EASTERN CAPE PROVINCE REPRESENTED BY DHLGTA

1
EASTERN CAPE PROVINCEREPRESENTED BY DHLGTA
DWAF PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE PUBLIC HEARINGS 03 May
2007
Presented By MEC S. Kwelita
2
Water Services

• 2001 Census Backlog 740 769 households
• Since 2004/2005 MIG registered projects 469
• The total value R3,300b worth projects
• No. of households served 314 207
• The remaining backlog 426 589 households
• Current backlog translate into R2,990b
• 2007/2007 MIG MTEF (DORA) allocation R1,525b
• Target Dec 2008
• (incl. 2009/2010 allocation)
• (Water and Sanitation constitute 72 of the total
  MIG allocation and Water is 45 of the 72)
• Shortfall to meet the national target R1,465b

3
Sanitation

• 2001 Census Backlog 902 150 households
• Since 2004/2005 MIG registered projects 298
• MIG Total value R1,9b worth projects
• Households served 155 881
• The remaining backlog 746 269 households
• Backlog translate R3,9 billion
• 2007/2007 MIG MTEF (DORA) allocation R1,86b
• (Water and Sanitation constitute 72 of the total
  MIG allocation and Sanitation is 55 of the 72)
• Shortfall to meet the national target R1,465b

4
Bucket Eradication

• 2004/2005 Backlog 46 977 Units
• End Jan 2007 Eradicated Backlog 26 558
• Current Backlog R20 419 Units
• Backlog translate into R250,987
• 2007/2008 MIG Ring-Fenced Allocation R145,26m
• Other Funding Sources R44,9m
• Shortfall to meet the national target R65,9m

5
Water Services Backlog
DM Name Current Backlogs Cost to Eradicate 2007/2008 MTEF MIG Allocations Shortfall / Surpluses
Cacadu DM 3 814 222,981,047 63,851,307 - 159,129,740
Amathole DM 126 753 960,755,350 380,766,124 - 579,989,225
Chris Hani DM 57 712 327,421,475 231,896,124 - 95,525,334
Ukhahlamba DM 34 482 230,034,750 113,926,608 - 116,108,141
OR Tambo DM 157 667 936,979,100 482,887,267 - 454,091,833
Alfred Nzo DM 20 778 239,658,500 128,925,750 - 110,732,750
Nelson Mandela BM 25 387 73,102,400 123,648,261 50,545,862
GRAND TOTAL 426 589 2,990,932,622 1,525,901,458 1,465,031,164
6
Sanitation Backlog
DM Name Current Backlogs Cost to Eradicate 2007/2008 MTEF MIG Allocations Shortfall / Surpluses
Cacadu DM 8 068 440,539,703 78,040,485 - 362,499,217
Amathole DM 232 516 1,271,083,020 465,380,831 - 805,702,188
Chris Hani DM 97 326 438,023,495 283,428,615 - 154,594,879
Ukhahlamba DM 60 054 333,506,300 139,243,632 - 196,262,667
OR Tambo DM 248 085 824,598,420 590,195,548 - 234,402,871
Alfred Nzo DM 54 247 183,283,546 157,576,312 - 25,707,233
Nelson Mandela BM 45 973 458,387,450 151,125,653 - 307,261,762
GRAND TOTAL 746 269 3,951,421,934 1,864,991,079 - 2,086,430,854
7
Bucket Eradication Backlog
DM Name Current Backlogs Cost to Eradicate 2007/2008 Budget MIG Ring-Fenced (R million) 2007/2008 Other Budget Allocations Shortfall / Surplus
Cacadu DM 4,010 49,534,761 16,143,780 12,736,360 - 20,654,621
Amathole DM 6,340 52,411,593 15,497,820 11,698,932 - 25,214,841
Chris Hani DM 5,856 72,244,999 73,076,200 0 831,201
Ukhahlamba DM 3,887 71,710,785 30,000,000 20,463,976 - 21,246,809
OR Tambo DM 109 1,635,000 3,116,880 0 1,481,880
Alfred Nzo DM 117 1,950,000 779,220 0 - 1,170,780
Nelson Mandela BM 100 1,500,000 6,650,000 0 6,650,000
GRAND TOTAL 20,419 250,987,138 145,263,900 44,899,268 - 65,973,970
8
Requirements for Province to achieve targets

• Increased MIG Allocations
• Secure funds to maintain infrastructure and
  replace ageing infrastructure to prevent of new
  backlogs
• Increase WSAs institutional capacity and
  outsource PMU non-core functions
• Management of Professional Service Providers who
  design and manage projects (i.e. Escalations)
• Partnerships between established and developing
  professionals and contractors to improve overall
  productivity
• Leadership to ensure collaboration of sector
  partners

9
Recommended Strategies

• The current MIG MTEF (DORA) allocations for both
  water and sanitation are far below for the
  province to meet national target
• There is an need to engage Provincial and
  National Treasuries to provide more funding.
• The MIG formula should be needs than HH based
• The Province and Municipalities should declare
  the bucket eradication programme as an emergency
• To urgently address the shortfall with funding
  institutions
• To prioritize the bucket within their MIG
  allocation
• To short-circuit some of the laborious
  pre-implementation process i.e. tedious SCM
  processes.

10
Thanks