Title: Tax Increment Financing
1Tax Increment Financing
- TIF A method for funding public investments in
an area slated for redevelopment by capturing
for a time all or a portion of the increased
property tax revenues that may result if the
redevelopment stimulates private investment. - State enabling legislation is required. (49
states, incl. FL) - Key principles behind the use of TIF
- 1) Private redevelopment would not occur without
(but for) public intervention. (the but for
question) - 2) The tax base in the redevelopment district is
declining/stagnant and any increases would only
occur through public intervention. - 3) The tax authorities that give over their
incremental tax increase will eventually receive
a larger tax base. - TIF is the Dot.Com model of infrastructure
financing.
2The TIF Redevelopment Cycle
Public RedevelopmentExpenditures
3The Typical TIF Procedure
Step 1 A Finding of Necessity is prepared and
boundaries for the redevelopment district are
identified and mapped. Step 2 The Redevelopment
Agency is created by resolution or
ordinance. Step 3 A Redevelopment Plan is
prepared and approved by the overseeing body,
usually the agency and often the city. Step 4
The Base Year is declared following plan
adoption. This locks in the current tax
base. Step 5 The Redevelopment Agency solicits
developers and enters into agreements for
redevelopment projects. Step 6 Revenue Bonds are
sold so that funds are available for front-end
expenses, typically on infrastructure
improvements. Step 7 Bonds are retired with the
revenues deposited into the special fund in the
form of incremental increases in property tax
revenues.
4The Allocation of Property Taxes Under TIF
Base Year Assessed Value
Source Weber (2002) Tax Incremental Financing
in Theory and Practice
5Floridas TIF Legislation
- The state of Floridas TIF enabling legislation
provides thefollowing guidelines for using Tax
Increment Financing in the stateGeneral
Limitations --Must prepare a Finding of
Blight/Slum Conditions --No But For Finding
requirement in the statute --Must delineate a
Redevelopment Area --A Public Purpose for TIF
funds must be identifiedPlanning
Requirements --A CRA Redevelopment Plan is
required --Linkages to Comprehensive Plan must
be identified --Relocation Feasibility Study
required --No CRA-specific CIP is required
Procedures --No Public Vote required (Elected
officials can establish) --A Redevelopment
Agency required --No state participation
required --No direct state oversight --A
Special Deposit Fund must be established
6Tallahassees CRA
- The city has a redevelopment agency that oversees
a community redevelopment area (CRA), generally
made up of areas north of FSU and areas to the
east and west of FAMU. (see map) - A Community Redevelopment Plan (prepared as part
of a DURP Studio) estimated that over thirty
years --Approximately 2,900 housing units will
be constructed --1.1 Mil. Sq Ft of
commercial/office space will be constructed
--316 million will be added to the tax base
over this period --TIF revenues will total
approximately 106 million - These revenues are borrowed against and
infrastructure and urban design improvements can
be made with this money. The common practice is
to invest in capital improvements early in the
process and repay these funds using the TIF
revenue stream. - The city and county are currently fighting (like
very angry cats and dogs!) over a proposed
Downtown CRA.
7(No Transcript)
8Assessing TIF
- TIF is a growing source of infrastructure
funding. Most states have in place enabling
legislation and TIF is a financing mechanism that
is here to stay. But how good an infrastructure
financing mechanism is it? - Advantages
- 1) A new, innovative source source of
infrastructure funding2) Essentially a special
district ? Users pay, Users benefit3) Can
finance infrastructure improvements/additions in
blighted areas 4) Potentially a very useful
redevelopment tool5) There is a infrastructure ?
development relationship - Disadvantages
- 1) Often misused or poorly applied financing
mechanism2) Often very optimistic in terms of
expected revenues development3) Takes money
from other governments4) A risky approach to
redevelopment (borrowing against anticipated
future revenue streams to fund needed capital
improvements)5) Quasi-government, no direct
public accountability