Title: Discrimination
1Discrimination
2Discrimination
- Making a distinction in favor or against a person
based on the group, class, or category that
person belongs to rather than individual merit - Based on non-productive characteristics
- When equals are treated unequally
- Based on group rather than individual attributes
3Discrimination sometimes confused with Prejudice
and Segregation
4Prejudice
- Attitude
- When a person dislikes those in another group
- I dont like Hispanics
- Only leads to discrimination if you ACT on the
prejudice
5Discrimination
- Verbal or nonverbal acts that bring about
negative consequences for the minority group - Aimed at denying equal access to societal rewards
6Segregation
- Physical separation due to negative feeling
- Complete elimination of the minority group or
thing - Easier to measure than discrimination because it
can be quantified - Can result from prejudice, discrimination, or
voluntary choice
7Discrimination vs. Social Injustice
- When equals are treated unequally
- When an individual is treated unjustly
8Why does discrimination exist?
- In 1946, Jackie Robinson was the first
African-American player since the 1880s to play
professional baseball - Baseball had much discrimination of blacks in its
past - Any other examples in sports??
- Two theories
9Neoclassical Theory of Discrimination
- Gary Becker in 1957
- People are rational and seek to maximize utility
- What is rationality?
- What is socially viewed as normal
- What is utility?
- Satisfaction or well-being
- People who discriminate experience disutility
from associating with members of certain groups
10 - Disutility leads to
- Firms willing to accept lower profits
- Consumers willing to pay higher prices
- Employees willing to accept lower wages
- All to avoid associating with members of that
group
11Monopoly Power
- Firms discriminate because it leads to higher
profits - Use race and gender to divide labor into
non-competing groups - Three models
- Dual labor market model
- Crowding/occupational segregation model
- Political economy model
12Dual Labor Market Model
- Market is segmented into a primary and secondary
sector - No mobility between sectors
- Primary Sector
- Job security, increasing wages, good benefits,
upward mobility, on the job training - Major League
- Secondary Sector
- High turnover rates, low wages, no benefits, no
on the job training - Minor League
13 - Based on internal labor market
- Wage determination and job assignments are based
on administrative procedures - Productivity doesnt determine wages
- Initial job does
- Employers put the people who they dont like in
the secondary sector - Hire themdoesnt look like firm discriminates
- Workers quit
14Crowding/Occupational Segregation Model
- Women and minorities are crowded into certain
occupations - Lower wage occupations
- With no discrimination what do we know about
mobility of labor and wages? - Mobility of labor exists and wages are equal
- With discrimination what do we know about
mobility of labor and wages? - Mobility of labor doesnt exist and wages are
unequal - Graphical (with and without discrimination)
15Ls
Wage
Wage
Ls
Ls
Ls
W2
W1
W2
Ld
Ld
workers
workers
2
1
2
1
Firm does not Discriminate
Firm Discriminates
16Why does this occur?
- Some employers want certain types of employees
- Some employees want to work with certain types of
workers - Some customers want to deal with certain types of
people - Segregation can increase productivity and
therefore profits
17Political Economy Model
- Discrimination benefits employers while ALL
employees lose - Play one race (gender) against the other
- Segregation of workers is done to minimized
probability of unionization - Firms are happy because unions tend to increase
wages
18Support
- African Americans have typically been used as
strikebreakers - Puts in workers minds that this group is
willing to take your job - Areas of the country that boast less
discrimination have more unionized jobs
19Types of discrimination
- Wage
- Women earn on average 72 of a mans salary
- African American men earn 80 of a white mans
salary - How are wages determined?
- Based on productivity
- How measure productivity?
- Only accurate measure is piece rates
- 50 of wage difference has been linked to
productivity differences - Rest (residual) can be linked to discrimination
20Employment Discrimination
- Not hired due to non-economic factors
- Age, race, gender
- Back to Neoclassical Theory
- People will pay to get rid of disutility gained
from working with certain types of people
21How can we measure this disutility?
- Discrimination coefficient
- D
- More intense prejudice means D is greater
22Example
- French speaking hockey players and English
speaking hockey players are equally productive - MPL are equal
- With no discrimination workers will be
substitutes - How will their wages compare??
- Wages will be equal
- If team discriminates against French speaking
players - How will wages compare??
- French speaking wage (salary) will be lower
23Why will French speaking hock wages be lower?
- Psychic Cost
- Disutility associated with hiring this group
- Monetary Cost Psychic Cost
- What is the monetary cost of an employee?
- wage
- How do we measure this psychic cost?
- D (discrimination coefficient)
24How are wages determined?
- Wage set by workers productivity
- With no discrimination
- WageFS WageES MPL
- Because players are equally productive
- With discrimination French Speaking players are
more costly - WES MPL
- WFS D MPL
25 - But MPL are equal so
- WES WFS D
- WES D WFS
- French speaking wage is less than the English
speaking wage - How much less?
- By the psychic cost (D)
26Occupational Discrimination
- Male jobs vs. Female jobs
- People not hired due to societys view of
appropriate gender for the job - Male or Female Job?
- Secretary
- Plumber
- Male carrier
- Flight attendant
27Statistical Discrimination
- Employers project onto individuals certain
perceived characteristics about the group they
belong to - Why do firms do this??
- Imperfect information
- Use available information that they feel is
correlated with productivity - What information is this?
- Education, experience, test scores, age
28 - Subjective information
- Information about the PERCEIVED average
characteristic of the group rather than
individual characteristic - Hire workers who are statistically safer
- Examples
- Women tend to leave their job after three years
- Hispanics tend not to speak English well
- White men tend to be arrogant
29Why use this information?
- Cheep source of information
- Seems to be efficient
- Non-discriminatory employers use also
30Employee Discrimination
- Taste for discrimination against co-workers
- Regard their wage as lower because they have to
work with these types of people - How much lower?
- w(1-D)
- Want higher wages to continue working in those
conditions
31Customer Discrimination
- People who prefer not to purchase goods or
services from certain types of people - Do customers get wages???
- Nothey pay prices
- View prices they pay as higher
- P(1D)
- Hard to isolate due to quality issues
32Customer Discrimination in Sports
- Fans have preferences for observing players of a
particular race, age, gender, or other
non-productive characteristic - Doesnt mean fans hate the other players
- Fans may pay a premium to see preferred players
- Implies
- MRP for players of the preferred group is greater
than for other groups - What is MRP?
- MR MPL
33Evidence
- Major League Baseball trading cards
- Baseball cards of Latin and Black players are
generally worth less than cards of equally
productive white players - NBA racial composition
- Teams racial composition has been found to be
highly correlated with the racial composition of
the city
34Is all discrimination bad??
- Should we try to eliminate all forms of
discrimination??
35Costs and Benefits of Discrimination
- Costs
- Social lower standard of living, less
opportunities, paid lower wages, pay higher
prices - Economic Less efficient (under PPF)
- Benefits
- Employers get more productive workers than they
pay for - Wage paid is less than MPL
36Should we??
- Those who receive benefits from discrimination
would argue NOthose who receive no benefits
would argue YES