35 USC - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

35 USC

Description:

17 ... Makes technical changes to Title 35, U.S.C. to correct errors introduced by the ... Each section of amendment paper must start on a separate sheet. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:195
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 55
Provided by: dbou2
Category:
Tags: usc | section | title

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: 35 USC


1
Benefit Claims to Prior Applications under 35
U.S.C. 119(e), 120, 121, and 365(c)
Prepared by Office of Patent Legal
Administration (OPLA) Robert J. Spar,
Director (703) 308-5107 Bob.Spar_at_USPTO.gov
2
Benefit Claimsunder 35 USC 120, 121, and
365(c)
  • Must include a specific reference to the
    prior-filed nonprovisional application in
  • the first sentence of the specification or
  • the application data sheet (ADS).

3
Benefit Claimsunder 35 USC 120, 121, and
365(c)
  • Specific reference to a nonprovisional
    application requires the following
  • Identification of the prior-filed application by
    application number and
  • Indication of the specific relationship (i.e.,
    continuation, divisional, or continuation-in-part)
    of the applications
  • Exception If application is a CPA, the request
    for CPA is the required specific reference, rule
    1.53(d)(7)
  • Example 1 This application is a continuation
    of Application No. 10/---, filed---.

4
Types of Benefit Claims
  • Benefit Claims to Multiple Applications under 35
    USC 120, 121, and 365(c)
  • Benefit Claims to International (PCT)
    Applications under 35 USC 120, 121, and 365(c)
  • Benefit Claims to Provisional Applications under
    35 USC 119(e)
  • Benefit Claims to Provisional via Intermediate
    Nonprovisional Application under 35 USC 120,
    365(c) 119(e)
  • Benefit Claims to Provisional via Intermediate IA
    under 35 USC 120, 365(c) 119(e)

5
Benefit Claims to Multiple Applicationsunder 35
USC 120, 121, and 365(c)
  • If the benefit claims involve a chain of
    nonprovisional applications,
  • the relationship must be stated for each
    application (in the chain) relative to an
    immediate prior application, as a continuation,
    divisional, or continuation-in-part, to establish
    copendency throughout the entire chain.

6
Benefit Claims to Multiple Applicationsunder 35
USC 120, 121, and 365(c)
  • Example 2 This application is a continuation
    of Application No. C, filed ---, which is a
    divisional of Application No. B, filed ---, which
    is a continuation-in-part of Application No. A,
    filed ---.
  • Example 3 This application is a
    continuation-in-part of Application No. C, filed
    ---, and also a continuation-in-part of
    Application No. D, filed ---.

7
Benefit Claims to International (PCT)
Applicationsunder 35 USC 120, 121, and 365(c)
  • Specific reference to an international
    application (IA) requires
  • Identification of the prior-filed IA by
  • International application number and
    International filing date
  • (not the 371(c) compliance date) and
  • Specific relationship of the applications.
  • Example 4 This application is a continuation
    of International Application No. PCT/US--/---,
    filed ---.
  • This example is for a benefit claim to an IA in a
    bypass application.
  • A bypass application is a 111(a) application
    claiming under 365(c) the benefit of an IA that
    did not enter the national stage under 371.

8
Benefit Claims to International (PCT)
Applicationsunder 35 USC 120, 121, and 365(c)
  • Example 5 Specific reference to a National
    Stage ( 371) Application
  • This application is a continuation of
    Application No. 10/---, which is the National
    Stage of International Application No.
    PCT/US--/---, filed ---.
  • Note 371(c) compliance date should NOT be
    given.
  • Example 6 Specific reference to an IA which
    claims the benefit of a prior U.S. Nonprovisional
    Application
  • This application is a continuation of
    International Application No. PCT/US--/---, filed
    ---, which is a continuation of U.S. Application
    No. 10/---, filed ---.

9
Benefit Claims to Provisional Applications under
35 USC 119(e)
  • Must include a specific reference to the
    prior-filed provisional application in the first
    sentence of the specification or an ADS.
  • Specific reference requires
  • Only the identification of the prior provisional
    application by the application number.
  • No relationship between the subject
    nonprovisional application and the provisional
    application should be specified.
  • Example 7 This application claims the benefit
    of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/---, filed
    ---.

10
Benefit Claims to Provisional via
IntermediateNonprovisional Application under 35
USC 120, 365(c) 119(e)
  • If the subject application is not filed within 12
    months from the filing date of the provisional
    application, the specific reference must
    identify
  • An intermediate nonprovisional application that
    is directly claiming the benefit of the
    provisional application and
  • The relationship between the nonprovisional
    applications.
  • Example 8 This application is a continuation of
    Application No. 10/---, filed ---, which claims
    the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No.
    60/---, filed ---.

11
Benefit Claims to Provisional via Intermediate IA
under 35 USC 120, 365(c) 119(e)
  • Example 9 Specific reference to claim the
    benefit of a provisional application via an IA.
  • This application is a continuation of
    International Application No. PCT/US--/---, filed
    ---, which claims the benefit of Provisional
    Application No. 60/---, filed ---.
  • Example 10 Specific reference to claim the
    benefit of a provisional application via a
    National Stage ( 371) Application
  • This application is a continuation of
    Application No. 10/---, which is the National
    Stage of International Application No.
    PCT/US--/---, filed ---, which claims the benefit
    of Provisional Application No. 60/---, filed ---.

12
Impact of Failure to MakeProper Benefit Claims
  • Failure to timely submit the specific reference
    is considered a waiver of any benefit claim
    unless a petition under 37 CFR 1.78(a) and
    surcharge are filed.
  • The Office may not be able to publish
    applications promptly after the expiration of a
    period of eighteen months from the earliest
    filing date for which a benefit is sought.
  • The publication may not include accurate benefit
    claims to determine the prior art date under
  • 35 USC 102(e).

13
Notification of the Failure to MakeProper
Benefit Claims
  • The Office plans to notify applicants on, or
    with, the filing receipt that a benefit claim may
    not have been recognized because it did not
    include the proper specific reference.
  • The filing receipt is usually provided shortly
    after the filing of the application so applicants
    should have sufficient opportunity to submit the
    proper benefit claim within the time period set
    in rule 1.78(a).
  • Applicants should carefully and promptly review
    filing receipts in order to avoid the need to
    submit a petition under rule 1.78(a) and
    surcharge under rule 1.17(t).

14
Timely Correction of Benefit Claims
  • Within the time period of 37 CFR 1.78(a),
    applicant may correct benefit claims by filing
  • A request for corrected filing receipt, and
  • The Required specific reference
  • Via an amendment to the specification, or an
    application data sheet (ADS) (see slide 2) or
  • If previously submitted, a copy of the amendment
    or ADS.
  • The later of four months from the actual filing
    date or the date on which the national stage
    commenced, or sixteen months from the filing date
    of the prior-filed application.

15
Untimely Correction of Benefit Claims
  • After the time period of rule 1.78(a) has
    expired, applicant may petition to correct
    benefit claims by filing
  • A petition to accept an unintentionally delayed
    claim under rule 1.78(a) and the surcharge under
    rule 1.17(t), and
  • The required specific reference (including the
    relationship of the nonprovisional applications
    and identification of any intermediate
    application which directly claims the benefit of
    the provisional application).
  • Note any benefit claim under 35 USC 119(e)
    must be submitted during the pendency of the
    instant nonprovisional application.

16
Prior Applications Also Must Include Specific
Reference
  • Each intermediate prior application must have
    specific reference to other prior applications.
  • For example, this benefit claim, This
    application is a continuation of Application No.
    C, filed ---, which is a continuation of
    Application No. B, filed---, which claims the
    benefit of Provisional Application No. A, filed
    ---. will only be effective if
  • Application No. C actually includes a proper
    benefit claim to Application No. B and
    Provisional Application No. A and
  • Application No. B actually includes a proper
    benefit claim to Provisional Application No. A.

17
Adding an Incorporation-By-Reference
  • After the filing of an application, adding an
    incorporation-by-reference statement in a benefit
    claim is not permitted.
  • No new matter can be added to an application
    after its filing date.
  • See 35 USC 132(a) and Dart Industries v.
    Banner, 636 F.2d 684, 207 USPQ (CADC 1980).
  • The Office will not accept a specific reference
    that includes an incorporation-by-reference
    statement of a prior application, unless such
    statement was submitted on filing of the
    application.

18
Examples of Benefit Claims under 35 USC 120,
121, and 365(c)
  • Ex. 1 Specific reference to a nonprovisional
    application.
  • This application is a continuation of
    Application No. 10/---, filed---.
  • Ex. 2 Specific reference to multiple
    nonprovisonal applications.
  • This application is a continuation of
    Application No. C, filed ---, which is a
    divisional of Application No. B, filed ---, which
    is a continuation-in-part of Application No. A,
    filed ---.
  • Ex. 3 Specific reference to multiple
    nonprovisional applications.
  • This application is a continuation-in-part of
    Application No. C, filed ---, and also a
    continuation-in-part of Application No. D, filed
    ---.

19
Examples of Benefit Claims under 35 USC 120,
121, and 365(c)
  • Ex. 4 Specific reference to an IA.
  • This application is a continuation of
    International Application No. PCT/US--/---, filed
    ---.
  • Ex. 5 Specific reference to a NS ( 371)
    application
  • This application is a continuation of
    Application No. 10/---, which is the National
    Stage of International Application No.
    PCT/US--/---, filed ---.
  • Note 371(c) compliance date should NOT be
    given.
  • Ex. 6 Specific reference to an IA which claims
    the benefit of a prior U.S. Nonprovisional
    Application
  • This application is a continuation of
    International Application No. PCT/US--/---, filed
    ---, which is a continuation of U.S. Application
    No. 10/---, filed ---.

20
Examples of Benefit Claims under 35 USC 120,
121, and 365(c)
  • Ex. 7 Specific reference to claim the benefit of
    a provisional application when the subject
    application is filed within 12 months from the
    filing date of the provisional application.
  • This application claims the benefit of U.S.
    Provisional Application No. 60/---, filed ---.
  • Ex. 8 Specific reference to claim the benefit
    of a provisional application via a nonprovisional
    application.
  • This application is a continuation of
    Application No. 10/---, filed ---, which claims
    the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No.
    60/---, filed ---.

21
Examples of Benefit Claims under 35 USC 120,
121, and 365(c)
  • Ex. 9 Specific reference to claim the benefit
    of a provisional application via an IA.
  • This application is a continuation of
    International Application No. PCT/US--/---, filed
    ---, which claims the benefit of Provisional
    Application No. 60/---, filed ---.
  • Ex. 10 Specific reference to claim the benefit
    of a provisional application via a National Stage
    ( 371) Application
  • This application is a continuation of
    Application No. 10/---, which is the National
    Stage of International Application No.
    PCT/US--/---, filed ---, which claims the benefit
    of Provisional Application No. 60/---, filed ---.

22
Rescission of non-publication requests
23
Eighteen-Month Publication -Exceptions
  • An applicant may request that an application not
    be published if
  • the applicant certifies that invention has not
    been and will not be the subject of an
    application filed in another country (or under
    international agreement) that requires
    eighteen-month publication
  • The request must be made upon filing (required by
    statute)
  • The request must be conspicuous
  • See PTO form PTO/SB/35

24
Eighteen-Month Publication Publication after
Non-publication Request
  • The nonpublication request may be rescinded at
    any time
  • If an application is subsequently filed in
    another country (or under international
    agreement) that requires eighteen-month
    publication
  • the applicant must notify the USPTO within
    forty-five days or the application will become
    abandoned
  • application may be revived if the delay in
    providing notice was unintentional
  • See
  • Pre O.G. Notice Reminder that Rescission of a
    Nonpublication Request is Not Itself a Notice of
    Foreign Filing posted on the web at
    http//www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/dapp/opla/pr
    eognotice/rescission.html
  • Form PTO/SB/36 (10-01)

25
Highlights of Recent Legislative Changes
Prepared 4-16-03
26
Highlights of Recent Legislative Changes
  • H.R. 2215 (Technical Amendment Act of 2002)
    (Conference Report 107-685)
  • Date of Enactment November 2, 2002
  • 102(e) Changes Effective Nov. 29, 2000

27
Highlights of Recent Legislative Changes
(Continued)
  • H.R. 2215 (Technical Amendment Act of 2002)
  • Authorizes appropriation of an amount equal to
    the fees estimated to be collected by the USPTO
  • Requires development of an electronic filing and
    processing system within 3 years
  • Requires a 5-year strategic plan for the USPTO
  • Permits reexamination on the basis of prior art
    that was previously cited by or to the USPTO or
    considered by the USPTO
  • Permits third-party requesters in inter partes
    reexamination proceedings to appeal t the U.S.
    Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
  • Makes technical changes to Title 35, U.S.C. to
    correct errors introduced by the American
    Inventors Protection Act of 1999 (AIPA)
    includes a correction to 102(e) and its
    effective date
  • Eliminates attestation requirement for patent
    grant copies

28
Highlights of Recent Legislative Changes
(Continued)
  • Regulatory Changes to implement H.R. 2215
  • Permitting reexamination on the basis of prior
    art that was previously cited by or to, or
    considered by, the USPTO
  • USPTO will publish new Reexamination (Portola)
    Guidelines in the Federal Register that supersede
    the Reexamination Guidelines published in March
    of 1999
  • New guidelines will set out the conditions under
    which the USPTO will make a new determination in
    a pending reexamination to make a ground of
    rejection that may not have been permitted under
    the 1999 Reexamination Guidelines
  • This change to the substantial new question of
    patentability applies to any determination made
    on/after the date of enactment

29
Highlights of Recent Legislative Changes
(Continued)
  • Prior art references now available under
    102(e) 1. U.S. Patents (formerly could not use
    any IA filing date)
  • Now If a U.S. patent issues from, or claims
    benefit of, an IA, the U.S. patents prior art
    date may now be the filing date of the IA if the
    following three conditions are met
  • the IA was filed on or after 11/29/00
  • the IA designated the US and
  • the IA publication (by WIPO) was in English.
  • Note when the three conditions are met,
    the IA filing date is a U.S. filing date for
    102(e) purposes.
  • 2. U.S. Application Publications (did not
    exist before 11/29/00)
  • Now A U.S. application publication is prior art
    as of the applications U.S. effective filing
    date, which can include an IA filing date, if the
    same three conditions are met.

30
Highlights of Recent Legislative Changes
(Continued)
  • Prior art references now available under 102(e)
    (contd)
  • 3. WIPO Publications of IAs (formerly A WIPO
    publication was not prior art under 102(e))
  • Now A WIPO publication of an IA is 102(e)
    prior art as of the IAs filing date, if the same
    three conditions are met namely
  • the IA was filed on or after 11/29/00,
  • the IA designated the US,
  • the IA publication (by WIPO) was in English.

31
Highlights of Recent Legislative Changes
(Continued)
  • Summary Changes to 102(e)
  • 35 U.S.C. 102(e) applies, as amended, to all
    applications under examination and patents under
    reexamination, whenever filed.
  • Proper domestic priority claims to provisional
    applications under 35 U.S.C. 119(e), benefit
    claims to nonprovisional applications under 35
    U.S.C. 120 or benefit claims to international
    applications under 35 U.S.C. 365(c) are
    considered in determining the effective U.S.
    filing date under 35 U.S.C. 102(e), but the
    relied upon application and any intermediate
    application must support the subject matter used
    in a rejection.
  • An international filing date prior to 11/29/00
    cannot be used as a prior art date a patent
    issuing from the National Stage of an IA filed
    before 11/29/00 will continue to be applied as of
    the 35 U.S.C. 371(c)(1), (2) and (4) date.

32
Highlights of Recent Legislative Changes
(Continued)
  • Summary Changes to 102(e) (contd)
  • A reference based on a foreign priority filing
    date claimed under 35 U.S.C. 119(a)-(d) or
    365(a), in U.S. or WIPO application publications
    or U.S. patents is never applied as the prior art
    date under 35 U.S.C. 102(e).
  • A reference based on the filing date of an
    International application (IA) when the IA did
    not designate the U.S. or was published in a
    language other than English is never applied. A
    published IA may be used as the reference, but
    under 35 U.S.C. 102(a) or (b) as of the
    publication date of the IA.

33
Electronic Processing Changes
34
Image Processing Prototype
  • USPTO Announces Prototype of Image Processing
    (signed 11/19/02) 1265 OG 87 (12/17/02).
  • In December 2002, The USPTO commenced a prototype
    of electronic image processing of patent
    applications. Three art units in Technology
    Centers 1600 and 2800 will participate in this
    prototype, as well as sections of the Office of
    Initial Patent Examination (OIPE) and other
    related processing divisions. This prototype
    program will test the use of image technology to
    replace the standard paper processing of patent
    applications currently used in the USPTO. All
    processing and examination will be performed with
    the image files, instead of the paper source
    documents, by the examiners, technical support
    staff and all other USPTO professional staff
    during the prototype.

35
Revised Amendment Format
  • Special Amendment Practice (limited to claims)
    begun in Prototype Electronic Image File Wrapper
    Program in Art Units 1634, 2827 2834.
  • See USPTO Announces Prototype of Image
    Processing, 1265 OG 87 (12/17/02).
  • The special amendment practice has been readily
    accepted by prototype participants, is beneficial
    to examiners, and will improve patent printing
    process.
  • Effective immediately, a voluntary revised
    amendment format which applies to specification
    and drawings in addition to claims may be used in
    the prototype cases, and in all applications,
    except reissue and reexamination.

36
Revised Amendment Format (Continued)
  • Implementation Plan
  • OG Notice announces a Revised Amendment Format
    and provides waiver of 37 CFR 1.121(a)-(d).
  • 1267 OG 106 (February 25, 2003) and posted at
    http//www.uspto.gov/web/offices/com/sol/og/2003/w
    eek08/patform.htm
  • Mailing of flyer describing the revised practice
    with every Office action.
  • Sample Revised Amendment Format and flyer are
    posted on website at http//www.uspto.gov/web/offi
    ces/pac/dapp/opla/preognotice/moreinfoamdtprac.htm

37
Revised Amendment Format (Continued)
  • Implementation Plan (cont.)
  • Notice of Proposed Rulemaking proposed changes
    to 37 CFR 1.121 to implement electronic
    maintenance of official patent application
    records
  • Changes To Implement Electronic Maintenance of
    Official Patent Application Records, 68 Fed.
    Reg.14365 (March 25, 2003).
  • Final Rule a revised amendment format will
    become mandatory by a final rule making notice
    expected publication by June 2003.
  • Training of tech support staff commenced March
    2003.

38
Revised Amendment Format (Continued)
  • Highlights
  • Each section of amendment paper must start on a
    separate sheet.
  • For example, each of the following must start on
    a separate sheet Introductory comments,
    Amendments to the Specification, Amendments to
    the Claims, and Remarks.
  • Submit only one version of the replacement
    portion which includes strikethrough or
    underlining showing the changes relative to
    immediate prior version.
  • The requirement to provide a clean version and a
    marked up version is waived if revised amendment
    format is used (1.121(b) and (c) are waived and
    proposed to be eliminated).

39
Revised Claim Amendment Format
  • Highlights
  • Amendment to claims must include a complete
    listing of all claims shown in ascending order.
  • The listing of claims (in the current amendment)
    will replace all prior versions, and listings, of
    claims in the application.
  • The requirement of a clean version is waived and
    a clean version should not be submitted.

40
Revised Claim Amendment Format (Continued)
  • The listing of claims must comply with the
    following
  • A status identifier for each claim is required.
    Multiple status identifiers must not be used for
    any single claim.
  • The text of all claims being currently amended
    must be presented with markings to show changes
    (strikethrough for deleted matter and underlining
    for added matter) relative to immediate prior
    version.
  • Only claims of the status currently amended
    will include markings.
  • All other claims under examination must be
    presented in clean text (without marking).
  • Any claim text presented in clean form (no
    markings) constitutes an assertion that it has
    not been changed relative to the immediate prior
    version.

41
Revised Claim Amendment Format (Continued)
  • Listing (cont.)
  • Canceled and withdrawn claims should only have
    canceled or withdrawn status identifier
    following the claim number, as text should not be
    supplied.
  • New Claims must be presented with a new status
    identifier.
  • Do not underline the text of the new claims.
  • Grouping of Claims consecutive canceled or
    withdrawn claims may be aggregated into one line
    (e.g., claims 1-5 (canceled).).

42
Revised Claim Amendment Format (Continued)
  • Example of a Listing of Claims
  • Claims 1-5 (canceled)
  • Claim 6 (withdrawn)
  • Claim 7 (previously amended) A bucket with a
    handle.
  • Claim 8 (currently amended) A bucket with a
    blue green handle.
  • Claim 9 (original) The bucket of claim 8 with a
    wooden handle.
  • Claim 10 (new) A bucket with plastic sides and
    bottom.

43
Revised Claim Amendment Format (Continued)
  • Use only the following status identifiers in
    parentheses after claim number
  • (Original) Claim filed with the original
    specification (not added by preliminary
    amendment).
  • (Currently amended) Claim being amended in the
    current amendment. Only currently amended claims
    should include markings (strikethrough and
    underlining) to indicate changes.
  • (Previously amended) Claim not being currently
    amended, but which was amended in a previous
    amendment paper. The claim should be presented
    in clean text.
  • (Canceled) Claim canceled or deleted. Do not
    present the text of the canceled claim.
    Consecutive canceled claims may be grouped
    together (e.g., claims 1-5 (canceled)).
  • (Withdrawn) Claim still in the application, but
    in a non-elected status. Do not present the text
    of the withdrawn claim. Consecutive withdrawn
    claims may be grouped together (e.g., claims 6-10
    (withdrawn)).

44
Revised Claim Amendment Format (Continued)
  • Permissible status identifiers (cont.)
  • (Previously added) Claim added in an earlier
    amendment paper.
  • (New) Claim being added in the current
    amendment paper.
  • (Reinstated-formerly claim __) Claim deleted
    in an earlier amendment paper, but re-presented
    verbatim with a new claim number in current
    amendment.
  • (Previously reinstated) Claim deleted in an
    earlier amendment and reinstated in an earlier
    amendment paper.
  • (Re-presented formerly dependent claim __)
    Dependent claim re-presented in independent form
    in current amendment paper. No additional (or
    new) subject matter may appear in these claims.
  • (Previously represented) Dependent claim
    re-presented in independent form in an earlier
    amendment, but not currently amended.

45
Revised Specification Amendment Format
  • Amendments to the Specification
  • Submit only one marked up version of any
    replacement paragraphs or sections marked with
    strikethrough (for deleted matter) or underlining
    (for added matter).
  • The requirement of a clean version is waived and
    a clean version should not be submitted.
  • An amendment to the specification, once made,
    should not be presented in subsequent amendment
    papers.
  • For substitute specification, no change from the
    current practice in 1.125. The following are
    required
  • a clean version, and
  • a marked-up version showing the changes for
    examiner use.

46
Revised Drawing Amendment Format
  • Amendments to Drawings
  • Submit only replacement figure(s) which include
    the changes, without markings, on a separate
    sheet(s) as an attachment to the amendment paper.
  • Proposed drawing correction process is
    eliminated.
  • Applicants need not submit any proposed drawing
    changes marked in red (but may include markings
    if desirable).
  • Examiner may require drawing changes to be shown
    by marking
  • The changes must be explained in the remarks or
    drawing amendment section of the amendment paper.
  • Any replacement drawing sheet(s) including
    amended figure(s) should include all of the
    figures appearing on the immediate prior version
    of the sheet.

47
Revised Drawing Amendment Format (Continued)
  • Amendments to Drawings (continued)
  • Header on replacement drawing sheet should
    include Replacement Sheet, application number,
    and date information.
  • The replacement drawing figure should not be
    labeled as amended.
  • Replacement drawing sheet with changes, accepted
    by examiner, unless notified by examiner. No
    further drawing submission is required.
  • If not acceptable, applicants will be notified of
    any objections or additional requirements.

48
Revised Drawing Amendment Format (Continued)
  • Amendments to Drawings (continued)
  • Deletion of a figure requires the following
  • Instructions to delete the figure
  • Replacement sheet(s) which does not include the
    canceled figure, unless no other figure is on the
    same sheet as the canceled figure
  • Amendment to the specification to make
    corresponding changes to the description of the
    drawings (e.g., deletion of the description of
    the canceled figure) and
  • If other figures need to be renumbered, those
    figures also need to be amended with revised
    figure numbers via replacement drawing sheets.

49
Electronic Processing Changes
Changes To Implement Electronic Maintenance of
Official Patent Application Records 68 Fed. Reg.
14365 ( March 25, 2003)
  • Proposed rule change will allow the Office to
    promote sharing of electronic priority documents
    and access to examination files to counterpart
    offices
  • International agreement required.
  • Written consent of applicant required before
    access granted (or priority document provided)
    prior to publication.
  • Proposed rule change will permit Office to
    provide electronic access to Office electronic
    file records when the official record is
    electronic
  • Efforts to declare image file records as the
    Official file records are ongoing.

50
For Further Information
  • Office of Patent Legal Administration (703)
    308-6906 or e-mail to Patent Practice_at_USPTO.gov
  • Amendment Practice Elizabeth Dougherty 306-3156
    or Joe Narcavage 305-1795
  • Patent Term Adjustment (PTA)- Kery Fries 308-0687
  • Eighteen-Month Publication Mark Polutta
    308-8122
  • Provisional Applications- Fred Silverberg
    305-8986
  • Reexamination- Jerry Dost 305-8610 or Ken Schor
    308-6710
  • Reissue- Joe Narcavage 305-1795
  • RCEs CPAs- Gena Jones 306-5586 or Joni Chang
    308-3858
  • Sections 102(e), 102(g) and/or 103(c) - Robert
    Clarke 305-9177, Mark Polutta 308-8122 or Jeanne
    Clark 306-5603
  • Electronic Filing, CDs Michael Lewis 305-5585
    or Jay Lucas 308-6868

51
Check the USPTO web site for important
announcements
Patents Information
52
Check the USPTO web site for important
announcements
http//www.uspto.gov/main/newsandnotices.htm
53
Check the USPTO web site for important
announcements
http//www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/dapp/ogsheet.
html
53
54
Thank You
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com