The EC and the Non State Actors - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 12
About This Presentation
Title:

The EC and the Non State Actors

Description:

Sometimes shorter process : e. g. one big workshop in India; ... Mostly through the thematic budget lines (mainly: NGO, EIDHR, environment, food security... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:22
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: saqu
Category:
Tags: actors | bigbudget | non | state

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The EC and the Non State Actors


1
The EC and the Non State Actors
  • Stakeholders Advisory Group
  • 25 October 2007

2
Introduction
  • Process some information on NSAs/LAs involvement
    and consultation was already available.
    Delegations were requested to provide extra
    information to fit the DEV questionnaire.
  • Requests sent to Asia and Latin America
    Delegations. 33 requests sent ? 19 answered 11
    Asia and 9 Latin America
  • Asia Afghanistan, Bangladesh, China, India,
    Indonesia, Lao, Mongolia, Pakistan, Philippines,
    Sri Lanka, Vietnam
  • Latin America Argentina, Brazil, Costa Rica,
    Guatemala, Panama, Paraguay, Uruguay, Venezuela
  • A rapid scan of the answers provided us with the
    information presented today. More in-depth study
    and report will be done at a later stage.

3
EC works with a Wide range of NSAs
  • European, local and regional NGOs networks
  • cooperative associations
  • local authorities and municipalities
    associations networks
  • trade unions, business and organized economic
    interest groups (like employer associations and
    consumer associations)
  • universities, researchers and foundations, think
    tanks

4
Mapping of the NSA situation
  • Mapping studies exist or are considered China
    Lao Chile (Venezuela)
  • Mapping study does not exist or is not considered
    because
  • Initiatives have already been taken to gather
    such information Argentina, India, Vietnam,
    Bangladesh, Philippines
  • At this stage, it is difficult to produce such
    study given the situation of the NSA in the
    country (e.g. Afghanistan, Indonesia)

5
Involvement in the policy dialogue
  • Linked to the country situation
  • In some countries national forums involving
    NSAs e.g. The Philippines Development Forum
  • The policy dialogue mainly takes place in a
    sectoral framework (e.g. around SWAPs education
    sector in Paraguay trade sector in China).
  • In some countries, the dialogue is limited for
    the time being given the situation (e.g.
    Afghanistan). In developing the (for the time
    being limited) policy dialogue, the EC intends to
    include the NSAs (e.g. Mongolia).
  • Example of a specific space set up for dialogue
    EU-CSOs the EU-Central America Civil Society
    Forum on regional integration.

6
Involvement in policy dialogue
  • Coordination between EC and MS offers also
    possibilities for policy dialogue with civil
    society (Peru, Bangladesh).
  • Main topics discussed future programming
    priorities, human and social development, human
    rights, governance, decentralization process,
    economic cooperation modalities, regional
    integration, migration, corruption, environment,
    gender, need for HIV/AIDS mainstreaming, rural
    development

7
NSAs consultation in the programming process
How this consultation was organized?
  • Most of the time, initiated by the Delegation.
    Uruguay both Delegation and Government.
  • Most used scheme meetings and workshops
    (regional, national and/or local) on concept
    notes/draft CSP or on specific issues relevant
    for the CSP
  • Scheme followed in several Central America
    countries
  • pre-programming mission/pre-consultation,
    drafting of a concept note, website consultation,
    workshops around the concept note, seminars
    around the draft CSP
  • Indirectly via a national development process
    (Afghanistan).

8
Type of consultations
  •  Consultative  type main type used (16
    countries)
  • Several stages of meetings, involvement in the
    preparation of the drafts, inputs taken into
    account Sometimes shorter process e. g. one
    big workshop in India
  • More  informative  type Lao (Sri Lanka,
    Afghanistan)

9
Involvement in implementation
  • Mostly through the thematic budget lines (mainly
    NGO, EIDHR, environment, food security)
  • Also implementation of geographical programmes
  • human and social development (e.g. in
    Afghanistan)
  • rural development (e. g. in Mongolia)
  • economic development (e. g. Panama),
  • culture (India),
  • decentralization (e.g. Costa Rica).

10
NSA/LA capacity building
  • Main source will be thematic programme on NSA
    LA (in the past NGO budget lines) - Annual Action
    Programme 2007 total EC contribution
    207.852.900. Support is also foreseen through the
    EIDHR programme.
  • Through the geographical programmes mostly in
    the framework of sectoral activities
  • Health, education, social cohesion, trade and
    development of SMEs, regional integration...
  • Or as specific governance focus (e.g. China the
    Governance for Equitable Development).

11
Main Preliminary Findings
  • Preliminary findings based on the first
    information gathered. Need to be more developed
    and precised to allow us to formulate concrete
    recommendations.
  • In general, the Delegations have a quite positive
    assessment of the role and input of NSAs. However
    this can vary quite significantly from one
    country to another and within the same country
    from one NSA to another because of the different
    levels of capacity and resources
  • Thematic and regional programmes are often put at
    the forefront by the Delegations as useful tools
    to involve and support NSAs/LAs. Examples of
    regional programmes
  • ALFA focuses on the promotion of co-operation in
    higher education between the two regions
  • ATLAS relations between Chamber of Commerce
  • ASIA URBS city-to-city cooperation between
    Asian and European local governements.

12
  • The consultation process has taken place in most
    of the Delegations but sometimes the process had
    to be limited due to time constraints. Most of
    the Delegations mentioned that the NSAs remarks
    were taken into account in the drafting of the
    CSP. ? A more structured and regular dialogue is
    needed.
  • Major obstacles identified for the involvement of
    NSAs/LAS are capacity and resources limits. In
    this framework, capacity support for NSAs/LAs is
    foreseen for most of the countries mostly
    through the Thematic Programmes. ? NSAs/LAs
    capacity building must be a priority goal.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com