Zammit Cutajar

1 / 12
About This Presentation
Title:

Zammit Cutajar

Description:

2% of CERs issued, except projects in LDCs and 2% of lCERs, tCERs ... activity all receipts, transfers, cancellations by serial number provide transparency ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:34
Avg rating:3.0/5.0

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Zammit Cutajar


1
Share of Proceeds to Assist in Meeting Costs of
Adaptation Workshop on the Adaptation
Fund Edmonton May 3-5, 2006
2
Adaptation Share of Proceeds
  • 2 of CERs issued, except projects in LDCs and
    2 of lCERs, tCERs issued, except small-scale
    projects
  • Expected prices CERsgtlCERsgttCERs all vary over
    time and by project
  • SoP for administrative expense USD 0.10 for
    first 15,000 CERs and USD 0.20 for additional
    CERs each year

3
CDM Registry Account(s)
  • Adaptation Fund holding account managed by
    institution responsible for sale of CERs or
    designee
  • Transfer CERs to buyers account in national
    registry when sold
  • Annual reports of account activity all
    receipts, transfers, cancellations by serial
    number provide transparency

4
Monetization Options
  • Define SoP Adaptation in money terms
  • Retain current definition and sell CERs
  • Directly to Annex B Parties
  • By auction
  • On an exchange
  • Using one or more brokers
  • Combinations of sales methods possible

5
Monetary Definition
  • Define SoP Adaptation in money terms
  • No CERs collected or sold
  • Revenue more predictable doesnt fluctuate with
    prices
  • May not maximize revenue for Adaptation Fund

6
Direct Sale to Annex B Parties
  • Offer CERs to Annex B Parties at high end of
    market price range
  • Price set by institution responsible for sale of
    CERs, not COP/MOP
  • Relatively high prices and low costs
  • Setting prices may be difficult for tCERs and
    lCERs

7
Auctions
  • CERs collected sold at auctions
  • CERs from each issuance sold as separate lot
    combine those from small-scale projects if
    necessary
  • Transparent, but some delay in collecting
    revenue, costs may be higher than some other
    options

8
Exchange(s)
  • If exchanges list CERs, SoP units could be sold
    there perhaps not lCERs, tCERs
  • Allows quick sale, gets market price, low
    transaction costs
  • Separate issuances are not standard lots, may
    not list tCERs, lCERS

9
Broker(s)
  • Retain broker(s) to help sell SoP units
  • Know the market and may get better prices,
    especially if differentiated
  • May be more costly than other options

10
Possible Funding Level
  • CERs issued to end of 2012 1,250 million (range
    750 to 2,500)
  • SoP at 2, 25 million CERs, (range 15 to 50)
  • Average price through 2012 Euro 10 to 15 (range
    Euro 5 to 25
  • Adaptation Fund revenue Euro 325 million (range
    Euro 125 to 750 million)

11
Separate Reporting
  • Maximum transparency if revenue from sale of SoP
    from each issuance is tracked and can be matched
    to transfer of the units should be possible
  • Revenue from other sources could then be
    reported separately as well

12
COP/MOP Decision
  • COP/MOP can choose a specific option, such as
    cash payment or direct sale, or provide general
    guidance, such as maximize revenue, to designated
    institution
  • COP/MOP will need to designate an institution to
    manage registry account(s), sell SoP units, and
    remit funds to Adaptation Fund trustee account
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)