The Failure of the Constitutional Treaty: Causes and Consequences - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

The Failure of the Constitutional Treaty: Causes and Consequences

Description:

Title: Slide 1 Author: Christophe Crombez Last modified by: Hans Weiler Created Date: 4/1/2003 3:39:57 PM Document presentation format: On-screen Show – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:25
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: Christophe808
Learn more at: http://web.stanford.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Failure of the Constitutional Treaty: Causes and Consequences


1
The Failure of the Constitutional Treaty Causes
and Consequences
  • Christophe Crombez

2
Outline
  • Toward an EU Constitution Origins and Process
  • Structure of the Constitution
  • Evaluation of the Contents
  • What Went Wrong?
  • Prospects for Adoption

3
Toward an EU Constitution
  • The first steps towards a Constitution were made
    at the European Council meeting in Laeken in
    December 2001.
  • At that European Council meeting the heads of
    state and government issued the Declaration of
    Laeken.

4
  • In the Declaration the European Council
    identified three principal challenges for the EU.
  • Bring the institutions closer to its citizens, do
    something about the democratic deficit.
  • Reform the institutions to prepare for
    enlargement.
  • Render the EU more effective in world politics
  • Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP)

5
  • Previous attempts to reform the institutions
    through Intergovernmental Conferences had failed
    (Amsterdam 1997, Nice 2001).
  • For this reason the EU decided to try a different
    route and call a Convention.
  • The Convention was a group of politicians of
    various European institutions (EU and national)
    brought together to discuss the main challenges
    the EU was/is facing.
  • It submitted a draft Constitution to the European
    Council in Thessaloniki in June 2003.
  • The European Council then called a new IGC and
    agreed on the Treaty Establishing a Constitution
    For Europe at the European Council in Brussels
    in June 2004.

6
  • The Treaty was signed in Rome in October 2004.
  • It currently awaits ratification by the member
    states.
  • 13 MS have already ratified it.
  • Austria, Cyprus, Germany, Greece, Hungary,
    Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta,
    Slovakia, Slovenia and Spain
  • France and the Netherlands rejected it in
    referendums.
  • 5 more MS would hold referendums.
  • The Czech Republic, Denmark, Ireland, Portugal
    and the United Kingdom

7
Structure
  • Part I The Basics, the real Constitution
  • 60 articles, 30 pages
  • Definition and objectives
  • Competences
  • Institutions,
  • Part II The Charter of Fundamental Rights
  • 54 articles, 14 pages
  • This is the text of a declaration approved in
    Nice in 2000.
  • Part III The Policies and Functioning of the
    Union
  • 322 articles, 131 pages
  • These are the old treaties.
  • Part IV General and Final Provisions ( 12
    articles, 6 pages)
  • Protocols and Annexes

8
Evaluation
  • Democracy
  • Vote weights in the Council QMV
  • 55 of MS, 15 MS, 65 of population
  • Blocking minority is at least 4 MS
  • Old rules 232/321 votes, 50 of MS, 62 of
    population
  • Parliament Powers
  • More codecision
  • This is a move toward a more uniform legislative
    process.
  • Transparency and simplicity
  • Legislative Council meetings will be open.
  • A single treaty, a single legal personality

9
  • Enlargement
  • Decision Rule in the Council more QMV
  • Council Presidency
  • Commission Composition
  • Max. 2/3 of MS from 2014 onward (old Max. 27)
  • Enhanced Cooperation min. 1/3 of MS
  • Effectiveness in World Politics
  • EU Minister of Foreign Affairs
  • Will also be Vice-President of the Commission
  • Is thus the result of a merger of two current
    positions
  • High Representative for the CFSP
  • Commissioner for External Relations
  • The Council still decides by unanimity, but it
    can decide by unanimity no longer to use
    unanimity.

10
  • The Constitution represents a small step toward a
    more democratic, more efficient and more
    effective EU.
  • Some of these steps can be achieved without a new
    treaty.
  • Steps in EU integration are results of
    compromises, they do not correspond to an
    elegant, well-thought through plan.

11
What Went Wrong?
  • With ratification by all 25 MS required, it was
    long clear that this would be a problem.
  • Calling referenda on a treaty that changes so
    little seems pointless.
  • Voters are unhappy for unrelated reasons.
  • Turkey, the Euro, immigration, the welfare state
  • The unpopularity of national leaders
  • There are a lot of misunderstandings about what
    is really new in the Constitution.
  • It was probably not a good idea to refer to the
    new treaty as a Constitution.

12
Prospects
  • Right now we are nearing the end of the
    reflection period.
  • The Austrian Presidency is to revive the
    ratification process.
  • The expectation is that not much will happen till
    the German Presidency a year from now.
  • The three most likely scenarios
  • The ratification process is resumed. A statement
    on social policy is added to the Treaty.
  • A few important elements on the functioning of
    the institutions, etc. are adopted separately.
  • The Constitution is dead. Some elements may be
    implemented without Treaty reform.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com