Title: Uni.Wien,
1Uni.Wien, ÖPG Tagung, FAKT 27.September, 2005
2Conventional two-photon EPR-experiment
A. Einstein, B. Podolsky and N. Rosen, Phys. Rev.
47 (1935) 777.
3Two-particle vs. two-space entanglement
Nature, Vol. 425, Sept. 4, 2003
4Poincare/Bloch-sphere description
5Quantum state tomography (1)
D.F. James et al., Phys. Rev. A 64 (2001) 052312.
6Quantum state tomography (2)
A.G. White et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 (1999)
3103.
7Background Mathematics (1)
since
8Background mathematics (2)
9Background mathematics (3)
D.F. James et al., Phys. Rev. A 64 (2001) 052312.
10Experimental setup
11Typical results --- c oscillations at
12Typical results --- a oscillations at
13Analysis
14Quantum state tomography of neutrons Bell-state
imaginary part
real part
F0.79
15Schematic view of the experiment
16Quantum state tomography --- two Bell-states
F0.79
F0.75
real part
17Quantum state tomography --- polarized incidence
imaginary part
real part
F0.91
18Quantum state tomography --- comparison
real part
F0.91
imaginary part
F0.79
F0.75
19Summary future perspectives
- Quantum state tomography of two Bell-like states
- of neutron was carried out F0.75, 0.79.
- Tomographical representation of the polarized
neutron beam was presented four-pillars
F0.91. - These tomographical technique will be applied
to, - decoherence/depolarization process,
- characterization of robustness of geometric
phase, - non-unitary evolution of neutrons entangled
state, - etc.
- especially from the polarized incident!
20Fin !
21Neutron interferometry
22Neutron interferometers
23Various two-level system
gtgt Described by SU(2)
24Two-particle vs. two-space entanglement
(Non-)Contextuality gtgt Bell-like
inequality (In)Dependent Results for commuting
Observables
25Violation of a Bell-like inequality
Cf. Max. violaion S2.81gt2
Y. Hasegawa et al., Nature Vol. 425, Sept. 4, 2003
26Publications and reactions
Nature, Vol. 425, 4. Sept. 2003
Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung 10.Sept. 2003