Chapter Four - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Chapter Four

Description:

zero point does not necessarily mean complete absence of the trait ... the respondent that his/hers was the last questionnaire and that he/she had to supply the data? ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:10
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: vku5
Category:
Tags: chapter | does | four | last | mean | my | name | what

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Chapter Four


1
Chapter Four
  • Research Design and Implementation - 2

2
Four types of Data
  • Alphabetical / Categorical / Nominal data
  • Information falls only in certain categories, not
    in-between categories
  • No inferences possible between groups except that
    one group may contain more / less observations
    than the other
  • Only reporting frequencies, percentages and mode
    makes sense (descriptive statistics)
  • Chi Square measure of Association (inferential
    Statistics)
  • Examples gender, age groups, income groups, etc.

3
Four types of data
  • Rank order data
  • Ranked according to some logic, e.g. preference,
    etc.
  • Again an in-between rank does not make sense.
  • Difference between say rank 1 and 2 need not
    necessarily be of the same magnitude as the
    difference between rank 3 and 4.
  • Only reporting frequencies, percentages and mode
    makes sense (descriptive statistics) Spearman
    Rho coefficient of correlation (Inferential
    statistics)
  • Examples brand preferences, class rank on test,
    etc.

4
Four types of data
  • Interval Level
  • Numerical data in which the numbers denote the
    amount of presence / absence of a trait.
  • zero point does not necessarily mean complete
    absence of the trait
  • In-between numbers make sense
  • Magnitude of difference between numbers on the
    scale is constant.
  • All descriptive and inferential statistics
    possible
  • Examples attitude, satisfaction, temperature,
    etc.

5
Four types of data
  • Ratio level data
  • Interval level data with a meaningful zero point
    meaning complete absence of the trait
  • Magnitude of the difference between numbers of
    the scale is constant AND the zero point denotes
    complete absence of the trait being measured.
  • All descriptive and inferential statistics
    possible
  • Examples sales, profits, weight, height, etc.

6
Type of data?
Age in years Recall order of brands
Age groups Ad. costs
Income Number of students in various classes
Income groups Time
Name Test grades
SAT scores Number of players in a team
Attitude to brand Number of students in WU
Number of ads recalled Calories
7
Data Collection Methods
  • Table 4-2
  • Relationship between Data Collection Method and
  • Category of Research
  • Category of Research
  • Data Collection Method Exploratory
    Descriptive Causal
  • Secondary Sources
  • Information System a b
  • Databanks of other a b
  • organizations
  • Syndicated Services a b b
  • Primary Sources
  • Qualitative Research a b
  • Surveys b a b
  • Experiments b a

8
Research Tactics
  • Measurement Generally what questions do we ask
    so that we get the information we want
  • Sampling Plan How do we select a sample for the
    study such that we maximize its chances of
    faithfully representing the population of
    interest
  • Analysis confirming that all information being
    obtained is appropriate and adequate for
    addressing the RQ / hypothesis

9
Errors in Research Design
  • Assume you are interested in knowing what
    Winthrop undergrad students feel about the
    quality of the faculty
  • What is the population? Size?
  • Assume you take a sample of 100 students and find
    the sample mean
  • Would your sample mean match the population mean?
  • If not, what is the difference?

10
Errors in Research Design
  • Assume you get a mean figure of 4.0 on a 1 (low
    quality) to 5 (high quality) scale
  • The population mean is an unknown figure
  • Always wise to acknowledge that it may different
    from the sample mean
  • assume it is 4.5
  • The difference of 0.5 (4.5 4.0) is the total
    error in the research design

11
Errors in Research design
  • Sampling errors difference between measure
    obtained from the sample and true measure
    obtained from the population from which the
    sample is drawn (assuming random sampling is
    used)
  • Non-sampling errors
  • Design errors
  • Administering errors
  • Response errors
  • Non-response errors

12
Non-sampling errors Design Errors
  • Selection errors biased sample selection
  • E.g. you may have used a convenience sample
  • Population specification error drawing a sample
    from the wrong population
  • E.g. Did you accidentally include even graduate
    students?

13
Non-sampling errors Design Errors
  • Sampling frame error using inaccurate sampling
    frame to create the sample
  • E.g. Did the list of students you took from the
    university include even those who were not
    active, recently graduated, etc?
  • Surrogate information error difference between
    information required for the study and what the
    researcher seeks
  • E.g. The study required a measure of quality of
    faculty but your question asked how much do you
    like the faculty at Winthrop

14
Non-sampling errors Design Errors
  • Measurement error difference between
    information sought by the researcher and
    information generated by a particular measurement
    procedure used by the researcher
  • E.g. You wanted a measure of quality you chose
    to measure that by finding out how quickly each
    instructors classes closed during registration.
  • Problems?

15
Non-sampling errors Design Errors
  • Experimental error improper experimental design
  • PREs (History, maturation, etc. need to be
    controlled)
  • Data Analysis error e.g. wrong data coding or
    wrong statistical analysis
  • Mistakes made while entering data into Excel /
    SPSS and using the wrong statistical procedure
    e.g. using the median instead of the mean

16
Non-sampling errors Administering Errors
  • Questioning error incorrect phrasing of
    questions to respondents
  • Did you say quality of faculty or quality of
    teaching?
  • Recording error improperly recording the
    respondents answers
  • Did you hear 5 when the respondent mentioned
    4?
  • Interference error does not follow the exact
    procedure while collecting data
  • Did you forget to say your responses will remain
    anonymous before asking the question?
  • Problems?

17
Non-sampling errors Response Errors
  • Respondent supplies (intentionally or
    unintentionally) incorrect answers to questions
  • Does not understand the question
  • Quality? Quality of what teaching, research,
    advising, etc.?)
  • Fatigue or boredom
  • Did you catch the respondent after a long hard
    day?

18
Non-sampling errors Response Errors
  • Unwillingness to give information
  • Did you tell the respondent that his/hers was the
    last questionnaire and that he/she had to supply
    the data?
  • Social desirability bias
  • Did the respondent want to project a favorable
    picture of him/herself?

19
Non-sampling errors Non-Response Errors
  • Respondents who did not respond may think
    differently on the issue
  • Did you do your survey during the Spring Break?
  • Some members of the sample may have provided
    incomplete information
  • Was your questionnaire too long and boring so a
    few dropped it after a while and left it
    incomplete?

20
RESEARCH DESIGN PROCESS
Compare Cost and Timing Estimates
with Anticipated Value Proceed
Terminate
Revise
Implementation
Data Collection and Analysis Data
collection Field work Data
processing Data analysis Statistical
analysis Interpretation
Conclusions and Recommendations
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com