Kant (4) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 12
About This Presentation
Title:

Kant (4)

Description:

Q1: Would it be rational to adopt and act on the maxim in the PSW? ... The maxim would not be an effective policy for promoting human welfare. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:58
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: julius
Category:
Tags: kant | maxim

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Kant (4)


1
Kant (4)
  • Case studies

2
CI procedure reviewed
  • Propose a maxim
  • Generalize
  • Transform into law of nature
  • Figure out PSW
  • Q1 Would it be rational to adopt and act on the
    maxim in the PSW?
  • Q2 Could I rationally choose the PSW?

3
Case 1 Marthas predicament
  • Martha, as a home-service medical care volunteer,
    has cared for George through the final weeks of
    his fatal illness. Just before he died, George
    told Martha where a large sum of money he had
    accumulated was stored. He asked her to see that
    the money was given to the Society for Protection
    against Alien Control of the Earth (SPACE).
    Since George's illness did not affect his mental
    capacity, she agreed. But now that he has died,
    she is considering using the money to support the
    activities of the local Hunger Task Force, an
    organization that provides donated food to those
    who need it. George has no surviving friends or
    relatives, and no one else knows about the money.
    He left no written will.

4
Case 1 Marthas maxim
  • Need to fill in form I am to do x in
    circumstances y in order to promote z
  • x break a deathbed promise
  • y Breaking the promise will allow me to do much
    more good for humanity
  • z the goal of increasing human welfare

5
Case 1 the PSW
  • In the PSW, it will be common knowledge that
    people break deathbed promises whenever they
    think they can do much more good for humanity

6
Case 1 Q1
  • Would it be rational to adopt and act on my maxim
    in the PSW?
  • No. In the PSW no one would ask for deathbed
    promises, because everyone would know that they
    are not genuine commitments. The maxim would not
    be an effective policy for promoting human
    welfare.

7
Case 1 Kantian analysis
  • Martha should not act on her maxim, since it
    fails the contradiction in conception test (Q1)

8
Case 1 Q2?
  • Could I rationally choose the PSW?
  • This question not relevant unless answer to Q1 is
    yes.
  • Answer would be no if having a viable practice
    of deathbed promising would be a basic need in a
    community of rational agents.

9
Utilitarian analysis
  • Specify the options
  • Specify possible consequences for each option
  • For each option, estimate the probability of each
    of its consequences
  • For each option, estimate the utility of each
    of its consequences
  • Identify the best prospect

10
Case 1 Options
  • O1 Keep the promise
  • O2 Give the money to the Hunger Task Force

11
Case 1 Consequences, probabilities, utilities
12
Case 1 Best prospect
  • Since keeping the promise is certain to have only
    a small impact on human welfare, whereas giving
    the money to HTF is very likely to have a much
    bigger impact, with only a small chance of
    producing an outcome that is somewhat worse
    (though not very much worse), giving the money to
    HTF is the best prospect.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com