Current Orbiter Capabilities for Future Landing Site Selection - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 12
About This Presentation
Title:

Current Orbiter Capabilities for Future Landing Site Selection

Description:

Odyssey Current Orbiter Capabilities for Future Landing Site Selection MRO Mars Express Richard Zurek Mars Program Office Chief Scientist Jet Propulsion Laboratory – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:57
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: ChadEd6
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Current Orbiter Capabilities for Future Landing Site Selection


1
Current Orbiter Capabilities for Future Landing
Site Selection
  • Richard Zurek
  • Mars Program Office Chief Scientist
  • Jet Propulsion Laboratory
  • California Institute of Technology

2
Proposed Mars Mission Architecture
Proposed Missions
Operational
2018
2013
2011
2016
2020 Beyond
2009
2001-2007
ESANASA ExoMars Trace Gas Orbiter
MAVEN Aeronomy Orbiter
Possible NASA-ESA Joint Mars Initiative
ESAEDLDemonstrator
NASAESA Rovers (Astrobiology/ Sample Return
Cache)
Mars Science Laboratory
MER
Pre-decisional - For Planning and Discussion
Purposes Only
3
Orbiter Support for Future Missions
  • Orbital Information is critical to future
    missions landing on Mars in the following ways
  • Identification, Characterization, and
    Certification (for safety) of landing sites
  • Characterization of atmospheric environments for
    EDL
  • Characterization of surface environments for
    landed operations
  • MER, PHX and MSL have all benefited from such
    data
  • Future landers now proposed include the ExoMars
    2016 EDM and a 2018 Dual Rover missions
  • Large areas of the planet have been covered at
    increased spatial resolutions, with some coverage
    continuing to expand
  • Major assets for providing additional critical
    data are currently ODY, MEX, MRO
  • 2016 EMTGO data would arrive late in the process
    for any launch in 2018

Pre-decisional - For Planning and Discussion
Purposes Only
4
Observation Attributes
MGS
ODY
MEX
Wavelength
Surface Spatial Scale 1 km 300 m 100 m 30
m 10 m 3 m 1m 0.3 m
Visible Visible - Near Infrared
Thermal
Phenomena Sea beds? Channels Polar
Layering Paleolakes? Salt Flats? Layering Vents/Sp
rings? Mineral Deposits Gullies Debris Fans Fine
Layering Patterned Ground Fractures Rocks
Daily Global Maps
TES
MOC-WA
OMEGA
gtgt50
70
THEMIS
100
HRSC
85
THEMIS VIS
2
40
56
62
MOC-NA
HRSC (SRC)
2.8
MOC 1-D CPROTO
1
5
Surface Coverage
Project Team Observation Objective Resoln m/pixel Coverage
ODY THEMIS (mid) Day IR (late) Day IR Night IR VIS Composition Morphology Thermal Inertia Morphology 100 100 100 18 40 (55) 100 100 40 (54)
MEX HRSC VIS (color, stereo) Morphology 20 60 56 85
MEX OMEGA VIS-IR Composition 300 gtgt 50
CRISM VIS-NIR Composition 200 in 72 bnd 200 in 264 bnd 18 in 544 bnd 70 (80) 15 few
MRO CTX VIS (stereo) Morphology 6 62
HiRISE VIS (stereo, color swath) Morphology (composition) 0.3 0.6 (color) 1

of Mars surface covered with good quality
data (total including high opacity periods)
6
MEX HRSC Coverage
Totals 56 at 20 m/pixel 85
at 60 m/pixel
7
MRO CTX Coverage Map
As of July 31, 2010
MSSS / JPL / NASA
8
MRO CRISM Coverage (as of Sep. 2010)
Type PSPESP ESP
FRT 10045 3918
HRL 3195 1286
HRS 1719 795
Targeted total 14959 5999
EPF 5885 2164
LMB 94 94
Gimbaled Total 20938 8257
TOD 9452 6082
MSW 2557 0
MSP segment 43038 12547
HSP segment 6968 6968
HSV segment 1449 1449
Survey segment total 51455 20964
Coverage by time under low-opacity conditions
Coverage by latitude under low-opacity conditions
71 low-opacity mapping coverage
9
Capabilities for Site Selection (1 of 2)
  • ODY Approved for second Extended Mission
    (FY11-12)
  • THEMIS IR VIS Working well in mid-afternoon
    orbit
  • Limited fuel will still support operations thru
    MSL prime mission
  • MEX Approved thru FY10, likely to be confirmed
    thru 2012, and request to be extended thru FY14
    under review
  • Uncertain remaining fuel load should support
    operations thru this period
  • Orbit phasing periodically limits day-time
    viewing
  • All instruments still operating
  • MRO Approved for first full Extended Mission
    (FY11-12)
  • Telecom is essentially single string, but has
    been that way for 4 years
  • Safe mode entries vexing, but not thought to be
    life-limiting
  • Fuel not currently an issue given latest
    scenarios for covering MSL EDL
  • MCS, MARCI, CTX, SHARAD continue to work as in
    PSP/ESP
  • HiRISE and CRISM have seen some degradation (next
    slide)

10
Capabilities for Site Selection (2 of 2)
  • MRO instrument issues
  • HiRISE Team has used longer and more frequent
    warm-ups to compensate for increasing ADC (analog
    to digital converters) bit flip errors
  • Considering an onboard annealing sequence which
    ground testing indicates could reduce errors by
    breaking up and dispersing the ADC contamination
  • CRISM Both the gimbal (needed for high
    resolution) and the coolers (needed for IR
    observations) have degraded with time
  • Plan Use full VNIR/IR capability for 2 weeks
    every other month in mini-campaigns focused on
    high priority items (especially during periods of
    higher data rate)
  • VNIR-only mode can be used at other times (but
    avoid major dust events)
  • VNIR (0.4 to 1.1µm) aqueous mineral signatures
    are limited to ferric minerals
  • Bottom Line Full-resolution VNIR/IR targeting
    reserved for high priority targets

11
MRO EM Predicted Data Volumes
270
Ls 0
90
180
S. Summer
N. Spring
N. Summer
(Relatively) Low Dust Opacity
Solar Conjunction
MSL Launch
MSL Arrival
12
Summary
  • Current Orbiter capabilities for support of
    future landed missions are substantial, but
    instruments and spacecraft are aging
  • Best to start the process now for proposed
    missions like 2018
  • Need site criteria (e.g., as being developed by
    the E2E SAG)
  • Need to use the capabilities conservatively where
    instrument and/or spacecraft limitations dictate
  • Landing site selection processes should be
    structured so that the life-limited capabilities
    are used only for the highest priority items
  • Need to use the data already in handtheres a
    lot, even though more needs to be done on many
    interesting places
  • Need to set site priorities using existing data
    and increased coverage of lower resolution/survey
    observations
  • May be useful to exploit correlations that have
    emerged between spectral and visible imagers
    (e.g., color variations and VNIR, IR thermal
    IR)
  • Need to have realistic expectations about the
    number of sites that could be certified (i.e.,
    with nearly complete high resolution coverage)
    and the schedule of data acquisition

Pre-decisional - For Planning and Discussion
Purposes Only
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com