Church and State in Europe - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

Church and State in Europe

Description:

SOME NEWS. Review: Cleavages. Why is politics about one thing and not another? ... Pillars Breaking Down. Respect for Ideologies Remain. But for How Long? ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:62
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: politica
Category:
Tags: church | europe | state

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Church and State in Europe


1
  • Church and State in Europe
  • MR DOUG PERKINS

2
TODAY
  • Admin
  • News
  • Cool terms
  • Politics and Religion in Europe and Australia

3
ADMIN STUFF
  • Exams Low Average
  • Why You Should Not panic
  • Challenge will improve everyones grade (if you
    take the time to do it right)
  • Get exam at end of class
  • Challenges due 10/23 e-mail preferred
  • The short answers were very good
  • Remaining grades are essay and short answer
  • Get Exams
  • Sign-Up for Extra Credit

4
SOME NEWS
5
Review Cleavages
  • Why is politics about one thing and not another?
  • Why do we identify with one group and not
    another?
  • A Couple of Cool Concepts
  • Reinforcing Cleavages
  • Cross-Cutting Cleavages

6
FREEZING HYPOTHESIS
  • Lipset and Rokkan
  • Formation and Endurance of Cleavages
  • Formation of Political Identification
  • Relative Timing of Democratization ...
  • Reformation
  • National Revolution
  • Industrial Revolution
  • Cleavages Freeze
  • Mechanism Party Organizations
  • Some party organizations do this better than
    others

7
WHAT IS A POLITICAL PARTY?
  • Anthony Downs
  • An Economic Theory of Democracy
  • A political party is a team of individuals
    seeking to control the governing apparatus by
    gaining office in a duly contested election.
    (page 25)
  • Simplification Parties as Rational Actors
  • What do we miss?

8
PARTY FORMATION AND EVOLUTION
  • Cadre Parties First Parties
  • Small Electorate
  • ratio of pols/voters small
  • Candidate-centered
  • Mass Parties Came Next
  • Historical Cause
  • Unions
  • Porous Bureaucracy
  • Paradigmatic Party Type
  • Effects of Mass Parties
  • For Regime Stability
  • For Socialization/Identity
  • Evolved into Catch-All Parties
  • Less need for a standing army
  • Utility of the media
  • Evolved into Cartel Parties
  • Cadre Parties Resurgent

9
HOW MANY PARTIES?
  • Duvergers Law
  • Single member districts favor two party
    systems
  • Proportional Representation tends to support
    multiparty system
  • Important Term District Magnitude
  • The number of representatives elected from each
    district
  • The higher the district magnitude, the more
    proportional the system is.
  • How Does it Work?
  • Mechanical Effect (see handout)
  • Psychological Effect
  • Party System of parties (and spread)

10
WHICH ONE IS BEST?
  • TWO PARTIES
  • Accountability
  • Stability (govt)
  • Stability (society)
  • Minorities?
  • Less Democratic?
  • /- Responsive?
  • MANY PARTIES
  • - Accountability
  • - Instability (govt)
  • - Instability (society)
  • Minorities Reprsntd
  • More Democratic?
  • /- Responsive

Should we change?
11
HEGEMONY ANDCREATING TRENCHES NOT JUST FOR
THE LEFT
  • Organized Religion felt Under Siege
  • Challenged by the Liberals
  • Lukewarm support from the Conservatives
  • Challenged by the Socialists
  • What to do about Catholic Workers?
  • Potential Strategies
  • Stathis Kalyvas on Christian Democratic Parties
  • How might this theory be applied to organized
    religion ( other groups) in the US and abroad.

12
THE NETHERLANDSPRINCIPLED PLURALISM
  • Densely Populated (15 Million)
  • Religiously Divided
  • Catholic South (4.7 million)
  • Protestant South
  • Reformed Church (3.3 million)
  • Lutherans, etc. (1.1 million)
  • Other
  • Traditionally Tolerant
  • Strong Individualist Ethic (Weber)
  • Strong Cooperative Spirit

13
IDEOLOGICALLY POLARIZED
  • Secularization since 1960s
  • Membership
  • Roman Catholic 37 -gt 31
  • Calvinist 38 -gt 21
  • No Preference 21 -gt 44
  • Activity (of Members)
  • Roman Catholic 87 -gt 26
  • Reformed drop smaller
  • But Still Large Core of Activists
  • 23 Very Active in Church
  • Highest in Europe
  • 40 Monthly Attendance
  • Among the Highest in Europe
  • And Equally Large Number of Non-Attenders (41)
  • This is Evidence of Polarization

14
EDUCATION POLICY
  • Same Story as Kalyvas
  • Liberal Goal Homogenous, Enlighten, and
    Democratize
  • Mechanism? Education of Particular Sort
  • Non-dogmatic
  • Universal
  • Unitarian Morality
  • Sectarian Education is Antithetical to these
    Goals
  • Orthodox Reaction
  • Liberalism became more Anti-Clerical

15
EDUCATION CONTD
  • School Law of 1867
  • Higher Standards for Schools
  • More Money to Public Schools
  • Schools not Meeting Standards to be Closed
  • No Support for Private Schools
  • An Attack on Religion?
  • Reaction?
  • Organize at the Grass Roots Level
  • Why a Different Reaction in US?

16
CONSERVATIVE REACTON
  • Catholics and Protestants Work Together!?
  • How Could They Work Together?
  • Monstrous Alliance
  • Won a Majority in 1888
  • Changed Religious Laws
  • New System Written into Constitution (1917)
  • The constitution was a compromise
  • Resulting Model of Education?

17
RELIGIOUS PLURALISM
  • Well Developed Theology
  • Religious Defense of Pluralism
  • Over Theocracy or State Church
  • Free State, Free Church
  • Did not Accept Secular as being Neutral
  • Supported Parallel Development
  • Why is this Different than the US?
  • What do You Think? Is This Pluralism Better
    than Ours?
  • Why not Separation into Separate States?
  • Rustow
  • How can Polarized Societies Stay Together?

18
PILLARS AND CORPORATISM
  • Parallel Development led to Segmented
    Sub-Cultures
  • Not Just Education Policy
  • Used as a Model for all Areas
  • Reformed, Catholic, Socialist, Liberal
  • Allowed for Full Development of Cultural Identity
  • Seemed to Work!
  • Diverse People, Remained Peaceful, Prosperous,
    and Tolerant
  • How? Corporatism
  • Pillars Breaking Down
  • Respect for Ideologies Remain
  • But for How Long?

19
PILLARS AND CORPORATISM
  • Parallel Development led to Segmented
    Sub-Cultures
  • Not Just Education Policy
  • Used as a Model for all Areas
  • Reformed, Catholic, Socialist, Liberal
  • Allowed for Full Development of Cultural Identity
  • Seemed to Work!
  • Diverse People, Remained Peaceful, Prosperous,
    and Tolerant
  • How? Corporatism
  • Pillars Breaking Down
  • Respect for Ideologies Remain
  • But for How Long?
  • What about new religions?

20
AUSTRALIA PRAGMATIC PLURALISM
  • In Some Ways, Similar to US
  • Dominated by European Immigrants
  • Most Similar Design
  • Religion not Protected
  • Depends on Politics and Culture
  • But Policies are Similar to Netherlands
  • New Development 1974
  • Until then, similar to US
  • Why the change? Politics
  • Divide in Labor, Labor and Libs wanted Catholic
    Vote
  • New Policy is Very Popular
  • Would it Be Popular Here?
  • To What Effect?

21
QUESTIONS???
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com