Braided Funding Through Collaboration - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 25
About This Presentation
Title:

Braided Funding Through Collaboration

Description:

45 Code of Federal Regulations part 74 & part 92. OMB Circulars A-122, A-87 (Cost Principles) ... Thus diminishing federal funding for all programs. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:241
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: nans283
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Braided Funding Through Collaboration


1
Braided FundingThrough Collaboration
  • Working Efficiently and Collectively
  • Head Start and Pre-K

2
Ground Rules and Guidelines for Braided Funding
within Head Start Participation
  • ACYF-IM-HS-01-06, Financial Management Issues In
    Head Start Programs Utilizing Other Sources of
    Funding
  • (Cost Allocation Plan is a Must)
  • ACYF-IM-HS-01-13, Budgeting for Partnerships
    between Child Care and Head Start
  • ( Cost per child after the fact
    determination. Can be a double check but should
    not be the guiding force for budget
    determination.)
  • 45 Code of Federal Regulations part 74 part 92
  • OMB Circulars A-122, A-87 (Cost Principles)
  • OMB Circular A-133, (Audit Requirements from
    Single Audit Act)
  • Head Start Program Performance Standards (45 CFR
    Part 1301 et seq. basic head start definitions)
  • Two Iowa State Reports
  • Iowa Case For Change (2004)
  • Iowa Strong Start (2006)

3
Case For Change
  • We know from the Iowa Learns Councils 2004 Case
    for Change that governor Vilsack built this
    council on one of the premises being
  • There are valuable resources currently available
    to help families with young children, but too
    many families cannot access these resources , as
    there simply are not enough quality early care
    and education programs to meet the needs of
    working parents.
  • (Show example)

4
Brain Growth vs. Public Spending
  • The critical importance of human development in
    early childhood as OPPOSED to Iowas low
    investments in early education.

5

The Promise of an Educational Opportunity for ALL
Children
  • Impacts of the Duplication of efforts
  • Financial Impact The cost of recreating the
    wheel of services in an already tough economy
    would cost the creator monies that come out of
    one or more pots, and as a whole giving the
    community more poor quality services, instead of
    a collaboration of one big pot addressing all
    areas of quality. Thus diminishing federal
    funding for all programs.
  • Impact on Children and Families This
    duplication would mean weaker services to the
    children and families by not addressing the needs
    in all areas of the childs development. In all
    environments.
  • Impact on Staff - With less monies to pay for
    quality staff, duplication of services would also
    effect even the most dedicated of our work force
    and begin prioritizing the competition between
    services instead of where the priority needs to
    be, on our children and families that we serve.

6
Seamless Educational System
  • A need for a seamless, aligned education system
    as OPPOSED to duplication of efforts, lack of
    common purpose, and articulation from one level
    to the next.

Monitoring Throughout System
Assessment
Assessment
Assessment
Assessment
Assessment
Assessment
EHS 0-2 yrs old
3-4 yrs old collaboration
K 6 grades
7 8 grades
9 12 grades
College
Transition
Transition
Transition
Transition
Transition
Private Schools may not choose to and
Home-Schools cannot be infused on site but can be
through recruitment, a single community
pre-school application, health staff, and
trainings for staff that come available through
the federal, state, and public programs.
7
The Goal
  • To create the highest quality Pre-School Program
    Possible through collaboration.
  • To eliminate all turf wars between programs
    within a community.
  • To eliminate any labels put on children.
  • To increase accountability of all involved.
  • To reach out to all organizations in a single
    community while putting the children at the
    center of our focus through the collaboration.

8
Quotes to live by
  • It is no longer we and them,
  • it is us.
  • Charletta Sudduth 2008
  • (Waterloo Schools)

How many of us really do care about our
neighbors children? Ken Tousley 1997 (My
father-in-law)
9
List and Contact all Potential Collaborators
  • Local Head Start
  • Local School District
  • Any local for profit Pre-Schools
  • Any local non profit Pre-Schools
  • Any Faith Based Pre-Schools
  • Any Funding Resources
  • Empowerments
  • Shared Visions
  • State Wrap Around
  • YMCA
  • United Way
  • Etc
  • Area Education Agency
  • Public Health
  • Many others

10
Two Part Collaboration Meetings
  • Fiscal Braided Funding
  • Programmatic Blending
  • Administrators
  • Principals
  • Directors
  • Fiscal Officers
  • Administrative Assistants
  • Etc.
  • Administrators
  • Principals
  • Directors
  • AEA Representatives
  • Education Specialist
  • Enrollment Specialist
  • Teachers/Staff
  • Parents reps
  • Etc.

11
Fiscal Braided Funding Step One
  • At the first meeting the purpose of the
    collaboration must be discussed and everyone must
    agree to its importance.
  • Therefore, the purpose is to understand The
    Goal.
  • The beauty of the State Pre-K monies is that they
    will not be awarded to a community without
    collaborations being made or attempted between
    all pre-k organizations within a school district
    area.
  • So you must be able to tell the difference
    between all individual entity funding then
    equally braiding those into a collaboration
    benchmark.
  • In other words Identify Separate basic funding
    from all outside or side funding.
  • After the separation is done, State Pre-K monies
    and other side funding sources are now easily
    identified as an additional aid for the
    collaboration. As it is meant to be used.

12
Separate Funding Sources Step Two
Example is a Fully Programmatic Infused Program
In Osceola Iowa.
  • Basic Entity Funding
  • Side Funding Sources
  • Basic Public School Funding
  • Basic Head Start Federal Funding
  • Basic Village Tuition Funding
  • State ECSE Funding
  • State Empowerment Funding
  • State Pre-K Funding

13
Classroom Cost Allocation Step Three
  • Show All Costs Using A Single Classroom, Staff,
    20 Children
  • Focus only on Two Types of Cost Allocations
  • Budget Line Items for the single classroom (Done
    at beginning of developing budget)
  • Allotted student slots for that single classroom
    (Done at end of developing budget to determine
    cost per child, and double check budget figures)

14
Budget Line Items ConsensusStep Four
15
Line Item Annual Cost AverageStep Five
16
Introducing the Braided PatternStep Six
17
Using the Side Funding to AID in costs Step
Seven
18
Final Braided Funded DocumentStep Eight (5
classroom example)
19
What does it look like?
  • Staffing Patterns
  • Schedules
  • Professional Development
  • Braided Funding
  • Blended Programming
  • Physical Locations

20
(No Transcript)
21
Full Infusion Collaboration Model
22
Center Funneling Collaboration Model
23
Flip the Switch Collaboration Model
24
Staff Criss-Cross Collaboration Model
25
Seamless Educational System
Monitoring Throughout System
Assessment
Assessment
Assessment
Assessment
Assessment
Assessment
EHS 0-2 yrs old
3-4 yrs old Collaboration
K 6 grades
7 8 grades
9 12 grades
College
Transition
Transition
Transition
Transition
Transition
eclkc.ohs.acf.hhs.gov QUESTIONS?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com