Title: NOMINATIONS%20AND%20CAMPAIGNS
1NOMINATIONS AND CAMPAIGNS
2Presidential vs Congressional Campaigns
- More voters
- More competitive
- Less incumbent advantage
- Lower turnout in midterm elections
- Take more credit for individual projects
- Able to distance themselves from DC
- Franking privileges
- Coattail effect has declined
3RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT
4Getting Mentioned
- Off the record to reporters
- Make speeches
- Fame
- Associated with major piece of legislation
- Governor
5Money
- Individuals
- Political Action Committees
6Organization
- Fund raisers
- Lawyers
- Accountants
- Pollsters
- Volunteers
- Position papers
7Competing for Delegates
- Caucus
- Neighborhood?countycongressional district?state
conventionnational convention - Primary
- McGovern-Fraser Commission
- Superdelegates
- Frontloading
8Evaluation of Primary and Caucus
- Disproportionate attention to early caucuses and
primaries (Iowa and New Hampshire) - Difficult to find time to run
- Money
- Low participation
- 5 of registered voters in caucuses (except Iowa)
and 20 in primary - Too much power to media
9Strategy and Themes
- Tone Positive or negative
- Theme trust, change, experience
- Timing heavy or light campaigning
- Targets Which voters will change their minds?
10Primaries and General Election
- Extreme in primary
- Center in general
- Clothespin Vote lesser of two evils
11Campaign Issues
- Position Issues
- Two opposing views
- Social Security, abortion, death penalty
- Can lead to party realignment
- Valence Issues
- Universal issues
- Strong economy
- Low crime
- Patriotism
12Federal Election Campaign Act (passed in 1971,
amended in 1974)
131. Federal Election Commission
- Oversee elections to ensure the parties and
candidates are complying with election rules
142. Presidential Election Campaign Fund
- 3 voluntary check off box on income tax (11 of
taxpayers)
153. Partial Public Financing for Presidential
Primaries
- Presidential candidates who raise 5,000 on their
own in at least 20 states can get individual
contributions of up to 250 matched by the
government (matching funds) If they accept
federal support, they agree to limit campaign
expenditures - Bush and Kerry declined matching funds
- Minor party candidates (5-25 of vote) part of
costs paid by the federal government
164. General Election
- Public financing for major party candidates in
general election - Major party candidates receive fixed amount of
money (75m in 2004) - Kerry and Bush accepted this money
175. Full Disclosure
- File with FEC
- List contributors
- Detail how money was spent
186. Limited Contributions
- Individual contributions to presidential and
congressional candidates 2,000 each (as of
2004) and indexed to inflation (2,300 in the
2008 presidential election. - Originally 1,000 but changed by McCain-Feingold
Act
19Campaign Finance Rules (1974)
- PACs
- One PAC per corporation, union, or association
- Register 6 months in advance
- At least 50 contributors
- Give to at least five candidates
- No more than 5,000 per candidate per election
- No more than 15,000 per year to national party
20Loopholes
- Soft money
- Funds NOT for specific candidates
- Get-out-the-vote
- Voter registration campaigns
- Bundling combining contributions to be given at
once (makes more of an impact)
21Effect of Reforms
- Growth of PACs (4,217 in 2006) contributed
288.6 m in 2004 House and Senate elections - Party power has weakened
- Rich candidates can avoid rules
- Favors ideological candidates
- Favors incumbents they are more well known, so
they can get the individual contribution - Must enter race early because of the need to
raise money
22Bipartisan Finance Reform Act of 2002
(McCain-Feingold Act)
- Banned soft money national parties can only
receive hard money (individual contributions or
PAC contributions) - Limit on individual contributions raised from
1,000 to 2,000 per candidate per election
(indexed to inflation)
23Bipartisan Finance Reform Act of 2002
- Independent expenditures by corporations, labor
unions, trade associations and (under certain
circumstances) nonprofits are sharply restricted
- Barred groups from running issue ads within 60
days of a general election (or 30 days before a
primary) if they refer to a federal candidate and
are not funded through a PAC (i.e., regulated
funds)
24Bipartisan Finance Reform Act of 2002
- 527 Groups are not subject to contribution
restrictions as long as political messages did
not make explicit endorsements of candidates by
using phrases, such as vote for, or vote against - 424 million in 2004 (52 gave over 1 million
213 gave over 100,000)
25Citizens United vs. Federal Election Commission
(2010)
- 5 to 4 decision
- Court held as unconstitutional a key provision of
the McCain-Feingold Bipartisan Campaign Finance
Act that places limits on how much corporations
and unions can spend for or against political
candidates toward the end of the campaign. - 5 Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, Alito
- 4 (dissenting) Stevens, Ginsberg, Breyer,
Sotomayor.
26Buckley v. Valeo (1976)
- Political contributions are speech within the
meaning of the 1st Amendment. - Individual persons can spend as much as they like
to express their views on issues and/or
candidates. - Contribution limits directly to campaigns prior
to an election are constitutional because the
government has an interest in making sure there
is no appearance of a quid pro quo arrangement
through campaign donations.
27Citizens United (Nonprofit corporation)
- Produced a video Hillary during Clintons
campaign in 2008
28Should corporations have the same 1st Amendment
rights as individuals?
- Yes Corporations are associations of individuals
and are entitled to the same 1st Amendment rights
as individuals. - Any legislation that affects the political
process should be suspect. - No The side with more money should not dominate
the political process by being able to
out-contribute the opponents (a level playing
field) - 1st Amendment rights are for real persons, not
artificial persons created the by State.
29VOTING FACTORS
30Incumbency
- In good economic times, party holding White House
normally does well in poor times it does badly
(pocketbook vote) - Many who are doing well will vote against
incumbent if country is not doing well because of
friends or customers not doing well
31Character
- Honesty and reliability
- Opinion on crime, abortion, and school prayer
- Acting presidential (speaking well, dignified,
compassionate, authoritative, reasonable, likable)
32Money
- Does not make a difference since each candidate
gets same amount (If both candidates accept
public funding.) - Makes a difference in Congressional races
- High-spending incumbents do better than
low-spending incumbents - Average spending has increased over time
(incumbent to challenger ratio 2.47)
33Non-factors
- VP nominee
- Political reporting
- Religion
- Abortion might affect who gets nomination
- New voting groups angry white males did not
elect Republican Congress in 1994 and soccer moms
did not elect Bill Clinton in 1996
34Party Identification
- More Democrats than Republicans, but Democrats
lost 7 of 12 presidential elections since 1968 - Democrats less loyal (80 of Republicans vote
party line, but 1/3 of Democrats voted for Nixon
and 26 for Reagan) - Republican attract a majority of independents,
who are usually younger whites - Higher percentage of Republicans vote
35Issues
- Prospective/Policy voting
- Voter learn about the issues
- Select best candidate
- Retrospective voting
- If voters look at how things have gone in the
past and they like it, they will vote for
candidate who will continue those policies (and
vice-versa) - Elections are decided by this factor
36Campaign
- Revive party loyalties
- Voters see how candidates handle pressure
- Judge character and core values
37Democratic Coalition
- African-Americans (most loyal)
- Mexican-Americans
- Puerto Ricans
- Jewish People (most loyal)
- Lost strong support of
- Catholics
- Southerners
- Union Members
38Republican Coalition
- Business people (most loyal)
- Farmers (volatile)
- Professionals
- Poor people (most are elderly and retired
low-income blacks vote Democrat, but less than
25 of Democratic vote)
39Party Realignment
- sharp lasting shift in the popular coalition
supporting one or both parties - new issue of utmost importance to the voters
cuts across existing party divisions and replaces
old issues that were formerly the basis of of
party identification - Five major shifts in American history
401800 Elections
- Jeffersonian Republicans defeated the Federalists
411828 Elections
421860
- Slavery issue
- Whigs (Constitutional Union Party) silent and
fall - Democratic Party split
- Northern part waffling
- Southern party in favor of slavery
- Republicans win with Lincoln
431896 Elections
- Economic causes (depressions)
- Republicans defeat William Jennings Bryan
- Republicans urban, workers, and businesspeople,
Catholics, Lutherans - Democrats farmers, small towns, low tariffs, and
rural interests, fundamentalists - North/South became East/West
441932 Elections
- Great Depression
- Roosevelt Democrats win
- Democrats urban workers, northern blacks,
southern whites, Jewish voters
45Party Decline
- Ticket splitting increasing
- Leads to divided government
- Office bloc (Massachusetts ) ballot list
candidates by office - Party-column (Indiana) ballot can vote straight
party with one mark
46Campaign Finance Rules (1974)
- GENERAL
- Federal Election Commission (6 people)
- Full disclosure of donors (100 or more)
- No cash contributions over 100
- No foreign contributions
- No limit if candidate does not accept federal
funding (up to 50,000 if he does)
47Campaign Finance Rules (1974)
- Individual Contributions
- No more than 2,000 per candidate per election
- An individual may not make federal political
gifts exceeding 95,000 every two years, of which
only 37,500 may go to candidates
48Campaign Finance Rules (1974)
- Presidential Primaries
- Matching funds for 250 donations or less
- Candidate must raise 5,000 in each of 20 states
in 250 contributions or less to be eligible
49Campaign Finance Rules (1974)
- Presidential Election
- Major party candidates all costs up to a legal
limit paid by the federal government (if they
accept federal support) - Minor party candidates (5-25 of vote) part of
costs paid by the federal government