Title: Immune System and Cancer
1Immune System and Cancer
2(No Transcript)
3What are NK cells? A part of the native immune
system, share a common early progenitor with T
cells but do not develop in the thymus 10 of
blood lymphocytes, defined by surface markers
(ex. CD56, NK 1.1, CD2, CD16) Activated by
IFN?, IFN? and IL-12 (IL-12 commonly used to
activate NK cells in vitro)
Involved in early response to infection with
certain viruses and intracellular bacteria
(first line of defense, giving CTLs time to
differentiate)
4Natural Killers NK discovered as tumor
killer cells Mice were immunized against a
tumor, then their lymphocytes tested for ability
to kill tumor cells in vitro. But negative
controls lymphocytes from unimmunized mice or
mice Immunized against a different tumor also
killed tumor cells very well! NK assay 51Cr
release from YAC-1 cells
5MHC/HLA review
6NK receptor overview
7NK receptors
Most inhibitory receptors recognize MHC I
molecules
- 2 groups
- Killer Immunoglobulin Receptors (KIRs)
- C-type lectin receptors (CD94NKG2 family member)
- Both have activating counterparts, but inhibitory
signals dominant. - Activation/inhibition depends on
- KIRs - long cytoplasmic tail with ITIMs vs. short
tails adaptor with ITAMs - C-type lectin receptors - NKG2 member a/b
activating, c, e/h, f inhibitory
8(No Transcript)
9NKG2d human and mouse ligands
- RAE-1/H60 evidence
- Tumors expressing RAE-1 or H60 are rejected, NK
cell-dependent. - Mice immune to re-challenge with the same tumor
cells, even if - RAE-1/H60 are no longer expressed a role for
adaptive immune system
10- New activating receptor NKG2d
- Low homology to other NKG2 receptors, an
activating receptor - conserved between humans, mice and rats
- Expressed on NK cells, macrophages, ?/? and ?/?
CTLs - Homodimer, forms an activating complex with
DAP-10, which - contains SH2 domains and recruits PI3K
- Can override inhibitory signals from KIRs and
C-type lectins
11Killing pathways (from Takeda et al, 2002)
12(No Transcript)
13(No Transcript)
14- Adhesion molecules may help NK get to tissue
- Human and rat NK cells synthesize fibronectin,
- mAbs against FN block NK cytotoxicity against
YAC-1 - NK cells express ?4?1 and ?5?1 integrins, mediate
adhesion to FN in an - in vitro assay
- NK cells express L-selectin, its expression is
upregulated by IFN?, IL-10 - and IL-12
- IL-12 also promotes NK adhesion to P and E
(endothelial) selectins - under flow conditions
- LFA-1
- N-CAM
15- Immune surveillance idea and NK cells
- In 1909, Paul Ehrlich proposed that the immune
system could repress - carcinomas. Idea was extended in 1957 by
Burnet/Thomas immune - surveillance as a way of maintaining tissue
homeostasis. - NK cells a good candidate
- Many virally infected and tumor cells express
less MHC I, escape - CTL detection/killing
- NK cells kill MHC I cells in vitro
- NK reject MHC I tumor cells, not same cells MHC
I - (same experiment for mets.)
- Irradiated mice get MHC I lymphocytes, rapid
NK-mediated
16- Tumor/NK evidence in mice
- Direct
- NK cells kill MHC I - tumor cells in vitro
- Eliminate tumor cells from circulation of
mice/rats - Protect mice from MCA skin carcinogenesis
- CTL knockouts have OK control of
carcinogen-induced sarcoma growth, - perforin knockouts (no CTL or NK activity) have
deficient control - Correlative
- A/J mice have low NK activity and high rate of
lymphoma, - C57/BL6 mice have high NK cell activity and low
rate of lymphoma
17- Tumor/NK evidence in mice
- Drawbacks
- No good data on protection from spontaneous
tumors (except MCA) - Good stimulation by blood cells but few other
(ex. Not by low MHC I liver) - In vitro models often activated by cytokines at
far above physiological - levels
- NK cells require homing signals (MIP-1? for
homing to CMV foci in liver) - No good mouse model lacking NK cells
- (until very recently a group was using a
granzyme A promoter to express - Ly49A cDNA, and got a mouse thats specifically
NK-deficient, both by
18- Tumor/NK evidence in people
- Direct
- In vitro, IL-12 activated human NK cells are
capable of killing MHC- - tumor cells
- Chediak-Higashi syndrome impaired NK
degranulation, susceptible to - highly metastatic lymphomas
- Correlative in vivo
- Patients on immunosuppressants get more blood
tumors - People with congenital or acquired
immunodeficiencies have a - significantly higher incidence of malignancies
(viral infection?) - NK is impaired in cancer patients, by in vitro
studies on YAC-1 and
19NKT cells A recently discovered subpopulation of
?? T cells that express NK markers (ex. NK 1.1,
Ly49 in mice), CD44, Ly6C Originate in bone
marrow, differentiate in the thymus Express a
limited set of T cell receptors, CD4/DN
(60/40) CD1-dependent activation (MHC I like
proteins conserved in mammals) Implicated in
immunoregulation and tumor growth, although not
clear if alone or NK-regulated
20CD1 ligand details Sites of constitutive
expression in mouse thymus, liver, spleen,
lung NKT recognize CD1 bound to
glycolipid (experimentally used -
?-galactosylceramide, ?-GalCer)
21- NKT function
- Specialized regulatory component of immune
system? - Secrete large amounts of Th1 and Th2 cytokines
upon stimulation, fast - Th1 inflammatory, IFN? main cytokine, involves
CTLs and macrophages - Th2 humoral, IL-4 main cytokine, stimulates
T-helper cells and Ab - production
- Can rapidly stimulate T and B cells in
antigen-nonspecific manner - Activate NK cells, macrophages, recruit dendritic
cells - Can induce Fas-mediated killing of CD1
thymocytes - Experimentally activated by anti-CD3
22- NKT evidence in cancer
- Rag -/- mice (lack NKT, T and B cells) get more
metastases than wt mice - with low IL-12 stimulation. Corrected by adoptive
transfer of NKT cells. - ?-GalCer is beneficial in preventing tumor
growth/mets. in mice - (stimulation of dendritic cells to release IL-12
and activate NK?) - IFN? release also important (stimulate TRAIL
expression on NK?) - Important in resistance to MCA-induced
fibrosarcomas (no exogenous - ?-GalCer or IL-12 stimulation)
- Purified NKTs cytotoxic to syngeneic MCA-induced
tumor line
23NK/NKT big picture
24Immune System
- Innate Immune Responses -- components
- Macrophage, Dendritic cells, Neutrophils,
- Mast cells, Eosinophils, Basophils
- NK cells, NKT cells
- Complement system
25Acquired Immune Responses
- B cells
- CD4 T cells
- CD8 T cells
26Cancer Immunosurveillance Hypothesis
- It is an evolutionary necessity that there
should be some mechanism for eliminating or
inactivating such potentially dangerous mutant
cells and it is postulated that this mechanism is
of immunological character -- Macfarlane Burnet
and Lewis Thomos (1957) - Data disfavored the hypothesis studies using
nude mice - 1) Osias Stutman used CBA/H background, look
atMCA - carcinogen-induced tumor
- wt/nude nu/nu
- 7/39, 95days 5/27, 90days
- 2)10,800nu/nu wt mice in spontaneous tumor
develp.
27Cancer Immunosurveillance Hypothesis
- Data supporting the hypothesis
- INF-? data block, KO, DN IFNGR1,or STAT-1 KO
mice have more spon. Or induced tumors - Perforin-/- more prone to MCA-tumor
- Rag2-/- increased rate of spontaneous tumor in
aged mice - Other KO mice researches
28Cancer Immunosurveillance Hypothesis
- Correlative data supporting the hypothesis
- Immune-suppressed patients have higher incidence
of melanoma, lung cancer - Positive correlation between tumor infiltrating
lymphocyte response and increased survival
(melanoma, breast, colon, prostate)
29Cancer Immunoediting
30Acquired Immune System?
- Not enough!
- CD8-/- mice seems to have
- similar rate of MCA induced
- tumor to WT (low MHC I!!)
- CD4-/- mice can reject syngeneic tumor graft
while CD8-/- cant - Rag2-/-
- In PND patients, CTLs targeting neuornal antigen
cdr2 seem to protect the patients from tumor
growth.
31Innate Immune Responses and Cancer---
Inflammation and Cancer
- Again, the hypothesis that tumor wounds that
fail to heal is around for a long time. Virchow
hypothesized that the origin of cancer was at
sites of chronic inflammation. 1863 - But, is it true? Is inflammation helping or
hindering tumor growth?
32Innate Immune Responses and Cancer---
Inflammation and Cancer
- Again, like everything else, two opposite views
- 1) Inflammatory infiltrations contribute to tumor
growth by inducing DNA damage, providing growth
and surviving factors, angiogenic/
lymphangiogenic factor, and proteases -- Foes - 2) Inflammatory infiltrations help to kill
transformed cells, therefore limiting the growth
of tumor. Friends
33Innate Immune Responses and Cancer---
Inflammation and Cancer
- Data supporting Foes
- 1) Association between chronic inflammation and
cancer risk - Malignancy Inflammatory stimulus
- Bladder schistosomiasis
- Cervical papillomavirus
- Colorectal inflammatory bowel disease
- Pancreatic chronic pancreatitis
- Lung bronchitis
- etc
Coussens LM and Werb Z, Nature, 2002,
420860 Balkwill F and Mantovani A, Lancet,
2001, 357539
34Inflammation and Cancer
- Cellular components
- Polymorphonucleates (PMNs)
Mast cells
TFN-a, VEGF, FGF-2, IL-8
Chemokines (IL-8, IP-10, MIG, MIP-1a,b etc)
VEFG
Tryptase Chymase
MMPs
Angiogenesis
Recruit TAMs
Angiogenesis
ECM remodeling, Facilitate migration
35Macrophages (TAMs)
MMPs, uPA
Thrombospondin-1
Angiogenesis
IL-2 IFN-g IL-12
ECM remodeling, Facilitate migration
IL-10 (tumor as well)
TGF-b1 PDG bFGF TGF-a IGF-I/II
TNF-a IL-1
CTLs
Kill tumor cells
Tumor growth
36Inflammation and Cancer
- Data supporting Friends
- Individual cytokines been shown to mediate
tumoricidal activity (TRAIL) - Activated macrophages mediate tumor rejection
- Some report says TAM positively correlate
disease-free probability after surgery (while
others report not informative, both prostate
cancer)
37Why all these conflicting data?
- They are looking at different stages
Csf1op/csf1op(do not express CSF1 which recruits
MAPs) does not affect the incidence or the
growth of the primary tumors, but delayed the
dev. to invasive, metastatic carcinomas. ? 2
stages CSF-1 promote the later stage. - Lin EY
et al., 2001
38Why all these conflicting data?
- Depend on the type of tumor and the stage of
tumor secrete cytokines, chemokines to attract
leukocytes,actively involved in the modulation of
immune responses (Th1 vs. Th2 etc..)