WHOLLY OWNED SUBSIDIARIES: POSTCREATION PERIODS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 39
About This Presentation
Title:

WHOLLY OWNED SUBSIDIARIES: POSTCREATION PERIODS

Description:

Pros & Cons. Pros: Minimal G/L bookkeeping by parent. Simple ... Pros and Cons. Pros: Based on economic activity--not the parent-controlled dividend policy. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:161
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 40
Provided by: arniep
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: WHOLLY OWNED SUBSIDIARIES: POSTCREATION PERIODS


1
CHAPTER 2
  • WHOLLY OWNED SUBSIDIARIES POSTCREATION PERIODS

2
FOCUS OF CHAPTER 2
  • Ways to Value the Parents Investment
  • Account in POSTCREATION Periods
  • Cost Method vs. Equity Method Driven
    Consolidation Procedures
  • Income Statements
  • Statements of Retained Earnings
  • Parent-Company-Only (PCO) Statements
  • Articulation with Consolidated Statements

3
The Cost MethodHow It Works
  • It is cash basis driven
  • Record income at the parent level ONLY when sub
    declares a dividend.
  • Ignore subs earnings.
  • Do NOT ignore subs losses.
  • Write-down investment ONLY IF valuehas been
    impaired.
  • Write-downs result in a NEW cost basis.

4
The Cost Method How It Works (cont.)
  • It is a one-way street!The investment can be
    written down--but NEVER written up.

5
The Cost Method Pros Cons
  • Pros
  • Minimal G/L bookkeeping by parent.
  • Simple consolidation procedures.
  • Cons
  • Overly conservative valuation.
  • Parent can manipulate its reported income.
  • PCO statements--if used internally or issued--may
    be of limited value.

6
The Cost Method MAJOR Point of Interest
  • Although the parent CANmanipulate its
    OWNreported net income,it can NEVER manipulate
    CONSOLIDATED net income.

7
The Equity MethodHow It Works
  • It is accrual basis driven
  • Record income at the parent level based on subs
    earnings and losses--an AUTOMATIC VALUATION
    TECHNIQUE.
  • Subs dividends reduce the parents investment
    (the parent has less invested).

autopilot
8
The Equity Method How It Works (cont.)
  • It is a two-way street!The investment can
    be(1) written up AND(2) written down.

9
The Equity MethodPros and Cons
  • Pros
  • Based on economic activity--not the
    parent-controlled dividend policy.
  • Has 2 built-in checking figures.
  • Cons
  • Entails continual bookkeeping.
  • Unnecessary work if PCO statementsare not used
    internally or issued to outsiders.

10
The Equity Method MAJOR Point of Interest
  • Compared with the cost method, the consolidation
    entry under the equity method has a new kid on
    the block.
  • A posting must be made to eliminate the
    subsidiarys beginning retained earnings.

11
The Cost Method Things to Remember in
Consolidation
  • Consolidated NET INCOME does NOT equal the
    parents NET INCOME.
  • Consolidated RETAINED EARNINGSdoes NOT equal
    the parents RETAINED EARNINGS.

P S Subs Divies
CON. 54,000 24,000 - 4,000
74,000
P S
CON. 103,000 20,000 123,000
12
The Cost Method Things to Remember in
Consolidation
  • NONE of the subs beginning or ending RETAINED
    EARNINGS is eliminated in consolidation.
  • ONLY the parents DIVIDENDS arereported in the
    consolidated column.

P S CON.
54,000 20,000 74,000
P S Subs Divies
CON. (51,000) (4,000) - 4,000
(51,000)
13
The Equity Method Things to Remember in
Consolidation
  • Consolidated net income EQUALSthe parents net
    income.
  • Consolidated retained earnings EQUALSthe
    parents retained earnings.

P CON. 74,000 74,000
P CON. 123,000
123,000
14
The Equity Method Things to Remember in
Consolidation
  • ALL of subs beginning ending RETAINED
    EARNINGS are eliminated in consolidation.
  • ONLY the parents DIVIDENDS arereported in the
    consolidated column(also occurs under the cost
    method).

P S Subs
R.E. CON. 123,000 20,000 -
20,000 123,000
P S Subs Divies
CON. (51,000) (4,000) - 4,000
(51,000)
15
PCO Statements Presented in Notes to the
Consolidated Statements
  • PCO statements are mandatory for publicly owned
    banks and SLs (SEC rules).
  • Can ONLY use the equity method.
  • Equity method results in 100articulation
    between PCO statementsand consolidated
    statements
  • SAME net income amounts.
  • SAME retained earnings amounts.

Bank of USA
16
PCO Statements Presented in Notes to the
Consolidated Statements
  • Retained Earnings Available for Dividends
  • Based on the parents G/L amount--NOT on the
    consolidated retained earnings amount.
  • Use of the equity method in PCO statements
    produces IDENTICALretained earnings amounts.
  • Use of the cost method in PCO statements creates
    CONFUSION.

17
Consolidation The Most Important Point of All
on Investment Basis
  • The consolidated statement amounts are identical
    whether the parent usesthe cost method or the
    equity method--this holds true for ALL 3
    statements.

18
Total Investment Loss Situations Equity Method
Procedures
  • Parent Has GUARANTEED Subs Debt
  • NO interruption occurs in the application of the
    equity method.
  • Parent can lose more than it has invested
    --parent ison the hook.

19
Total Investment Loss Situations Equity Method
Procedures (cont.)
  • Parent Has NOT GUARANTEED Subs Debt
  • Discontinue equity method when subs equity
    reaches zero--resume ONLY WHEN subs equity
    becomes positive.
  • Parent can NEVER lose more than it has invested.

20
AROI Versus IRR They Serve Entirely Different
Purposes
  • Annual Return on Investment (AROI)
  • Tells what was actually earned onan investment
    EACH year.
  • Based on actual GAAP net income.
  • Can be used to calculate an average AROI covering
    several years.

1 2 3
AVG. 18 12 15 45
45/3 15
21
AROI Versus IRR They Serve Entirely Different
Purposes
  • Internal Rate of Return (IRR)
  • An assumed rate covering SEVERAL years.
  • Based on cash flows for those years.
  • CANNOT show what was actually earnedin any GIVEN
    year.
  • Artificially assumes that each years unrecovered
    investment (at B-O-Y) earns the SAME rate.

22
AROI vs. IRR They Serve Entirely Different
Purposes
23
Review Question 1
  • Under the COST METHOD, a subs DIVIDENDS
    wouldA. NOT be eliminated in consolidation.
    B. Be the parents investment income. C.
    Reduce the parents investment. D. Increase
    the parents investment. E. None of the above.

24
Review Question 1--With Answer
  • Under the COST METHOD, a subs DIVIDENDS
    wouldA. NOT be eliminated in consolidation.
    B. Be the parents investment income. C.
    Reduce the parents investment. D. Increase
    the parents investment. E. None of the above.

25
Review Question 2
  • Under the COST METHOD, a subs LOSSES wouldA.
    Never reduce the parents income. B. Always
    reduce the parents income. C. Always reduce
    the parents investment. D. Always be
    eliminated in consolidation. E. None of the
    above.

26
Review Question 2--With Answer
  • Under the COST METHOD, a subs LOSSES wouldA.
    Never reduce the parents income. B. Always
    reduce the parents income. C. Always reduce
    the parents investment. D. Always be
    eliminated in consolidation. E. None of the
    above.

27
Review Question 3
  • Under the EQUITY METHOD, a subs DIVIDENDS
    wouldA. NOT be eliminated in consolidation.
    B. Be the parents investment income. C.
    Reduce the parents investment. D. Increase
    the parents investment. E. None of the above.

28
Review Question 3--With Answer
  • Under the EQUITY METHOD, a subs DIVIDENDS
    wouldA. NOT be eliminated in consolidation.
    B. Be the parents investment income. C.
    Reduce the parents investment. D. Increase
    the parents investment. E. None of the above.

29
Review Question 4
  • Under the EQUITY METHOD, a subs LOSSES
    wouldA. Never reduce the parents income.
    B. Normally reduce the parents income. C.
    Always reduce the parents investment. D.
    Always be eliminated in consolidation. E. None
    of the above.

30
Review Question 4--With Answer
  • Under the EQUITY METHOD, a subs LOSSES
    wouldA. Never reduce the parents income.
    B. Normally reduce the parents income. C.
    Always reduce the parents investment. D.
    Always be eliminated in consolidation. E. None
    of the above.

31
Review Question 5
  • On 1/1/04, Paxco invested 500,000 in Saxco
    (100-owned). For 2004, Saxco (1) earned
    70,000, (2) declared dividends of 40,000, and
    (3) paid dividends of 30,000. What amounts does
    Paxco report?
    Cost EquityInvestment
    income for 2004.....
    Investment in Saxco at Y/E......Retained
    earnings increase.......

32
Review Question 5--With Answer
  • On 1/1/04, Paxco invested 500,000 in Saxco
    (100-owned). For 2004, Saxco (1) earned
    70,000, (2) declared dividends of 40,000, and
    (3) paid dividends of 30,000. What amounts does
    Paxco report?
    Cost EquityInvestment
    income for 2004..... Investment in Saxco at
    Y/E......Retained earnings increase.......

40,000 70,000
500,000 530,000
40,000 70,000
33
Review Question 6
  • A parent can lose MORE THAN than it has
    investedA. Only under the cost method. B.
    Only under the equity method. C. Under either
    the cost or equity methods. D. Only if the
    subsidiary is not consolidated. E. None of the
    above.

34
Review Question 6--With Answer
  • A parent can lose MORE THAN than it has
    investedA. Only under the cost method. B.
    Only under the equity method. C. Under either
    the cost or equity methods. D. Only if the
    subsidiary is not consolidated. E. None of the
    above.

35
Review Question 7
  • Parent-company-only (PCO) statements are usually
    presented in notes only whenA. The parent
    uses the cost method. B. The parent uses the
    equity method. C. The subsidiary is not
    consolidated. D. The SECs rules require them.
    E. None of the above.

36
Review Question 7--With Answer
  • Parent-company-only (PCO) statements are usually
    presented in notes only whenA. The parent
    uses the cost method. B. The parent uses the
    equity method. C. The subsidiary is not
    consolidated. D. The SECs rules require them.
    E. None of the above.

37
Review Question 8
  • When a parent-sub relationship exists, STATE LAWS
    require dividends to be based on theA.
    Parents retained earnings. B. Subs retained
    earnings. C. Consolidated retained earnings.
    D. The lower of the parents OR the
    consolidated retained earnings. E. None of
    the above.

38
Review Question 8--With Answer
  • When a parent-sub relationship exists, STATE LAWS
    require dividends to be based on theA.
    Parents retained earnings. B. Subs retained
    earnings. C. Consolidated retained earnings.
    D. The lower of the parents OR the
    consolidated retained earnings. E. None of
    the above.

39
End of Chapter 2
  • Time to Clear Things Up--Any Questions?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com