Feedback on US ETV - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 27
About This Presentation
Title:

Feedback on US ETV

Description:

Experiences of Hidex as a vendor on evaluation of BioTox toxcicity ... Trathler multilabel vial counters. Risto Juvonen | Product manager, Hidex Oy, Finland ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:59
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: davidfe8
Category:
Tags: etv | feedback | vial

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Feedback on US ETV


1
Feedback on US ETV
  • Experiences of Hidex as a vendor on evaluation of
    BioTox toxcicity test system on US ETV
  • Hidex Oy
  • Risto Juvonen

Risto Juvonen Product manager, Hidex Oy, Finland
2
Agenda
  • Hidex Oy
  • BioTox - toxicity test system
  • US ETV - Evaluation of rapid toxicity
    technologies
  • Results and comments on US ETV
  • Conclusions

Risto Juvonen Product manager, Hidex Oy, Finland
3
Risto Juvonen Product manager, Hidex Oy, Finland
4
  • Founded 1993 by people from Wallac (PerkinElmer)
  • Specialized in instrument design for life science
    research and anvironmental applications
  • Products
  • Chameleon multitechnology platereaders
  • Trathler multilabel vial counters

Risto Juvonen Product manager, Hidex Oy, Finland
5
BioTox - toxicity test system
Risto Juvonen Product manager, Hidex Oy, Finland
6
  • Portable Triathler luminometer with automatic
    injector

  • BioTox luminescent bacterial reagent kit by
    Aboatox Oy

BioTox test is based on ISO standard luminescent
bacteria method for screening of ecotoxicity.
Risto Juvonen Product manager, Hidex Oy, Finland
7
BioTox Test principle
  • Luminescencent BioTox test bacteria produce light
  • Toxic compounds reduce the light emission.
  • The changes in light output are measured
  • Decrease of light emission is a measure of
    toxicity.

Risto Juvonen Product manager, Hidex Oy, Finland
8
BioTox Result evaluation
  • Improved ISO standard method, correcting
    automatically quenching caused e.g. by color and
    turbidity
  • BioTox system was verified through US ETV as a
    system measuring toxicity in drinking water.

Risto Juvonen Product manager, Hidex Oy, Finland
9
US ETV Evaluation of rapid toxicity
technologiesBattelle, of Columbus, Ohio - 2003
Risto Juvonen Product manager, Hidex Oy, Finland
10
The purpose of ETV is to provide objective and
quality assured performance data on environmental
technologies, so that users, developers,
regulators, and consultants can make informed
decisions about purchasing and applying these
technologies.
Risto Juvonen Product manager, Hidex Oy, Finland
11
  • The main objective was to evaluate the ability of
    the technologies to detect certain toxins that
    are particularly toxic to humans
  • Samples tested were clear water samples spiked
    with the toxins and interfering compounds
  • Conservatives were used to preserve the samples

Risto Juvonen Product manager, Hidex Oy, Finland
12
  • Performance parameters evaluated
  • the ability to detect the toxicity of the
    contaminant present in the samples.
  • precision
  • false negative and positive rate
  • field portability
  • ease of use
  • throughput

Risto Juvonen Product manager, Hidex Oy, Finland
13
  • Hidex participated the US ETV together with
    Aboatox, which is the company manfacturing the
    BioTox reagents
  • About 6 other companies
  • Vendors had to sign vendor agreement, provide
    the test systems and operator training

Risto Juvonen Product manager, Hidex Oy, Finland
14
  • Outcome
  • Environmental Technology Verification Report and
    ETV Joint Verification Statement
  • Certificate -statement on verification of the
    technology
  • Outreach efforts of ETV, eg. conferences

Risto Juvonen Product manager, Hidex Oy, Finland
15
Results on US ETV Comments by Hidex
Risto Juvonen Product manager, Hidex Oy, Finland
16
  • Toxicity
  • BioTox test was not responsive to most of the
    contaminants at the concentration level tested,
    indicatin false negative response.
  • Similar response was obtained with most of the
    other test systems evaluated
  • Only one system was reported to give response to
    most of the samples

Risto Juvonen Product manager, Hidex Oy, Finland
17
  • Toxicity
  • BioTox test is designed to test ecotoxicity,
    but the focus on this evaluation was on compounds
    toxic to human beings
  • The samples tested did not necessarily represent
    the situation with real world samples
  • Turbidity/colour which are typical interfering
    factors in real water samples was not tested at
    all

Risto Juvonen Product manager, Hidex Oy, Finland
18
Field portability
  • System could be used in the field and the
    precision of the results suggests that the
    BioTox system functioned similarly at the
    non-laboratory and laboratory locations.
  • Result can be used to confirm the same regardles
    on the tested chemicals.
  • Field conditions is a question do the test
    conditions represent true situation in the field?

Risto Juvonen Product manager, Hidex Oy, Finland
19
Other factors
  • The system was reported to be easy-to-use after
    setting up the correct procedure with the vendor
  • Sample throughput was 50 samples per hour, which
    is high as expected
  • The comments obtained from the operatiors were
    valuable for Hidex to improve the operational
    procedure and the instructions

Risto Juvonen Product manager, Hidex Oy, Finland
20
Conclusions
Risto Juvonen Product manager, Hidex Oy, Finland
21
Technology
  • Preliminary evaluation of tests should be
    considered to avoid wrong type of tests to be
    verified for desired interest
  • Technology should be commercially available

Risto Juvonen Product manager, Hidex Oy, Finland
22
Samples
  • Spiked water samples do not represent the
    situation with real world samples samples
    from natural sources should be considered
  • Conservatives used to preserve the samples may
    cause false positive results - big risk on
    response to conservatives rather than the toxin
    itself

Risto Juvonen Product manager, Hidex Oy, Finland
23
Field conditions and The
importance operator expertiece
  • What is to be considered as field conditions
    should be discussed
  • Sending the samples to laboratiories with
    experienced operators should be considered,
    rather than sending the test systems to single
    lab for testing

Risto Juvonen Product manager, Hidex Oy, Finland
24
Costs
  • The focus, as stated also by US ETV, should be on
    the advantage of getting right information on
    available technologies for the buyers and users
  • The cost for the vendors must be kept low to
    facilitate all potential technologies to
    participate

Risto Juvonen Product manager, Hidex Oy, Finland
25
Benefit for the vendor
  • US ETV Certificate received can be used for
    marketing purposes, regardless of the results!
    is this desired?
  • Report and comments by operators gave valuable
    information for further product development
  • Increased markets and public awareness
    advertised by ETV as potential benefit was not
    realised requires activity of the vendor and
    favourable results

Risto Juvonen Product manager, Hidex Oy, Finland
26
Important questions arised
  • Can the users outside Europe accept technologies
    verfied by EU?
  • Can users in Europe acept technologies verified
    by US or other countries?
  • Are we going to do same work several times?

Risto Juvonen Product manager, Hidex Oy, Finland
27
  • Risto Juvonen
  • Mustionkatu 2, FIN-20750 Turku, Finland
  • www.hidex.com
  • risto.juvonen_at_hidex.com

Risto Juvonen Product manager, Hidex Oy, Finland
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com