Cell Saver Audit - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Cell Saver Audit

Description:

Title: Cell Saver Audit Author: Kevin Chu Last modified by: Arnaud Created Date: 9/2/2003 6:03:55 PM Document presentation format: Affichage l' cran – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:218
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: Kevi102
Category:
Tags: audit | cell | saver | total

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Cell Saver Audit


1
Cell Saver Audit
  • Dr Richard Evans (CONS)
  • Dr Vikram Halikar (SHO)
  • Dr Kevin Chu (PRHO)

2
Introduction
  • Fresenius CATS (Continuous AutoTransfusion
    System)
  • Autologous blood transfusion
  • Mechanism
  • Citrate
  • Collection Filter
  • Centrifuge Wash
  • Haematocrit 60 (depending on wash)

3
Why this Audit?
  • Usage efficacy
  • Cost implications
  • Problems / Suggestions

4
Why Use A Cell Saver
  • Loss of Transfusion Risk
  • Infection
  • Transfusion Error
  • Difficult Cross Match
  • Blood Shortage
  • Cost Benefits

5
When not to use a Cell Saver
  • Tumour
  • Infection
  • Chemicals

6
Data Collected
  • Cell Saver audit forms
  • August 2002 April 2003 inclusive
  • 9 months
  • 48 patients
  • Theatre Ledger
  • Emergency Operation Lists
  • Diary of Bookings
  • Blood bank records

7
Cell Saver Audit Forms
8
Operations
  • Vascular
  • Emergency AAA
  • Elective AAA
  • Urology
  • Cystectomy
  • Prostatectomy
  • Nephrectomy
  • Orthopaedic
  • Revision Hips / Occasional Total Hip Replacment
  • Spinal Fusions

9
Usage - General
10
Usage AAA Repair
11
Blood Returned Units Transfused
12
AAA Repair Units Transfused
13
Cost Effectiveness
  • Capital Cost
  • Cell Saver 21,000 (Now 14,000)
  • ODP Training 300 7 2,100
  • Running Costs (over 9 months)
  • 48 cases 90 disposables/case 4,320

14
Cost Effectiveness
  • Total Salvaged 24,971ml (over 9 months)
  • Approx 250ml / unit i.e. 100 units
  • Cost / unit 120
  • Total Saved 12,000
  • Predicted Saving
  • 12,000 - 4,320 7,680 (over 9 months)
  • 10,240 savings per year (at current usage)
  • 160 savings per case

15
Problems / Missed Cases
  • Availability
  • Of Cell Saver (double booking)
  • Of ODP trained in usage
  • Of ODP for usage in Emergency AAA
  • Under-usage
  • Especially in orthopaedics
  • Relatively new technique
  • Lack of awareness surgical anaesthetic

16
Conclusions
  • Cell Saver is highly cost effective
  • Second unit (in orthopaedics) would bring further
    cost benefit
  • Expanding staff training would allow greater
    usage of the machine

17
Suggestions / Plans
  • 2nd Machine for Orthopaedics
  • Increase awareness
  • Routine collection for
  • All Hip operations
  • All Knee operations (not using tourniquet)
  • Femoral Nails
  • Expand staff training

18
Re-Audit
  • This audit was first presented at the anaesthetic
    meeting on 5 September 2003
  • Re-audit of use 6 months from then

19
Thank YouAny Questions?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com