SESAR

1
SESAR

• Implementing the Single European Sky

2
Background

• Todays context
• Growth will push todays infrastructure beyond
  its max capacity
• Insufficient implementation of existing and
  proven technologies
• Lack of a harmonised and integrated approach to
  ATM deployment
• Single European Sky (SES) legislation (2004)
• Provides the regulatory framework enforcement
  powers
• supports a road map of CNS/ATM evolution
• stakeholder commitments required

3
Need for

• A high performance ATM system throughout Europe
• That meets SES objectives
• driven by user requirements
• Continual commitment from all stakeholders
• In development, definition and delivery
  activities
• Throughout duration of programme

4
What is SESAR ?

• SESAR is the European ATM implementation
  programme
• Definition Phase industrial feasibility study
  end 2005- end 2007
• Implementation phases from 2008 to 2020 and
  beyond

ANSPs, airlines, airports, manufacturing
industry, Military users/providers, professional
associations, Regulators, EUROCONTROL research
orgs
Programme for the Single European Sky
5
Key Aspects

• Build on / deliver benefits as envisaged in SES
  legislation
• Meet airspace user requirements
• Focus future activities via well defined ATM
  Master Plan
• Owned by all stakeholders
• Guarantee current / future investments lead to
  mutual business benefit
• Accelerate deployment of technological
  operational improvements
• Co-ordinate air ground infrastructure
  developments

6
Objectives of the PD Phase

• To define future high level ATM network
  performance requirements
• To 2020 and beyond (capacity, safety, cost)
• To identify the target ATM system for 2020
• To identify globally interoperable and harmonised
  ATM solutions
• Future concept of operations
• Technical systems architecture specifications
• To define how to achieve the above
• Detailed and phased implementation and
  deployment plan (viable transition scenarios for
  ANSPs, airspace users and airports)
• Detailed Research Technology validation work
  programme
• Legislative, financial and regulatory framework

7
The SESAR Consortium a broad basis of expertise
PROJECT EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE (10 voting rights)
Project Directorate(Secretary)
Military(Observer)
Users (4)
ANSPs(3)
Airports(2)
Supply Industry (1)
GLOBAL CONSORTIUM (co-contracting arrangements)
Air Traffic Alliance GIE
AEA
AENA
AAS
Airbus
Air France
Austrocontrol
AENA
AMS
ERA
DFS
BAA
BAE Systems
EURAMID
Airbus
IAOPA
DSNA
FRAPORT
EADS
BOEING
EADS
IATA
ENAV
LFV
INDRA
IFATCA
Thales ATM
Iberia
LFV
Thales ATM
ATC EUC
Thales SA
Munich Airport
Lufthansa
LVNL
Thales Avionics
JATWMG
ADP
KLM
NATS
CAA UK
NAV
Research Centres (10)
Subcontracting arrangements for admin purposes
EBAA
ECA
Content Responsibility (4 Basic Consortia and
Project Associates)
Potential Project Associates
Airspace Users Basic Consortium Members (7)
ANSPs Basic Consortium Members (9)
Airports Basic Consortium Members (5)
Supply Industry Basic Consortium Members (7)
Project Directorate
8
Key for success Communication Buy-in Plan

• Building an ATM Master Plan shared and agreed by
  all air transport operators
• Gather consensus of all SES and neighbour
  countries
• Sharing the vision outside Europe

Internal Buy-in Consortium Partners
External buy-in Non participating Air Transport
Operators
Political buy-in Europe and other world regions
9
ANSP Consortium Members
ANSP CONSORTIUM

• AENA (Spain)
• Austrocontrol (Austria)
• DFS (Germany)
• DSNA (France)
• ENAV (Italy)
• LFV (Sweden)
• LVNL (Holland)
• NATS (UK)
• NAV Portugal (Portugal)
• Signatories of a Basic Consortium Agreement.
• All other European ANSPs addressed by ANSP Comm
  Plan

10
6 Project Milestones
Progressive build-up of the ATM Master Plan
ACTION PLAN
GO
M5
M6
Define organisation work- programme 2008-2014
Build the ATM Master Plan
Mar 08
Dec 07
Oct 07
Work-programme for 2008-2014 completed
Jun 07
Dic 06
ATM Master Plan specified
Sept 06
11
SESAR Work Breakdown Structure
4. Work Programme for 2007-2012
2. Performance Requirements System Definition
3. Implementation Plan Definition
1. Institutional Framework Definition
Workpackage
Task
12
Work-Programme
Implementation Plan
Institution
System Definition

Implementation limitations
Air Transport assessment and role of ATM
ATM current system definition
D1
Target System Performance Definition
Air Transport vision and future role of ATM
Short-term improvement objectives
D2
Initial Target Concept development
Preliminary assessment of the institutional
feasibility, especially safety
Preliminary assessment of the cost and transition
sequence feasibility
D3
ATM Target Concept Definition
Institutional recommendations for the
implementation of the ATM System
Transition sequence recommendations for the
implementation of the ATM System

• ATM System Definition
• Long-term Baseline
• - Mid-term Baseline

D4
D5
Master Plan
Work-programme 2007-2012
D6
13
D1 Obj Tasks mapping
SubTask Title Obj-1 Obj-2 Obj-3 Obj-4 Obj-5
1.1.1/D1 Analysis of the Air Transport Value Chain ü ü ü
1.1.2/D1 Evaluation of ATM System within the Air Transport Value ü ü
1.1.3/D1 Security ü ü ü ü ü
1.1.4/D1 Environment ü ü ü ü ü
1.2.1/D1 Identification of existing mechanisms and triggers for decision making ü ü ü
1.3.1/D1 Review existing financial mechanisms and identify investment needs for the whole programme ü ü ü ü ü
1.4.1/D1 Review of existing tools and preparation of the CBA model ü ü ü
1.5.1/D1 Legislative and regulatory benchmarking with third countries (US mainly) ü ü ü ü
1.6.1/D1 Study of impacts of new concepts and procedures on safety regulations ü ü ü ü
1.7.1/D1 Human factors impacts ü ü ü ü ü
1.7.2/D1 Recruitment, training and licensing ü ü ü ü ü
1.7.3/D1 Social factors ü ü ü ü ü
2.1.1/D1 Assessment on Current Baseline ü ü ü ü
2.2.1/D1 Inventory of on-going initiatives (promising function resulting from Research, ...) ü
2.4.2/D1 Description of Responsibility ü ü
2.4.3/D1 Analysis of the various technical sub-systems/functions supporting the architecture ü ü ü ü
2.5.2/D1 Inventory of potential aeronautical technologies, benchmarking with other technologies, assessment of limitations. Analysis of expected technical performance compared to requirements ü ü
2.6.1/D1 Identification of critical elements for the long term baseline ü ü ü ü ü
3.2.1/D1 Identification of limits/Blocking points. For airspace environment ü ü ü
3.2.2/D1 Identification of limits/Blocking points. For airport environment ü ü ü
14
D2 Obj Tasks mapping
SubTask Title Obj-1 Obj-2 Obj-3 Obj-4 Obj-5
1.1.1/D2 Analysis of the Air Transport Value Chain ü
1.1.2/D2 Evaluation of ATM System within the Air Transport Value ü
1.1.3/D2 Security ü
1.1.4/D2 Environment ü
1.2.1/D2 Identification of existing mechanisms and triggers for decision making ü
1.3.1/D2 Review existing financial mechanisms and identify investment needs for the whole programme ü ü
1.4.1/D2 Review of existing tools and preparation of the CBA model ü ü
1.5.1/D2 Legislative and regulatory benchmarking with third countries (US mainly) ü ü
1.6.1/D2 Study of impacts of new concepts and procedures on safety regulations ü ü
1.7.1/D2 Human factors impacts ü
1.7.2/D2 Recruitment, training and licensing ü
1.7.3/D2 Social factors ü
2.1.2/D2 Define Strategic Objectives (Safety, Security, Capacity, Environment, Cost, World-wide Interoperability, ) ü
2.4.3/D2 Analysis of the various technical sub-systems/functions supporting the architecture ü
2.6.1/D2 Identification of critical elements for the long term baseline ü ü
3.2.1/D2 Identification of limits/Blocking points. For airspace environment ü
3.2.2/D2 Identification of limits/Blocking points. For airport environment ü
15
D3 Obj Tasks mapping (1/2)
SubTask Title Obj-1 Obj-2 Obj-3 Obj-4 Obj-5
1.1.3/D3 Security ü ü ü
1.1.4/D3 Environment ü ü ü
1.2.2/D3 Definition of new mechanisms for timely and harmonised decision making ü
1.3.2/D3 Prepare a proposal for the Financial and Investment Plan, including financing schemes and incentive policies ü
1.4.2/D3 Consolidate update the CBA model with data supporting the trade-offs and Financial Plans ü
1.5.2/D3 Identification of potential modifications to existing legislation and regulation to be undertaken within or beyond the scope of short-, mid- and long-term packages ü
1.6.2/D3 Compliance and synchronisation with ICAO Safety standards ü ü ü ü
1.7.1/D3 Human factors impacts ü ü
1.7.2/D3 Recruitment, training and licensing ü ü
1.7.3/D3 Social factors ü ü
2.2.2/D3 Definition of ATM operations based on new concept including airspace redesign ü ü
2.2.3/D3 Identification of underlying ATM functions and procedures ü ü
16
D3 Obj Tasks mapping (2/2)
SubTask Title Obj-1 Obj-2 Obj-3 Obj-4 Obj-5
2.2.4/D3 Resulting set of recommendations for operational concepts trade-offs analysis ü ü ü
2.3.1/D3 Compute and Map Operational Concepts Airspace KPIs based on identified available tools and methodologies ü ü
2.4.1/D3 Overall architecture alternatives, including allocation of functions on the various systems and related data flow ü ü
2.4.2/D3 Description of Responsibility ü ü
2.4.3/D3 Analysis of the various technical sub-systems/functions supporting the architecture ü
2.4.4/D3 Resulting set of recommendations for architecture trade-offs analysis ü ü
2.5.1/D3 Identification of future technical needs for the implementation of the long term baseline ü ü
2.5.2/D3 Inventory of potential aeronautical technologies, benchmarking with other technologies, assessment of limitations. Analysis of expected technical performance compared to requirements ü ü
2.5.3/D3 Mapping to technical needs and recommendation for development of innovative technologies required to fill the gap ü
2.5.4/D3 Resulting set of recommendations for technology trade-offs analysis ü
2.6.1/D3 Identification of critical elements for the long term baseline ü ü ü
3.3.1/D3 Methodology for transition strategy trade-offs ü
3.3.2/D3 Establishment of deployment costs for the deployment scenarios as input into 3.3.3 ü
17
D4 Obj Tasks mapping (1/2)
SubTask Title Obj-1 Obj-2 Obj-3 Obj-4 Obj-5
1.1.3/D4 Security ü
1.1.4/D4 Environment ü
1.2.2/D4 Definition of new mechanisms for timely and harmonised decision making ü
1.3.2/D4 Prepare a proposal for the Financial and Investment Plan, including financing schemes and incentive policies ü ü
1.4.2/D4 Consolidate update the CBA model with data supporting the trade-offs and Financial Plans ü
1.5.2/D4 Identification of potential modifications to existing legislation and regulation to be undertaken within or beyond the scope of short-, mid- and long-term packages ü
1.6.2/D4 Compliance and synchronisation with ICAO Safety standards ü
1.7.1/D4 Human factors impacts ü ü
1.7.2/D4 Recruitment, training and licensing ü ü
1.7.3/D4 Social factors ü ü
2.2.4/D4 Resulting set of recommendations for operational concepts trade-offs analysis ü ü ü ü
2.3.1/D4 Compute and Map Operational Concepts Airspace KPIs based on identified available tools and methodologies ü
2.3.2/D4 Investigate needs for new appropriate modelling and validation tools and methodologies ü
18
D4 Obj Tasks mapping (2/2)
SubTask Title Obj-1 Obj-2 Obj-3 Obj-4 Obj-5
2.4.1/D4 Overall architecture alternatives, including allocation of functions on the various systems and related data flow ü
2.4.2/D4 Description of Responsibility ü
2.4.3/D4 Analysis of the various technical sub-systems/functions supporting the architecture ü
2.4.4/D4 Resulting set of recommendations for architecture trade-offs analysis ü
2.5.4/D4 Resulting set of recommendations for technology trade-offs analysis ü ü
2.6.1/D4 Identification of critical elements for the long term baseline ü
2.6.2/D4 Contribution to Standardisation Identification and potential creation of the appropriate standardisation groups ü ü
3.1.1/D4 Integration with on-going initiatives ü
3.1.2/D4 Impacts of external initiatives ü
3.1.3/D4 Recommendation for an effective integration of the future ATM network ü
3.2.3/D4 Trade-off analysis and selection of short term improvements ü
3.2.4/D4 Establishment of Deployment costs for short term improvements ü
3.2.5/D4 Standardisation activity (operational technical) required for the short term baseline ü
3.2.6/D4 Description Schedule of the Short Term Baseline for Airspace ü
3.2.7/D4 Description Schedule of the Short Term Baseline for Airport ü
3.3.2/D4 Establishment of deployment costs for the deployment scenarios as input into 3.3.3 ü
3.3.3/D4 Trade-off analysis and selection of deployment scenarios ü
19
D5 Obj Tasks mapping
SubTask Title Obj-1 Obj-2 Obj-3 Obj-4 Obj-5
3.4.1/D5 ATM Master Plan consolidation ü
3.4.2/D5 Deployment Planning ü
3.4.3/D5 RT/D Program Planning ü
3.4.4/D5 Benefit Planning ü ü
3.4.5/D5 Financial Investment Planning ü
3.4.6/D5 Regulatory / Legislative Planning ü ü
3.4.7/D5 Risk Assessment ü
20
D6 Obj Tasks mapping
SubTask Title Obj-1 Obj-2 Obj-3 Obj-4 Obj-5
2.3.2/D6 Investigate needs for new appropriate modelling and validation tools and methodologies ü
4.1.1/D6 Programme and Governance rules ü ü
4.1.2/D6 Definition of Roles Responsibilities ü ü
4.1.3/D6 Risk Management ü ü
4.2.1/D6 System Engineering Development Validation Process ü
4.2.2/D6 Standardisation, Interoperability Harmonisation Process define interoperability and its attributes ü ü
4.2.3/D6 Task 4.2.3 Modelling, Simulation Validation Tools Definition required during the development lifecycle ü ü ü
4.3.1/D6 Short-term / Baseline 2008 Development definition of activities required for the deployment of the short term baseline ü
4.3.2/D6 Mid-term / Baseline 2013 Development definition of the research validation activities ü
4.3.3/D6 Long-term / Baseline 2018 , Assessment definition of the innovative research activities ü
21
Deliverable production
M1
M6
D1
D6
Milestones Deliverables

WBS
Subtask/Task Deliverables
Task Deliverables
Work Package Deliverables
WP I.J
Task I.J.1
Subtask i.j.1/D1 Deliverable
Task i.j.1 Deliverable
WP I.J Deliverable
Subtask i.j.1/D6 Deliverable
Task I.J.2
Task i.j.2 Deliverable
WP K.L
Task K.L.1
Task k.l.1 Deliverable
WP K.L Deliverable
Task K.L.2
Subtask k.l.2/D1 Deliverable
Task k.l.2 Deliverable
Subtask k.l.2/D6 Deliverable
22
Timetable
23
SESAR Timeline of major Events where are we?!
Mar2006
D1 Stakeholder Forum 12th Sept.
2006  Official  D2 Kick-Off - event for
respective R- and O-Levels incl.  lessons
learnt  from D1 12th of July
24

Date 23/03/2006
Progress Report Milestone 1
OVERALL MILESTONE STATUS
Schedule Status
Content Status
Resources Participation as planned?
1. ACHIEVEMENTS / EVENTS

1. M1 and M2 Kick Off Meeting at Eurocontrol in
   Brussels with more than 250 Participants
2. Eurocontrol internal Kick Off meeting with more
   than 100 participants
3. Setting up a meeting schedule for Content
   development (MPM), Validation (MVM) and Approval
   (MAM) for M1 between April and June 2006
4. Introduction of a Reporting Concept on Task and
   Milestone level

2. MAIN CURRENT ISSUES (3max.)
3. KEY NEXT STEPS
E-room still difficult to find applicable documents, meetings dates, lack of common workspace for tasks, etc Lack of Participation of specific participants (W-Levels) EURAMID, US Industry, Aerospace Manufacturers , User (see Summary reports) E-room restructuring under way (Project Directorate) DLH, AF, US Industry to urgently assign W-levels EURAMID to enhance participation in task meetings to which they are invited Access to e-room for ATCEUC/ETF/ECA
A number of tasks and WPs do not make use of the e-room for exchanging documents. Thus the progress made in terms of content development is not available to those who are not on the distribution lists All intermediate results/docs produced by tasks should be displayed in the draft deliverable folders of the respective tasks in the e-room
5. MITIGATION ACTIONS
4. MAIN FUTURE RISKS (3max.)
KEY DATES ACCORDING TO MILESTONE PLANNING
Kick Off
25
Progress Report Summery per task 1/4
Progress Report Summary per task 1/4
Task Timing Content Resources Observations/actions
1.1.1/D1 Insufficient participation of Aerospace Manufacturers and Military
1.1.2/D1 No issues/risks identified
1.1.3/D1 New O-Level nominated by EADS but not yet operational difficulties to schedule next meeting,
1.1.4/D1 No issues/risks identified
1.2.1/D1 No issues/risks identified
1.3.1/D1 No issues/risks identified
26
Progress Report Summery per task 2/4
Progress Report Summary per task 2/4
Task Timing Content Resources Observations/actions
1.4.1/D1 No issues/risks identified
1.5.1/D1 Tight schedule, broad Terms of reference
1.6.1/D1 Timescales are very tight, planning adjusted accordingly, less resources available than planned, but still sufficient to deliver in time
1.7.1/D1 Contributor from AF to be assigned, Access to e-room for ATCEUC/ETF/ECA
1.7.2/D1 Contributor from DLH to be assigned, skip first review cycle because of insufficient contributions from Ws
1.7.3/D1 Contributor from DSNA to be assigned, Insufficient effort from ATCEUC
27
Progress Report Summary per task 3/4
Task Timing Content Resources Observations/actions
2.1.1/D1 No issues/risks identified
2.2.1/D1 No issues/risks identified
2.4.2/D1 No issues/risks identified
2.4.3/D1 Contribution from the USER group to be improved (IATA, DLH)..
2.5.2/D1 Ramp-up slow for 50 of W-levels Lack of Ground supply industry inputs
2.6.1/D1 US industry participation agreed, but W-level(s) not assigned. Action on US Industry POC (R. Holland)
28
Progress Report Summary per task 4/4
Task Timing Content Resources Observations/actions
3.2.1/D1 EURAMID to secure Military participation in task meetings.
3.2.2/D1 No issues/risks identified
Total No of Reports 0 1 19 20 0 1 19 20 0 8 12 20 Smooth start, tasks teams do not mention major risks concerning D1, so far no delays have been signalised. However, several tasks mention resource issues, urgent action on EURAMID, AF, DLH, DSNA, US Industry to assign missing W-levels and/or improve participation, E-room restructuring and access is a priority.
29
Conclusions

• New approach for building the ATM Master Plan
• Traditional bottom-up approach will be limited
  only for Short term improvement plan
  (2008-2012).
• Top-Down approach to deliver the ideal target ATM
  System, a vision shared for the first time by all
  Air Transport stakeholders.

• The Master Plan a step-by-step approach to the
  target, suitable and sustainable for all European
  regions.