Title: Models of Welfare in Europe and the UK
1Models of Welfare in Europe and the UK
2Esping Andersen Three Regimes of Welfare
Capitalism
- Conservative Welfare Regimes
- Liberal Welfare Regimes
- Social Democratic Welfare Regimes
3Esping Andersen Three Regimes of Welfare
Capitalism
- Conservative Welfare Regimes
- Corporatist welfare arrangements
- State welfare used to maintain existing class and
status differentials, encouraging social and
political stability and continued loyalty to the
state. - The state (not the market) delivers welfare but
not in ways intended to encourage redistribution
or equalization welfare.
4Esping Andersen Three Regimes of Welfare
Capitalism
- Conservative Welfare Regimes
- Austria, France, Germany, and Italy
- These types of welfare regimes tend to be
dominant in countries in which Catholic parties
are strong and parties of the left are weak and
there has been a history of absol8utism and
authoritarianism. Because such regimes tend to
be highly influenced by the Church, they are
committed to traditional family forms and the
state intervenes only when the family cannot cope.
5Esping Andersen Three Regimes of Welfare
Capitalism
- Liberal Welfare Regimes
- Emphases on market-based social insurance
- Means-testing in the distribution of benefits.
- Universal transfer payments and social insurance
are modest and welfare is largely y oriented
towards a class of the poor dependent on the
state.
6Esping Andersen Three Regimes of Welfare
Capitalism
- Benefits are limited and stigmatized because this
welfare model assumes that higher levels of
benefit will reduce incentives to work. - Private schemes are encouraged for those who wish
to go beyond the minimum, and these schemes may
be subsidized.
7Esping Andersen Three Regimes of Welfare
Capitalism
- Such regimes are highly differentiated and there
is a very uneven distribution of wealth within
such states. - Examples of liberal welfare regimes are the USA,
Canada and Australia. - Esping Andersen argues that the UK fits most
closely to this model.
8Esping Andersen Three Regimes of Welfare
Capitalism
- The Social-Democratic Model
- Principles Universalism and equality.
- Encourage Equality across classes based on high
standards, rather than the minima endorsed
elsewhere. - To achieve this services and benefits are
provided at levels acceptable to the middle class
and the working class both groups have the same
rights.
9Esping Andersen Three Regimes of Welfare
Capitalism
- This model crowds out the market, and
consequently constructs and essentially universal
solidarity in favour of the welfare state. All
benefit all are dependent and all will
presumable feel obliged to pay
(Esping-Andersen,1990,The Three Worlds of Welfare
Capitalism, Cambridge, Polity Press p. 28)
10Esping Andersen Three Regimes of Welfare
Capitalism
- The attitude to the family within the model is in
marked contrast to the other two because the
state takes on and socializes aspects of family
responsibilities - Such as providing support for children and the
old encouraging individual independence for women
who choose to work. - Full employment is central because it makes it
possible to pay the costs of welfare through
taxation of the working population. The
Scandinavian countries are the most typical
examples of this type of welfare model.
11Esping Andersen Three Regimes of Welfare
Capitalism
- This typology allows us to develop patterns of
difference across different European States and
look at broad directions of change. It also
enables us to look at how different welfare
models impact on poverty and social exclusion in
different European states. Esping-Andersen makes
clear that non of the models he identifies can be
found in a perfect or pure form and each European
welfare system may have elements of all three
welfare models.
12The impact of global economic forces
- Globalisation has implications for all welfare
states and it is interesting to explore the
impact that neo-liberal economic forces are
having on different welfare regimes in Europe. - Recent European Union reforms such as the
de-regulation of service industries in Europe
could have profound consequences as workers from
former Eastern European Countries are paid
significantly less than their European
counterparts and so may begin to comprise larger
proportions of the workforce within the public
and private service sectors.