr06-Jan07 Backlog at end Jan 07
FREE STATE            
SETSOTO 0 350 150 500 1,000 14,000
NKETOANE 330 300 90 0 720 9,060
DIHLABENG 234 1,170 100 0 1,504 3,213
LETSIMENG 0 120 180 220 520 1,349
MANGAUNG 0 0 0 0 0 9,500
MANTSOPA 0 0 0 549 549 5,069
MATJHABENG 1,156 0 100 2,851 4,107 8,279
MOHOKARE 0 294 0 0 294 1,537
NALEDI 0 293 15 755 1,063 -584
MOQHAKA 2,580 290 60 0 2,930 2,859
METSIMAHOLO 2,067 0 0 0 2,067 156
MAFUBE 52 60 0 0 112 1,256
MASILONYANA 200 100 60 0 360 7,130
NALA 0 0 0 0 0 9,026
TSWELOPELE 0 80 0 0 80 3,547
TIKOLOGO 0 0 0 0 0 3,718
KOPANONG 0 0 0 0 0 3,244
PHUMELELA 0 110 338 1,588 2,036 685
MAL A PHOFUNG 0 0 0 0 0 300
NGWATHE 2,212 2,601 27 0 4,840 5,447
FS TOTAL 8,831 5,768 1,120 6,463 22,182 88,791
5
Delivery Hot Spot Areas in the Free State
  • The Free State has challenges of Water Resources
    in the following Municipal areas
  • Dihlabeng
  • Sterkfontein-Qwaqwa
  • Nketoane
  • Ngwathe
  • Jagersfontien-Fauresmith
  • Rouxville-Smithfield
  • Tokologo
  • As a result, it becomes extremely difficult to
    eradicate buckets with waterborne sanitation.

6
Delivery Hot Spot Areas in the Free State (Cont
)
  • Most municipalities have capacity problems with
    their sewer treatment plants, they will require
    upgrading and the province has a short fall of
    R500 million.
  • Few existing sewer treatment plants have spare
    capacity.
  • Some municipalities are currently not eradicating
    buckets until they have DoRA allocations in the
    new financial year (see slide on current status
    on eradication)

7
Potential Problem Areas in WSAs
  • Most municipalities experience shortage of
    technical skills, the department of LGH together
    with DWAF have made available engineers to assist
    with technical supervision at the WSAs.
  • A water supply master plan has been developed and
    it should be implemented as soon as funding is
    available
  • A decision making tool to guide municipalities
    for the choice of sanitation of technology,
    referred to as the sanitation strategy document,
    has been developed municipalities to adhere to
    it.

8
Potential Problem Areas in WSAs (Cont)
  • Enforce implementation role-out plan as
    presented, through continuous monitoring
  • Review unit cost to meet current average in FS
  • Obtain additional R 566 million to enable the
    eradication of 45 000 units not yet funded
  • Ensure that detail action plans, focused on
    sustainability are being implemented

9
Expenditure Performance To Jan 2007
10
Budget Constraints
  • Current Backlog Jan 2007 ? 88 791
  • Buckets eradicated to date Jan 2007 ? 71 209
  • Funding required to eradicate current backlog _at_
    R9000/bucket as per Policy 2006 ? R799.1
    million
  • Funding required to eradicate current backlog _at_
    an average unit cost in the FS _at_ R12 534/bucket
    ? R1 113 billion
  • Funding available currently ? R 679.9 m
  • Shortfall ? R 566.1m

11
Provincial Delivery Constraints
  • Shortage of funding to eliminate all buckets by
    October 2007
  • Ceiling cost per bucket currently of R9000 is not
    adequate vs. the current average cost of R12 534
  • Poor attendance by municipal key staff and
    politicians in most meetings
  • No proper roll out plans were available at
    municipalities during the bucket eradication
    workshops
  • Shortage of water in certain municipalities
  • Insufficient capacity on the existing bulk
    infrastructure
  • Some LMs are extending their Programmes to
    2008/09

12
Implementation Plan Mantsopa
13
Implementation Plan Mohakare
14
Implementation Plan Naledi
15
Implementation Plan Letsemeng
16
Implementation Plan Kopanong
17
Implementation Plan Mangaung
18
Implementation Plan Nala
19
Implementation Plan Masilonyana
20
Implementation Plan Tokologo
21
Implementation Plan Tswelopele
22
Implementation Plan Matjhabeng
23
Implementation Plan Metsimaholo
24
Implementation Plan Ngwathe
25
Implementation Plan Mafube
26
Implementation Plan Moqhaka
27
Implementation Plan Phumelela
28
Implementation Plan Maluti
29
Implementation Plan Nketoana
30
Implementation Plan Setsoto
31
Implementation Plan Dihlabeng
32
Detail funding per LM
33
Establish Capacity Constraints
  • Most rural municipalities are not able to attract
    the right caliber of skill/expertise they require
  • No sufficient monitoring of water services
    delivery at municipal level
  • Low expenditure of project implementation
  • Lack of capacity in engaging communities in
    service delivery issues
  • Lack of capacity at municipal level to facilitate
    revenue collection and credit control
  • Lack of technical expertise mostly in Water
    sewer treatment plants, hence water quality
    problems
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com