PRESENTATION NAME

1
(No Transcript)
2
Introduce Myself

• ??
• ?????????????????
• ??
• ???????????????
• ???????????????
• ??
• ??????
• ??????
• ????????????????????
• ???????????????????????

3
The two functions of social interaction

• Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P.A., Jochems, W. (2003).
  Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction
  in computer-supported collaborative learning
  environments a review of the research. Computers
  in Human Behavior, 19 (3), 335353.

4
MSN Agent

• Hwang, W. Y., Huang, Y. M., Wu, S. Y.
  (2011).The Effect of an MSN Agent on Learning
  Community and Achievement. Interactive Learning
  Environments, 19(4),413-432. (SSCI)

5
Collaboration with Multi-robots

• We examined their collaborative strategies and
  their behavioral interactions.
• 6 grade elementary school students
• 16 groups, each with three students

6
Lag Sequential Analysis

• Bakeman, R. (1986). Observing interaction an
  introduction to sequential analysis. New York
  Cambridge University Press.
• Lag sequential analysis is the examination of
  whether particular sequences of behavior occur
  more or less frequently than would be expected by
  chance.
• It could examine the sequence that a particular
  target event would occur subsequent to a given
  event having already occurred.

7
LSA Procedure

• Building coding schema
• Data collection
• Observation
• System logs
• Data analysis
• Frequency of Behaviors ??????
• Conditional Probability Calculation????
• Expected frequencies ?????
• Z-Score Calculation Z-SCORE?????
• Draw Transitional Diagram

8
Interaction analysis model (IAM)Gunawardena,
Lowe, and Andersons (1997)

• C1 Sharing/comparing of information????
• C2 Discovery and exploration of dissonance or
  inconsistency among participants?????
• C3 Negotiation of meaning/co-construction of
  knowledge??/??
• C4 Testing and modification of proposed synthesis
  or co-construction????
• C5 Agreement statement(s)/application of newly
  constructed meaning????/????
• C6 Off-topic????

9
The Cognitive Processing Dimension of the Revised
Blooms TaxonomyAnderson et al. (2001, 2006)

• B1 Remember
• B2 Understand
• B3 Apply
• B4 Analyze
• B5 Evaluate
• B6 Create
• B7 Off-topic

10
Online synchronous collaborative discussion
40 university students Web Design Whole
semester Online synchronous IM tools
IM1(Academic-related) IM11 ???? IM12 ????? IM13
??/?? IM14 ???? IM15 ????/???? IM2(Task
coordination) IM21 ??????? IM22 ????? IM23
????? IM3(Social interaction) IM31 ????/?? IM32
??????? IM33 ??????? IM4(Off-topic) IM41
?????? Hou, H. T., Wu, S. Y. (2011).
Analyzing the social knowledge construction
behavioral patterns of an online synchronous
collaborative discussion instructional activity
using an instant messaging tool A case study.
Computers Education, 57, 14591468. (SSCI, EI)
11
Synchronous Peer Assessment Discussion Activity

• BC (Remember, Understand, Apply) AC (Analyze,
  Evaluate, Create) OT (Off-Topic)
• all students high-quality group
  low-quality groups
• Wu, S. Y., Hou, H. T., Hwang, W. Y. (2012).
  Exploring Students Cognitive Dimensions and
  Behavioral Patterns during a Synchronous Peer
  Assessment Discussion Activity Using Instant
  Messaging. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher,
  21(3), 442-453. (SSCI)

12
The Influences of Social Self-efficacy on Social
Trust and Social Capital - A Case Study of
Facebook

• Online-questionnaire survey
• Accessing Facebook for at least 3 months
• 415 valid samples
• 152 males (36.5) and 263 females (63.2 )
• Wu, S. Y., Wang, S. T., Liu, E. Z. F., Hu, D.
  C., Hwang, W. Y. (2012). The Influences of
  Social Self-efficacy on Social Trust and Social
  Capital - A Case Study of Facebook. Turkish
  Online Journal of Educational Technology, 11(2),
  246-254. (SSCI)

13
ONE-TO-ONE TECHNOLOGY-ENHANCED LEARNINGAN
OPPORTUNITY FOR GLOBAL RESEARCHCOLLABORATION

• T.-W. Chan et al. 16
• Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced
  Learning
• Vol. 1, No. 1 (2006) 329
• seamless learning spaces
• Seamless learning implies that a student can
  learn whenever they are curious in a variety of
  scenarios and that they can switch from one
  scenario to another easily and quickly using the
  personal device as a mediator.
• ??????????????????????????????????????????,???????
  ???????????????????????,????????????????????????,?
  ?????????????????????????????????????

14
Seamless Online Learning Integrated
DiscussionSOLID
15
System framework
16
Study 1 (AT1/AT2) Study 2 (AT3)
Number 41 students 49 students
Group 9 groups of 4 to 5 people 10 groups of 5 to 6 people
Major Infant and Child Care Teacher Education Center
Course name Production and Application of Instructional Media Operation of Instructional Media

• The problem solving-based discussion activity
  (AT1)
• The project-based discussion activity (AT2)
• The advanced project-based discussion activity
  (AT3)

17
Collaborative Concept Mapping System (CCMS)
18
Research Frmework
??MSN Agent ????Y /??N
Robot ?? ??????????????
??????,?????????,??????? (????????????????)
?????? ??????????
???????? ??off-topic????
??????
??????? ???????? ???????????
?? ??
19
Summary

• ???????????????????,?????????????
• ????????,??????????????????????????????
• ??????????????????????
• ?????????????????????????????
• ?????????????????????????????
• ???????????????????????????????????

20
???????????
21
????

• ????

Lag sequential Analysis Social network analysis
Educational data mining Q methodology
22
(No Transcript)