Nominations, Elections, and campaigns - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 54
About This Presentation
Title:

Nominations, Elections, and campaigns

Description:

Chapter 9 * Future Trends in Campaign Finance Public funding faces uncertain future Major candidates can raise more money on their own Contribution bundlers Internet ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:273
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 55
Provided by: kenstonK
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Nominations, Elections, and campaigns


1
Nominations, Elections, and campaigns
  • Chapter 9

2
The Evolution of Campaigning
  • During election campaigns, political parties help
    structure voting choice
  • Successful campaigns need resources to acquire,
    analyze, and disseminate information
  • Voter interests
  • Campaign tactics
  • Candidate message
  • Voter turnout

3
The Evolution of Campaigning
  • Until 1950s, political parties
  • ran most campaigns
  • Todays candidates manage their own campaigns
  • Races more candidate-centered
  • Must campaign for nomination as well as election
  • Parties help with funding and party label

4
Nominations
  • American political parties use elections to
    choose party nominees
  • In most other countries, party leaders choose
    nominees
  • In America, each state has own set of laws
    regarding party nominations
  • America puts large burden on voters

5
Nomination for Congress and State Offices
  • All states use a primary election as all or part
    of the nomination process
  • Nomination process highly decentralized
  • Only half of regular party voters vote in a given
    primary UNBELIEVABLE!!!!
  • Many primary races have little or no competition

6
Primary Elections
  • Four types of primary elections
  • Closed primaries
  • Open primaries
  • Modified closed primaries
  • Modified open primaries
  • Blanket primaries
  • Most scholars believe type of primary affects
    strength of party organizations

7
Nomination for President
  • Presidential candidates for each party chosen at
    national convention
  • Until 1960s, party delegates to national
    convention chose nominee
  • Since 1972, delegates have been chosen by complex
    process that includes the primary election and
    party caucuses

8
Selecting Convention Delegates
  • Different states and parties have different
    procedures for selecting delegates
  • States follow one of two basic formats
  • Presidential primary
  • Presidential primary/caucus
  • Democratic selection proportional
  • Republicans winner takes all

9
Selecting Convention Delegates
  • Delegates selected openly back one of the
    presidential candidates
  • Primary elections and caucuses mean nominees
    names usually known before national conventions
  • Early primaries and caucuses result in
    front-loading

10
Changes in the Presidential Nominating Process
Until 1968 Since 1972
Party Dominated Candidate Dominated
Few Primaries Many Primaries
Short Campaigns Long Campaigns
Easy Money Difficult Fundraising
Limited Media Coverage Media Focused
Late Decisions Front-Loaded
Open Conventions Closed Conventions
11
Campaigning for the Nomination
  • A complex, drawn-out process
  • Invisible primary
  • Iowa caucuses and New Hampshire primary viewed as
    testing grounds
  • In 2008, narrowed field to five Republicans and
    seven Democrats
  • Super Tuesday resulted in one Republican and
    two Democrats with the most support by voters

12
Only in America Marvels the World
13
Campaigning for the Nomination
  • John McCain set as Republican nominee after Super
    Tuesday
  • Democratic contest not settled until June
    7th!!!!!!!

14
Consequences of Presidential Campaigns
  • Races with no incumbents contested in both
    parties
  • Incumbent presidents usually face little
    opposition
  • Iowa and New Hampshire do matter MEDIA attention
  • Candidates favored most by party identifiers
    usually win nomination
  • Winners owe little to national party
    organization!!!!!!

15
Figure 9.1From Many to Two Presidential
Hopefuls Starting and Dropping Out
16
Elections
  • By national law, all seats in House of
    Representatives and 1/3 of seats in Senate
    elected every two years in general election
  • State and local offices also on ballot
  • President chosen every 4th year in presidential
    election
  • Non-presidential elections congressional,
    mid-term, or off-year elections

17
Presidential Elections and the Electoral College
  • Presidency not automatically given to person with
    the most votes in the general election
  • General election selects electors who then select
    president
  • States receive one elector for each House and
    Senate seat
  • Washington, D.C. also receives three electors

18
The Electoral College
  • Candidate must have a majority of electoral votes
    (270) to win presidency
  • If no candidate receives majority, decision on
    president made by the House Senate chooses vice
    president
  • Each state has one vote
  • Has only happened in 1800 and 1824

19
Figure 9.2Populations Shifts and Political Gains
and Losses Since 1960
20
The Electoral College Politics
  • Prior to 1860, most electors chosen by state
    legislatures
  • After 1860, electors chosen by popular vote
  • All states but Maine and Nebraska award electors
    winner takes all
  • Election in 2000 came down to Floridas electoral
    votes

21
Figure 9.3How America Votes
22
The Electoral College Abolish It?
  • Over 700 proposals to abolish electoral college
    introduced in Congress over the years
  • Electoral vote system allows states to decide how
    electors chosen a federal system
  • Many voters appear to prefer nationwide direct
    popular vote
  • Grover Cleveland (1888) and George W. Bush (2000)
    elected despite losing popular vote

23
Figure 9.4The Popular Vote and the Electoral Vote
24
Support for the Electoral College
  • Generally, results from electoral vote system
    magnify popular vote results
  • Electoral college is a federal election system
  • Allows small states to have more weight in
    process
  • Campaigns carried out via personal contact versus
    the large market media
  • Nationwide recounts not needed

25
Congressional Elections
  • Candidates for president listed at top of ballot,
  • with other national, state, and local offices
    below
  • Voter Fatigue
  • Voters can vote straight ticket or split ticket
  • between 15 and 30 of voters choose president
    from one party and congressional candidates from
    the other
  • Can result in divided government

26
Congressional Elections
  • Democrats basically in power until 1994
  • Winners from single member districts are
    candidates with the most votes
  • First-past-the-post elections
  • http//www.youtube.com/watch?vs7tWHJfhiyo
  • Districts drawn by the party in power and usually
    benefit dominant partyOhio 2010
    Census---Republicans draw new districts.
  • Presidents party generally loses seats in
    mid-term elections

27
Figure 9.5Presidential Popularity and Party
Seat Loss/Gain
28
Campaigns The Political Context
  • Most important structural factors in campaign
    planning
  • Office sought
  • Whether incumbent or challenger
  • Non-incumbents more successful in open elections
  • More populous and/or diverse districts mean more
    expensive campaigns
  • Party preference of electorate also important

29
Financing
  • Quality of campaign organizations a function of
    money
  • However, money alone does not ensure success
  • There are four parts to any campaign.
  • The candidate, the issues of the candidate,
  • the campaign organization, and the MONEY to run
    the campaign with. Without money, you can forget
    the other three. -- former House Speaker Thomas
    (Tip) ONeill

30
Regulating Campaign Financing
  • State and federal governments regulate campaign
    financing
  • Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA) passed in
    1971
  • Amendments in 1972 created
  • Federal Election Commission (FEC)
  • Limits on political action committee (PAC)
    contributions both soft and hard money
  • After court challenges, 1974 FECA governed
    elections for about 30 years

31
Regulating Campaign Financing
  • Increases in campaign contributions and spending
    led to Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (BCRA) in
    2002
  • Limits on contributions by individuals
  • Banned soft money contributions to political
    parties
  • Allowed 527 committees to spend unlimited amounts
    for media, with some limits
  • 2007 Supreme Court ruling struck down ban on
    issue ads before elections
  • New committees formed 501(c)4 social welfare
    organizations
  • 2010 Supreme Court ruling overturned ban on
    corporate and Labor contributions to candidates
  • Citizens United v. FEC

32
Public Financing of Presidential Campaigns
  • Both FECA and BCRA provided for public financing
    for presidential campaigns
  • Subject to spending limits!!!!
  • Until 1996, all eligible candidates used public
    funds for primary elections
  • Since 1996, more and more candidates refusing
    public funds for primaries
  • Funding for general election follows different
    rules most candidates used until 2004Obama did
    not

33
Private Financing of Congressional Campaigns
  • Candidates for national office raised over 3
    billion during the 2007-2008 primary and general
    electionsUnbelievable!!!
  • Obama raised almost 750 million
  • McCain raised almost 370 million
  • Congressional candidates raised almost 1.4
    billion

34
Future Trends in Campaign Finance
  • Public funding faces uncertain future
  • Major candidates can raise more money on their
    own
  • Contribution bundlers
  • Internet fundraising
  • BCRA limited soft money but not amounts raised
    for presidential campaigns

35
Strategies and Tactics
  • Strategies are broad approaches to campaigns
  • Party-centered strategies
  • Issue-oriented strategies
  • Candidate-oriented strategies
  • Strategies must take into account political
    context

36
Pollsters and Political Consultants
  • Well-funded campaigns buy polling packages
  • Benchmark poll
  • Focus groups
  • Trend polls
  • Tracking polls
  • Information gathered then used to tailor campaign
    to current political situation

37
Making the News
  • News coverage valuable because its free and
    seems objective to the public
  • Incumbents have advantage
  • News coverage frequently limited to sound bites
  • Horse-race metaphors limit attention to issues
    bandwagons, losing ground, the front-runner, and
    the likely loser

38
Advertising the Candidate
  • Main objective for campaigns ads
  • NAME RECOGNITION
  • Voters may not recall name but recognize on a
    list, such as a ballot
  • Must also point out virtues of candidate
  • Campaign ads also sometimes attack opponent or
    play on emotions
  • Majority of ads use electronic media

39
Advertising the Candidate
  • Recent years ads tend to mention personal
    characteristics rather than policy preferences
  • Negative ads can be either attack ads or contrast
    ads
  • Media sometimes report controversial ads as news
  • Candidates must approve message in their ads
    independent groups do not

40
Using the Internet
  • Use started in 1992 with e-mail to supporters
  • Democrats pioneered Internet usage in election
    campaigns, both to raise funds and mobilize
    supporters
  • Also use social networking sites, blogs, and
    YouTube
  • Internet inexpensive way to quickly contact
    supporters, but TV still best way to reach
    average voters

41
Explaining Voting Choice
  • Long-term forces predispose voters to choose
    certain types of candidates
  • Party identification most important
  • Short-term forces associated with particular
    elections
  • Combination of candidates and policy positions on
    current issues

42
Party Identification
  • Over half of electorate decides candidate before
    party conventions
  • Early decisions generally vote based on party
    identification
  • Each candidate in 2008 received 90 of vote of
    self-described partisans
  • Independents generally favored Obama
  • Republicans have won more elections due to lack
    of Democratic voter turnout and other short-term
    factors

43
Figure 9.6Effect of Party Identification on the
Vote, 2008
44
Hopes Fulfilled
45
Issues and Policies
  • Candidates exploit issues that seem to be
    important to voters
  • Incumbents record versus problems pointed out by
    challenger
  • Even with no incumbent, that partys candidate
    may be tied to outgoing president

46
Hopes Dashed
47
Candidates Attributes
  • Attributes important because most voters lack
    information about candidates past performance
    and policy stands
  • Stereotypical thinking may play into some voters
    decisions

48
Evaluating the Voting Choice
  • Party identification and candidate attributes not
    basis for voting according to democratic theory
  • Citizens should vote based on past performance
    and proposed policies
  • However, all are factors when developing
    statistical models to explain voting
  • Historically, attributes and party identification
    most important

49
Evaluating the Voting Choice
  • Recent studies show increase in policy-based
    voting
  • Relationship between party identification and
    voters positions on issues more distinct today
  • Alignment between party and ideology almost
    perfect in congressional voting

50
Campaign Effects
  • While campaign may not cause change in party
    identification, can influence enough votes to
    change outcome of election
  • Television ads main method for transmitting
    candidates message
  • Battleground states key
  • Presidential campaign in 2008 most expensive ever
  • No major candidate took federal matching funds in
    primary only McCain in general election

51
The Americanization of Campaigns
52
The Presidential Debates
  • First televised debate in 1960 between John F.
    Kennedy and Richard Nixon
  • In 1976, televised debates began airing regularly
  • Presidential and vice-presidential debates in
    2008 election led to rise in support for Obama in
    election polls

53
Campaigns, Elections, and Parties
  • Party organizations not central to elections in
    America
  • Both parties follow majoritarian model by
    formulating different party platforms and
    pursuing announced policies when in office
  • Weak connection between party platform and voters
    during campaigns and elections
  • Party platforms do not play major role in
    elections, especially those for House and Senate
    seats

54
Parties and the Pluralist Model
  • The way parties operate in America more like
    pluralist model
  • Function as two giant interest groups
  • Parties prefer candidates who support party
    platform
  • However, candidates operate as entrepreneurs, and
    may vote against party leadership
  • Stronger parties might be able to better
    coordinate government policies after elections
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com