Title: MTA SEMINAR What
1MTA SEMINARWhats Wrong With Turkeys Quest
for Nuclear Power!?MUSTAFA KIBAROGLU, Ph.D.ISP
MTA FellowBelfer Center for Science and
International AffairsJohn F. Kennedy School of
GovernmentHARVARD UNIVERSITY
- BCSIA Library
- December 14, 2004
2Whats Wrong With Turkeys Quest for Nuclear
Power!?
- Turkeys international standing
- Signed the NPT in January 1969 and ratified in
April 1980 - Signed Safeguards Agreement with the IAEA
(INFCIRC/295) in September 1981 - Ratified the Additional Protocol in July 2001
- Signed the CTBT August 1996 and ratified in
February 2001 - Member of the Zangger Committee and the NSG
since June 2000 - Member of the MTCR since April 1997
- Signed the BTWC in April 1972 and ratified in
November 1974 - Signed the CWC in January 1993 and ratified in
May 1997
3Whats Wrong With Turkeys Quest for Nuclear
Power!?
- Some facts about Turkey
- Population 67 millions
- Population growth rate 2.1 per annum
- Population forecast 85 millions in
2010 100 millions in 2020 - Total energy energy production 26
million tons oil equivalent (mtoe) in 2003 - Total energy energy consumption 2003 84
mtoe 2010 126 mtoe 2020 222 mtoe - Total electricity consumption 150
billion kilowatt hours (TWh) in 2004 - Increase in electricity consumption 7 per
annum - Distribution of energy sources 38
oil 27 coal 23 gas 12 hydraulic
4Whats Wrong With Turkeys Quest for Nuclear
Power!?
- Estimates of electricity consumption by various
institutions - MoE 2005 197 TWh 2010 294 TWh 2020 570
TWh - TEAS 2005 212 TWh 2010 290 TWh 2020 547
TWh - CEE 2005 171 TWh 2010 224 TWh 2020 310 TWh
- The consumption figure for 2004 which is 150 TWh
suggests that, with a - 7 increase per annum, the energy consumption in
2005 should be around 160.5 TWh. This implies
that for the year 2005 there is - 18.6 deviation in the estimate of MoE
- 24.3 deviation in the estimate of TEAS
- 6.2 deviation in the estimate of the CEE
5Whats Wrong With Turkeys Quest for Nuclear
Power!?
- Turkeys energy potential as of 2004
- Installed capacity 37,480 MWe
- Share of indigenous sources 30 percent
- Thermal potential 120 TWh
- Installed thermal capacity 42 TWh (35)
- Hydroelectric potential 128 TWh
- Installed hydroelectric capacity 45 TWh (35)
- Total energy potential 248 TWh
- Total capacity created 87 TWh (35)
- Total energy consumed 150 TWh
6Whats Wrong With Turkeys Quest for Nuclear
Power!?
- Major steps in Turkeys interest in nuclear
energy - In 1956 the Turkish Atomic Energy Commission
(TAEC) was established under the auspices of the
Turkish Prime Ministry to coordinate efforts to
build nuclear research and training centers, and
to issue licenses for nuclear power plants - In 1961 the Cekmece Nuclear Research and
Training Center (CNRTC) was established and a 1
MWth pool-type research reactor TR-1 was
installed in 1962 - In 1966 the Ankara Nuclear Research and Training
Center (ANRTC) was established to carry out
fundamental and applied research to use nuclear
energy and technology for the benefit of the
country and to support national development - In 1967 first feasibility studies for the
construction of 400 MWe PHWR were launched in
order to start generating electricity by 1977
- From 1972 to 1974 site selection studies for a
600 MWe nuclear power plant were conducted
throughout Turkey and in 1976 TAEC issued license
for the Akkuyu Bay on the Mediterranean due to
its stable seismic conditions
7Whats Wrong With Turkeys Quest for Nuclear
Power!?
Akkuyu Bay
site for nuclear power plant
IAEA Public Relations official Hans Frederich
Meyer said, Akkuyu is the most suitable place in
the world to build a nuclear power plant.
Turkish Daily News, May 31, 1997
8Whats Wrong With Turkeys Quest for Nuclear
Power!?
- Major steps in Turkeys interest in nuclear
energy (contd) - In 1977 negotiations on the construction of a
600 MWe power plant begun with two
half-state-owned Swedish firms, namely Asea-Atom
and Stal-Laval - In 1979 the 250 kWth Triga Mark II research
reactor started in operation - In 1980 site selection survey for a second
nuclear power plant begun and Inceburun on the
Black Sea shore was selected - In 1981 the TR-1, which was shut down in 1977,
was replaced by a 5 MWth pool-type research
reactor TR-2 - In 1982 TAEC was replaced by Turkish Atomic
Energy Authority (TAEK) as a governmental
organization under the direct supervision of the
Prime Minister - In 1983 letters of intent were issued to 3
firms AECL for a 655 MWe CANDU (Akkuyu) KWU for
990 MWe PWR (Akkuyu) GE for 1,185 MWe BWR
(Sinop)
9Whats Wrong With Turkeys Quest for Nuclear
Power!?
- Major steps in Turkeys interest in nuclear
energy (contd) - ...General Electric (GE) soon withdrawn, but AECL
and KWU continued. At a later stage KWU as well
withdrawn - In 1984 the Turkish government suggested
Built-Operate-Transfer (BOT) to AECL for two
CANDU reactors one in Akkuyu and one in Inceburun
(Sinop) - Allegations about an illegal Turkish-Pakistani
connection are intensified and they have
affected the Canadian firm, which had already
encountered troubles in financing the bid,
resulting in a deadlock in the negotiations - In 1988 Turkey signed a 15-year nuclear
cooperation agreement with Argentina for
technical assistance including front-end
nuclear fuel-cycle research and development, and
research on power and research reactor planning,
construction, quality assurance, operation and
regulation - Turkey is interested in Argentine 380 MWe Argos
PWR designed by Empresa Nuclear Argentina de
Centrales Electricas (ENACE)
10Whats Wrong With Turkeys Quest for Nuclear
Power!?
- Major steps in Turkeys interest in nuclear
energy (contd) - ...As part of the agreement Turkish scientists
and technicians would go to Bariloche Nuclear
Center in Argentina for training - Turkey also sought an agreement for an Argentine
25 MWe CAREM nuclear reactor developed by
Investigaciones Aplicadas (INVAP) at Bariloche
Center - In 1990 Turkey and Argentina agreed to form a
joint architect-engineering firm to develop
Argentinas modular low power CAREM-25 reactors
to export to other nations in Latin America,
Africa and the Middle East in the long term - The United States was said to have worried
because of the fears that Turkey might sell the
technology, that it would acquire from Argentina,
to Pakistan - Prof. Dr. Yalcin Sanalan, then Director of TAEK,
soon cancelled the CAREM-25 deal which he found
ambiguous, because CAREM was too small for
electricity generation, too big for research and
training, but suitable for plutonium production
thus a proliferation concern that would diminish
Turkeys chances in the future
11Whats Wrong With Turkeys Quest for Nuclear
Power!?
- Major steps in Turkeys interest in nuclear
energy (contd) - ...in 1995 the Korean Atomic Energy Research
Institute (KAERI) won a contract for
investigation of internationally accepted
contemporary nuclear power plant types and
systems feasible for Turkey review of bids
solicited during previous attempts to set up a
nuclear program in Turkey and consultations with
TEAS during bid evaluations and contract
negotiations - In 1996 Turkey planned to accept bids for Akkuyu
nuclear power plant either as a single unit of
1,200 MWe or two units of 600 MWe each - Three consortia made offers in the bidding 1.
Westinghouse (USA), Mitsubishi (Japan) Enka-MNG
(Turkey) 2. AECL (Canada), Kuarner John Brown
(Britain), Hitachi (Japan), Gama-Guris-Bayindir
(Turkey), Ansoldo (Italy) Daiwoo (Korea). 3. NPI
(France-Germany), Siemens (Germany), Framatome
(France), Campenon Bernard-Hochtief-Garanti
(Germany-Turkey), Simko, STFA, Tekfen (Turkey) - In June 2000, the Turkish government postponed
the bid to be considered at a later time due to
a lack of financial resources
12Whats Wrong With Turkeys Quest for Nuclear
Power!?
- Why did Turkeys repeated attempts to install
nuclear power plants fail? - International Concerns
- 1...Worries about illicit cooperation between
Turkey and Pakistan - 2...Allegations of secret desires to build
nuclear weapons capability - Domestic Disorder
- 1...Lack of well defined objectives
- 2...Lack of coordination within bureaucracy
- 3...Lack of a master plan
- 4...Lack of a reliable database
- 5...Lack of financial resources
13Whats Wrong With Turkeys Quest for Nuclear
Power!
- Major arguments against nuclear energy in Turkey
- 1...Nuclear energy is old fashioned and
abandoned in the developed world - 2...Renewable energy is fashionable and Turkey
has enough potential - 3... Nuclear energy is not cheap anymore, and
its percentage will be small - 4...Nuclear accidents can have catastrophic
effects - 5...Nuclear waste disposal is a big problem yet
to be found a safe solution - 6...Nuclear energy plants increase dependency on
foreign fuel - 7...Energy consumption estimates are
exaggerated - 8...Uprading the energy distribution system
costs cheaper - 9...Akkuyu is very close to faultlines sesimic
studies must be revised
14Whats Wrong With Turkeys Quest for Nuclear
Power!
- My arguments against possession of nuclear
weapons by Turkey - 1...Turkey is a member of the NPT as a NNWS
- 2...Turkey has comprehensive safeguards
agreement with the IAEA - 3...Turkey is a state party to the Additional
Protocol of the IAEA - 4...Interest groups and NGOs in Turkey will not
tolerate clandestine efforts - 5...Turkey is a member of NATO and has EU
membership perspective - 6...Turkey has powerful armed forces doesnt
need nukes to deter enemies - 7...Turkey cannot use nuclear weapons
effectively in any scenario - 8...Confrontation with the world will have
disastrous effects for Turkey - 9...Turkeys neighbors may wage proxy wars, as
did Syria in the past
15Whats Wrong With Turkeys Quest for Nuclear
Power!
Conference on Energy Resources and Security,
January 15-16, 2004, War Academies, Istanbul
16 MTA SEMINAR Whats Wrong With Turkeys Quest
for Nuclear Power? MUSTAFA KIBAROGLU, Ph.D.ISP
MTA FellowBelfer Center for Science and
International AffairsJohn F. Kennedy School of
GovernmentHARVARD UNIVERSITY
- BCSIA Library
- December 14, 2004