Introduction - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 84
About This Presentation
Title:

Introduction

Description:

Introduction & Flood Hydrologic Analysis CE154 ... Runoff Process Gauged Watershed -flood frequency analysis to determine peak design flow rate -Gauge data to ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:234
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 85
Provided by: Lian59
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Introduction


1
Introduction Flood Hydrologic Analysis
  • CE154 - Hydraulic Design
  • Lectures 1-2

1
2
Green Sheet
  • Course Objective - Introduce design concept and
    procedure for a few basic types of hydraulic
    structures that an engineer may encounter
  • Hydraulic structures- Water supply and
    distribution systems including spillways,
    reservoirs, pipeline systems
  • - Flood protection systems including culverts,
    storm drains, natural rivers

2
3
Green Sheet
  • Lecture Schedule
  • Homework assignments
  • Exams
  • Grading
  • Office hour
  • Communication email address, web site
  • Emergency evacuation route
  • Grader selection

3
4
Introduction
  • Hydraulic Design Design of Hydraulic Structures
  • Elements of Design (class discussion)- design
    objective- design criteria - design data and
    assumptions- design procedure- design
    calculations- design drawings- design report

4
5
Hydraulic Design example
  • Design a channel that can safely carry the storm
    runoff generated from a 1 flood from a
    residential development that is 20 square miles
    in drainage area.
  • Design objective
  • Design criteria
  • Design data and assumptions
  • Design procedure

5
6
Flood Hydrology
  • Design flood Discharge (design flow)- peak flow
    rate governing the design of relevant hydraulic
    structures
  • Design flood Hydrograph- time-flow history of a
    design flood

6
7
Sample Flood Hydrograph
8
Hydrology
  • Rainfall Runoff Process

8
9
Hydrologic Parameters
  • Precipitation intensity duration for design
  • Infiltration rate (watershed soil type and
    moisture condition)
  • Watershed surface cover overland roughness
  • Watershed drainage network geometry
  • Watershed slope
  • Time of concentration

9
10
Rainfall Runoff Process
  • Gauged Watershed-flood frequency analysis to
    determine peak design flow rate-Gauge data to
    calibrate unit hydrograph and generate design
    flood hydrograph
  • Ungauged Watershed-Hydrologic Modeling (HEC-HMS
    or HEC-1)-Regional regression analysis-Synthetic
    unit hydrograph

10
11
Flood Hydrology Studies
  • determine design rainfall duration and
    intensity- design rainfall ranges from probable
    maximum precipitation (PMP) on the high end to
    100-year or 10-year return period rainfall event
  • develop design runoff hydrograph includes peak
    flow rate and runoff volume to size reservoir and
    design spillway and other pertinent structures

11
12
Our Topics
  • Determine probable maximum precipitation (PMP)
    -Theoretically the greatest depth of
    precipitation for a given duration that is
    physically possible over a given storm area at a
    particular geographical location at a certain
    time of the year (HMR55A)
  • Bureau of Reclamations S-graph dimensionless
    unit hydrograph methods of developing synthetic
    unit hydrograph
  • Clark unit hydrograph method

12
13
PMP
  • National Weather Service Hydrometeorological
    Reports (HMR)provide maximum 6, 12, 24, 48 and
    72 hour PMPs for areas of 10, 200, 1000, 5000
    and 10,000 mi2. HMR 58 Probable Maximum
    Precipitation for California Calculation
    Procedures, NOAA, Oct. 1998 (supersedes HMR36,
    Note errata for pp. 22 27)
  • http//www.weather.gov/oh/hdsc/studies/pmp.htmlHR
    58

13
14
Rainfall Losses
  • Surface retention, evaporation and storage
    (usually small compared to infiltration)
  • Infiltration- Ranges 0.05 ? 0.5 in/hr
    approximately- L Lmin (Lo Lmin)e-kt L
    resulting infiltration rate Lmin minimum rate
    when saturated Lo maximum or initial
    infiltration rate
  • Rainfall losses Rainfall Excess

14
15
PMP Computation Example
  • Read pp. 43-48 of HMR 58
  • 973 mi2 Auburn drainage above Folsom Lake
  • Step 1Outline drainage boundary and overlay the
    10-mi2, 24-hour PMP map from Plate 2, HMR 58
  • Step 2Determine to use all-season or seasonal
    PMP for design

15
16
Plate 2 California Northern General Storm PMP
Index Map (in inches)
16
17
PMP Computation Example
17
18
PMP Computation Example
  • Step 3Calculate average PMP value (for 10 mi2
    and 24-hr) over drainage area 24.6 inches
    (using a planimeter or griddled paper overlay)
  • Step 4Depth-Duration Relationship- Auburn
    drainage is within the Sierra region. Use Table
    2.1 to obtain ratios for durations from 1 to 72
    hours

18
19
PMP Computation Example
19
20
PMP Computation Example
Step 4 Ratios for Auburn Drainage (Table 2.1 HMR58) Ratios for Auburn Drainage (Table 2.1 HMR58) Ratios for Auburn Drainage (Table 2.1 HMR58) Ratios for Auburn Drainage (Table 2.1 HMR58) Ratios for Auburn Drainage (Table 2.1 HMR58) Ratios for Auburn Drainage (Table 2.1 HMR58)
Duration (hours) 1 6 12 24 48 72
Ratios .14 .42 .65 1.00 1.56 1.76
20
21
PMP Computation Example
  • Multiply the average value for 10-mi2, 24-hour
    PMP of 24.6 inches by these ratios

Step 5 Auburn drainage 10-mi2 PMP Auburn drainage 10-mi2 PMP Auburn drainage 10-mi2 PMP Auburn drainage 10-mi2 PMP Auburn drainage 10-mi2 PMP Auburn drainage 10-mi2 PMP
Duration (hr) 1 6 12 24 48 72
PMP (in) 3.4 10.3 16.0 24.6 38.4 43.3
21
22
PMP Computation Example
  • Step 6Determine aerial reduction factors using
    the Auburn drainage area of 973 mi2 Fig. 2.15

22
23
PMP Computation Example
  • Fig 2.15, HMR 58

23
24
PMP Computation Example
Step 6 Area Reduction Factors Area Reduction Factors Area Reduction Factors Area Reduction Factors Area Reduction Factors Area Reduction Factors
Duration (hr) 1 6 12 24 48 72
Factors .64 .67 .70 .72 .77 .80
24
25
PMP Computation Example
  • Step 7Apply aerial reduction by multiplying
    PMPs from Step 5 by factors from Step 6

Step 7 Auburn Drainage average PMP Depths Auburn Drainage average PMP Depths Auburn Drainage average PMP Depths Auburn Drainage average PMP Depths Auburn Drainage average PMP Depths Auburn Drainage average PMP Depths
Duration (hr) 1 6 12 24 48 72
PMP (in) 2.2 6.9 11.2 17.7 29.6 34.6
25
26
PMP Computation Example
  • Step 8Plot the depth-duration data on Fig. 2.19

26
27
PMP Computation Example
  • Extract cumulative depths from Fig. 2.19

Step 8 6-hr Cumulative Rainfall Depths 6-hr Cumulative Rainfall Depths 6-hr Cumulative Rainfall Depths 6-hr Cumulative Rainfall Depths 6-hr Cumulative Rainfall Depths 6-hr Cumulative Rainfall Depths 6-hr Cumulative Rainfall Depths 6-hr Cumulative Rainfall Depths 6-hr Cumulative Rainfall Depths 6-hr Cumulative Rainfall Depths 6-hr Cumulative Rainfall Depths 6-hr Cumulative Rainfall Depths
Hr. 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 60 66 72
PMP (in) 6.9 11.2 14.6 17.7 20.8 23.8 26.7 29.6 31.6 32.7 33.7 34.6
27
28
PMP Computation Example
  • Compute incremental depths

Step 9 6-hr Incremental Rainfall Depths 6-hr Incremental Rainfall Depths 6-hr Incremental Rainfall Depths 6-hr Incremental Rainfall Depths 6-hr Incremental Rainfall Depths 6-hr Incremental Rainfall Depths 6-hr Incremental Rainfall Depths 6-hr Incremental Rainfall Depths 6-hr Incremental Rainfall Depths 6-hr Incremental Rainfall Depths 6-hr Incremental Rainfall Depths 6-hr Incremental Rainfall Depths
Hr. 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 60 66 72
PMP (in) 6.9 4.3 3.4 3.1 3.1 3.0 2.9 2.9 2.0 1.1 1.0 0.9
28
29
PMP Computation Example
  • Adjust temporal-distribution of these incremental
    rainfall based on historical data or by
    experiments. Keep the 4 highest increments in a
    series. A PMP isohyetal distribution may be

6 hr incremental rainfall depths 6 hr incremental rainfall depths 6 hr incremental rainfall depths 6 hr incremental rainfall depths 6 hr incremental rainfall depths 6 hr incremental rainfall depths 6 hr incremental rainfall depths 6 hr incremental rainfall depths 6 hr incremental rainfall depths 6 hr incremental rainfall depths 6 hr incremental rainfall depths 6 hr incremental rainfall depths
Hr 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 60 66 72
PMP1 6.9 4.3 3.4 3.1 3.1 3.0 2.9 2.9 2.0 1.1 1.0 0.9
PMP2 3.1 3.0 2.9 2.9 3.1 4.3 6.9 3.4 1.1 0.9 2.0 1.0
29
30
PMP Computation - summary
  • Need Hydrometeorological Report HMR 58 for
    northern California
  • Define general storms up to 72 hours in duration
    and 10,000 mi2 in area and local storms up to 6
    hours and 500 mi2
  • Start with a total PMP depth for a general area
    and end with intensity-time distribution of rain
    for a specific watershed this is the design
    rainfall

30
31
How to turn PMP (design rainfall) into PMF
(design runoff)?
  • Unit hydrograph a rainfall-runoff relationship
    characteristic of the watershed - developed in
    1930s, easy to use, less data requirements, less
    costly- many methods, most often seen include
    Soil Conservation Service (SCS) method, Snyder,
    Clark, and Bureau of Reclamation dimensionless
    unit hydrograph and S-curve methods
  • hydrologic modeling used widely since PC became
    popular, requiring data of topo contours, surface
    cover, infiltration ch., etc., HEC-HMS (HEC-1)

31
32
Unit Hydrograph
  • Basic unit hydrograph theory A storm of a
    constant intensity over a duration (e.g, 1 hour),
    and of uniform distribution, produces 1 inch of
    excess that runs off the surface. The hydrograph
    that is recorded at the outlet of the watershed
    is a 1-hr unit hydrograph
  • Define several parameters to characterize the
    watershed response e.g., lag time or time of
    concentration, time-discharge relationship,
    channel storage attenuation synthetic unit
    hydrograph

32
33
Unit Hydrograph Assumptions
  • Rainfall excess and losses may be lumped as
    basin-average values (lumped)
  • Ordinates of runoff is linearly proportional to
    rainfall excess values (linearity)
  • Rainfall-runoff relationship does not change with
    time (time invariance)

33
34
Hydrograph Development
34
35
Unit Hydrograph Approaches
  • Conceptual models of runoff single-linear
    reservoir (SkO), Nash (multiple linear
    reservoirs), Clark (consider effect of basin
    shape on travel time)
  • Empirical models Snyder, Soil Conservation
    Service dimensionless method
  • Different methods use different parameters to
    define the unit hydrograph

35
36
Unit Hydrograph Parameters
  • Time lag time between center of mass of
    rainfall and center of mass of runoff, original
    definition by Horner Flynt 1934, (SCS,
    Snyder). Different formulae were developed based
    on different watershed data (e.g., SCS BuReC)
  • Time of concentration - time between end of
    rainfall excess and inflection point of receding
    runoff (Clark)
  • Time to peak beginning of rise to peak (SCS)
  • Storage coefficient R (Clark)
  • Temporal distribution of runoff (BuReC, SCS)

36
37
Unit Hydrograph parameters
Rainfall excess precipipation - loss
Lag time
Receding limb
Q
Time of concentration
Point of inflection
Rising limb
Peak Time
time
37
38
Synthetic Unit Hydrograph
  • Uses Lag Time and a temporal distribution
    (dimensionless or S-graph) to develop the unit
    hydrograph

38
39
Lag Time
  • Unit Hydrograph Lag Time (Tlag or Lg) per Bureau
    of Reclamation

39
40
Lag Time
  • Lg unit hydrograph lag time in hours
  • L length of the longest watercourse from the
    point of concentration to the drainage boundary,
    in miles

L
Lca
40
Point of concentration
41
Lag Time
  • Lca length along the longest watercourse from
    the point of concentration to a point opposite
    the centroid of the drainage basin, in miles
  • S average slope of the longest watercourse, in
    feet per mile
  • C, N constant

41
42
Lag Time
  • Based on empirical data, regardless of basin
    location
  • N 0.33
  • C 26Kn where Kn is the average Mannings
    roughness coefficient for the drainage network
  • Note other methods such as Snyder and SCS define
    lag time slightly differently

42
43
Lag Time
  • To allow estimate of lag time, the Bureau of
    Reclamation reconstituted 162 flood hydrographs
    from numerous natural basins west of Mississippi
    River to provide charts for lag time for 6
    different regions of the US
  • Use Table 3-5 Fig. 3-7 of DSD for lag time
    estimate for SF Bay Area

43
44
Lag Time
44
45
Lag Time
  • Example, Table 3-5 on p.42, DSD- San
    Francisquito Creek near Stanford University,
    drainage area 38.3 mi2, lag time 4.8 hours, Kn
    0.110- Matadero Creek at Palo Alto, drainage
    area 7.2 mi2, lag time 3.7 hours, Kn 0.119

45
46
UH Temporal Distribution
  • Time vs. Discharge relationship
  • Bureau of Reclamation uses 2 methods to develop
    temporal distribution based on recorded
    hydrographs divided into 6 regions across the
    US- dimensionless unit hydrograph method, -
    S-graph technique
  • Tables 3-15 and 3-16 (Design of Small Dams) for
    the SF Bay Area

46
47
Temporal Dist. Table 3-16
47
48
Temp. Dist. - S-graph Method
48
49
S-graph method - Example
  • Read pp. 37-52 of Design of Small Dams
  • drainage area 250 mi2
  • lag time 12 hours
  • unit duration 12/5 ? 2 hours (SCS
    recommendation)
  • Ultimate discharge drainage area in mi2 times
    52802/3600/12 and divided by unit duration, in
    this case 80662.5 cfs

49
50
S-graph method - example
50
51
Bureaus Method - summary
  • Estimate lag time and time-flow distribution
  • Based on recorded hydrographs
  • Regionalized approach does not consider
    specific local condition
  • Works better for larger watersheds, such as for
    dam construction
  • For smaller watersheds, or smaller design flood
    events, consider another method, such as the
    Clark unit hydrograph method

51
52
Clark Unit Hydrograph Method
  • Reading Materials- Chapter 7 of Flood-Runoff
    Analysis, EM 1110-2-1417, Corps of Engineers,
    Aug. 94http//www.usace.army.mil/publications/en
    g-manuals/em1110-2-1417/toc.htm- if you have
    more time, read - Unit Hydrograph Technical
    Manual, National Weather Service,
    www.nohrsc.noaa.gov/technology/gis/uhg_manual.html

52
53
Clark Unit Hydrograph Method
  • Uses the concept of instantaneous unit hydrograph
    (IUH) hydrograph resulted from 1 unit of
    rainfall excess occurring over the basin in zero
    time
  • Uses IUH to compute a unit hydrograph for any
    unit duration equal to or greater than the time
    interval used in computation
  • Uses 2 parameters and a time-area relationship to
    define IUH

53
54
Clark Unit Hydrograph Method
  • Need 2 parameters time of concentration (Tc) and
    storage coefficient (R)
  • Tc travel time from the most upstream point in
    the basin to the outflow location
  • or Tc time from the end of rainfall to the
    inflection point on the recession limb
  • R Q/(dQ/dt) at point of inflection estimate
    from recorded flood hydrographs
  • Example reconstitute a flood hydrograph for
    Thomas Creek at Paskenta, CA for Jan/1963

54
55
Clark Unit Hydrograph
  • Step 1 Delineate watershed boundary

55
56
Clark Unit Hydrograph
  • Step 2 Identify major watercourses

56
57
Clark Unit Hydrograph
  • Step 3 Estimate time of concentration by
    estimating overland and river travel times
    through the watershed. Identify watershed
    slopes, surface cover types and river channel
    geometries, and use simplified relationships to
    estimate travel time.

57
58
Time of Concentration
  • Watershed flow characteristics sheet flow
    approximately 0.1 ft deep, less than 300 ft in
    length shallow concentrated flow channel
    flow

58
59
Sheet Flow Roughness Coef. Engman 1986
59
60
Sheet Flow travel time
  • Sheet flow travel time (Tt)Tt travel time in
    hrn Mannings roughness coefficientL flow
    length in ftP2 2-yr, 24-hr rainfall in
    inchesS slope in ft/ft

60
61
Sheet Flow travel time
  • NOAA Atlas precipitation distribution maps
  • Northern California 2-yr, 24-hour rainfall
    http//hydrology.nws.noaa.gov/oh/hdsc/On-line_repo
    rts/Volume20XI20California/1973/North202420hr
    20precipitation20charts.djvu
  • For San Jose area, 2.2 inches

61
62
Shallow Concentrated Flow velocities
62
63
Time of Concentration (Step 3)
  • Channel flow use Mannings equation
  • travel time channel length/velocity
  • Time of concentration summation of travel times
    from sheet flow, shallow concentrated flow and
    channel flow
  • Do this for the entire watershed separated into
    subareas based on slope and surface cover
  • Sum up the travel time through the watershed and
    divide into equal-travel-time subareas
    (isochrones)

63
64
Clark Method (Step 3) - isochrones
64
65
Clark UH Procedure (Step 4)
  • Draw isochrones to subdivide the basin into
    chosen number of parts, e.g., if Tc8 hr., choose
    8 subdivisions with ?t1 hr.
  • Measure the area (ai) between each pair of
    isochrones and tabulate. ai ordinate in units
    of area (mi2 or km2)
  • Plot ( of Tc) versus (cumulative area).
    Tabulate increments at 1 ?t apart

65
66
Clark UH Example
Map Area Planimeter Value Accum. Value Accum. Area (km2) Travel time in Tc
1 0.08 0.08 12 12.5
2 0.15 0.23 35 25.0
3 0.40 0.63 96 37.5
4 0.36 0.99 151 50.0
5 0.45 1.44 220 62.5
6 0.45 1.89 288 75.0
7 0.66 2.55 389 87.5
8 0.68 3.23 493 100.0
66
67
67
68
Clark UH Procedure
  • ApproachTime-Cumulative Area curve?
    Translation hydrograph? Linear reservoir
    routing? Instantaneous Unit Hydrograph? Unit
    Hydrograph of a duration

68
69
Clark UH Procedure
69
70
Clark UH Procedure
  • Convert areas into flows (area x unit rainfall /
    unit time) of a translation hydrograph Ii
    Kai/?t where Ii ordinate of translation
    hydrograph in unit of discharge (cfs or cms) at
    end of period i, K conversion factor (645 to
    convert in-mi2 to cfs or 0.278 to convert mm-km2
    to cms) 0.278 1000x1000/1000/3600

70
71
Clark UH Example
(1) Time (hr) (2) Rain over ai (mm-km2) (3) Inflow Ii Of translation hydrograph (cms) (4) IUH Oi (cms) (5) 2-hr UH Qi (cms)
0 0 0
2 35 5
4 116 16
71
72
Storage Coefficient R (Step 5)
  • For linear reservoir SRO
  • Estimate from recorded hydrographThe inflection
    point of a recession limb, by definition, is when
    inflow ceases, because time of concentration is
    from end of rainfall to the inflection point, and
    is when the last rain reaches the end of the
    watershed.dS/dt I-O -O continuity
    equationdS/dt R dO/dt for linear reservoir?
    R -O/(dO/dt) at the inflection point

72
73
73
74
Storage Coefficient R
  • R is used to define a dimensionless routing
    constant C
  • C
  • with R5.5 hours and ?t 2 hours,C 0.308

74
75
Clark UH Procedure (Step 6)
  • Route the inflows (Col. 3) to the outflow
    location (Col. 4)Oi CIi (1-C)Oi-1Oi
    outflow from the basin at the end of period iIi
    inflow from each area at the end of period i

75
76
Clark UH Example
(1) Time (hr) (2) Inflow ai (mm-km2) (3) Inflow Ii (cms) (4) IUH Oi (cms) (5) 2-hr UH Qi (cms)
0 0 0 0
2 35 5 1.55
4 116 16 5.97
76
77
Clark UH Example
6 137 19 10.01
8 205 29 15.69
10 0 0 10.85
12 7.50
14 5.19

77
78
Clark UH Procedure
  • Average the ordinates of the IUH to create the
    unit hydrograph (Col. 5) Qi 0.5 (Oi Oi-1)
  • The duration of the UH may be different from ?t
    (provided that it is an exact multiple of ?t),
    and the UH follows this formulaQi 1/n (0.5Oi-n
    Oi-n1 Oi-1 0.5Oi)
  • where

78
79
Clark UH Procedure
  • Qi ordinate at time i of unit hydrograph of
    duration D and tabulation interval ?t
  • n D/ ?t
  • D unit hydrograph duration
  • ?t tabulation interval

79
80
Clark UH Example
(1) Time (hr) (2) Inflow ai (mm-km2) (3) Inflow Ii (cms) (4) IUH Oi (cms) (5) 2-hr UH Qi (cms)
0 0 0 0 0
2 35 5 1.55 0.78
4 116 16 5.97 3.76
80
81
Clark UH Example
6 137 19 10.01 7.99
8 205 29 15.69 12.85
10 0 0 10.85 13.27
12 7.50 9.17
14 5.19 6.35

81
82
Clark UH Example
  • Continue the UH calculation to Hour 46 when the
    discharge diminishes to 0
  • For each 2-hour interval of the Jan/Feb 1963
    storm, compute rainfall excess, multiply by the
    UH ordinates and lag the time of occurrence to
    obtain the flood hydrograph
  • Compare with the measured hydrograph

82
83
83
84
The END
84
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com