Kant - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Kant

Description:

Title: Mistakes in Moral Reasoning Author: Ron Nusenoff Last modified by: Ron Nusenoff Created Date: 2/5/1996 1:58:44 PM Document presentation format – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:55
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: RonN79
Learn more at: https://www.sjsu.edu
Category:
Tags: biology | kant

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Kant


1
Kant
  • Good Will
  • Morally praiseworthy actions are done from a
    sense of duty.
  • Our duty is to follow the right moral rules.

2
Imperatives
  • Moral rules contrast with the rules of prudence.
  • You ought to keep your promises.
  • If you want a safe car, buy a Volvo.
  • Moral rules are categorical imperatives.
  • They are not dependent on any particular desire.
  • Prudential rules are hypothetical imperatives.
  • They are binding only on those with the
    appropriate desire.

3
Two Versions of the Categorical Imperative
  • Follow moral rules that are universalizable.
  • This means you should only accept a moral rule
    that a rational person would accept as binding
    for all persons.
  • Always treat persons as ends and never merely as
    means.
  • This means that we should recognize that each
    person has the same basic moral worth as we do.

4
Universalizability and Respect for Persons
  • Moral principles are universalizable.
  • The only condition under which this can be true
    is if something is intrinsically valuable and
    hence an end we all share.
  • The only thing which is intrinsically good is
    humanity either in myself or in others.
  • So the end of morality is to respect humanity in
    myself and other persons.

5
Decision procedure
  • Describe morally relevant features of case.
  • Look for principles.
  • Evaluate principles by using one or both versions
    of the categorical imperative.
  • Apply principle.
  • Describe actions which conform to principle.
  • Assign praise or blame by looking at intentions.

6
Alternative Decision Procedure
  • Apply the second version directly.
  • Ask what action would be consistent with treating
    persons as morally valuable and not as mere means
    to achieve some particular goal.

7
Moral Rights
  • differ from legal rights
  • are claims that society should enforce
  • imply duties
  • cannot be waived
  • cannot be overridden
  • apply universally

8
Moral Rights and Legal Rights
  • We have legal rights solely on the basis of what
    is granted by our legal/political institutions.
  • We have moral rights in virtue of characteristics
    we share as humans.

9
Moral rights and enforcement
  • If someone has a moral right, then the rest of us
    are obligated to enforce that right.

10
Moral Rights and Duties
  • Negative Rights View
  • If P has a right to X, then everyone else is
    required to refrain from interfering with Ps
    having X.
  • Positive Rights View
  • If P has a right to X, then everyone else is
    required to refrain from interfering AND should
    cooperate, when necessary, in Ps having or doing
    X.

11
Moral Rights cannot be waived
  • If someone has a right to something, they can not
    give up this right.

12
Moral rights cannot be overridden
  • If someone has a right to something, the right
    claim is the most important consideration.

13
Moral rights are universal
  • If someone has a moral right, then everyone else
    has the same right.

14
Who has rights?
  • All humans
  • All rational creatures
  • All creatures who possess the relevant
    properties.
  • Some properties which have been suggested
  • rationality
  • moral agency
  • moral emotion
  • human biology

15
Decision Procedure
  • What possible rights are involved?
  • Are these really rights?
  • Should society enforce this claim for everyone?
  • Do we have duties with respect to X?
  • Can P give up the claim to X?
  • Would it be OK to ignore X if it conflicted with
    some other consideration?

16
Decision Procedure
  • Are the rights being violated?
  • What would respecting these rights require?
  • If rights are coming into conflict, how can we
    balance them?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com