Financing Decisions and The Cost of Capital - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Financing Decisions and The Cost of Capital

Description:

Financing Decisions and The Cost of Capital. Outline (1) Descriptive Data and Overview of Financing (2) The Debt versus Equity Decision ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:1553
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 43
Provided by: zen3
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Financing Decisions and The Cost of Capital


1
Financing Decisions and The Cost of Capital
2
Outline
  • (1) Descriptive Data and Overview of Financing
  • (2) The Debt versus Equity Decision
  • Is debt a cheaper source of finance?

3
Where do Firms Get Their Money?
  • Self Financing (using internal cash flow)
  • Accounts for 80 (avg.) of financing
  • Difficult for start-up companies
  • External Financing
  • Borrowing from banks or issuing bonds
  • Sharing the business with investors by issuing
    stock

4
The Long-Term Financial Deficit (in 1999)
5
(No Transcript)
6
Where Do Small Businesses Get Money?
Source 1987 SBA survey of firms with less than
500,000 in assets.
7
What Happens As Firms Get Larger?
Firm Size
Information
Medium-sized
Small with growth potential
Large with Track record
Very small, no track record
Inside seed money
Self
Short-term commercial loans
Commercial paper
Short Debt
Intermediate-term commercial loans
Medium-term Notes
Inter- mediate Debt
Mezzanine Finance
Private Placements
Long-Term Debt
Bonds
Outside Equity
Public Equity
Venture Capital
Source FRB Report on Private Placements, Rea et.
al., 1993
8
Size of U.S. Bond Market
Source Merrill Lynch Bond Indices, 10/96
9
Privately Placed Debt
  • Private placement debt is not placed with the
    public at large.
  • In 1990, Rule 144a was passed which relaxed
    restrictions on the private placement market.
  • Did not have to conform to GAAP accounting.
  • Must be sold to qualified institutional buyers
    (QIBs).
  • This made it more attractive for foreign issuers
    to enter the U.S. market.
  • Private placements are mainly sold to insurance
    companies.

10
Project Finance
  • Financing structured for a project alone, rather
    than a whole firm.
  • Must be physically isolated and provide the
    lender some type of tangible security.
  • Used heavily for high dollar projects in oil,
    gas, infrastructure, and film making.
  • Used extensively in high growth countries like
    China.

11
New Stock Issues
  • A firms first issue of public equity is called
    an initial public offering.
  • Firm issues through primary market (almost
    always) using an underwriter.
  • IPO's are underpriced, on average, by about 15.
  • Example IPO of Cyrix in August 1993. Jumped over
    20 in first day.

12
What is the Difference Between Debt and Equity?
Debt
Equity
  • Fixed Promised payments
  • Senior to equity
  • Interest is deductible
  • Only get control rights in default
  • Uncertain residual cash flows
  • Subordinated
  • Dividends are not deductible
  • Comes with control rights (can vote)

13
Recent Trends in Financing
  • This important question is difficult to answer
    definitively.
  • Book or Market values?
  • In general, financial economists prefer market
    values. Debt levels have fallen recently.
  • However, many corporate treasurers find book
    values more appealing due to the volatility of
    market values. These have slightly risen
    recently.
  • Whether we use book or market values, debt ratios
    for U.S. non-financial firms have remained below
    60 percent of total financing.

14
(No Transcript)
15
(No Transcript)
16
Capital StructureHow should a firm structure
the liability side of the balance sheet?
  • Debt vs. Equity
  • We have seen how to do capital budgeting when the
    firm has debt in its capital structure.
  • However, we have not figured out how much debt
    the firm should have.
  • Can the firm create value for shareholders
    through its financing decisions?
  • In particular, should the firm load up with low
    cost debt?

17
One possible answerIt makes no difference.
  • Assume PCM, importantly, there are no taxes, and
    that the firms investment policy is unaffected
    by how it finances its operations.
  • Both Modigliani and Miller won the Nobel Prize
    for showing
  • The value of a firm with debt is in this case
    equal to the value of the same firm without debt.
    MM Proposition I.
  • The important idea is that since the assets are
    the same regardless of how they are financed so
    are the expected cash flows and so are the asset
    risks (asset betas) of a levered and
    unlevered firm.

18
Irrelevance Proposition II
  • What this means is that the expected return on
    equity rises with leverage according to (B/S
    leverage ratio -- market value of debt over
    market value of equity, r denotes expected
    return).

19
WACC under Irrelevance
Let the expected return on the underlying assets
be 9 and the cost of debt be 6.
20
MM Proposition II with No Corporate Taxes
Another View
Cost of capital r ()
r0
rB
rB
Debt-to-equity Ratio
21
What About The Tax Deductibility of Interest?
  • Interest is tax deductible (dividends are not).
  • A valuable debt tax shield is created by
    substituting payments of interest for payments of
    dividends, i.e. debt financing for equity
    financing.
  • Modigliani and Miller also showed that if the
    only change in their analysis is an
    acknowledgement of the US corporate tax
    structure, then
  • The value of a levered firm is VL VU TcB
  • the value of an equivalent unlevered firm PLUS
  • the value of the tax shields from debt.
  • Firm Value always rises with additional borrowing!

22
Proposition II with Taxes
  • When we take the tax deductibility of interest
    payments into account the equations we presented
    must change
  • and

23
Proposition II
Cost of capital r()
r0
rB
Debt-to-equityratio (B/S)
24
Limits to The Use of Debt
  • Given the treatment the U. S. corporate tax code
    gives to interest payments versus dividend
    payments, firms have a big incentive to use debt
    financing.
  • Under the MM assumptions with corporate taxes the
    argument goes to extremes and the message
    becomes firms should use 100 debt financing.
  • What other costs are associated with the use of
    debt?
  • Bankruptcy costs and/or financial distress costs!

25
Bankruptcy Costs
  • Direct costs
  • Legal fees
  • Accounting fees
  • Costs associated with a trial (expert witnesses)
  • Indirect costs
  • Reduced effectiveness in the market.
  • Lower value of service contracts, warranties.
    Decreased willingness of suppliers to provide
    trade credit.
  • Loss of value of intangible assets--e.g., patents.

26
Agency costs of debt
  • When bankruptcy is possible incentives may be
    affected.
  • Example (Risk Shifting)
  • Big Trouble Corp. (BTC) owes its creditors 5
    million, due in six months.
  • BTC has liquidated its assets because it could
    not operate profitably. Its remaining asset is
    1 million cash.
  • Big Bill, the lone shareholder and general
    manager is considering two possible investments.
  • (1) Buy six month T-bills to earn 3 interest.
  • (2) Go to Vegas and wager the entire 1 million
    on a single spin of the roulette wheel.
  • Why might Bill consider the second investment?
  • Would he have considered it in the absence of
    leverage?

27
Under-investment Problem
  • Example
  • Slight Trouble Corp. (STC) has a small but
    significant chance of bankruptcy in the next few
    years. Its debt is trading far below par.
  • Managers are evaluating an investment project
    that will cost 1 million to undertake. The
    alternative is to pay 1 million out as
    dividends.
  • While the NPV of the project is positive it may
    be that the shareholders are better off with the
    dividend than if the project is taken.
  • The reason is that while shareholders pay all the
    costs of the project, they will have to share the
    value with bondholders, the added value will
    raise bond prices as well as stock prices.

28
Disciplinary Power of Debt
  • On the other hand as economists are fond of
    saying, debt can be a disciplinary device.
  • It has long been realized that an owner works
    harder and makes better decisions than does an
    employee.
  • This was an often cited justification for the LBO
    wave of the mid 80s and early 90s.
  • Idea is that one of the most contentious issues
    between managers and shareholders is the payout
    of excess cash.
  • Debt allows manager to commit to the payout in a
    way that cannot be accomplished with a dividend
    policy.

29
A Theory of Capital Structure
  • The value of a levered firm can be thought of as
  • the value of an equivalent but unlevered firm
  • present value of tax shields (net)
  • present value of expected bankruptcy
    costs and agency costs.

30
The Value of the Firm with Costs of Financial
Distress
Value of firm (V)
VL VU TC B Value of firm under
MM with corporate Maximum taxes and
debt firm value V Actual value of
firm VU Value of firm with no debt
Debt (B) B Optimal
amount of debt The tax shield increases the value
of the levered firm. Financial distress costs
lower the value of the levered firm. The two
offsetting factors produce an optimal amount of
debt.
Present value of financial distress costs
31
Financing Decisions
  • Pecking Order Theory says that there is no
    optimal capital structure, just the culmination
    of all your financing decisions.
  • Internally generated funds.
  • External Debt.
  • External Equity as a last resort.
  • Data shows that preferences such as these are
    there but a subject of debate is whether they are
    necessarily inconsistent with there being an
    optimal capital structure.

32
Choosing an Amount of Debt
  • The theory provides no clear formula (unlike NPV)
    but the tradeoffs are clear the benefits versus
    the costs of debt.
  • Use more debt if
  • effective tax rates (without debt) are higher,
  • operating cash flows are more predictable,
  • agency costs can be controlled by contracts.
  • A safe strategy might be to emulate the industry
    average. After all these are the firms who have
    survived. From there you make alterations as your
    own situation dictates.

33
Example
  • Ralphs firm has been in the food processing
    business for the last 10 years. It has
    maintained a conservative capital structure
    financing 60 of its value with equity.
  • Ralph has recently considered investing in the
    IPO of a start-up company that will develop and
    manufacture internet infrastructure. In
    discussions with the start-ups manager, Ralphs
    nephew, it is revealed that the start-up will use
    either no or 20 debt financing. You have been
    called in to help identify an appropriate cost of
    capital for evaluating this investment.

34
Ralphs Dilemma
  • Currently Ralphs equity beta is estimated at
    0.95. There is no beta we can estimate for this
    private company (the start-up) but we know that
    Cisco has an equity beta of 1.92.
  • The risk free rate is 6 and the market risk
    premium is 7. The tax rate for all corporations
    is 35.
  • How can we approach determining the appropriate
    discount rate?

35
Ralphs Dilemma cont
  • Start with the following
  • We can reasonably assume that the asset beta for
    Cisco will be a close estimate for the asset beta
    for the start-up.
  • We know that the equity beta for Cisco is 1.92.
    What is Ciscos asset beta?

36
Ralphs Dilemma cont
  • Now we know that the asset beta for the start-up
    can be estimated at 1.92. What is the equity
    beta?
  • We have two scenarios to consider, a debt to
    value ratio of either 0 or 20.
  • If it is zero, the equity beta equals the asset
    beta or 1.92.
  • If it is 20, we need to use

37
Ralphs Dilemma cont
  • Now we need a weighted average cost of capital.
  • For the case of no debt rE rA rWACC
  • rE 6 1.92(7) 19.44.
  • With 20 debt
  • rE 6 2.23(7) 21.61.
  • rD 6 (since we assumed the debt was riskless).
  • rWACC 21.61(.8) 6(1-.35)(.2) 18.07.
  • Why was I sure that I did something wrong when I
    calculated the rWACC as 22.50 on my first try?

38
Example BK Industries
If you recall, BK was evaluating a project in a
very different industry from its own with the
following incremental cash flows (FCF). At 10
we found an NPV of 5.2 million.
39
Example BK Industries Revisited
  • BK Industries is a conglomerate company with
    operations in marine power, pleasure boating,
    defense, and fishing tackle. BKs equity beta is
    1.0. BK has and will maintain a debt/equity
    ratio of 1.0.
  • Can we use the company cost of capital to value
    the text editing project?
  • Latec Inc. is a firm that makes only text editing
    systems. Latecs equity beta is 1.35. Latec has
    a debt to equity ratio of 0.75, and a marginal
    tax rate of 45.

40
Delevered Betas with debt/equity ratios
  • The formulas for obtaining asset betas from
    equity betas and vice versa provided earlier
    required dollars values for debt (B) and equity
    (S). What if you are only given the leverage
    ratio, L B/S? The formulas are restated as

41
Unlever Latecs Beta to obtain the Beta of
Text-Editing Assets
  • Latec has L 0.75, TC .45, and an equity beta
    of 1.35.

42
Relever the asset Beta to reflect BKs capital
structure
Recalling that BK will keep its debt/equity
ratio equal to one, we can get
  • This is the beta for a BK equity position in a
    text
  • editing asset.
  • Why is this equity beta greater than Latecs?

43
BK Industries, Cont.
  • Assume that the risk free rate is 8 and that
    BKs cost of debt is also 8. The market risk
    premium is 7. Then the required return on BKs
    equity is

The weighted average cost of capital for the text
editing venture (using the fact that B/S 1) is
44
  • Finally, we can evaluate the NPV of the text
    editing venture using the WACC that reflects the
    risk associated with this particular business.
    Using the cash flow estimates obtained earlier
  • The NPV is positive, so proceed with the text
    editing business.
  • Note also that the market value of the project
    will be 28.78 M.
  • Notice that the selected discount rate of 11.38
    reflects
  • The risk (beta) of text editing businesses, not
    BKs existing businesses.
  • BKs capital structure, not that of the
    comparable firm.

45
Questions
  • BK Industries debt to equity ratio is 1.0 as it
    is for the project. BKs equity beta prior to
    starting the text editing business was 1.0
    (levered beta).
  • What will happen to the beta of BK Industries
    after starting the text editing business?
  • Suppose that BK uses its firm cost of capital to
    evaluate the text business? Would this favor the
    investment?
  • Does BK diversifying into the text editor
    business help shareholders by providing them a
    more diversified portfolio?

46
An Alternative Approach
  • The Adjusted Present Value (APV)
  • Follows from the MM equation VL VU
    TCB.
  • Take the value of the project, if it were
    unlevered, then add the debt tax shields (more
    completely the additional effects of debt).
  • Lets just do the exercise. We have cash flows
    for the unlevered firm but remember that the
    formulas are derived using a perpetuity (a
    simplification).
  • If BKs project generates 3.39124 million each
    year forever its NPV is the same using the WACC.

47
An Alternative Approach
  • The unlevered NPV is now, using the perpetual
    equivalent cash flow derived as follows
  • rA 8 .955(7) 14.69
  • NPVU 3.39124/.1469 26 - 2.9 m
  • APV NPVU TCB -2.9 .45(14.9m)
  • 3.79 m.
  • This approach is most useful when you know the
    dollar amount of debt that will be used each year
    rather than the debt ratio over the life of the
    project (perhaps an LBO or other highly levered
    transactions).
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com