Title: DHS Proposal
1CxO Advisory Council Stake Holders Meeting A
Public/Private Partnership for leveraging IT
innovation and best practices
September 2005
Assuring the business value of technology
John Weiler. Founder JP Morganthal, Chief
Architect Ron Parsons, EVP Programs Infor_at_ICHnet.
org 703 768 0400 www.ICHnet.org www.SecurE-Biz.ne
t
This document is confidential and is intended
solely for the use and information of the client
to whom it is addressed.
2Stake Holders Meeting Agenda 0800-1200
- 0800-0815 Overview of CxO Advisory Council
Charter Ron Parsons, John Weiler, JP Morgenthal - Collaborate CxO Advisory Council Public/Private
Partnership - 0815-0900 How CxO Advisory Council dove tails
with existing programs - Educate SecurE-Biz CxO Summit, promoting
solutions - Validate Solution Architecture Integration Lab,
a solution engineering resource center - 0830-0900 QA Charter acceptance,
clarifications, refinement. Bob Dix, EVP Citadel
Security - 0900-1000 Serving the needs of our most dedicated
Federal Leaders - John Garing, CIO, Director Strategic Planning and
Information, DISA - David Tillotson, Director Policy, Plans,
Resources, US AF XC - Karen Marsh, Citizen-Corp, Dept of Homeland
Security - 1000-1030 QA with Government Leaders
- 1030-1130 How CxO Advisory Council leverages many
communities of interests - Alan Balutis, President Govt Research, Input
- Randall Yim, Director, Homeland Security
Institute - Red Thompson, VP Council for Excellence in
Government - Rod Nydam, George Mason, Critical Information
Infrastructure Program - 1130-1230 Open Dialog, Next Steps Ron Parsons,
EVP Programs, ICHnet.org
3CAC mission
to advance collaborative mechanismsthat
assure the successful adoption of secure
technical solutions aligned with business drivers
in an inclusive, and conflict
free, market place
4Current Situation
- 72 of all major IT programs are failing (54 in
industry) IDG, Gartner GAO - Govt Planning and Acquisition process do not
leverage best practices (GAO, Congress) - Small innovative businesses are underutilized and
hard to track - Real world best practices and lessons learned
inaccessible or hard to replicate - Business value of technology investments hard to
prove or predict - Performance Metrics and measurable outcomes are
difficult to establish - Missing link between technology and business
requirements - Complexity and fast pace of IT market undermines
timely decision making
5Desired Outcomes (building on 7 years of applied
RD)
- For Government PMs, CxOs
- Reduce research costs and evaluation
- Identification and remediation of risks in the
lifecycle process - Access to wide-range of industry expertise
- Mitigation of OCI issues when engaging industry
- Improve efficiency and effectiveness of the
acquisition process - Industry Members
- Validation of unique market capabilities for
small and large alike - Ability to participate in the CPIC process
without OCI concerns - Reduce bid costs
- Ability to participate in funded research/pilot
projects - Lower-cost means of demonstrating and validating
market capabilities
6CxO Advisory Council Goals and Objectives
- Goal To Provide CxOs (CIO, CISO, CSO, CTO, CEO,
CFO, PMs) a conflict free structure for sharing
best practices and lessons learned for
Cyber-security, Secure Information Sharing, and
Secure Network Infrastructure. - Provide a collaborative, conflict free forum
where key federal, state, local, tribal and
industry stake holders can collaborate in
developing strategies, plans and architectures - Document issues and barriers inhibiting
implementation success - Enhance the awareness of government and industry
leaders on mechanisms required to comply with
emerging homeland security legislation FISMA,
HSPD12, Sarbanes-Oxley, 911 Commission
Recommendations - Supporting Capabilities
- Identify, model and validate proven business
processes, architectures and technical solutions
for assuring implementation success (SAIL) - Educate National U.S. leadership and key stake
holders in applied technical solutions and their
associated implementation best practices
(SecurE-Biz Forums) - Recognize and promote those patriotic and
dedicated leaders who have demonstrated
leadership and success in helping secure our
homeland (SecurE-Biz Leadership Awards)
7Action Items Please volunteer
- Validate Charter with various stake holder
groups Agencies, Hill, Solution Providers, Small
Businesses, Non-profits, Academia - Develop membership structure that is self
sustaining yet leverages existing industry
association capabilities (leverage not compete) - Organize domain working groups and committees
- Review current organizational structure to
support Public/private Partnership - Review SAIL conflict of interest mitigation
process with acquisition community - Modify/adopt SAIL lexicon that improves the
precision of the communication of business
requirements and technical capabilities - Establish 06 SecurE-Biz Education Committee
8Domain Working GroupsWhere collaboration and
information sharing are optimized
- Secure Information Sharing (Identity Management,
Multi-level security, Portals) - Horizontal Integration (Web Services, Solution
Oriented Architectures) - Net-Centric Computing (Secure Information
Infrastructure, NCES, IA) - Infrastructure Protection (Cyber-Security,
Resilience Planning) - Case Management (Record Management, CRM)
- Mission Assurance (Actionable Architectures,
Portfolio Mgt, BPR)
9 Prospective Public/Private Partners
- Federal Agencies US AF XC, Defense Information
Systems Agency, Director for National
Intelligence, National Reconnaissance Office,
National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, Office
of the Secretary of Defense (OSD NII OSD HD),
Federal Aviation Administration, Department of
Homeland Security, US Army PEO/EIS, Navy SPAWAR,
DIA, FBI - Hill House Homeland Security Committee, Senate
Homeland Security Committee, Govt Reform
Committee, House Select Committee on Intelligence
- Non-profit AFFIRM, American Bankers Association,
Center for Internet Security, CCIA, Council for
Excellence in Government, Financial Services
Technology Consortium, NVTC, NBSP, Information
Systems Security Association, Object Management
Group (OMG), Open GIS Consortia, Professional
Services Council, Society for Information
Management, Homeland Security Institute, Rosettex - Academia Harvard University Kennedy School,
George Washington University, George Mason
University, University of MD, National Defense
University - Solution Providers Anteon, ATT, Alcatel, BEA
Systems, BAE Systems, BMC, CSC, BearingPoint
Inc., Booz Allen Hamilton, Computer Associates,
Citrix, EDS, Entrust Technologies, Fortify,
Google, Harris Corp, IBM Federal, Intel, KPMG,
Lockheed Martin, Lucent, NetApps, Nortel/PEC,
Northrop Grumman, Oracle, PWC Consulting, SAIC,
SRA, Sun Microsystems, Titan/L3, VeriSign,
Verity, Verizon, and too many small businesses to
name. - Commercial Leaders General Motors, E-Bay,
Citigroup,..
10Emerging CxO Advisory Council OfferingsAlready
on ICH GSA Schedule 70 and MOBIS
- A Formal IT Solution Assessment Framework
Developed and evolved under a government
sanctioned, 501C6 non-profit that helps
government and industry transform IT acquisition
process - Knowledge Exchange that facilitates value chain
members in modeling, validating and leveraging
implementation best practices and lessons learned
to assure solution architecture process. - Solution Architecture Integration Lab A virtual
IT solution assessment lab that leveraging
existing research and implementation experiences
without conflicts of interest Do more with less
- Educational Programs Created by and for the
Federal IT Leadership to be a catalyst for
transformation SecurE-Biz CxO Forum (co-hosted
by DHS, DoD and Intel community) - A COTS Interoperability Clearinghouse Where
government and industry work together to
identify, model and validate common solution
frameworks in terms of business fits,
interoperability and securability based on real
world implementation experiences. - Cost of the ICH ounce of prevention PRICELESS
(23k to 500k per program, now on GSA Schedule,
MOBIS, USDA BPA, DHS BPA and GPO)
11Guidance for IT Reform and Business
Transformation We understand the problem, and can
no longer afford business as usual
- Clinger/Cohen Act requires (IT Leadership)
shall develop, .., a process for analyzing,
tracking, and evaluating the risks and results of
all major capital investments made by an
executive agency for information systems. and
shall include explicit criteria for analyzing the
projected and actual costs, benefits, and risks
associated with the investments - AF Scientific Advisory Board Report on Challenges
of Integrating Commercial Items into missions
systems Most (PMs) are struggling with the
complexity and a few have failed miserably. The
complexities are numerous and less than obvious.
. Requirements must flow into an architecture
that can truly exploit the advantages of COTS.
Contractors must shift from a design and build
unique product to buy and integrate standards
products.(Everyone) freely admits that have
made every mistake imaginable along the way.
Unfortunately, others cant image the mistake
that are about to make. - OMB FEA-PMO requires Select, recommend, plan,
guide, and assist initiative teams in the
deployment of technologies that are proven,
stable, interoperable, portable, secure, and
scalable. Facilitate the migration and transition
of E-Government initiatives from legacy and
"inward-driven" architectures, to architectures
that embrace component-driven methodologies and
technology reuse. - IAC EA SIG Recommendations to OMB and the CIO
Council (2003) A neutral party should facilitate
reaching consensus on the many areas necessary
for adoption of Component-based Architectures.
Rather than attempting to achieve global
consensus (ie standards), it should be developed
among a few motivated agencies and the results
provided to other agencies to adopt as they are
able. - ECCWG report to the DEPSECDEF Current
architectural initiatives (C4ISR, JTA) dont
quite fit the E-Business problem space. Rate of
Technology Change Exacerbates the Problem the
lack of an easily understood process modeling
technique is a root cause for the lack of
participation of the general user in the
definition of business processes.
12Demonstrated Progress in meeting these
needs Together we stand to overcome the
challenges
- Office of the Secretary of Defense, DCIO "Since
the value of the ICH to our programs increases
rapidly through results sharing, we encourage the
defense community and IT industry to participate
directly in the public service initiative in
terms of sponsorship and lessons learned" - Assessment by DoDs Leading FFRDC... the concept
of the Interoperability Clearinghouse is sound
and vital. Its developing role as an honest
broker of all interoperability technologies, no
matter what the source, is especially needed.
Such efforts should be supported by any
organization that wants to stop putting all of
its money into maintaining archaic software and
obtuse data formats, and instead start focusing
on bottom-line issues of productivity and
cost-effective use of information technology. - OMB/GAO Recommendations Establish a set of
normalized, re-usable solution frameworks to
accelerate the requirements, development, and
implementation of Cross-Agency e-Gov initiatives.
Enable transforming of common e-business
requirements into interoperable COTS solution
suites that provide immediate ROI. Provide a
formal process to enable Component-Based Systems
Engineering. Eliminate redundancy and reduce cost
by providing agencies with a common, cross agency
solution requirements and research lab. Provide
a joint government/industry clearinghouse of
re-usable and normalized requirements
blueprints in a common form - DARPA Commendation on ICH RD Project The
unique work youve done to frame issues about
Interoperability effects on IA of systems is
particularly encouraging. I believe it can
contribute to ongoing work in the field of IA
metrics and composition ongoing at DARPA and
other agencies. I was pleasantly surprised at
the effective and efficient use of funding I was
able to invest in this effort as well as your
ability to leverage other funding sources. You
guys came through! Â - Howard Schmidt, Former White House Cyber Security
Advisor and Chair of President's critical
infrastructure protection board, The SecurE-Biz
CxO Security Summit continues to provide a level
of depth and breadth that many executives seek
from an executive training program. Â SecurE-Biz
is a must attend for those business and IT
executives who are seeking to leveraging the
combined experiences of the worlds leading
security experts.
13Key Milestones leading to the CxO Advisory
Council formation
ICH Awarded GPO PMO Contract
ICH Awarded DHS SAIL BPA
2005
ICH Wins Commerce EA Contract w/ CSC
ICH wins USDA BPA w/ SRA
ICH wins GSA FSS Contract w/ LMI
OSD HA Awards ICH EA Contract
2004
ICH wins GSA FMS Contract w/ JACER
GSA MOBIS contract Awarded to ICH
ICH Develops DEAs EA Strategic Plan
2003
ICH wins GTN21 Contract with Harris
ICH Establishes Value Chain approach completing
FEA process
ICH awarded first ever GSA Schedule for
Architecture IVV
2002
ICH establishes XML COTS Solution Templates
ICH Membership Create e-Solutions Registry
ICH Membership establishes Architecture Assurance
Method
2001
DARPA awards ICH grant to establish Architecture
Assessment method/tool
9-11-00 ICH incorporates as 501C6 Research
Consortia
2000
DEPSECDEF adopts ICH ECCWG Recommendations
OSD ECCWG Forges Partnership w/ ICH, IAC,
NDIA/AFEI, AFCEA
ICH given seat at Federal CIO Council
1999
Office of the Secretary of Defense validates
endorses ICH
ICH launches SecurE-Biz.net Executive Summit
Healthcare, Defense, Aerospace, Media, Commerce
industries apply ICH method
1998
Interop WG establishes COTS Validation
Methodology.
Interoperability Clearinghouse initiative
established as medium for Government and Industry
collaboration. DoD, IBM, Microsoft, Sun, Oracle,
Lockheed, KPMG pledge support when established
Filename/RPS Number
12