Title: Chapter 4: defined benefit integration provisions
1Chapter 4 defined benefit integration provisions
2How xyzs Retirement Benefit Is Combined With
Social Security
- Example
- Age 65 - 30 years of service - FAE 3,000 -
Social Security Benefit 1,313.10 - 60 of 3000 1,800.00
- 50 of 1313 - 656.55
- xyz Retirement Benefit 1,143.45
- Social Security Benefit 1,313.10
- Total Monthly Retirement Benefit 2,456.55 (81.9
of FAE) - In this example, the final average earnings is
3,000. The total retirement benefit is
2,456.55. - FAE - Final Average Earnings, including Profit
Sharing
3A quick review of PIA offset plans
- pre-TRA86 Revenue Ruling 71-446 imposed a
maximum limit on the permitted offset - up to 83 1/3 percent but most employers did not
want to explain a reduction higher than 50
percent to employees - N.B. linked to primary PIA
- did not change as Social Security benefits
increased through colas
4TRA 86
- Add Section 401(l) defining statutory permitted
disparity and killing pure excess - offset Abbot provides 1.1 highest average pay
(max 35) with offset of .5 highest 3 year
average pay up to Social Security covered comp
(yob table) participation (max 35 years) - excess Acco provides (0.75 HAP to CC 1.25
HAP over CC) service (max 30)
5Impact of TRA 86 on employers
- According to CRS, it appears to have influenced
plan sponsors to change their integration methods
from offset to excess - Although more than 1/2 of all pension
participants were still covered by integrated
plans
6Employer breakdown by size
KPMG Retirement Benefits in the 1990s 1998
7What happened to PIA offset?
- Conventional PIA-offset plan violates the
integration disparity condition under 401(l) - Does not mean that this violates the
nondiscrimination requirement - However, must satisfy the general
nondiscrimination test (Section 401(a)(4))
8What does this mean?
- Quick definition of rate groups and minimum
coverage principles - IF the plan covers no HCEs, then satisfaction
should be automatic - Otherwise, depends on demographics of the group
(see Benefits Quarterly article)
9What is the difference between a PIA-offset and a
statutory offset?
- Mathematically they may be essentially the same
- See Record of the Society of Actuaries, Volume
16, Number 4B, page 3071 for a discussion - BUT from the employees standpoint it MAY be true
that the impact of the latter is harder to discern
10Interested in more detail on permitted disparity?
11Permitted disparity
- The benefits from the employer's plan must be
dovetailed with Social Security benefits - in such a manner that employees earning over the
taxable base will not receive combined benefits
under the two programs that are proportionately
greater than the combined benefits for employees
earning under this amount. - The integration level
- the dollar amount specified in an excess plan at
or below which the rate of employer-provided
contributions or the plan is less than the rate
of employer provided contributions or benefits
under the plan above such dollar amount. - The offset level
- the dollar limit specified in the plan for the
amount of each employee's final average
compensation taken into account in determining
the offset under an offset plan - The covered compensation
- the average (without indexing) of the taxable
wage bases in effect for an employee for each
year during the 35-year period ending with the
year in which Social Security retirement age is
attained
12Alternative methods of meeting the Section 401(l)
requirements for a defined benefit plan
- excess plan
- the rate at which employer-provided benefits are
determined with respect to average annual
compensation above the integration level is
greater than the rate at which employer-provided
benefits are determined with respect to average
annual compensation at or below the integration
level - expressed as a percentage of such average annual
compensation - offset plan
- each employee's employer-provided benefit is
reduced or offset by a specified percentage of
the employee's final average compensation up to
the offset level under the plan.
13Average annual compensation and final average
compensation.
- Average annual compensation is calculated as an
average over a period of at least three
consecutive years, and can exclude years before
the final ten years of service. - Final average compensation is the average of the
employee's annual compensation from the employer
for the three consecutive year period ending with
or within the plan year. - Compensation for any year in excess of the
taxable wage base in effect at the beginning of
that year must not be taken into account in
determining final average compensation.
14Maximum excess allowance
- The disparity between the excess benefit
percentage and the base benefit percentage may
not exceed the maximum excess allowance defined
as the lesser of - the base benefit percentage or
- 0.75 percent (reduced for any integration level
or retirement age modifications)
15Gross benefit percentage
- The rate at which employer-provided benefit are
determined under an offset plan (before
application of the offset) with respect to an
employee's average annual compensation (expressed
as a percentage of average annual compensation) - The disparity (as determined by the offset
percentage) may not exceed the maximum offset
allowance defined as the lesser of - 0.75 percent (reduced for any integration level
or retirement age modifications as explained
below) or - one-half of the gross benefit percentage,
multiplied by a fraction (not to exceed one)
equal to the employee's average annual
compensation divided by the employee's final
average compensation up to the offset level
16Annual/Cumulative disparity fractions
- Disparity provided under the plan divided by
either the maximum excess allowance (for excess
plans) or the maximum offset allowance (for
offset plans) - ? disparity fractions ? 1
- The cumulative permitted disparity limit is
satisfied if the sum of the employee's total
annual disparity fractions does not exceed 35
17The future of PIA offsets?
- If the government were to improve Social
Security benefits and the gross pension benefit
did not change, the larger offset would result in
a smaller net benefit - Section 411 of the IRC (vesting) generally
prohibits a reduction in benefits already accrued - Will this be modified????
18The other side of Social Security reform
KPMG Retirement Benefits in the 1990s 1998
19Questions
- The following facts apply to the next three
questions unless otherwise provided plan is
noncontributory and is the only plan ever
maintained by the employer the plan uses a
normal retirement age of 65 and contains no
provision that would require a reduction on the
0.75 percent factor. Defined benefit excess
plans used each employee's covered compensation
as the integration level offset plans used each
employee's covered compensation is the offset
level and provides that an employee's final
average compensation is limited to the employee's
average annual compensation each employee has a
Social Security retirement age of 65.
20Db integration - 1
- An excess plan provides a normal retirement
benefit of 0.5 percent of average annual
compensation in excess of the integration level,
for each year of service. The plan provides not
benefits with respect to average annual
compensation up to the integration level. Result?
21Db integration - 2
- An offset plan that provides a normal retirement
benefit of 2 percent of average annual
compensation, minus 0.75 percent of final average
compensation up to the offset level, for each
year of service up to 35. result?
22Db integration 3
23Db integration - 4
- An employee benefits under C, a dc excess plans
and B, a Defined benefit excess plan of the
employer. Plan C provides a base contribution
percentage of 5 percent and an excess
contribution percentage of 7 percent. Plan B
provides a base benefit percentage of 1 percent
and an excess benefit percentage of 1.35 percent.
Do the plans satisfy the annual overall pd limit
with respect to the employee?
24Db integration - 5
- A Defined benefit excess plan that provides a
normal retirement benefit of 0.75 percent of
average annual compensation up to cc, plus 1.25
percent of average annual compensation above cc,
for each year of service up to 45. result?